Frantisek Vlcek schrieb:
I just found this poor orphaned LX Grip A (the brown plastic that you
cut yourself to your hand shape), already sandpapered so it fits to
most hands... long after I sold my LX.
Seeing it silly to sell it, I will exchange it for a nice BW print of
reasonable size,
Hi!
Welcome and be ready for a ride of your life...
Lovely creature. You definitely seem to know your way in macro
photography.
Thanks for posting. And welcome again...
Boris (from finally somewhat sunny Israel)
On 27/2/04, TANYA THE SKINT disgorged:
Cotty, I am yet to book flights but there is plenty of availability around
the dates that I want. I am looking at flying in around the 27th May - tv
has some work around the 30th that I was going to tag along for and
generally just check things out for the
Hi!
wb (Tanja wasn't really a willing subject, but suffered in silence, for my art)
Art demands sacrifices as old saying roughly translated by me goes...
Without really knowing what does it mean exactly cheesy in this
context I suppose I should say that I really like this one.
You know, this
On 27/2/04, AN F1 NUT disgorged:
Here is a selection of *ist D pictures I took yesterday:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04e.htm
Dario Bonazza
Very nice, Dario. Forgive me, I don't recall your background. Do you
shoot for money or are these for pleasure? In what capacity were you at
Hi!
Stan, this is not really a critique but rather a question/request.
Do you have the photo of this dog's owner shot at the same time? I am
really curious to see a man/woman dazing away g.
I trust it you shot it at longest focal length, didn't you?
Boris
Hi!
PS Never thought I had anything good enough for PUG postings, but PAW got me
PS out of *lurker* mode. Constructive criticism appreciated.
PS http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/washingt.htm
PS Paul
Welcome to visible mode, Paul g...
Fascinating photo. It looks a little surreal to me.
Astonishing for me - ISO800! Now the reality shows: the low sharpening
of the *istD - often criticized - is a big advantage. A stronger
sharpening would have increased the noise, too.
Cheers, Heiko
Just as a point of information, the sharpening can be set in these DSLR
cameras to the desired
Hi!
Excellent image for car enthusiast. I used to be involved in driving
news group soon after I bought my car. But I never had a chance to
drive anything faster than Ford Focus.
I have only one frowny comment g... David, if you wanted it to be a
real riddle why you allowed the Ferrari Horse be
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I have SOME good news, and it's not that I saved on my car insurance
by switching to Geico. It's that I actually saw an Optio 550 on display
a couple of weeks ago. In Wolf Camera, of all places. Price had gone
down since I bought mine, too.
Hi Cotty,
on 27 Feb 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
Just as a point of information, the sharpening can be set in these DSLR
cameras to the desired level.
Yes, but the highest level of sharpening that the *istD offers, sharpens
less than Canon's normal or even low setting.
I keep sharpening set to
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:00:17 +0100, you wrote:
Hi
This part of the film has not been exposed or not developed. I suggest it is
caused by:
1) Missing emulsion on this part of the film (film makers error) or has been
scratched off before exposing.
2) You accidently sckratched the emulsion off, or
It's not a scan. *istD on ***L
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/26/04 07:30PM
i pushed it a fair bit in Photoshop CS and used a couple of other
filters.
what
I like it. You have a nice mix of really pure symmetry with non-symetical
elements (like the partial symmetry of the bank to the left of the frame
and the non-reflected foreground branches. I think it would be stronger
with in a less contrasty print - I'd like to see some detail in the two
very cool looking insect, and nicely captured!
- MCC
At 05:09 PM 2/27/2004 +1100, you wrote:
G'day fellow Pentaxians,
Here's a photo I took just then for my first PAW - it's a beetle with some
pretty spectacular pectinate antennae (possibly a /Peisarthrius /species).
- Original Message -
From: Michel Carrère-Gée
Subject: Re: Digicam Slide Duplicator / Scanner
(and 1.8/55, screw, normal or reverse) + Pentax Slide-Copier
Its good !
Are you able to get full frame with that?
Not full frame, approximately 20x30mm with 1.4/50mm
Thats
Do you remember which setup gave you the full frame? I have also spent an
evening juggling with 35, 40, 50 and 55 mm lenses, reverse rings and extension
tubes and did not find a good setup (using the x1 slide copier). I thought the
only way would be to use the slide holder that attaches to the
What did you order?
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/roadrunner.html
(195K Progressive JPEG)
Comments or derisive laughter welcome. I liked the colors.
- Original Message -
From: keller.schaefer
Subject: Re: Digicam Slide Duplicator / Scanner
Do you remember which setup gave you the full frame? I have also
spent an
evening juggling with 35, 40, 50 and 55 mm lenses, reverse rings
and extension
tubes and did not find a good setup
Hi David,
Comments interspersed:
I have been taking some college courses at our local university and all of
the computers in the graphics dept are Mac. They are only running OS 9.1 or
9.2...can't remember for sure. As I understand this is pretty outdated for
today.
Correct. Bear that in mind.
On 27/2/04, DOCTOR HEIKO disgorged:
Just as a point of information, the sharpening can be set in these DSLR
cameras to the desired level.
Yes, but the highest level of sharpening that the *istD offers, sharpens
less than Canon's normal or even low setting.
Interesting. Do you have any
Hi all
Having got the MZ-S and saving for the *ist D,
I have (finally) decided to sell these very nice Pentax items to the highes
bidders.
I'll be offering the items on ebay in a while, and I thought you'd like to
know!
Bodies:
Pentax P50 (P5), excellent condition
Pentax P30n (P3n),excellent
dpreview showed this in their testing
Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D Formula 1 tests
On 27/2/04, DOCTOR HEIKO disgorged:
WE ate next door at the sushi place ...
Norm Baugher wrote:
What did you order?
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/roadrunner.html
(195K Progressive JPEG)
Comments or derisive laughter welcome. I liked the colors.
Not full frame, approximately 20x30mm with 1.4/50mm
I tried two new tests:
- with SMC 2/55mm: almost full frame
- with SMC 4/100 Macro-Bellows: I replaced the tube of Slide-Copier by a
steel tube, I can do full frame.
(diameter 12mm, lenght 25cm; original is 13mm diameter, 8.5mm lenght)
Awww. Nice shot Bill. The face just ozzes love.:-)
It looks very sharp on my monitor.
Dave
Here's my first weekly PAW image.
http://groups.msn.com/BillOwensPhotos/shoebox.msnw?action=ShowPhotoPhotoID=66
Bill
Other than the drain pipe in the background,i like it
Dave(cat person:-))Brooks
Ok I figured I'd contribute to this and I would like
feedback
however there are a few things I don't want to hear. One is that
the subject is too dark or the background is
Hi Cotty,
on 27 Feb 04 you wrote in pentax.list:
On 27/2/04, DOCTOR HEIKO disgorged:
LOL
Yes, but the highest level of sharpening that the *istD offers, sharpens
less than Canon's normal or even low setting.
Interesting. Do you have any references to substantiate this?
Hm, I don't have a D60
Thanks Dave. This was taken with the *ist D and 28-105 PZ at whatever focal
length I needed to get the framing I wanted. Guess I could look it up in
the exif data, but I'm too lazy. It was sharpened with Nik sharpener pro.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Something a little different today.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
And quite boring, I am sure.
Rip it apart folks.
William Robb
I like this one,Gianfranco.
Something about the stillness and sharpness of the subject and the blurry people in
motion,work for
me.
Your title is very approprate.It looks as if he has stopped time to have his small work
break..:-)
Dave
Hi everybody,
I will delete most of Cotty's excellent well-balanced reply.
I do need to add two suggestions.
1. David, re: the deleted 'icon'. Whether it is a deleted
file, folder, application, or alias, it was not deleted. It
was moved to the Trash. It is probably still there. Open the
Trash, click and
Looks like that 28-105 is a nice piece of glass.
Dave
Thanks Dave. This was taken with the *ist D
and 28-105 PZ at whatever focal
Bill
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004
Hi folks,
I have the following items for sale. I expect them to be mainly of
interest to those of you based in the UK, so I list the prices in UK
pounds; we can work something out if you are not based here, I am
sure. Please note the following:
- Prices include shipping in the UK.
-
Hi Bill,
I'd love to see your pictures. Unfortunately, your hosting site doesn't allow my
browser (Netscape) to see them. The pics just don't come up at all. That means
in order to see your pics I have to use another browser. Kind of a PITA. Just
thought you might want to know that at least
Nothing to rip IMO. Granted it's different, but I like it.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:41 AM
Subject: PAW
Something a little different today.
I don't know why but i really like these type of night time sky line shots. I really
like
the coloured
reflections from the buildings in the water.The people in motion give it that
hustle-bustle feel.
Dave
I haven't posted a pic for a while and I've
Hi!
I know sunsets are cliche and so on. But this one I think is a little
different.
http://boris.isra-shop.com/photos/basic-zoom/sunset.htm
My site is back up so I am posting the proper link...
All comments are most welcome.
Thanks in advance (even if you'd beat me to dust g).
Boris
I think he'll be hanging on to this one just a bit longer
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3800614403category=15240
Hi!
GI Hi everybody,
GI I'd like to hear some comments about this one:
GI http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2147246
GI I'm not sure if I like it or not... The man is a shoeshine, he
GI works (worked? not sure I saw him recently) along one of the
GI shopping streets in Naples. I took
Hey , this looks like three PAWS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW: Keeping Warm
I'm sure its been said a 100 times before,but this shot is just pufect.g
Great shot,thanks for sharing.Gotta show the SO and daughter.
Dave
Hi!
SD Here's my first attempt at this (W. Robb embarrassed me into figuring
SD out how to post this at WL ;-). Until I get Frontpage installed, I'm
SD using Word to make a webpage. Unfortunately, it doesn't look as sharp
SD on the web:
SD http://home.wlu.edu/~desjardi/
I have only one word
Hi!
Oops. I suppose I was looking at the cropped and otherwise corrected
version. I couldn't get to the original one...
Just to make sure it is understood of which image I am rambling...
Boris
Hi!
RS http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2157559
Rob, I admit that my appetite experienced a surge up when I saw this.
So I suppose it is quite successful.
grin
Boris
Looks like a few have problems with barrel distortion.
Which 20/24/28 primes show the least?
-Lon
Hi!
AC http://ecoli.idv.tw/photo/street.jpg
AC This one was taken last year when I first got my Olympus 5050. Never
AC tried a proper night scene before so I got on top of the roof of my
AC office and took this pic.
Andy, this is excellent. It reminds me of some views I have from my
office
Hi!
JM Here's a bit of pastoral color:
JM http://www.photolin.com/misc/BOT032a.jpg
JM Taken at the Desert Botanical Gardens in Phoenix, Arizona USA in March
JM of last year. We were walking a path through the wildflower area,
JM then around a blind corner came upon two ladies painting in the
I liked that one. There is some strange sense of humor at work here.
A bit weird.
A small objection to the pink colour.
DagT
På 27. feb. 2004 kl. 16.41 skrev William Robb:
Something a little different today.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
And quite boring, I am sure.
Hey Folks,
Here's one I need some help on. I'm wondering if I should crop it tighter.
There's an element in the middle left side of the photo I'm wondering if I
should clone out. Ditch it altogether and try again?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2167370
Thanks,
Mark
Hi!
Ib I read a few books and watched postings to try learn the tricks of doing
Ib these long night exposures.
Ib Amateur as I am, but eager to learn from the myriads of those clearly less
Ib amateur than I, I'd love
Ib to receive your advice on what to do better.
Ib Weather was muggy,
Hey Folks,
One more for the week. This one was inspired by Shel. He sent me a similar
shot and decided to try it also. This shot was taken while driving (with
both hands on the wheel). It's the craziest one of all the frames I took.
Hope you enjoy:
Hi!
FW Thanks for the kind comments. Kelly, my model, is a very cute
FW two year old with wonderful facial expressions - plus she enjoys
FW being photographed and is happy to sit still long enough for the
FW shot. She featured in my entry to February's PUG, and again for
FW March.
Fred, you
Hi Mark ...
You've got a good idea here, but I think this shot fails to make the cut.
Apart from the element you'd like to clone out, the object in the background
is very distracting. It looks like another guitar string post. Softer bokeh
might get it to work a little better, or maybe going the
Thanks Boris!
Working has taken most of my time so I sometimes go up to the roof and
look around to see what's going on around the office building grin
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 2:11 AM
To: Andy Chang
You mean for brown, white pink shoes?
Of course the alcohol boils off before the water so you're actually diluting the
stuff.
Call yourself hard ;)
Nick
-Original Message-
From: Cotty[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24/02/04 15:17:50
Dahhh. You're all a bunch of wusses. I take a glass, boil the rest of the
Your welcome.
Andy Chang wrote:
Peter,
Thank you ever so much
Time for reading now grin
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SUN 24/2.5 lens
You can find a great
The only Sun lens I owned was a 60-135/3.5 zoom, back in the early 80s. It
was horrible, producing soft images with an unappealling greenish cast. I
gave it away, with a suitable warning. I think Sun was a lesser-known
3rd-party brand back then, but I hadn't heard or seen the name in at least
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
with the D.
Comments welcome.
http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65384/1/2589664/Original
Larry from Prescott
On 27/2/04, STAN DA MAN disgorged:
c. Using OS9.x and earlier Mac systems, you periodically
need to do something called cleaning the desktop folder.
Think of it like flushing the cache on a web browser. To do
this on the Mac, you hold down a special key combination
during start-up. I
On 27/2/04, EHH WHAT'S UP DOC? disgorged:
LOL
Yes, but the highest level of sharpening that the *istD offers, sharpens
less than Canon's normal or even low setting.
Interesting. Do you have any references to substantiate this?
Hm, I don't have a D60 to compare ;-) but I remember to have read
On 27/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Something a little different today.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
And quite boring, I am sure.
Rip it apart folks.
William Robb
Bill, that's a beautiful pic. I really like it. Needs the bottom of the
mirror though to be perfect IMO.
On 27/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
I'm trying to get mySO to let me grow mine like that,but no luck so far.g
Other than the bright engine people have mentioned, its a great shot,Cotty.
Dave
Okay, in an effort to steer away from car
threads and
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/pianostrings.html
Saw some nice patterns in the piano strings. This is one of
the QuikSnaps® I took while hanging around Bonnie's place.
It's not as sharp as I'd like since the exposure was long
and I had no tripod, but you might like the pattern made by
the
On 27/2/04, WOULD LOSE HIS HEAD IF NOT SCREWED ON disgorged:
It's gone.
Mike, honestly - you only just had it. Now where were you? You popped
into the kitchen to make a cup of tea, then you went into the bog...
Is it down the back of the settee?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
Larry,
What great colors! Super shot. Unfortunately, I suspect the web and my monitor
don't do it the justice it deserves ... and it still looks great! You clearly
got it right!
shel
Larry Hodgson wrote:
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I
Dag T [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Something a little different today.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/mirror1.html
And quite boring, I am sure.
Rip it apart folks.
I liked that one. There is some strange sense of humor at work here.
A bit weird.
A small objection
Mark Dalal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more for the week. This one was inspired by Shel. He sent me a similar
shot and decided to try it also. This shot was taken while driving (with
both hands on the wheel).
I'm not even going to *ask* what you pressed the shutter button with.
It's the
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Which wide Pentax primes show the least distortion?
Looks like a few have problems with barrel distortion.
Which 20/24/28 primes show the least?
-Lon
The A20mm f/2.8 seems good. I tend to be pretty sensitive to barrel
distortion,
Wow! Very nice. Looks like you captured this in perfect light. You
must have staked out the shot earlier - composition is great and the
sky cooperated. Great job!
Bruce
Friday, February 27, 2004, 10:59:37 AM, you wrote:
LH Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon
I couldn't hep but notice, in the latest flare-up of Mac
advocacy, that once again one of the purported strengths
of the Mac is that you don't have to understand the inner
workings to be able to use the machine sucessfully.
Oddly enough the same argument can be applied to cameras,
but the
In my experience, if you try to avoid vertical lines at the left and
right edges of the scene, you'll love it.
I know that sounds logical, but you'd be surprised.
If you keep thinking of what emphasizes the barrel distortion, and stay
away from it, you'll like it a lot more. . . Keep it level as
Hi,
If anyone can simply give me an answer to some of the questions I've raised
or direct me to a primer that will help me understand the Mac's better I'd
greatly appreciate it.
these 2 books might be useful:
As part of my plan to learn to repair old pentax stuff, I just got
a Spotmatic SP, a Spotmatic F, and an SMCT 300/4.0 from KEH in
as is condition. Both bodies were inop, although I have yet to
find anything wrong with the F. The SP mirror and aperture stopdown
hangs up at slow shutter speeds
På 27. feb. 2004 kl. 20.39 William Robb:
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Which wide Pentax primes show the least distortion?
Looks like a few have problems with barrel distortion.
Which 20/24/28 primes show the least?
-Lon
The A20mm f/2.8 seems good. I tend to be pretty
Keith Whaley wrote:
In my experience, if you try to avoid vertical lines at the left and
right edges of the scene, you'll love it.
I know that sounds logical, but you'd be surprised.
Judging by Wheatfield's HomeRenovation Updates there were
very few true vertical lines left
Which 20/24/28 primes show the least?
-Lon
The A20mm f/2.8 seems good. I tend to be pretty sensitive to barrel
distortion, and I have used the 20 pretty extensively ove rthe past
few months with the home reno pictures, and nothing has jumped out at
me.
I agree that the A20 f/2.8 is quite good, and
Actually John, I think that you need to know a fair amount
about any complex mechanism to best make use of it. Be it a
camera or a computer or a form of operating system or an
application or utility. DOS/Windows (and CPM before them)
have just made different assumptions about the user than the
I love it when things come together...
Yesterday the postal service jeep pulled up into the driveway and the mail
carrier brought two packages. One was the 6x7 system I bought from a list
member, which includes the 6x7 w/ MLU, standard (non-ttl) finder, and a 105
f2.4 and 150 f2.8 lens. The
Really lush colors and textures - great shot!
- MCC
At 11:59 AM 2/27/2004 -0700, you wrote:
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
with the D.
Comments welcome.
I really like including just a sliver of land at the bottom of the frame
with the sky fading off into the darkness. Really makes me feel like the
night is pressing in...
- MCC
At 07:45 PM 2/27/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Hi!
I know sunsets are cliche and so on. But this one I think is a little
I bought this lens some time ago on ebay for a paltry $50, thinking I
could get a good walking around lens with a fabulous focal range, but it
is worth about that much. It is quite soft. I guess it has its uses.
I used it to take my PUG entry for Feb, but only because I happened to
have
the A20 f/2.8 is quite good, and the 28 f/2.0 too
Which 28/2 ? The K 28/2 or the M/A 28/2 ?
Fred
I think it fell out of the hole in me trouser pocket. I'm really,
really sorry.
Cotty wrote:
On 27/2/04, WOULD LOSE HIS HEAD IF NOT SCREWED ON disgorged:
It's gone.
Mike, honestly - you only just had it. Now where were you? You popped
into the kitchen to make a cup of tea, then you
Oh, you mean the hole that you er, the hole that is er, I mean, oh -
*that* hole!
On 27/2/04, MIKE THE MECHANIC disgorged:
I think it fell out of the hole in me trouser pocket. I'm really,
really sorry.
Cotty wrote:
On 27/2/04, WOULD LOSE HIS HEAD IF NOT SCREWED ON disgorged:
It's gone.
Shel,
Just so you know, I was laughing at your comment that you ate next door at
the Sushi place, and not at the Burrito place. I thought that was funny.
Don't know why, but I did.
Look forward to seeing your sunset shot of that sign. Should look good.
Just have a few more sakes first, so
On 27/2/04, LARRY disgorged:
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
with the D.
Comments welcome.
http://tripodman.smugmug.com/gallery/65384/1/2589664/Original
Larry from Prescott
Pretty impressive for outakes that are much softer than the negs in the
loupe!
I guess you're now in the Brotherhood, eh Mark?
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL
I think it's pretty freaking cool!
I think it might look even cooler in bw. But, still, it's pretty cool
right now.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, no, no (I say that with respect and love, Boros g)
Simple is good. At least in this case it is. Maybe that's why I said
earlier that it might work in BW, because that would be even simpler - no
colours. Strip away everything superfluous, and get to the essence of the
mirror and the
That's right, I guess we should welcome Mark into the brotherhood.
Welcome Mark [secret shutter shake]!
Norm
frank theriault wrote:
I guess you're now in the Brotherhood, eh Mark?
Nice pics, Mark. I love 6702. Great definition. I wouldn't split hairs
over the difference in the two 55mm lenses. It's probably inivisible to
the naked eye. I've been playing with my *istD for a couple of weeks
now, but you just motivated me to get the 6x7 out. For handheld cameras
it doesn't
Awesome!!
-frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PAW - sunset
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:45:16 +0200
Ditto.
frank theriault wrote:
Awesome!!
I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the
Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt
that any adults would consider it offensive. I've posted it here
because I think it's a nice example of what can be done with unusual
lighting. Of
it's too bad you didn't shoot RAW, there is enough room to boost the
saturation a lot without too much artifacting in the sky. even if there is,
much of the resulting chroma noise can be removed with a good noise filter.
send me the original and i'll see what i can do.
Herb...
- Original
the Pentax RAW conversion software offers more sharpening than the camera
does.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 9:43 AM
Subject: Re: *ist D Formula 1 tests
Yes, but the highest level of
On 27 Feb 2004 at 19:10, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I'm quite pleased with this shot. It was done by candle light with the
Pentax 6x7 and 105/2.4 lens. It displays full rear nudity, but I doubt
that any adults would consider it offensive. I've posted it here
because I think it's a nice example
All,
I've been using Kodak Portra 400UC for snapshots lately and am pretty happy
with its color palette. I'm thinking about using it as a general travel
film and am wondering how it responds to filtering (as compared to slide
film). I have a bit of experience with filtration (e.g., ND
Nicely done, I agree with Rob, the hand doesn't seem to fit itdon't
like the tan line as well.
Norm
Rob Studdert wrote:
I like it, the only negative distraction (to me) are the hard lines caused by
the lighting of her hand. A little a more light on the lower legs would have
been good too
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
