Hi!
Dave, et al, I think I am going to have to ask for guidance here.
One ear, one eye, and part of the nose are missing. On the other hand,
this is very nice picture. Very calm, dreamy and generally relaxed.
The beast is sleeping all right, probably daydreaming...
Anyway, I need to
Do I recall correctly that someone said that CR Kennedy was willing to
match prices with the US camerahouses (postage + taxex included) ?
I am just about to make a 'largish' purchase and I am considering all
options ;-)
(*)o(*)
Robert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Maybe I'm a bit late, but here's my version: http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/mad21_w.jpg
Adjusted highlights with 70%, high pass sharpening 65%. All done in
Photoshop 8. I think Larry's version is better, I couldn't get the sky
that blue.
BTW, I have a link with a good PS tutorial I want to
Hello brooksdj,
A wonderful cat shot, those eyes are very expressive, kinda ready to
strike on it's prey. The DOF is also excellent, with the very sharp
face and blurred background.
Attila
Saturday, March 6, 2004, 6:01:30 AM, you wrote:
bcin Colour shot from the D2h of
Currently we are using SanDisk Ultra cards. Quite happy with them, no probs
so far.
Are there significant differences between cards? What is recommended? Any
brands to stay away from?
Do 'faster' cards load faster, or are we still limited by what the camera
can do?
(*)o(*)
Hello Shel,
Just a dirty trick: I copied the left part over the right part:
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/elevator1_a.jpg
And here it is with higlights corrected:
http://ns.atn.ro/~attila/elevator1_b.jpg
I think the second version looks more realistic.
Attila
Saturday, March 6, 2004, 7:35:36 PM,
Arca-Swiss QR supports very long rails so that you can slide a lens or
camera system to get the exact balance point. the rails generally are not
lever-locked and have a very wide contact surface. there won't be any
movement, rotation, or looseness. there are probably about a dozen ball head
and
It is.
CW
- Original Message -
From: Amita Guha
I looked at the Adorama one but it looked kind of flimsy to me.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.614 / Virus Database: 393 - Release Date: 3/5/2004
--- mapson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently we
are using SanDisk Ultra cards. Quite
happy with them, no probs
so far.
Do 'faster' cards load faster, or are we still
limited by what the camera
can do?
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/pentaxistd/page9.asp
Offers some insight
On 8 Mar 2004 at 20:01, mapson wrote:
Do I recall correctly that someone said that CR Kennedy was willing to
match prices with the US camerahouses (postage + taxex included) ?
Of the *ist D and Sigma SD9/SD10:
http://www.crkennedy.com.au/content/home.html
I've made most of my 'largish'
On 8 Mar 2004 at 21:37, mapson wrote:
Are there significant differences between cards?
Depends on what you deem as significant?
What is recommended? Any
brands to stay away from?
With shouting them down I've not positive reliability reports about the 2.2GB
compact hard disks from
I really like this shot.Simple lines,easy on the eye,nice contrasts.The tree makes it.
Dave
I shouldn´t, because I haven´t had time to look at
your photos,
but.. ...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2186930size=lg
DagT
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Jens Bladt wrote:
About standard focal length for the *Ist D.
Is it true, that a normal lens for the *ist D, with a CCD of 23.5 x 15.7
mm is equal to the diagonal of this rectangular square? If yes, the standard
focal length should be 28,3mm.
This calculation (Phythagoras)
Great shot with lots of detail.It reminds me of those movies i used to love in the late
50's early 60's.
Run away:-)
Dave
Well I missed out on this month's PUG
(portraits), so for this week's
PAW I've decided to post what may have passed as a
Sigma also makes this pair of APS sensor lenses which they sell as a
pair for $279 or so. I think its a 18-50 and a 55-200. I wonder how
good they are?
BTW, did anyone notice the *istD on the cover of PC magazine. Their
camera issue compared only the *istD and the E-1 for DSLR's (the actual
Great shot Frank.
The contrast works fo rme,the background is appealing and i like the placement of the
hand.For me,it
adds some depth.
You take cameras to parties,i'm not allowed.:-)
Dave
I was a bit late on week 3. Now I'm a bit early on week 4.
Oh
Good question:
a) Nikkor-M 450/9 for the 8x10
b) Fujinon-W 180/5.6 for the 4x5
c) Rolleiflex 2.8D/E 'cause I have no way to shoot 120 right now!
d) Pentax-A 100/2.8 I miss it. Need another.
Missed the eBay ones last night 2 wks ago.
e)
While we're on the subject, I've been looking at the Gitzo G-1560
monopod. Anyone had experience with this, or any other Gitzo monopod?
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, William M Kane wrote:
We've discussed this issue, and decided that the circle created by
the DA lenses is optimized for the smaller sensor area of the *ist D.
Therefore, the DA will not produce a full frame image on a normal 35mm
camera.
You can see this by mounting the
If the LX was conceived in the K era and took a while to
develop then the fact that it isn't M sized makes sense.
DJE
Even if the LX had been finished a litle latter, in the M era, to
make it smaller would have been impossible.
Andre
Knowing Pentax, they'd have tried! If you are used to the
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Andre Langevin wrote:
You can see this by mounting the DA onto the MZ-5. Through the
viewfinder you'll see that there is severe vingetting up until about
20mm, and there is still some up until the mid to high 20mm range.
Beyond there it looks like it'll work (I haven't
Most of my lust list doesn't quite exist:
Canon 200/1.8 EF to fit my Nikon D1h orPentax A* 200/2.8 to fit my Nikon D1h.
Olympus 21/2.0 to fit my Nikon D1h, or that Pentax 20/1.4 that they
prototyped but didn't produce.
85/1.4 Nikkor with SWM internal motor.
Pentax LX that takes Nikon MD-4
Excellent question!
Here goes:
A 20mm f/2.8
FA 20-35mm f/4
FA 24mm f/2
FA 77mm Limited
I'd like to ask list members who own or have owned or
otherwise are contemplating buying the A 20mm and the
FA 20-35mm. If you were to choose between these two
lenses which one would you choose to couple
It's funny that photographers ditched their Speed-Graphics for a Nikon F
or M3 with maybe three or four lenses because it was so much lighter.
Now they are still using 35mm sized cameras but take everything except
the kitchen sink. Maybe the could take a lead from Ansel Adams and
invest in a good
Tanya wrote,snipped
And now for the onslaught of questions...
Can someone explain to me exactly how RAW works? I understand that it gives
you a file that is captured exactly as you see it, without colour
correction, compression etc. Does this also
Remember, gaffers tape is the photographer's friend. A little piece will keep
that wheel in its place when you want it to stay there.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Stan. That could be it. I'm always changing the Tv wheel. When
I'm shooting in the studio, I have it set at 1/125. I shoot and the
Another lens worth considering is the older 12mm f8 fisheye made by
Sigma and sold under various brand names like Accura, Spiratone, etc.
145 degrees wide.
The image circle is 36mm. On a 35mm camera, the circle just hits the
middle of the two horizontal limits of the film. Plenty of covering
I have an old 564-L Mono Studex Luxe, bought it used years ago. I use it as a
monopod, and hiking staff. It is rugged. (I just noticed it says FULL WARRANTY
FOR LIFE -- PLUS REINCARNATION on it. I wonder if Manofrotto who owns them now
will honor that?)
--
Steve Desjardins wrote:
While we're
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi - I'm Bill and I have made scads of beautiful (and even
well-selling!) images using my lowly 20mm f4.5 Bow-Wow Takumar
How can this be?
Bill
Because the lens has good contrast and your eye good vision.
Andre
Bill, I don't get it
Thanks Mark.She is our favorite. :-)
Although shot indoors,natural light from the bay window,a click with the colour cast
eyedropper in
Elements cleaned this up nicely.
Dave
Beautiful cat, Dave. The details and colors in
the exposure are great.
-
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Francis Alviar wrote:
remaining three. The FA 24mm remains a very
sought-after lens as evidenced by it being out of
stock from both Adorama and BH. List members highly
recommend it.
Isn't that the one that exhibits colour fringing with the *ist-D?
Kostas
Dave Brooks:
http://www.wuthrich.cc/mad21.jpg
In Photoshop CS I used the highlight/shadow tool to have a bit more
texture in the shadows, and I added red to the colour balance.
--
Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the late reply
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I was shooting some table top food for stock this afternoon. Had the
*ist D set to manual. PC cord was attached to one monolight, the
others were on slave. I shot about 50 frames, then on frame 51 the lcd
review image didn't appear. I hit the review button. Nothing
That's how it has been priced in the UK all along. I think Pentax USA
must have chosen to price it above these two initially and now realise
that may not have been wise. It has been very tiresome reading soo many
people complain how it was $50 more than the 10D et al, when in UK (
Europe?) that
Thanks Frank.
Nope don't have to.She's the only one in the family that LIKES a camera in her face.LOL
Dave
You nailed it, Dave!!
Look at those eyes. What did you do, tape a dead mouse to the camera?
vbg
Lovely shot...
cheers,
frank
The
I had the same happen with my D1 last fall.Everything worked but no picture,just a
black
screen.Turns
out that the older batteries i had show a charge but have an effect on the camera.When
i
used the
new one all was good.Now 3 are in the garbage and a new one was ordered.
Weird huh
Dave
I have a Pentax 6x7 and two lenses: 135mm and 105mm.
At a Photografica Market I bought two tubes, each
with a turning ring, Asahi Pentax 6x7 Japanon it,
nr. 1 and nr. 2. I thought they were extension tubes,
but... They fit on the body (by the ring), but the
lenses don't fit on the other side of
Good idea for the studio shoots. I always shoot at 1/125th, because I
like as much shutter speed as possible to kill the ambient light.
On Mar 8, 2004, at 12:10 PM, graywolf wrote:
Remember, gaffers tape is the photographer's friend. A little piece
will keep that wheel in its place when you
OK, I suppose this is some flash fact, so forgive my
ignorance. How does the shutter speed kill ambient
light? What do you mean by kill?
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Good idea for the studio shoots. I always shoot at 1/125th, because I
like as much shutter speed as possible to kill the ambient
Actually I found out that the Kirk plate for the N***n N90 fit my ist D
perfectly. However I'd love a L-bracket for my istD with or without the
battery grip. So far no interest from Kirk or RRS :(
/paul
From: Herb Chong [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SN: 7 000 403 Original retail price $467. (18/3.5 was $549. 24/2.8 $292.)
20.38mm f/3.95
Distorsion: less than 1% barrel (hard to believe)
Light falloff at 5.6: 2.8 stops
This tiny lens delivered outstanding central sharpness even
wide-open. Edge sharpness maximized at f/8 and overall
Hello Shel,
When using studio lights, it is common to be shooting around F8-16
because of the power of the flash heads. The faster the shutter
synch, at those small f stops, the less ambient light becomes part of
the equation. If you are relying on the flashes for all of the
lighting effect, it
Lasse, thanks for the excellent example of how to improve the picture by cropping.
I'm glad you did that. It really does help zero in on the essence of the shot,
namely the boy's hands and his posture.
If anyone on the list can direct me to a site or resource so I can figure out
how to resize
Hi Jos,
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004 18:03:23 + (GMT), Jos Peters wrote:
I have a Pentax 6x7 and two lenses: 135mm and 105mm.
At a Photografica Market I bought two tubes, each
with a turning ring, Asahi Pentax 6x7 Japanon it,
nr. 1 and nr. 2. I thought they were extension tubes,
but...
They are ...
Wait. Tamron has no SMC.
Best, Bernd
-original message
From: cloversan
a.. Subject: 14mm for *ist D
b.. Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 15:16:55 -0800
Hello guys,
Do you think it is better
Here's an old BW pic in TIF format ... curious to see how
some here may interpret it.
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/family/coquette.tif
AFAIK Ginzo is the Rolls Royce of tripods!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. marts 2004 17:30
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Monopods
While we're on the subject, I've
They make dynomite knives too... ;-)
Jens Bladt wrote:
AFAIK Ginzo is the Rolls Royce of tripods!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Steve Desjardins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 8. marts 2004 17:30
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I haven't done that - but I'm thinking about buying an eye piece for the A
kameras and maybe for the MZ-S and convert into af piece for my M
refconverter.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William M Kane [mailto:[EMAIL
Sven said, among other things:
And you know how to feed a film into the camera, do you? The backing paper
needs to go *between* the rollers, otherwise you will crank the film through
the camera without a stop...
I was able to find the instruction manual for my 1950s-era Rolleiflex on line.
Has this one appeared in this discussion yet?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0403/04030502rolleiminidigi.asp
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
On 8 Mar 2004 at 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, I'd join the support group. I've got guilt over ignoring my M50/2
for years in preference to the A50/1.2 which I don't recall EVER shooting
wide open (good thing, too, from what I hear).
Of course where appropriate it excels wide open
Well he certainly would not be able to send his pix in via satellite photo
(grin). More inline...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure, read the article.
Then tell us how the guy with the speed graphic would cope with the case
mentioned in the comparison, where the podium was 200' away.
The same
It looks like it's a great photo, but it's just too small to judge
beyond that. :-)
S
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Please check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comments - Likes/Dislikes
Ken Waller
PeoplePC Online
A better way to Internet
http://www.peoplepc.com
I know someone who has a M 100mm/2.8 for sale!
Jens Bladt
But I want the A. I know they're formula-optically the same but I
like the cooler contrastier A coatings...
Collin
That A costing were a bit more contrasty than M, I knew, but are A
lenses generally cooler than K and M lenses?
Andre
Thank you Paul greywolf for commenting. About the size - you both are
right about it being on the small-ish size - I was trying to present it
without scrolling, on my monitor, at the present size, it just fits. Should
I post larger even if it means scrolling?
Paul, I'll try your suggestions for
In case anyone is interested, and wants to join the dawg lens support group,
I have a very nice example for sale - in KEH LN condition with the original
metal plastic caps, metal hood, lens hood cases, straps box - as close
to new as you'll find.
I'll throw in a bayonet adapter if you need one.
Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Paul greywolf for commenting. About the size - you both are
right about it being on the small-ish size - I was trying to present it
without scrolling, on my monitor, at the present size, it just fits. Should
I post larger even if it means
I heard you Steve, Paul greywolf - take a look now - its bigger VBG
Thanks for taking the time to look.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - KW's third
It looks like it's a great photo, but it's just too small to judge
beyond
I think you're correct. Perhaps it has to do with the way grain interacts
with the digital bits. I'm going to print some of these when I get a
chance. I think they'll print better than they scan.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Paul ...
I like the image, but I don't like what Delta 3200 has done
to
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1906210
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I saw the current crop of digital SLRs at a trade show on the
weekend. Both the
Ah, that's better. :-) It's a great landscape shot - the light is just
right and brings out some gorgeous patterns in the fields. TBH you
could make it as large as you like and it wouldn't be too large. :-)
S
Kenneth Waller wrote:
I heard you Steve, Paul greywolf - take a look now - its
Actually, part of it was the transition to color photos for publication. Having
to have on camera loaded with Kodachrome, and one loaded with Tri-X made
carrying two cameras a neccessity for many media photographers. I is no doubt
easier to carry two 35mm than 2 larger cameras, though for
Shoot some trannies, you will wonder what you are doing messing around with
those rinky-dink cameras after you see them.
--
Chris wrote:
Glad News,I think,The Camera that I have access to is a Rolleiflex Planar
lens model 2.8E K7 E s/n1660783 which is a 56 to 59 model the first with
built in
Francis,
The FA24/2.0 was a particular favorite of mine. The picture quality was sometimes
mystical, but it's a big lens.
I bought an A20/2.8. It's small and compact with a flair just at the front end. It
is now part of my vacation kit - LX 43mm + 77mm limiteds plus the A20/2.8. It gives
On Mon, 8 Mar 2004, Lindamood, Mark wrote:
New condition, includes box and all it came with in new condition. $500. Mark
How I wish you were here, as the song goes.
Never mind. Good luck with the sale.
Kostas
I don't think it ~was~ difficult to make a small pro 35mm slr. Not 20 years
ago.
It is now. Batteries, motor winds, all that electronics. Batteries.
It all takes up too much space.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true.
My electronic dictionary gives 4 different stories.
bistro
bistro (bê´stro, bîs´tro) noun
plural bistros
1. A small bar, tavern, or nightclub.
2. A small, informal restaurant serving wine.
[French bistro and or bistrot, tavern owner, tavern.]
Word History: According to a
Why does this thread still have this subject?
Regards,
Bob...
A Democracy is three wolves and two sheep voting on dinner.
A Republic is three hundred wolves and two hundred sheep
voting for three wolves and two sheep to prepare
Ken,
I'm speechless.
I'm without speech.
I have no speech.
I wish to speak, but cannot.
Wow. That's beautiful.
thanks for posting it,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL
On 8 Mar 2004 at 11:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OTOH, I'd join the support group. I've got guilt over ignoring my M50/2
for years in preference to the A50/1.2 which I don't recall EVER shooting
wide open (good thing, too, from what I hear).
Rob Suddert wrote:
Of course where appropriate it
Hi,
I'm interested. Does it come with an original receipt
for warranty purposes (if its still under warranty)
Thanks
Yousef
--- Lindamood, Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
New condition, includes box and all it came with in
new condition. $500. Mark
On 8/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Can anyone provide approximate dimensions for the various
6x7 Pentax models, also, approx weight with 90mm and 65mm
lenses (or similar close focal lengths)?
Shel,
362 X 184 X 812 feet
weight with 65mm : 1250 metric tons
weight with 90mm : (scales
I have to laugh at some of the ideas that folks have about what they never have
used.
I had an interesting link to an article about photojournalists comparing a Speed
Graphic kit to a Canon Digital kit. The Speed Graphic kit weigthed 17lbs. The
digital kit is 59lbs.
59 lbs? I suppose if
What an interesting shot!
Of course, the composition, nice colours, focus are all spot on. But, I
wouldn't have thought a spider (jumping or not) could have facial
expressions as this one seems to! I guess it's just because it's looking
directly into the camera, but what a look on it's face!
Dave,
That tight framing really works well. There's a certain poignancy and
intimacy to it that would be lost if you had moved out.
I really like it a lot.
thanks,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0403/04030801pentaxoptio43wr.asp
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
At 17:36 2004.03.08 -0500, you wrote:
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 16:59:23 -0500
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know someone who has a M 100mm/2.8 for sale!
Jens Bladt
But I want the A. I know they're formula-optically the same but I
like the cooler contrastier A coatings...
Collin
That
graywolf wrote:
I think the point I am trying to make is you don't actually
need the most latest expensive piece of equipment to do the
job.
With the possible exception of sports and action photography, I heartily
agree. On the other hand, with the possible exception of serious
perspective
Lon, don't forget, this is Australia - all PC peripherals are much higher
priced than the US, and also it was in Australian dollars, so I am guessing,
it would be equivalent of around a printer for around US$750.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Lon Williamson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Paul, you said: On *istD the shutter has to be open at least 1/125 to synch
with the flash...
I totally don't get this. I shoot with mine right down to a second
sometimes, and the sync speed goes up to 1/150.
Can you explain what you mean by this?
tan
-Original Message-
From: Paul
How funny! I'm the total opposite, I prefer to slow it right down to
CAPTURE ambient light and if I don't want it around, I usually shoot at
night time.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 4:36 AM
To: Shel Belinkoff
Subject:
Thanks to all who helped out on this subject,especially the loading of the
film bit.
Regards Chris K
First, it is very nice the way it is. However, personally I think it would be
even better if the overbright forground was burned in, or cropped out. Of coure
it may not seem as bright in the print as it does on the monitor. As it is it
seems to pull my eyes away from the more important, to me,
Hello Tanya,
You may have missed the big IF (If you are relying on the flashes for
all of the lighting effect...). That doesn't mean that I always want
the ambient light minimized - but Shel was wondering how the shutter
speed would kill the ambient light. I was just going a bit further
Gorgeous, there is nothing more to be said.
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 9 March 2004 8:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - KW's third
I heard you Steve, Paul greywolf - take a look now - its bigger VBG
Thanks for
One second is more than 1/125. I said at least 1/125. More is okay. But
you're right, the minimum is 1/150. But when you turn the tv dial in
manual mode, the next step from 1/125 is 1/80th. So 1/125 is the
fastest I can shoot in flash synch mode.
On Mar 8, 2004, at 6:31 PM, Tanya Mayer
Hi Tanja,
I slow down to capture ambient light if I'm shooting with a single
on-camera flash or sometimes even with a single off camera flash. In my
studio I shoot with three off camera flashes using various devices to
arrange the light the way I want it to fall. When I shoot off a tripod,
I
Lasse, I really like these shots, despite what others have been posting
about the shadows etc. Yep, in hindsight they may have been improved with
some fill flash or a reflector, BUT the shadows also add an element of
interest to the shot, and I think that that is important too.
Gosh, she is so
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Pentax 67 questions?
Can anyone provide approximate dimensions for the various
6x7 Pentax models, also, approx weight with 90mm and 65mm
lenses (or similar close focal lengths)?
If all you need is approximate, then the Pentax web
i think it is worse on a film camera. at least on the *istD, the corners are
cropped off. sharp, yes.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: What gear is on
given the cost of developing a new plate, i wonder why they created a new
one then?
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Paul Eriksson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 1:19 PM
Subject: Re: New camera plate announced
Actually I found out that the Kirk
Hi All,
Haven't had a chance to read any of the (1200!) unread messages since
Friday, but thought I'd submit my first PAW.
This is from the first portrait session I've done with a willing adult
sitter;
http://members.iinet.net.au/~celsim/Session1/pages/Quarter1.htm
The others are
Now isn't that precious. It just goes to show the Japanese market will
buy any thing.
To true Rollie fans this must be an abomination.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Has this one appeared in this discussion yet?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0403/04030502rolleiminidigi.asp
A number of years ago, after the PZ1P came out I worked with Kirk to develop
a QR plate for that camera. I was told it was just a slightly modified
version of an existing plate, (probably the PZ1). They wanted my PZ1P to use
as a model, I wouldn't let them have it so I wound up doing some
Shel, you caught a great expression there. What did you do to elicit it?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Kinda Paw: Man on the Street
I went into San Francisco before the weekend, and grabbed a
few shots on Market Street. This was
Peter wrote:
Sounds like the title of a book, The Tao of Photography.
FV still functions, an 1937 model I think), I can't see myself parting
FV with it. I just think that that camera is closely attuned to Tao :)
Hi Peter,
IMNSHO, even though I am a bibliophile, Tao is not about books but
about
I have searched many places on the WWW, and even
read the user manual that came with my MZ-6 camera,
but I have not been able to find which IR remote
control is needed for it. Can someone tell me which it
is?
Thanks,
Leigh.
Powered by telstra.com
Jos Peters wrote:
Thanks for your reaction! You're right, the tubes fits
on the outer bayonet and my lenses on the inner.
I suppose I have to face to loss of a couple of euros
and go on with looking for a three-piece set.
nah - just get one of those P67 800mm f4's and use
Any of them. All the Pentax IR remotes use the same signal for shutter
release. Some have zoom buttons for the IQ cameras but for shutter release
they are interchangeable.
David Madsen
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.davidmadsen.com
-Original Message-
From: Leigh Wedding
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
