He'll probably just say: I never said so!
Amazing what some people will do to sell a Nikon. isn't it?
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. februar 2006 07:05
Til: Pentax Discuss
Emne: Interesting marketing
We
Why do sales people hate Pentax?
I could never figure that out. I guess they get paid less??
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Scott Loveless [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. februar 2006 07:28
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Interesting
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:41:10 -, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:58:24 -, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I only know of one religion whose followers behave like that.
I think I know a lot of the followers of said religion who
Hello Jay,
Thanks for the comment. The lens is very cool. It is small and light
for a 400mm and focuses very close. I use it quite a bit. I expect
to see some of your pics!
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 16, 2006, 11:31:16 PM, you wrote:
JT Bruce,
JT I'm just now seeing this
Entertaining stories, Shel!
Regards
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. februar 2006 14:39
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Interesting marketing
Long ago I learned never to judge people by their
fra: John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:58:24 -, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only know of one religion whose followers behave like that.
I think I know a lot of the followers of said religion who wouldn't do
it either, but there's an overwhelmingly
fra: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is actually irrelevant to the issue of whether God exists or not.
This is a simple one.
If you believe God exists, then yes, there is a God.
If you do not believe God exists, then
With adapteres it's different, isn't it?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 16. februar 2006 21:37
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Re: Ebay nonsense - New record price for this lens?
Jens,
I've got a
fra: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom C wrote:
As mere humans with finite life spans, none of us can claim to know it all
or understand it all.
Exactly.
But that does not mean there is not a belief system that embraces truth
and comes as close as
fra: Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom C
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 16:03:54 -0800
I'm sure he did as well. I'm quite sure God exists, but I don't
subscribe to the belief that Jesus was God on earth
(which he never said he was).
Tom C.
Yes, he did.
He clarified the point
fra: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Keith McGuinness
Subject: Re: OT Religion, Christ vs. the Other Guy
Of course, to confuse the picture, people do not necessarily
agree on what counts as evidence, or how to interpet that which
is available.
OK, I see what you mean. However I don't think it works, for at least 2
reasons. First, the holy books are all written by people and there's no
reason to think that those people had any special insight into the nature of
their god that other people don't have. Second, the books are all so vague
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:09:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is actually irrelevant to the issue of whether God exists or not.
This is a simple one.
If you believe God exists, then yes,
On 2/16/06, Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Hitler was a Marxist.
[...]
Canada
and the US are
Socialist to varying degrees, watered-down varieties of Marx'
beliefs.
Collin,
After those statements, I cannot begin to imagine what your ideal
system might be like. I'm
Jay:
The gear available
right now for say shooting birds in flight or other similar subjects is
somewhat limited.
With a Pentax name on it, it is.
Other than that, there's quite a few lenses availble from Tokina, Tamron and
Sigma and a few Chinese ones too.
This one is quite nice:
Not sure what this one was searching for in the middle of a grass
field; a rodent maybe? I always thought they did most of their hunting
around the shorlines. This one was a good half mile away from the
water.
Taken with the newly acquired Tokina AT-X 400 f5.6 . I think I'm going
to have to
On 2/17/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, that still leaves us with no answer to the question of how the
universe began. Those who believe in a god can sidestep that question,
which is very convenient for them.
Only because they don't care to ask themselves all the questions
On Feb 17, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
So, now it's newpapers - in plural. It realy was just one.
It was published in a couple of papers in this country, after the
situation had blown up overseas. That got them a little meeting with
the Prime Minister, after which an apology was
Marx was communist.
Ergo, Hitler was communist (!)
and
USA and Canda are watered-down versions of USSR.
I'm back to USSR!
best,
mishka
On 2/17/06, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/16/06, Collin R Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Hitler was a Marxist.
[...]
Canada
no, that's quite an objective truth -- i just check a few rolls,
neither had pulse.
film is very dead.
best,
mishka
On 2/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Film is dead.
WW
That's what you believe .-)
DagT
On Feb 17, 2006, at 7:16 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Most of the folks I know who've ordered the Nikon D200 within the
past three months are still waiting too. Only 2 of the 12 people
have received their cameras.
Down here that happens with any new Nikon or Canon body. But our
market is
On Feb 17, 2006, at 12:52 AM, Leon Altoff wrote:
He was driving along and though he might like to buy a convertible
(he does this). He stopped at a Honda dealership and asked to test
drive their convertible. He was dressed very casually at the time
- shorts, polo shirt, $2000 watch - and
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:53:08 -, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jay:
The gear available
right now for say shooting birds in flight or other similar subjects is
somewhat limited.
With a Pentax name on it, it is.
Other than that, there's quite a few lenses availble from Tokina,
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 08:58:39 -, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2/17/06, John Forbes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, that still leaves us with no answer to the question of how the
universe began. Those who believe in a god can sidestep that question,
which is very convenient
Collin provides more laughs on this list than Cotty and Bill Robb combined.
John
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:10:20 -, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marx was communist.
Ergo, Hitler was communist (!)
and
USA and Canda are watered-down versions of USSR.
I'm back to USSR!
best,
mishka
On
On 16 Feb 2006 at 20:07, Mark Erickson wrote:
Rob,
I looked at the site and I couldn't find a description of how to light the
target. Can you describe the process that you go through to obtain the
image that is input into the processing?
Hi Mark,
I just used normal illumination but I
That's the fun part with a simplified left-rigth categorization of the
political system. You can always put the people you don't like on the other
side .-)
Sure, you can put Hitler among the communists, as well as other totalitarian
systems? And how about anarchists and idealistic communists
Hi,
in the last months I've found nearly no time to read or even
participate in the PDML. I'm afraid it's better for me to leave the
list for a while. I'm still in the Pentax realm and hope to come back
soon, but at the moment I have to clear up my mailboxes.
Feel free to contact me if
But it's got soul .-)
DagT
fra: Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no, that's quite an objective truth -- i just check a few rolls,
neither had pulse.
film is very dead.
best,
mishka
On 2/17/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Film is dead.
WW
That's what you believe
Very nice - quite sharp for F.6.7.
Why do you shoot a 400mm handheld at 200ASA?
I'd use a monopod, I think.
What is LBA?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Jay Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 17. februar 2006 09:55
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Why do sales people hate Pentax?
I could never figure that out. I guess they get paid less??
My local dealer won't even stock them now it's been that way for years.
Everyone that goes in for an SLR including all the students from our college
inevitably comes out with a C***n, needless to say
On 17 Feb 2006 at 9:51, Don Williams wrote:
Hi Rob,
The stacking of images has been done for a
long time in laboratories using electron and
light microscopes. We did this in the late
70s on an HP2000 system in my Institute. I
was able to entice a virologist from Holland
(despite
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most major auto manufacturers have been sued with sudden accel as the
allegation.
I've experienced this with a couple of vehicles. As far as I could ascertain,
it was a function of the fuel delivery system to deliver excess fuel if the
catalytic
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/17 Fri AM 02:53:39 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Interesting marketing
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/2/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Want me to have a look around Pittsburgh's record shops?
Jay Taylor wrote:
Not sure what this one was searching for in the middle of a grass
field; a rodent maybe? I always thought they did most of their hunting
around the shorlines. This one was a good half mile away from the water.
Taken with the newly acquired Tokina AT-X 400 f5.6 . I think I'm
From: Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/02/17 Fri AM 08:55:01 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Heron In The Field
Not sure what this one was searching for in the middle of a grass
field; a rodent maybe? I always thought they did most of their hunting
around the
An interesting exercise. Take two stuffed dodo models off to Mauritius,
photograph them in their natural setting, and stitch multiple shots
together. Strangely unsettling.
http://www.slate.com/id/2136049/?nav=ais
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
This one time, at band camp, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marx was communist.
Ergo, Hitler was communist (!)
Invocation of Godwins Law
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Gosh, someone better tell the magazines I shoot for and the stock house
that sels my pics that six megapixels isn't good enough. They have
hundreds of my images that are working just fine for them. How could
that be?
Paul
On Feb 17, 2006, at 4:13 AM, John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006
On Feb 16, 2006, at 6:25 PM, Tom C wrote:
Interesting poem and unfortunately true.
It's much better heard in the rich voice of Bill Buckley. He
recorded it in San Francisco on Lincoln's birthday in 1950.
Unfortunately God is often blamed for what followers do in his name.
Not by
On Feb 16, 2006, at 6:32 PM, John Forbes wrote:
Thank you, Bob. I hadn't read this before. Very apposite.
John
For those unfamiliar with him, Bill Buckley, better known by his
stage persona Lord Buckley, was a great hip talk comedian of the 40s
and 50s. His comedy was always gentle,
On Feb 16, 2006, at 6:47 PM, William Robb wrote:
Interesting poem and unfortunately true.
Unfortunately God is often blamed for what followers do in his
name.
Apparently, so is Mohammed.
That is actually irrelevant to the issue of whether God exists or
not.
I'm pretty sure Mohammed
On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:45 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The business of buying and selling cameras and photographic
equipment is quite different from photography. Who sells these
items and how they make money are mostly irrelevant to photography.
Absolutely. The guys running the companies
In case anyone is interested I have a
directory full of photomicrography here:
http://www.science-info.org/pages/edfwill/
The videos in 'AVI' and the high resolution
in 'AP' might be interesting. The AP images
were taken at the limit of resolution for
light microscopy with visible light.
On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:49 PM, Tom C wrote:
Actually I disagree on that, though you are surely entitled to your
belief/unbelief. :-)
If I believe something exists, that does not mean I am right and it
exists. It may indeed, not exist.
On the other hand, if I don't believe something
On Feb 16, 2006, at 7:34 PM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
But we do not all live in the same world. If I dont believe
something exists,
then in my world, my reality, it does not. If I believe something
does not
exist in my world, then it does not. If this is contrary to your
reality it
does not
On Feb 16, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
1 + 1 = 2
You're free to believe 1 + 1 = 3
That may be your subjective reality, but it's not objective reality.
Kevin's point is that there is no such thing as objective reality.
The universe is probabilities. It is highly
it's not applicable here -- somebody should *compare* something/one else
to nazis/Hitler.
a mere mentioning of Hitler doesn't count, i'm afraid.
best,
mishka
On 2/17/06, Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Mishka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marx was communist.
I don't believe you can apply 'probability
theory' to real numbers.
Don
Bob Shell wrote:
On Feb 16, 2006, at 8:31 PM, Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
1 + 1 = 2
You're free to believe 1 + 1 = 3
That may be your subjective reality, but it's not objective reality.
Kevin's point is that there
On Feb 17, 2006, at 12:45 AM, Tom C wrote:
Film is dead.
WW
I contend that film was never alive. Where does that leave us?
Tom C.
Calves ears?
Bob
Bob,
The concept of number is quite abstract, well defined and
unrelated to modern or any other kind of physics.
Basically, 1+1 is 2 because 1 and 2 are defined that way.
When I said 1+1=10, I meant binary representation.
The joke of large values of 1 is a joke on physicists
best,
mishka
On
On Feb 17, 2006, at 3:42 AM, John Forbes wrote:
However, that still leaves us with no answer to the question of how
the universe began. Those who believe in a god can sidestep that
question, which is very convenient for them.
Thinking that the universe must have a beginning is a very
On Feb 17, 2006, at 3:47 AM, Bob W wrote:
OK, I see what you mean. However I don't think it works, for at
least 2
reasons. First, the holy books are all written by people and
there's no
reason to think that those people had any special insight into the
nature of
their god that other
On 17 Feb 2006 at 6:23, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Gosh, someone better tell the magazines I shoot for and the stock house
that sels my pics that six megapixels isn't good enough. They have
hundreds of my images that are working just fine for them. How could
that be?
There's no need to be
fra: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Feb 17, 2006, at 3:42 AM, John Forbes wrote:
However, that still leaves us with no answer to the question of how
the universe began. Those who believe in a god can sidestep that
question, which is very convenient for them.
Thinking that the
Looking for field mice? Nice photo... Regards, Bob S.
On 2/17/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice - quite sharp for F.6.7.
Why do you shoot a 400mm handheld at 200ASA?
I'd use a monopod, I think.
What is LBA?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig
fra: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 17 Feb 2006 at 6:23, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Gosh, someone better tell the magazines I shoot for and the stock house
that sels my pics that six megapixels isn't good enough. They have
hundreds of my images that are working just fine for them. How
Given the bitingly sarcastic negativity that typifies many Pentax
critiques posted here, there is a need to be condescending. The post
implied that the Pentax cameras are inadequate photographic tools. Not
only are the 6 megapixel images very acceptable to the stock house and
pubs for which I
...not that it's necessarily a *good* thing ;-)
But I'd appreciate it if any PDMLers from down under who have had
trouble accessing my web site or sending me email wouold give it another
try when they have time (and let me know how it works out). My hosting
service thinks it's all worked out now
mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16/2/06, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Want me to have a look around Pittsburgh's record shops?
If you believe in miracles
That song's not by Jefferson
On 17 Feb 2006 at 7:37, Mark Roberts wrote:
...not that it's necessarily a *good* thing ;-)
But I'd appreciate it if any PDMLers from down under who have had
trouble accessing my web site or sending me email wouold give it another
try when they have time (and let me know how it works out). My
Of course the adequacy of six megapixel images for many types of work
is dependent on shooting RAW and converting to high resolution with
good tools.
On Feb 17, 2006, at 7:30 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Given the bitingly sarcastic negativity that typifies many Pentax
critiques posted here,
On Feb 17, 2006, at 7:02 AM, Don Williams wrote:
I don't believe you can apply 'probability theory' to real numbers.
Don
Sez who?
Bob
On 17 Feb 2006 at 7:30, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Given the bitingly sarcastic negativity that typifies many Pentax
critiques posted here, there is a need to be condescending. The post
implied that the Pentax cameras are inadequate photographic tools. Not
only are the 6 megapixel images very
On Feb 17, 2006, at 7:23 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It reminds me of a story about Steven Hawkin (maybe from his book,
a breif history of time?).
He was invited to a conference on cosmology in the Vatican, and
being liberal the Pope had stated that they could discuss anything
except
What is the size requirement of the stock house to which you refer? You
can convert to six megapixel image to a nice 72 meg, 8 bit file in the
PSCS RAW converter. No stock house I've contacted wants images larger
than that. The Hearst and Primedia photo editors I've worked with
prefer them at
On 17 Feb 2006 at 7:37, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Of course the adequacy of six megapixel images for many types of work
is dependent on shooting RAW and converting to high resolution with
good tools.
Sorry I just really hate being told what's good for me. Like the jerks who
can't understand
And there's a big difference between 6MP from a dslr and 6MP from a compact.
DagT
fra: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dato: 2006/02/17 fr PM 01:37:41 CET
til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
emne: Re: Pentax Pre PMA announcment.
Of course the adequacy of six megapixel images for many types of
My Anti-Valentines day post the other day got me thinking (a rare
occurance to be sure). There, I posted this photo:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/5806/2203/1600/haley.jpg
which happens to be my favourite photo of mine. It's a close race,
actually, because until I took that one a couple
I don't remember the exact numbers, but in the beginning the requirement was
about A4 format (21x30cm) with 300dpi printing.
The numbers you mention here looks like the same range that she is able to do
now, but she uses another program specially made for the purpose. I have all
these names
Hitler was a fascist, promoting himself by the means of - partly -
socialistic/communistic ideas. Hitler tried to eradicate the Jews.
Stalin was a fascist promoting himself by the means of
socialistic/communistic ideas. Stalin tried to eradicate the
socialists/communists and any other group of
John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 03:41:10 -, E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Forbes wrote:
On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:58:24 -, E.R.N. Reed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only know of one religion whose followers behave like that.
I think I know a lot of the followers
I've never had any problems.
Dave
On 2/17/06, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...not that it's necessarily a *good* thing ;-)
But I'd appreciate it if any PDMLers from down under who have had
trouble accessing my web site or sending me email wouold give it another
try when they have
On 17 Feb 2006 at 7:44, Paul Stenquist wrote:
What is the size requirement of the stock house to which you refer? You
can convert to six megapixel image to a nice 72 meg, 8 bit file in the
PSCS RAW converter. No stock house I've contacted wants images larger
than that. The Hearst and
John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:09:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This one time, at band camp, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That is actually irrelevant to the issue of whether God exists or
not.
This is a simple one.
If you believe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey troops. A member on the Nikon BB i go to posted this the other day.
Discussing digital
IR the last few days.
http://www.lifepixel.com
These people also do the conversions: http://www.maxmax.com/
See also
Very nice shots, Frank.
I believe photography is about capturing the moment (as do you, as far as I
can tell).
This is why I think the best photo ever (my favorite) is actually a
painting:
Hip, Hip, Hurra by P.S. Krøyer (was made from the painters memory - and from
his photographs):
Tough one, Frank!
I'll have to think about it for a while.
On one hand, an old shot still liked has proven its qualities by remaining a
favourite, but it's not necessarily representative for a photographer's present
style and interests.
On the other hand, it's dangerous to choose a recent
On 17 Feb 2006 at 8:22, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey troops. A member on the Nikon BB i go to posted this the other day.
Discussing digital
IR the last few days.
http://www.lifepixel.com
These people also do the conversions:
The Skagen painters are a great resource for studying photography. I've always
thought of them as a resource for seeing how light falls on a landscape, but
you're right about the condensed mood and sense of having captured a moment in
this picture.
Jostein
Quoting Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
fra: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:09:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what then if you don't believe in a god, but also accepts that
you may be wrong. And you end up ingoring the matter because it
doesn't affect you life any
This is my favorite shot online:
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_008.htm
Dave
On 2/17/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Anti-Valentines day post the other day got me thinking (a rare
occurance to be sure). There, I posted this photo:
Amazing. I sent my message Tuesday evening, and it
showed up on the list today (though it was in the
archives on Wednesday morning--go figure!).
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes it is!
Tom C.
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:09:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what then if you don't believe in a god, but also accepts that
you may be wrong. And you end up ingoring the matter because it
I do. And so do a lot of others. Numbers are
man made and don't 'observe' the laws of
physics. Numbers (labels) and mathematics (a
language) are man made and obey specific
rules. 1 will always be 1. But 1 (something)
may have any value you like and be equal to 2
(something else). But 1 egg
I've tried the lot: GEM, SHO, ROC, and GEMAirBrush. From what I can
tell, GEM is a little agressive at default settings for grain removal
when compared to NoiseNinja, NeatImage, or GrainSurgery (the last is my
favorite for film). SHO may do something that a curves adjustment
doesn't do for
An almost impossible question to answer, but right now I think this is it:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=144899
It represents a rare combination of two of my favorite themes, silence and the
kids, and it still makes me remember that clear summer morning.
Other days it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
fra: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:09:00 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what then if you don't believe in a god, but also accepts that
you may be wrong. And you end up ingoring the matter because it
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: SV: Interesting marketing
Why do sales people hate Pentax?
I could never figure that out. I guess they get paid less??
It's not that they hate Pentax, it's more that the Nikons and Canons have
more market appeal. These are the brands
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed
Subject: Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy
But here's another way to look at relative numbers -- there are still
more people in the world who aren't Moslem than people who are, and yet
the suicide-bombers (i.e., people blowing
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang
Subject: Dodophoto
An interesting exercise. Take two stuffed dodo models off to Mauritius,
photograph them in their natural setting, and stitch multiple shots
together. Strangely unsettling.
http://www.slate.com/id/2136049/?nav=ais
For
- Original Message -
From: Don Williams
Subject: Re: Religoon, Christ vs. the Other Guy
I don't believe you can apply 'probability
theory' to real numbers.
Mathmatics is an invention of man. Man made rules are applied to it.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell
Subject: Re: Religoon, Christ vs. the Other Guy
I know The Buddha existed. I've seen his tomb in three different
countries.
Travel does pay dividends. It's good to broaden ones horizons.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Jay Taylor
Subject: Heron In The Field
http://i.pbase.com/g3/87/63987/2/56113299.GBHinField.jpg
Nothing wrong with the composition, but youve ruined the bokeh with post
processing.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed
Subject: Re: Religon, Christ vs. the Other Guy
No.
Those who believe in a God can *answer* the question, not sidestep it.
Throughout human history, more rational people have believed in God, or
gods, than haven't. In all cultures.
I am not
At the last NorCal get together that I attended, Bruce showed one of his
photos made with the istD blown up to 16x20, or some other such large size.
Larger than the 13x19 or so which a lot of people print at. The print was
soft, and Bruce admitted so. It didn't look bad from a distance, but it
Tough question indeed. But i also think about it sometimes... I think
Jostein is so right saying: On the other hand, it's dangerous to
choose a recent shot, in case it's just a short-lived flame. Anyway,
currently my favourite shot of mine is this one from last summer:
I like the focus isolation of the aperture used. Nice image!
Jack
--- Jay Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure what this one was searching for in the middle of a grass
field; a rodent maybe? I always thought they did most of their
hunting
around the shorlines. This one was a good half
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Pentax Pre PMA announcment.
At the last NorCal get together that I attended, Bruce showed one of his
photos made with the istD blown up to 16x20, or some other such large
size.
Larger than the 13x19 or so which a lot of people
How often does the beer win?
frank theriault wrote, in part:
Do we get to have beer? I do my best arguing with beer.
1 - 100 of 383 matches
Mail list logo
