On 28/4/07, eric, discombobulated, unleashed:
See the results of Windex on a Macbook -
http://forum.insanelymac.com/lofiversion/index.php/t27618.html
LOL
cause --- effect.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 29/4/07, Digital Image Studio, discombobulated, unleashed:
Indeed, I'm a butter fan
Nice one Marlon ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
As promised yesterday, I have published some photographs, done in the early
morning light:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157600153149200/
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Your pecker looks a little soft, Paul, but the angle is about right.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
Sent: 29 April 2007 03:49
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: Mr. Downey
Shot a male downey
I haven't been able to access my gmail account via a web browser for a
couple of days now ( Temporary Error (502)). Not a real problem, as they are
still forwarding mail to my accesscomm account. Anyone else on gmail having
problems or are they just picking on me?
no problems yet from
On 4/28/07, Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've played around with this on film cameras. No way in hell will I risk
exposing aidigtal CCD to possible contamination like that. But if you
want to take things a step further - work with the real element.
Thats what the rebel xt is for
Some time ago there was a thread on A Better Bounce Card:
http://www.abetterbouncecard.com/
I tried this out a few days ago and they really do work well.
I still find the Gary Fong Lightsphere more versatile but at almost free
vs $49 the 'BBC' is a great option.
Here's a good source I found for
Hi Don.
I made one a few months ago, and agree, it works very well.
I found the foam at a local convenience store for $0.99 and used a
hair band from my daughters collection to secure it.
Dave
ps good to see you back on
On 4/29/07, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some time ago there
This guy sprayed windex and got it behind the screen. If you dampen a
cloth with it, it works fine. But so does water.
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 3:52 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 28/4/07, eric, discombobulated, unleashed:
See the results of Windex on a Macbook -
Hmm... I did not find the foam, but instead I went to Office Depot
(yes, we have such a beast in Israel ;-) ) and bought plastic envelope
for $1. I then cut out the bounce card and now I even have it in to
slightly different flavors because the sides of the envelope are
slightly different in
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907100
Resurrecting the WOW for a moment.:-).
I converted this shot from last weekend to BW using the Fotofusion
red filter(the ones P. Alling uses). Itt seems a bit flat to me,
specially the face looking flat, so i tried adjusting the curves in R,
G,
Makes for an interesting self portrait i suppose. I do like the gold hue to it.
Dave
On 4/28/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17435full=1
Please be honest and brutal.
Thanks.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Are you doing these in IR or adding the effect.
Either way this and the plane one are very good. I like the bright
foliage behing the tree to add depth, perspective, or what have you
Dave
On 4/23/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another from my walk in the park this past Saturday,
Boris, it bothers me that you are out of focus. I think you should
have focused on yourself and let the background go out of focus.
Bob
On 4/28/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=17435full=1
Please be honest and brutal.
Thanks.
Last year i did a custom WB on the istD, from sunny grass, and was
getting either a magenta or sepia tint to the photos. The camera went
in for repair, for faulty flash shots, and i re did the WB last
weekend. It did not give me the tint or exposure i received last year.
I did one with and one
I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141size=lg
This pose isn't quite as happy, and there's a bit of diffusion in his
wing feathers, probably caused by a foreground branch. But overall I
think it's better, but probably won't make the
On 29/04/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last year i did a custom WB on the istD, from sunny grass, and was
getting either a magenta or sepia tint to the photos. The camera went
in for repair, for faulty flash shots, and i re did the WB last
weekend. It did not give me the tint or
I agree this is better. I would try a left and top crop, however.
Obviously, I feel the limb is too dominant and after cropping, the top
would then need to be brought into balance.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
The grass was suggested from an IR website, and several others. It
seemed to work, but i'll try the white card.
Oh the Hoya R72
Dave
On 4/29/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/04/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Last year i did a custom WB on the istD, from
Thanks Jack. I'll have a look.
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:34 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
I agree this is better. I would try a left and top crop, however.
Obviously, I feel the limb is too dominant and after cropping, the top
would then need to be brought into balance.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist
On 29/04/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The grass was suggested from an IR website, and several others. It
seemed to work, but i'll try the white card.
Oh the Hoya R72
Sorry Dave I missed the IR reference. In this case I have no idea what
would be the best way to WB. I would tend
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141size=lg
Here's the previous pecker:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5905654size=lg
Hey, Paul, honestly both shots appear excessively noisy and quite soft
to
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lacus
Subject: Re: GMail problems
I haven't been able to access my gmail account via a web browser for a
couple of days now ( Temporary Error (502)). Not a real problem, as they
are
still forwarding mail to my accesscomm account. Anyone else on
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lacus
Subject: Re: GMail problems
I haven't been able to access my gmail account via a web browser for a
couple of days now ( Temporary Error (502)). Not a real problem, as they
are
still forwarding mail to my accesscomm
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
Most folks do confuse f-stop with aperture, I sure used to. However,
they are not the same thing. So you are mistaken here (I have not looked
at the Wikipedia article to see if it is correct or not).
I am not
On Apr 29, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Christian wrote:
Issues like this make me smile. In 3 years working for the evil-
AOL the
longest we've gone without being able to READ an email (not system
wide,
maybe 1/2% of all 14 billion emails we currently store; and certainly
not account access or
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/photos/147840234-L-1.jpg
I think this link should work.
It's a photo from yesterday. I think it's been re-sized and jpegged a
couple times by software so it looks a little different than the RAW but eh,
so what.
CW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Damn it!
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/photos/147840234-L-1.jpg
CW
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 11:20 AM
Subject: PESO: Not My House
I think this link should work.
It's a photo from yesterday. I think
In a message dated 4/29/2007 7:36:03 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
Most folks do confuse f-stop with aperture, I sure used to. However,
they are not the same thing. So you are mistaken
On 29/04/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was in San Francisco early this morning, climbed the hill to Twin
Peaks and captured this view ...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
===
While I liked this a
Both links seem to be identical, and they both worked for me by the way...
It's very cute.
cbwaters wrote:
Damn it!
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/photos/147840234-L-1.jpg
CW
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Sunday, April
Nice.
This is an old technique and still works well. I made this photo
posted in my PAW 2002 set about 25 years ago using it ... although I
used vaseline rather than butter...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW2/02.htm
Godfrey
Jens Bladt wrote:
I just had to try the old David
On Apr 29, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This is an old technique and still works well. I made this photo
posted in my PAW 2002 set about 25 years ago using it ... although I
used vaseline rather than butter...
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW2/02.htm
Vaseline,
Yeah, they're a bit noisy. I have to try to shoot at ISO 400. They're
off the monopod, but that's not much more secure than handholding.
Thanks for the feedback and the bird ID.
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:50 AM, Christian wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I replaced my soft Pecker with the next
On my way home from work my train goes past a football ground
(Millwall) and I see almost exactly that scene on a regular basis.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ralf R. Radermacher
Sent: 29 April 2007 18:35
To: Pentax
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8747755
As always, your comments and suggestions... :-)
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - updated Jan. 10, 2005
Contarex - Kiev
Sounds cool Boris, will the envelope 'roll down' like the foamie stuff?
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 7:50 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A Better Bounce Card, revisited.
Hi Dave, thought since there were no 100+ message threads involving
heated debates or character assasination at the moment, I might pop
in with a photography related message! ;-)
I've been scanning the threads all along but refuse to read/get
involved in the flame wars anymore.
Precious little
I downloaded the image - it is still in RGB. Either convert to LAB and
adjust the curve in the L (luminosity) channel only, then re-convert to RGB,
or (what will be as good as the R, G B channels are presently identical or
almost so) convert to Greyscale first and then adjust your curve. I
One more from the heron series, a pretty close portrait of
a blue heron concentrated on fish, not photographers :-)
http://www.dfsee.com/gallery/index.php?id=237
And an union, destined for our sunday salad that
showed some nice texture and colors:
The wall at the bottom-left, the silo and building at bottom-right break up
the unity of the image for me. Otherwise it's good.
Maris
Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8747755
As always, your comments and suggestions... :-)
--
PDML
Linko non worko.
Rick
--- cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://cwaters.smugmug.com/photos/147840234-L-1.jpg
I think this link should work.
It's a photo from yesterday. I think it's been
re-sized and jpegged a
couple times by software so it looks a little
different than the RAW
Sir graywolf,
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source ap·er·ture
(ap'?r-ch?r) Pronunciation Key
n.
1. An opening, such as a hole, gap, or slit.
2.
a.A usually adjustable opening in an optical instrument, such
as a camera or telescope, that limits the amount of light
passing
This is better.
Fully charged NiMH batteries in the K10D?? Or, did you
mean in the flash?
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141size=lg
This pose isn't quite as happy, and there's
The Heron pic is super. The union is an onion:-). Seriously, it's
quite nice as well, although the vegetable looks like it may be a bit
past its prime:-)).
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 2:28 PM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
One more from the heron series, a pretty close portrait of
a blue heron
LOL!!!
G
On Apr 29, 2007, at 1:42 AM, Bob W wrote:
Your pecker looks a little soft, Paul, but the angle is about right.
Paul Stenquist
Shot a male downey woodpecker at the nature center today. I also made
a very good deal with the same facility to sell and exhibit my
photos. Sort of a
Odd.
I've just now signed-up for this smugmug account so that may have something
to do with it.
P.J. said he could see it
He also said there was a link in my initial post (there WAS a link in the
email that left here). When it came back to me from the list, no link.
Wierdness.
CW
- Original
That may be the lousiest done infomercial I ever saw.
How you doing, Don? Long time no, read.
-graywolf
Don Sanderson wrote:
Some time ago there was a thread on A Better Bounce Card:
http://www.abetterbouncecard.com/
I tried this out a few days ago and they really do work well.
I still
Thanks Paul!
On Sun, 29 Apr 2007 14:39:59 -0400, Paul Stenquist wrote:
The Heron pic is super.
Thanks!
I was lucky with this one, it is in an area where they are somewhat
accustomed to people, and it felt quite safe between the reet.
A few minutes after this shot (taken from about 20 feet
Grass is a good sub for an 18% gray exposure card. It would not work for
color balance for obvious reasons. Of course with IR you are not
interested in color balance
-graywolf
David J Brooks wrote:
The grass was suggested from an IR website, and several others. It
seemed to work, but i'll
Paul,
I think the second looks a lot better for the sharpness in the head and beek.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/29/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I replaced my soft Pecker with the next frame.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5907141size=lg
Here's the
In a message dated 4/29/2007 10:31:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
obshell.com writes:
On Apr 29, 2007, at 12:51 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
This is an old technique and still works well. I made this photo
posted in my PAW 2002 set about 25 years ago using it ... although
Thanks, Bob.
Nice shot - nice song (from Grease - the one that I love, uh, uh uhh..
:-) ?
If you see/remember David Hamiltons fruit tree blossom shots - you will
understand :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig
On Apr 29, 2007, at 12:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like fake shallow DOF. Opening up the f-stop would seem
to be a lot
easier and a lot less messy. I guess I just don't get it.
A good soft-focus filter, the vaseline technique, a soft focus
specialized lens ... they're all
Colloquial usage does not apply to optical physics. Reading what someone
says does not mean it is true. Go do the experiments I suggested, then
it is your own knowledge you are going by.
-graywolf
Bob Blakely wrote:
Sir graywolf,
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source ap·er·ture
Yes it is. Look at it this way, if you set a 50mm at f/2.0 it has a 25mm
opening, now if you set a 100mm at f/2.0 it has a 50mm opening, but at
f/4.0 it has the same 25mm opening that the 50mm does at f/2.0. So, if
the magnification of your viewing image (print) is the same (which Bill
took
Yes, thats what i am doing,with the image editor, but, i was just
curious why after the repair, and redoing the custom WB I'm not
getting the same results.
I did some back yard experiments after lunch, and for WB i now have 3
settings Grass/Filter, Grass/No filter and white board no filter.
1
Or at least the second.:-)
It seems to work, and for a buck, WTF
Dave
On 4/29/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That may be the lousiest done infomercial I ever saw.
How you doing, Don? Long time no, read.
-graywolf
Don Sanderson wrote:
Some time ago there was a thread on A Better
- Original Message -
From: graywolf
Subject: Re: M85mm f2.0 bokeh
Yes it is. Look at it this way, if you set a 50mm at f/2.0 it has a 25mm
opening, now if you set a 100mm at f/2.0 it has a 50mm opening, but at
f/4.0 it has the same 25mm opening that the 50mm does at f/2.0. So, if
I've been in the office all afternoon doing some editing and more
textures photos, and got to fooling around, coming up with this:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/selfport.jpg
kind of odd.
and so is the photo.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
An exchange started yesterday at the Southern Maryland Celtic Festival,
by someone who saw me photographing the band that performed after us
with my K2:
You can't beat that Pentax.
[After checking which camera I was using] Well, I suppose, depending
on your tastes, you might beat it with a
Don,
I cutout the bounce card from some scrap packing foam I found at work.
It works just fine. Pictures on request.
Regards, Bob S,
On 4/29/07, Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some time ago there was a thread on A Better Bounce Card:
http://www.abetterbouncecard.com/
I tried this
Doug,
It's very Geman with all the mirrors,
and the mirrors in the mirror.
You could be a bit clearer.
Well done.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/29/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been in the office all afternoon doing some editing and more
textures photos, and got to fooling around,
On 29/4/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Your pecker looks a little soft, Paul, but the angle is about right.
Mark! (But you knew I would do that didn't you ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On 29/4/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've been in the office all afternoon doing some editing and more
textures photos, and got to fooling around, coming up with this:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/selfport.jpg
kind of odd.
and so is the photo.
I think it's about time we had
On 29/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21.htm
Comments and critique always appreciated.
===
While I liked this a lot, Godfrey, and said so, my eye puzzled over the
three faint squares above the first spire of the
On 4/29/07, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug,
It's very Geman with all the mirrors,
and the mirrors in the mirror.
You could be a bit clearer.
Thats the way he looked last year.:-)
Nicely layed out Doug
Dave
Well done.
Regards, Bob S.
On 4/29/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL
Can you post the curve at least.
I thought the filter might do the conversion, never thought to look,
but i quess not.
My other problem is printing it. On the 2400, its a bit darker than
the monitor, and its calibrated.
I have PS set to colour manage. Should i be doing it differently for BW
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/21.htm
Thanks for all the compliments and comments ... Some responses to
individual questions.
From: Joe Barnhart
... I see the shot was 1/20 sec with your DA70 -- tripod? I've
considered getting something like a combo walking stick/monopod
By jove I think you got it Paul !
FWIW - on my calibrated monitor, the spots on the wing have a slight
turquoise hue to them and the wing, a brownish hue. According to my bird
book the spots are white the wing is black.
Also your pecker is a Red-Bellied Woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus).
HTH
Well done Heron. Great subject light.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jan van Wijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Heron portrait and an union :-)
One more from the heron series, a pretty close portrait of
a blue heron concentrated on fish, not photographers :-)
Hi Bob.
I had a small piece of packing foam I used too, liked it so much
I went ahead and bought the 'foamie' stuff.
This seems to roll down, and recover from it, better than the packing
I had.
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bob
Still kickin'.
Just not as fast as I used to. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
graywolf
Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 2:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A Better Bounce Card, revisited.
That may be the lousiest
On Apr 29, 2007, at 6:35 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Also your pecker is a Red-Bellied Woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus).
Yes, and easily recognized by the complete lack of red on its belly.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'd like to upgrade to firmware v1.10 instead of more recent ones.
Anybody has it?
Andre
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My alternative better bounce card is a very large, white plastic
pill bottle that sits over the K10D and *ist DS flash head. Cost:
zero. Effectiveness: pretty ok if you want something like this.
It's kinda like having a soft bare-bulb flash on top of the camera.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
- Original Message -
From: André Langevin
Subject: Firmware 1.10
I'd like to upgrade to firmware v1.10 instead of more recent ones.
Anybody has it?
You can grab it from here:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/k10e110w.exe
I'l leave it there for a couple of days.
William Robb
--
http://www.alphoto.com/images/selfport.jpg
kind of odd.
-
Rather list-meisterly.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 4/29/2007 1:52:05 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been in the office all afternoon doing some editing and more
textures photos, and got to fooling around, coming up with this:
http://www.alphoto.com/images/selfport.jpg
kind of odd.
and so is
Uh huh.
I don't really know how to calculate DOF, never really understood it (yes, I
know there are cards and things). But I agree, I think we get so we
unconsciously aware. Like on a wide angle, I will figure with f/8 most things
will
probably be in focus. While with a long telephoto,
In a message dated 4/29/2007 3:10:19 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In the full rez print, there is quite a lot more detailing in the
distance that delivers the eastern end of the Bay Bridge as well as
more of the Oakland shore. Downsampling the image for the web
In a message dated 4/29/2007 7:14:55 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Issues like this make me smile. In 3 years working for the evil-AOL the
longest we've gone without being able to READ an email (not system wide,
maybe 1/2% of all 14 billion emails we currently
I was wondering if I said that:-) I meant in the flash of course. But
I'm old:-)).
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 2:40 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
This is better.
Fully charged NiMH batteries in the K10D?? Or, did you
mean in the flash?
Rick
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I replaced
HAR!
On Apr 29, 2007, at 7:51 PM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Apr 29, 2007, at 6:35 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Also your pecker is a Red-Bellied Woodpecker (Melanerpes carolinus).
Yes, and easily recognized by the complete lack of red on its belly.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I had to seriously f___ with the wing. It was real soft due to
diffusion caused by one of those G__ D___ tree branches. But that's
life in the woods. Thanks for the ID. Have to correct that. Although
I think I'll delete both pics they're just okay. But just okay is
sometimes just okay:-).
In a message dated 4/29/2007 10:39:49 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.fotocommunity.de/pc/pc/mypics/770012/display/8747755
As always, your comments and suggestions... :-)
Ralf
==
Very, very nice. Are those people really not bothered by being near
Hi Andre,
You can go the Pentax.de site and download that version. I did recently.
If you have a problem, email me off list and I will supply you with a copy.
Cheers,
Bob
- Original Message -
From: André Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007
Went out to do some street photography today. Shot another damn
bird:-). The DA50-200 of course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910039
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have had a similar problem.
My wife only uses AOL. (My fault - that is what I started her on, now
she is used to it.)
When she travels, she cannot send me an email whether to my AOL or
this account or any other. Unless she uses AOL webmail. She has no
problem sending to anyone else,
I have photographed my Stanley measuring device with a
Pentax K10D and a Tamron SP 2.5/90mm lens - at closest possible focusing
distance; 0.39 m. Is this macro?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/477746425/
Maybe not. My sensor is 23.5mm. This image covers appr. 47mm. This means
it's almost
A beautiful spring day in Michigan. My tulips are popping out all
over. Grace is pleased.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910081
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Macro is in the 1:2 to 1:1 range. Your Tamron does 1:2 (half life-size)
without the dedicated extension tube.
Microphotography is greater than 1:1 magnification. But that generally
requires bellows or a reverse mounted lens on a macro lens rather than
just a macro lens.
-Adam
Jens Bladt
Speaking of shooting birds, this one looks like a BB just got him/her
in the breast.
Really difficult to get both ends of a bird in focus. Either one or
both ends invariably protrude from the field.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Went out to do some street photography today.
Went out to do some street photography today. Shot another damn
bird:-). The DA50-200 of course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910039
-
Nice, Paul. I like the crop.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
A beautiful spring day in Michigan. My tulips are popping out all
over. Grace is pleased.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910081
-
Looks like you got down to knee level for this one. Nothing not to like.
Joe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Remember that the K10D's 1.10 update incited second curtain sync and
possibly wireless remote flash issues.
I have v1.20 installed now. Some folks on DPReview have reported
reduced noise with it.
Godfrey
On Apr 29, 2007, at 7:31 PM, Bob Rapp wrote:
Hi Andre,
You can go the Pentax.de
Macro is arbitrary. It's a photograph. Does it matter what you call
it?
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
I have photographed my Stanley measuring device with a
Pentax K10D and a Tamron SP 2.5/90mm lens - at closest possible
focusing
distance; 0.39 m. Is this macro?
Thanks Joe. Almost passed this one up in reviewing the days shoot.
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 11:04 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
Went out to do some street photography today. Shot another damn
bird:-). The DA50-200 of course.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910039
-
Nice, Paul.
Thanks again, Joe. Yeah, gotta get down to where the action is:-).
Paul
On Apr 29, 2007, at 11:05 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
A beautiful spring day in Michigan. My tulips are popping out all
over. Grace is pleased.
Paul
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5910081
-
Looks like
It's reasonable to consider reproduction ratios in approximately the
1:4 to 2:1 range as macro despite more specific definitions for
photomacography and microphotography.
Most lenses marked as Macro achieve 1:4 to 1:2 magnification ratio
without additional equipment. Some go to 1:1. For
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
