Hi Rob,
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 13:36:36 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
I'm interested in making an informal survey of the noise performance of our
*ist D cameras. Anyone with access to a PC who has permission to run the little
test app at http://www.starzen.com/imaging/deadpixeltest.htm can
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, David Miers wrote:
out to 24mm right? Thus on the *istD if the onboard flash covers an angle
equivalent to 24mm in film, it covers the range of a 16mm lens. Or am I
totally off base here?
According to Boj, you are a bit:
Coverage (lens' focal length): 18mm
Me reading
On 10/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Saw a piece on ABC News (U.S.) about how some valuable images might be lost
to history because of digital. A photo editor for a national magazine cited
a case where a photographer took a picture of President Clinton hugging
Monica Lewinsky. The news of
AFAIK, the cameras in the UK face receding traffic. That is, they flash
behind you, not in front.
It's our Gatso cameras that go flash-flash as you speed by; the Truevelo
and the SPECS infra-red systems almost always face the oncoming vehicle
and you can't tell when they fire. Gatso is usually
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 00:42, Mark Cassino wrote:
In light of some the recent discussion, I was tempted not to post these
anymore, except on Friday. But then I figured, even if I'm _not_ breaking
the rules, I may as well go ahead and post some more. So here we go:
Mark,
For Sale and Want To
On 10/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Rob,They are now using speed cameras to get you coming towards them(Safe?)as
well as the accepted norm of only taking the picture from behind.
Regards Chris kennedy
Apparently in Australia, but not in the UK. The thought is that a front-
on shot will show
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 10:59, Cotty wrote:
On 10/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Rob,They are now using speed cameras to get you coming towards them(Safe?)as
well as the accepted norm of only taking the picture from behind.
Regards Chris kennedy
Apparently in Australia, but not in the
I think your living in a fairy world, John, if you don't
believe a flash may startle an unsuspecting driver. And if
there were some mishap as a result of the flash contributing
to an accident, you can bet that the police are gonna look
into it. The term contributory negligence comes to mind
...
That's my take on it ... but I'm an idiot when it comes to
using flash. However, I'm less of an idiot when it comes to
contributory negligence, and even if there was no death,
just property damage, you can bet that the camera operator
is gonna be called upon to make a contribution
Cotty
Thanks Tanya for the tips. I wonder what I will be receiving with the
mail. Perhaps even packages from Australia, who knows?
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 03:38, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Frits wrote:
Tanya, Do you have any suggestions as to where I can get a piece of carton
suitable for this?
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Cotty wrote:
At night one or more flash units may be deployed to enhance the image
taken of motorists committing an offence. These flash units can be
deployed remote from the speed camera vehicle and triggered by infrared
light emission.'
Amazing - has there ever been
On Mon, 9 Feb 2004, Jim Apilado wrote:
A photo editor for a national magazine cited
a case where a photographer took a picture of President Clinton hugging
Monica Lewinsky. The news of their affair had yet to be revealed. The
hug was captured by a photographer using film.
Same thing
It is a big place, isn't it? Our Australian sunflowers bloomed in
January, perhaps they were a different variety. I'll have to look for
one of my pics. It was quite a sight. I enjoyed what little I saw of
Australia and hope to return some day. My only negatives were that they
pour the drinks
- Original Message -
From: Nenad Djurdjevic
Subject: istD USB driver
I have just purchased a *istD. Great camera and one
that rendered my much
loved Z1 obsolete immediately (it, the Z1, is for sale
BTW).
Only problem is I just tried to connect the *istD to my
PC to download
- Original Message -
From: David Miers
Subject: RE: Earth Calling Pentax
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but a 16mm with a 1.5
conversion angle works
out to 24mm right? Thus on the *istD if the onboard
flash covers an angle
equivalent to 24mm in film, it covers the range of a
16mm
Speaking of the SMCT 105/2.8, I have one for sale on ebay this week.
It's at http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? No reserve. Starts at
$90.
ViewItemitem=2986471253category=4688sspagename=STRK%3AMESSE%3AITrd=1
On Feb 9, 2004, at 11:30 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
The SMCT and SMCK 120's are
Esp Nikon Olympus apparently...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3474923.stm
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm getting gray where yellow should be when I
print and
when I do nozzle check...
Ann,
The status monitor should tell you if you're low on yellow. If you were out,
it wouldn't let you print. That I discovered the hard way. When I have
stubborn clogs, I
John Francis wrote:
As to how the police feel about it: the original example was
a public road, outside an apartment block. While there's no
way to predict how any particular police officer may choose
to behave, I doubt if there's anything they could charge you
with that would hold up in court.
On 10 Feb 2004 at 10:07, Jan van Wijk wrote:
It certainly looks worse, chromatic abberations are clearly vissible
in the high contrast parts for the Pentax.
On the sharpness issue I am not so sure though ...
Take a close look at the CROP-1 and CROP-2 examples, and check the relative
On 10 Feb 2004 at 11:11, Frits Wüthrich wrote:
That wouldn't work in the Netherlands, as the owner of the car is
responsible anyway in case no specific driver can be blamed.
The offence here is recorded against the driver and the driver loses point
from their licence. By default the fine is
On 10 Feb 2004 at 9:10, Cotty wrote:
Amazing - has there ever been any incidents of accidents caused by an
oncoming speed camera flash? It must be waiting to happen...
99% of vehicular accidents in Australia are speed related, keeps the plebs
nodding OK and the revenue stream flowing.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The offence here is recorded against the driver and the
driver loses point
from their licence. By default the fine is attributed to the
registered owner
of the vehicle and to transfer the fine to an alternate
The nozzle check includes one black square and 5 colored squares, one of
which is yellow, as I recall.
See pg. 34 in your owner's manual to do a nozzle check, where it prints
out those squares.
From what you say, you already know that, but when you do it, all you
get is a gray square, in lieu of a
frank theriault escribió:
The only problems I've had with them have been with items shipped up
from the US.
UPS stinks here in Spain. I have decided that I will never buy anything
from somebody in the US if they insist on shipping the goods using UPS.
USPS (US Postal Service), on the other
Shel wrote: I think your living in a fairy world, John, if you don't
believe a flash may startle an unsuspecting driver.
erm, I'll have you know that there is simply *nothing* wrong with living in
a fairy world!?! I'm quite happy here thankyou very much, and I seem to
think the more the merrier,
Mark Dalal wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm getting gray where yellow should be when I
print and when I do nozzle check...
Ann,
The status monitor should tell you if you're low on yellow. If you were out,
it wouldn't let you print. That I discovered the hard way.
In NSW they have measured distance monitored by RTA cameras set at specific
distances mainly to monitor the truckies who are notorious for speeding.It
works on average speeds and is mainly found on the major highways.Oh for the
days when all you had to watch out for were the motorcycle cops and
Nope Paul, they would be the same sunflowers, it just depends on the
weather. We have had great rains throughout QLD in the past month and
nothing really for most of last year, so planting was held back in the
hope of rain. Sooo, now that we have had so much rain and flooding over the
past 3 to
Who needs them? I shoot in aperature priority with
the Super. Almost always.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Agreed. the buttons are the one thing I hate about my 645.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/02/04 07:31AM
and those damn shutter speed buttons on the ME super and Super
Program (which might have made
Just saw on a ng.
http://www.finden123.com/Top/Arts/Photography/Cameras/35mm/Pentax/index.asp?bhcd2=1076417349
lol! Don't hold back on my account Chris! You may have missed the post, but
just last week, one of the other southern Aussie guys was posting about me
being in Far North QLD and I corrected him - I was just kind of carrying
on the joke with you! lol...
BTW, I am nowhere near Quilpie either, lol!
John Mustarde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:03:17 -0500, you wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:14:42 +1000, Ryan Lee wrote:
Just got one of these, and was wondering (from anyone who's
got one or has used one before) what lens combos have been
known to show good results.
This
Quick fix: Don't delete images. This is an update of don't throw out
the negatives.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 8 Feb 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Lovely shot ERN! And I agree that it suits bw, and with the extra chin
in! lol... She's such a cutie!
I agree about the chin, but not about the BW, for two reasons. One is
that the subject (sorry Eleanor, not sure if she is your daughter),
On 10/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
They also want to introduce a traffic control over a certain distance,
so you are photographed at the beginning end the end of a specific
distance of the motorway, so you get a fine if your average speed is
over the limit. This seems to work a lot better
On 10/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
As to how the police feel about it: the original example was
a public road, outside an apartment block. While there's no
way to predict how any particular police officer may choose
to behave, I doubt if there's anything they could charge you
with
A really cheap 4 section monopod with a small ballhead
mounted on it works well and is not as fiddly if you
need to re-compose. Anyone else ever try it this way?
Try another test: Put a support of some sort from the camera
body to a tripod leg, see if that doesn't do some good.
Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick fix: Don't delete images. This is an update of don't throw out
the negatives.
Right. Or as a wise man once said, The photographer's lack of
discipline is independent of the camera.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
I believe that we have trials of that system here in the UK. Nottingham
somewhere, if I'm not mistaken. What a scenario: the latest gizmo
computes your average speed over a set distance, at known camera points,
and so as you've been wildly overtaking those half a dozen cars doing
38mph in a
Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FYI a place called Publishing Perfection (www.pubperfect.com) has
refurbished units of the Minolta Dimage Scan Multi, with 3 month warranties,
for $299. I ordered one and am very pleased. They also have the Scan Multi
II (ie Scan Multi with ROC and GEM
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Cory
back to editing my photos from last night.
Bull-snot is amazingly stringy.
You don't have to pull it off your lenses, I hope? :-)
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging
Oh! I just got it.
Steve the Blushing.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/10/04 12:13AM
Chris wrote:
Kevin,I have a Pentax Takumar Telephoto 300mm f4.-67
They have this SPECS on the M4 between Newport and Cardiff too.
That is not the worst though. The mobile vans they have in Reading generate soo much
money, and the police are limited in what they are allowed to spend the revenue on,
that after the first month they gave £3million back to the
I have considered one of these, but at it's maximum medium
format resolution, it would produce only a 8.3 MP file
for a 6x7 original, which is about two megapixels less than
it can do with 35mm.
Is there a noticeable difference between medium format and
35mm scans with this unit? I realize there
I noticed the same thing.
Jan van Wijk wrote:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:04:10 +1000, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Omg! Rob those results make the Pentax-A 135mm look like a piece of CRAP!!!
It certainly looks worse, chromatic abberations are clearly vissible
in the high contrast parts for the
Hi!
Some time ago I was asked to help one of my fellow to photograph
jewelry that his father makes. I searched for advise. One of the
suggestion was to put it right on scanner...
I have no answer to your original question though.
Boris.
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, zoomshot wrote:
Got mine on Saturday, good sharpness and colour, this will now be my
standard *ist D lens.
It was mentioned on the list that the lens vignettes with the built-in
flash from 16-28. Out of curiosity, does the flash indicator in the
viewfinder flicker in these
I know - I was waiting to see how price compares elsewhere - they seem
to be the only ones who have it.
I still need to work out how to get the Flashtrax into the house
unnoticed first though! I guess a lens might be easier as she probably
(hopefully) wouldn't notice that it is new amongst all
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham
Sent: 10 February 2004 18:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Pentax DA 16-45 mm Lens
I know - I was waiting to see how price compares elsewhere - they seem to be
the only ones who have it.
I still need to work out how to get the Flashtrax into
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:58:53 + (GMT), Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
It was mentioned on the list that the lens vignettes with the built-in
flash from 16-28. Out of curiosity, does the flash indicator in the
viewfinder flicker in these focal lengths to warn you, as it does on
the MZ-5n with the
You know, this has gone an awful long way from my original
observation that if you wanted to get sharp detail on the
car it was a lot harder than arnie seemed to be suggesting,
and that fill-flash would help in that case.
Well, I for one am not interested in underwriting the cost
of finding
LOL Indeed it has, but that's so often the case with many
discussions on this (and other) lists. Just a natural
dynamic of conversation.
John Francis wrote:
You know, this has gone an awful long way from my original
observation that if you wanted to get sharp detail on the
car it was a lot
I don't want to appear as a shill for you, but I feel that I
must mention that this is a super-duper lens. I've owned
this lens in several iterations, and all have been very
satisfactory and produced great pics. And I highly
recommend the 120/2.8 as well, the harder to find big
brother to this
Hi,
99% of vehicular accidents in Australia are speed related, keeps the plebs
nodding OK and the revenue stream flowing.
motorists here have given the police a lot of stick over recent years
for using the cameras as revenue-collection devices. So now they are
mostly highly visible, which
On 10/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Imagine how much in fines that added up to!? I've been through the M62 and
A616 ones - the cameras are quite distinctive and visible from a long way
off. They can potentially also do some quite devious stuff. For example
the threshold in a 50mph zone might
Because of the extending barrel design, the retractable flash vignettes with this
lens at
focal lengths of 16 to 28 mm.
Joe,
Is that with or without the lens hood?
Jostein, that is unfortunately without the hood. With the hood on one probably cannot
use the rtf at any focal length.
Joe
On 10 Feb 2004 at 16:50, Jostein wrote:
Quoting Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
0=Hot,2798,135,69
Hi, Rob,
What was your threshold for hotness? 65?
And the other threshold...?
Hi Jostein,
Default, 60/250
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10
That's why country Ozzies talk with their mouths half-closed - keeps the
flies out!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 10:35 PM
Subject: Re: *istD Manufacture
Nope
jtainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because of the extending barrel design, the retractable flash
vignettes with this lens at focal lengths of 16 to 28 mm.
Is that with or without the lens hood?
Jostein, that is unfortunately without the hood. With the hood on
one probably cannot use the rtf
Rothman, Aric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have considered one of these, but at it's maximum medium
format resolution, it would produce only a 8.3 MP file
for a 6x7 original, which is about two megapixels less than
it can do with 35mm.
Is there a noticeable difference between medium format and
Interesting that the justice system should now be questioning the move to
digital for evidence. For years, I understood that a (film-based)
photograph would not be admitted unless the negative was also available to
support any print offered to the court as part of an argument, or that an
Ok, what about actual dead pixels? Mine seems to have a couple. Does
anybody else see them, or should I be considering sending it back?
Jeff.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 8:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: *ist D
On 11 Feb 2004 at 8:22, John Coyle wrote:
Interesting that the justice system should now be questioning the move to
digital for evidence. For years, I understood that a (film-based)
photograph would not be admitted unless the negative was also available to
support any print offered to the
On 10 Feb 2004 at 15:22, Jeff Jonsson wrote:
Ok, what about actual dead pixels? Mine seems to have a couple. Does
anybody else see them, or should I be considering sending it back?
Doesn't sound so good, none of the six test results I've seen so far show dead
pixels.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE
I've never used the RTF flash on any body I've ever had. I find them worse
than useless
Quoting Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 17:58:53 + (GMT), Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
It was mentioned on the list that the lens vignettes with the built-in
flash from 16-28.
I show no dead pixels, but quite a few so called hot ones, but I can't see
them in PS7
Bill
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 6:32 PM
Subject: RE: *ist D sensor noise survey
On 10 Feb 2004 at 15:22, Jeff
John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting that the justice system should now be questioning the move to
digital for evidence. For years, I understood that a (film-based)
photograph would not be admitted unless the negative was also available to
support any print offered to the court as
sometimes i need a flash to freeze the incredible speed this list goes off
topic. its very entertaining
From: John Francis
You know, this has gone an awful long way from my original
observation that if you wanted to get sharp detail on the
car it was a lot harder than arnie seemed to be
You're going to want to have a card reader anyway. they make it much easier
to work with the CF cards.
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Nenad Djurdjevic
I may have to get a card reader unless anyone knows where I can get a USB
driver.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Hi, Rob.
I don't have the camera with me tonight, but I have some results from
yesterday with a 30s exposure at ISO 200.
[DeadPixelText]
Version=1.0
Description=
FileType=TIFF
NumBadPixels=4
0=Hot,2820,150,77
1=Hot,1865,209,67
Ambient temperature was 20-22°C, and the camera had been turned off
Thanks to everyone who replied.
The best advice was from Shel and Tom (you alluded to it, Boris, and others
may have mentioned it):
Talk to my lab about it. I'll see what Robert recommends, and make sure I
have some of that with me.
My current thinking is to maybe go with Delta 3200, Neopan
If you're flush with money then maybe best to avoid speeding in Finland...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/3477285.stm
Jussi Salonoja, the 27-year-old heir to a family-owned sausage empire, was given the
£116,000 ticket after being caught driving 80km/h in a 40km/h zone!
-Original
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
AFAIK, the cameras in the UK face receding traffic. That is, they flash
behind you, not in front. I was going to say that they probably operate
that way in Australia also, but then looking at Rob's link:
There are a number of examples here, in NE England, where a camera
Hi,
Lon Williamson wrote:
A really cheap 4 section monopod with a small ballhead
mounted on it works well and is not as fiddly if you
need to re-compose. Anyone else ever try it this way?
Try another test: Put a support of some sort from the camera
body to a tripod leg, see if that
Hi,
Cotty wrote:
Learned some interesting facts - there are nearly 300 speed cameras in
the Thames Valley Police area, and in Oxfordshire alone, only 6 of these
are loaded with recording cameras at any one time ...
Fewer in Northumberland 8-)
That's less than 10% of cameras (TVP
Mark,
I doubt that Australia, being a Common Law jurisdiction, like Canada, the US
and England, would be any different than you described, Mark.
Basically, ~any~ image is admissable; how likely it is that it's been
manipulated or otherwise altered goes to the weight of that evidence, not
I haven't done the test, I can actually see the two pixels in my images.
They're stuck on, and appear as bright dots. The same two pixels in
every image, at least those with dark enough subject matter that they
can be seen. I have dead pixels in my Canon Powershot G1, but the canon
manual actually
Anybody out there familiar with the rexagon 28/2.8 in M42 screwmount?
(who made it, did it have other names, how's the optical quality, why
do I find rexagon 28/2.8s in other mounts, etc)
I've been accumulating some oddball 28s for my Spotmatics and I'm
curious if this thing is worth the $40
they did a pilot project in Texas a few years back. gave up when all of the
test cameras ran out. all of them were shot to bits.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Speed
So much for the punishment fitting the crime. Next thing you know, they'll
be handing down longer prison sentences for people with long-lived
ancestors. Shades of Harrison Bergeron.
Aric
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2004
I would imagine that for digital, the same scenario would be played out. As
long as they aren't altered, and the photographer says they represent his
recollection of the scene photographed, digital would, imho, be admissable.
That's about the strength of it. The picture per se is *not*
Aric wrote:
So much for the punishment fitting the crime.
I don't see why fining someone a fixed fraction of their income (for
example) instead of a fixed amount is a worse way of making the
punishment fit the crime.
Next thing you know, they'll
be handing down longer prison sentences for
There are no rules only guidelines. Some people get quit snippy when
you ignore those guidelines. (Not that you should care).
At 09:18 PM 2/8/04, you wrote:
And while we are on the subject - what is the rule in regards to auctions?
I see some people say we aren't supposed to link to unfinished
Thanks to everyone who responded to my query.
In the end I transferred the images in a rather complicated way but it
worked:
I plugged the CF card into to CF - PCMCIA adaptor which I had. I put this
in my old Toshiba Libretto laptop and transferred it to my desktop PC via a
network connection.
Dear Sir,Eight months ago I exchanged my iBook for a full on
HP2.53GHz-512mbSDRam-120Gb hard drive etc.etc.My reasons were that if you
can't beat them join them.I was tired of trying to get drivers for the
printers I wanted to get for Mac OS X.So I succumbed to the (D)evil
empire.God I wish I had
And with the AF-360 FGZ you don't have to take the hood off to take flash
photos even at 16mm (unless the subject is very close to the camera).
- Original Message -
From: Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2004 2:27 AM
Subject: Re: Pentax DA
Actually I think it's the opposite. One of my sold MX had difficulty to fit
any LX screens, but perfectly happy with MX screens.
Regards,
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
The LX screen is slightly smaller than the MX screen. I'm not sure how
much. You may be
able to tell by comparison.
Seems not...
At 03:05 PM 2/9/04, you wrote:
Some jerk filled my inbox with huge attachments today, and I think I
started bouncing e-mails. Just wanted to see if I've been stricken from
the list yet.
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
pessimist fears it is
On Feb 11, 2004, at 12:18, mike wilson wrote:
There are a number of examples here, in NE England, where a camera is
on
a pole in the central reservation and is swivelled to cover either
lane. In both instances, the camera takes the rear of the vehicle. No
front number plates on motorcycles
Even further OT because I'm not even going to mentioon the cameras...
Bob W wrote:
I heard on the radio today, as I was speeding home from work, that
only about 7% of road accidents here are caused by the driver
speeding. I can't find anything on the BBC website to back this up.
But it's
Hi all,
Has anyone here had Giclee prints made? There are a couple of places
here that do them. They seem to be very expensive but are advertised
as being the ultimate in quality.
I've been giving a little thought to picking out a 6x7 slide to have
drum scanned and printed, just to see what
For those Pentaxians who use the FA 24-90 w/ the built-in flash on the
Zx-5n, do you experience vignetting? I don't have a 24-90 (yet) to try for
myself. And yes, I do have the ability to use an accessory flash, but
thought I'd toss out the question.
Thanks.
Pat in SF
Giclee is just a fancy French name for ink jet. There are a
few great labs around here that to outstanding work on the
Epson 9600.
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone here had Giclee prints made? There are a couple of places
here that do them. They seem to be very expensive but are
The T Max should probably be rated closer to 1000. It becomes quite grainy
at it's rated ISO
and the contrast can become a problem. (I like high contrast images but
there is a limit).
I've read somewhere that it can be pushed to 12800, never tried it though
since I don't have
a meter that
http://www.lightroom.com/lr_pages/giclee.html
This page may be helpful. The lab is one that I use for my
higher end inkjet work.
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
Has anyone here had Giclee prints made?
Peter Alling wrote:
The T Max should probably be rated closer to 1000. It becomes quite grainy
at it's rated ISO
True, but after you've seen it at 12500, the grain at 3200 doesn't
look bad at all. I'm quite willing to get 8x10 prints from it
despite the grain. With one caveat: in my
I've seen similar things happen with HP printers
when you run out of just one color. (It doesn't
last long though, if you're out of one you're just
about out of them all).
At 11:09 PM 2/9/04, you wrote:
I'm getting gray where yellow should be when I
print and
when I do nozzle check...
The simple
Late last Friday afternoon, my friend said Let's hit some photo shows!, so
off we went. First to see his show at a cafe, in aid of Crystal Garden
(www.savecrystalgarden.com) . Lots of excellent pictures of parrots,
marmosets, butterflies, and flowers.
Next to another cafe for one part of a show
Shel, It was just an example of film saving an image of an event the importance
of which isn't realized until later. Where as Digital probably would not.
Lighten up.
At 01:16 AM 2/10/04, you wrote:
One needn't use Bill Clinton's sexual exploits and personal
affairs to justify film.
Jim Apilado
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
