both are very nice. The muted colours are very attractive, but the
picture is more about content than anything else so not much is lost
without them.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bong Manayon
Sent: 12 January 2008 04:48
What a lovable little sweety you are. Ben 'Polyhead' Smith is just a
pseudonym, isn't it? You're really Dale Carnegie in disguise, giving
us all a masterclass.
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Polyhead
Sent: 12 January 2008
The shot is nearly full frame I cropped a bit from the right.
My wife and I were there in October but we went early (about an hour
before opening) and got in approx 30 mins after opening so it was
still a long wait. But it was worth the wait the place is just
amazing. I recently read that if
On Jan 12, 2008 7:02 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My Photos landing page, the page you land on from www.pnstenquist.com, has
only a small banner ad at the bottom. I had to look to see if there was
anything there. I couldn't recall. I pay the $25/year dues. That may make a
difference in
Hi Bong
I think both versions work but I have a slight preference for the colour
version.
Great title!
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Took this for
Color for this one. It's more a portrait than a picture of the
carriage. Were it the latter, I'd probably say BW. And the colors are
very attractive. They add interest.
Very nice work. Excellent.
Paul
On Jan 11, 2008, at 11:47 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Took this for my son's school which had
Doug,
I'm sorry, but even for a live and let live kind of guy I am, I have my
limits. Should PDML have a charter against really offensive posts? I
read a post from a PDMLer who has probably been blocked by most members.
But I have been lazy and have been letting them through.
In response to a
I don't know how you generate these. I just went to my landing page
again, and all I saw was a small banner ad for Pop Photo at the
bottom. Strange.
I couldn't live with flickr. I don't have time. It's far too slow.
Paul
On Jan 12, 2008, at 4:41 AM, David Savage wrote:
On Jan 12, 2008 7:02
From: Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/PatrickOFordweb.jpg
Technically excellent and a very emotive image. Thanks for sharing this with
us.
-
Email sent from www.virginmedia.com/email
Virus-checked
I was checking my bit bucket today and saw that message. Truley the
product of a twisted individual.
Gotta set up a filter Derby.
Cheers,
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 8:14 PM, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug,
I'm sorry, but even for a live and let live kind of guy I am, I have my
limits.
That's my point. You're a paying photo.net user most likely always
logged into the site.
Anyone who isn't a paying user sees the tacky adds.
There is a lot about Flickr I don't like, but it is ad free, and has
superior organisational capabilities compared to Photo.net.
However, I still prefer
Yeah, I went to the filter folder and saw it as well. He's a child,
trying to get a reaction. Misbehaving children are best ignored.
Paul
On Jan 12, 2008, at 6:56 AM, David Savage wrote:
I was checking my bit bucket today and saw that message. Truley the
product of a twisted individual.
Yes, if it's the moron I suspect it is, I'm not surprised.
His posts go straight to the deleted folder, unread.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I was
David Savage wrote:
I was checking my bit bucket today and saw that message. Truley the
product of a twisted individual.
Gotta set up a filter Derby.
Cheers,
Dave
Thanks Dave,
You are right. I was going to have a pleasant night replying to some
interesting photos, including yours.
I get it. But I think the public has become accustomed to banner ads
and pays scant attention to them. Most successful web sites have
them. As I said, they don't bother me. I'd like to have my own web
site in addition to the photo.net page and the Pentax Gallery, but I
just don't have time
G'day All,
While on my way to GFM last year, I took this during my stopover in
Vancouver (~150kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_040.htm
This was taken down along the sea wall where lots of construction was
taking place.
Any all comments welcome.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
Scott,
I understand about helmets. Never was too successful at getting the
kids to wear them...
Your picture is very appealing - the little girl, the bike, the
training wheels and the schoolyard.
I remember taking my kids over to the schoolyard to practice riding.
Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 11,
Yes, I've been quite happy snce setting up a filter to remove all his
posts. Regards, Bob S.
On Jan 12, 2008 6:08 AM, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, if it's the moron I suspect it is, I'm not surprised.
His posts go straight to the deleted folder, unread.
Cheers
Brian
Hi Dave,
The contrast is excellent, as well as the symmetry. I wonder though,
what it would be like without the people, they seem to get in the way
of the vanishing point where the lines converge.
Bong
On Jan 12, 2008 9:51 PM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
While on my way
You're right...I was looking at it as a documentary shot which is why
I even thought of the BW conversion. It's ultimately a
portrait...color it is then!
Thanks everyone!
Bong
On Jan 12, 2008 7:01 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Color for this one. It's more a portrait than a
Just thought I might show you the other end of the old Chevy in the
January PUG:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=belair6
Comments are always nice...
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
We have.
We just lower the baskets and place them on the ground, then flood the
ground to make ice.
:-)
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 3:02 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should think that Canada would have come up with a Snow based version
of Basketball by now...
David J Brooks wrote:
Hi Dave,
I have the 28-75 I had got it back in '04 for use on my film bodies.
It is a great lens on both film and the K10 you won't be disappointed.
Regards
Patrick
On Jan 12, 2008 3:33 PM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 1:52 PM, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Derby Chang wrote:
Doug,
I'm sorry, but even for a live and let live kind of guy I am, I have my
limits. Should PDML have a charter against really offensive posts? I
read a post from a PDMLer who has probably been blocked by most members.
But I have been lazy and have been letting them
Nice photo.
It does have a scale model feel toi it
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 4:12 PM, Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
(you'll have to supply your own bird)
small
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826229
Thanks all for your inputs.
I really don't give LR a proper work out,so maybe i'll try Godders
sugestion and se what that gives me. I have , some, space left on my
site for some small gallery pages.
I'll still have time on my hands for a few more weeks at least, so now
is a goo time to do this.
Another member showed me more off list. Thanks to all for alerting me to what
non-subscribers see. I'm not happy. I think I'll have to develop my own site.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I get it. But I think the public has
On Jan 12, 2008 9:51 AM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yeah, I went to the filter folder and saw it as well. He's a child,
trying to get a reaction. Misbehaving children are best ignored.
Paul
I agree with Paul. I hadn't seen his post until this morning.
Thanks for that, and thats what i'm hearing.
I don't have a good low light lens in K mount, but i really like what
the K10D produces and what to get a few more lenses in line with what
i have Nikon wise.
Its 1/2 the price of the 16-50 but quality is the most important thing
Dave
On Jan 12,
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yeah, I went to the filter folder and saw it as well. He's a child,
trying to get a reaction. Misbehaving children are best ignored.
Paul
I agree with Paul. I hadn't seen his post until this morning. Rarely
do I dig into the bucket to see if he's sent any drivel to
On Jan 11, 2008 1:52 PM, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with you there... otoh i;m not too interested in the awards
but more in what its real world performance is like.
I've been waiting for a good 70-200 f2.8 --- would go for a genuine
pentax offering if it was available
Like the lines in this.
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 8:51 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
While on my way to GFM last year, I took this during my stopover in
Vancouver (~150kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_040.htm
This was taken down along the sea wall where
Fins and chrome, Gotta love it.:-)
Nice grain
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 9:30 AM, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I might show you the other end of the old Chevy in the
January PUG:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=belair6
Comments are always nice...
- Toralf
--
PDML
It's a 1956 BelAir wagon.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toralf, that looks almost like a Nomad rear. Was it a station wagon?
If so I never know they made a wagon with the Bel Air
name.
Nice BW rendition. Is the grain added?
I will hold my tongue as to my thoughts on the sicko in question. I
guess it is time I filtered as well.
Walt
On 1/12/08, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug,
I'm sorry, but even for a live and let live kind of guy I am, I have my
limits. Should PDML have a charter against really
Works for me.
If you hadn't said where it was, due to the bright colours in
particular the colour of the water I would have sworn coastal resort
scene from some tropical region of the world :-)
As someone how has never been there, this is a city I only know
through television movies they have
Yes, the colour one. However the BW is good
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 9:25 AM, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right...I was looking at it as a documentary shot which is why
I even thought of the BW conversion. It's ultimately a
portrait...color it is then!
Thanks everyone!
Bong
Thanks Paul. Now that is a new one to me. I didn't know there was a BelAir.
In 69 I bought a Townsman Wagon. I guess that was the replacement name
for the BelAir and Nomad.
Walt
On 1/12/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's a 1956 BelAir wagon.
Paul
-- Original
Wonderful shot Walt.
The reflection is supurb
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 4:02 PM, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ran across this the other day.
I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
Gunners Mate who was killed in action in Vietnam. His heroic actions
won him
Nice Scott. I have some photos of Erin in similar poses.
Good one for the photo album.
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 8:27 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
Thanks Paul.
I'm a paid member as well, and only see small ads.
Goo to know. I'll work on photos fo rmy site and try LR or jalbum
Dave
On Jan 12, 2008 9:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another member showed me more off list. Thanks to all for alerting me to what
non-subscribers see. I'm
So, have you given up on digital then Scott.
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 6:24 PM, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, gang. I'm contemplating a portrait lens for the 645. I have no
foreseeable need for the leaf shutter on the 135, and both focal lengths
are acceptable. Plus, the 150 is a
On Jan 11, 2008 5:01 PM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I asked Carolyn about the how/where use of the screensaver and
received the following today:
Hi, Jack,
We hope to have the screensaver available for downloading in 2 weeks. I
will keep you posted.
Thanks,
Carolyn Pitcavage
I
Marvin approves.
Dave
On Jan 11, 2008 7:07 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not much more than just a snapshot. But what the heck.
Marvin got a new blanky, he's not sure he approves.
http://www.mindspring.com/~happydogsoftware/PESO%20--%20%20marvin'schristmas.html
Equipment:
Well composed, Toralf. Difficult exposure well handled, also.
Am somewhat surprised that f/8 gave you that DoF. Not knowing any
better, I would have set f/22 and probably sacrificed some resolution.
Jack
--- Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I might show you the other end of the
On Jan 11, 2008, at 5:27 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what
the
exposure was.
Both renderings work for me, but I find myself preferring the color
in this instance.
G
On Jan 11, 2008, at 8:47 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
http://www.bong.uni.cc/peso/2008-03.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
Scott,
Don't obsess about the slight curves--they're not
apparent unless one looks for them. Nice shot.
I'm wondering about the color--it has an antique
Kodachrome look to it. Is that intentional or a
scanning bug?
Rick
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is an early (for
Please excuse this misdirected post. Good morning!! Was meant for Post
No Bills.
Once owned a '56 Bel Air 4-door hard top that I'll bet is still running
and under full restoration.
BW, grainy mood, a matter of taste.
Jack
--- Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well composed, Toralf. Difficult
Dave, nice composition and exposure. Am somewhat surprised that f/8
gave you the needed DoF. I would have probably set f/22 and lost some
resolution.
Well done.
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
While on my way to GFM last year, I took this during my stopover in
Hmm... I like the lines and the contrast, but am not
sure what to do about the people. Either they should
be closer, so that more is happening in the frame, or
they shouldn't be there at all so that there is
nothing to interrupt the converging lines.
Rick
--- Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Toralf, that looks almost like a Nomad rear. Was it a station wagon?
If so I never know they made a wagon with the Bel Air
name.
Nice BW rendition. Is the grain added?
Walt
On 1/12/08, Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought I might show you the other end of the old Chevy in the
Anything to do with a misanthrope like that is automatically,
permanently deleted from my email, but his cretinous and vulgar crap
is recorded along everyone else's in the PDML Archives. Do you really
want such senselessly stupid spew associated with your name in the
archives?
This is one
David J Brooks wrote:
Nice Scott. I have some photos of Erin in similar poses.
Good one for the photo album.
Thanks, Dave. Much appreciated.
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/photo#5154394198121539746
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML
Dave - a couple of us are using Zenfolio. Several things I like about
it:
-no ads
-good selection of templates to use
-lots of flexibility to set up your own display design
-unlimited space
-on-the-fly rendering of photos to the max size possible given the
size of the viewer's browser
-you can
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/
photo#5154394198121539746
I like this a lot ... a great photo.
Thanks, Godfrey.
Who cares about a little bit of rectilinear distortion like that?
That lens was about all I used on the 645 while I had it on
David J Brooks wrote:
So, have you given up on digital then Scott.
Not so much given up, but rather given it the freakin' boot. ;)
(Kidding. Retract the claws already.)
Christie has the K100D and the 750z is still around. I'll reach for one
of those for random snapshots and chasing the
Bong: I prefer the color shot. Very, Very nice. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:47 PM
Subject: PESO: looking back...
Took this for my son's school which had
Dave: Yes, would much prefer the shot without the people. But everything
else? Excellent! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 7:51 AM
Subject: PESO: No Bills!!
Rick Womer wrote:
Scott,
Don't obsess about the slight curves--they're not
apparent unless one looks for them. Nice shot.
Thanks, Rick.
I'm wondering about the color--it has an antique
Kodachrome look to it. Is that intentional or a
scanning bug?
Yes! Correcting for the red
On Jan 11, 2008, at 1:02 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/PatrickOFordweb.jpg
Excellent photo.
I cannot look at that wall without something happening in my head.
Too much emotion tied up there, a pain that 40 years has not diluted.
Godfrey
--
PDML
Scott: I love the coloring, prefer the curve. Enjoyed seeing this. She's
a sweetie. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 7:27 PM
Subject: PESO - one of my first with
Toralf: Very nice. I like the grain. Good composition. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:30 AM
Subject: PESO - Bel Air (2)
Just thought I might show you the
Because they do have at least some real photographic skills.
On 1/11/08, Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If most PS users love power zoom then why is Manual Zoom a selling
feature of higher-end PS's. Most PS shooters I know actively hate
Power Zoom and it's imprecise control.
-Adam
On
Peter: The way they keep building in this town, there'll be no good
negative space left! Thanks for looking. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 3:20 PM
Subject: Re:
On Jan 12, 2008, at 7:48 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
http://picasaweb.google.com/sdloveless/MeganSNewBike/
photo#5154394198121539746
Who cares about a little bit of rectilinear distortion like that?...
I don't really mind the curvature. I guess if I was doing
architectural
photography
Walt: Meggs Field is about a mile a half south of Navy Pier, which would
be to the right of the frame. I greatly miss Meggs Field. There was
something wonderful about having it on the lake front, watching the planes
all. Though I heard it could be quite dodgy sometimes for the pilots on
On Jan 12, 2008, at 6:14 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Doug,
I'm sorry, but even for a live and let live kind of guy I am, I
have my
limits. Should PDML have a charter against really offensive posts? I
read a post from a PDMLer who has probably been blocked by most
members.
But I have been
Bob S: I now use the corner of a small envelope as a square-ruler to check
my verticals to help me make sure they are square. I'm not kidding. Glad
you liked it. Thanks for looking. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss
Paul: You can't swing a cat in this town without hitting a crane,
bulldozer, or hard-hat, but it's Chicago, it's home, I'm used to it, and I
still love it. Thanks for looking comments. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Doug: I have to say I'm greatly cheered by this action. I found the
comment very scary so disgusting. For me it crossed the line.
Thanks, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008
Graywolf: At first I thought that was a typo you meant Sin City I
thought to myself, yeah, well, lots of sin in Chicago. Nothing new there.
Everybody knows that, but then I thought I better Google the term just in
case, and, no, I don't take it too negatively. Thanks for looking.
Cheers,
Jack Davis wrote:
Please excuse this misdirected post. Good morning!! Was meant for Post
No Bills.
Ah. Right. I was going to ask how you knew about the f-stop, as I
couldn't find any info in the file myself, and didn't remember recording
anything (the file is a scan...)
But thanks for the
Walter Hamler wrote:
Toralf, that looks almost like a Nomad rear. Was it a station wagon?
Yes.
If so I never know they made a wagon with the Bel Air
name.
No idea if they did, I just went by the badge on the actual car (which
might have been added later; the car definitely looked like
Bruce: Thanks for looking your comments. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: PESO Well, they ain't the Canadian Rookies . . .
Very well done - I
Ann: When my husband started at Circle, they used to bus the students to
Navy Pier for gym class; a different kind of action than you mean of course.
I like the crane too. Thanks for looking your comments.
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Not to disagree with your thoughts Rick, but it appears to me that if
the people were not well down toward the far end, it would diminish the
infinity feel. And I wonder if the brightly lit lattice panel (looks
like) were exposed, it might, also, partially nullify the effect.(?)
Please understand,
Christine Aguila wrote:
Toralf: Very nice. I like the grain. Good composition. Cheers, Christine
Thanks!
- Toralf
- Original Message -
From: Toralf Lund [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:30 AM
Subject: PESO -
Doug: Sometimes when I look at this, I get the strong urge to reach my hand
deep into photo move those cars around like one might on a child's train
set. I can't really account for the effect. It's not a model. I shot this
from the balcony on the 27th floor of a building across the river.
Dave: Thanks for looking your comments. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 8:42 AM
Subject: Re: PESO Well, they ain't the Canadian Rookies . . .
Nice photo.
It
Kenneth: Well, if you ever do decide I can be reached at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Seriously though, thanks for looking.
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 10:30 PM
Subject: Re:
In a message dated 1/11/2008 1:13:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
or a South Pacific sunset, and certainly not majestic lighthouses, but--
(you'll have to supply your own bird)
small
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6826229
large
In a message dated 1/11/2008 1:06:02 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ran across this the other day.
I shot it back in the early to mid 80's. Patrick O. Ford was a Navy
Gunners Mate who was killed in action in Vietnam. His heroic actions
won him the Navy Cross.
In the
William: It's not a CGI, but it is a CGIV shot, that is, Christine Gets
Intense Vertigo when shooting from up high. I hate those high rise
balconies. I don't trust them one bit. But the wanna-be adventurist in me
paced herself got a few shots off. Thanks for looking comments.
Cheers,
In a message dated 1/12/2008 5:53:46 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
G'day All,
While on my way to GFM last year, I took this during my stopover in
Vancouver (~150kb)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_040.htm
This was taken down along the sea wall where lots
In a message dated 1/11/2008 8:48:11 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Took this for my son's school which had an educational field trip to a
historical site, so appropriately titled Looking Back (the kids are
sitting in a horse drawn carriage). Am torn between keeping
In a message dated 1/11/2008 5:29:08 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue
I was at Circle in those days, but just for one semester, Fall '66. I hated it.
Ended up doing undergrad work at Roosevelt.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Christine Aguila [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ann: When my husband started at Circle, they used to bus the
In a message dated 1/12/2008 8:21:16 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do yourself a favor and keep the profanities to yourself. You won't
come up with anything original, and you certainly won't impress
anyone, least of all me.
Doug
List God
===
Thanks, Doug.
Christine Aguila wrote:
Doug: Sometimes when I look at this, I get the strong urge to reach my hand
deep into photo move those cars around like one might on a child's train
set. I can't really account for the effect. It's not a model. I shot this
from the balcony on the 27th floor of a
Doug Franklin wrote:
The effect seems to be strongest on the lighter colors, too. The
strangest thing is that on the tower building on the left, the upper,
darker part looks like a regular photo. The black tower really doesn't
either. But the lower, lighter colored part of the leftmost
On 11/01/08, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is an early (for me) shot with the 35mm lens on the 645. It's
apparent that this lens likes to be level, which it wasn't in this
photograph. Anyway, P645, 35/3.5, E400X. I don't have a clue what the
exposure was.
In a message dated 1/10/2008 2:36:20 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is a link to some of my sports photos as a slide show..Joe
http://photo.net/photodb/slideshow?folder_id=707206
===
Very nice gallery, you have some great action shots, especially where
Dave: This shot was taken 9/9/07. I'd only had my K10D a few months.
Learning White Balance caused me great frustration. There were times when I
was so disgusted with my shots, I wanted to find the nearest rugby pitch and
drop-kick the wench (camera) over the goal post. But then came this
On 12/01/08, Derby Chang, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm sorry, but even for a live and let live kind of guy I am, I have my
limits. Should PDML have a charter against really offensive posts? I
read a post from a PDMLer who has probably been blocked by most members.
But I have been lazy and
Doug:
What does the histogram on that photo look like?
Well, peaky--or maybe spiky. Frankly, I don't know what information to look
at that would help you. I've got all the peaks and spikes centered. But I
like the shadow compression explanation.
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message
Marnie: Thanks for looking your comments. Greatly appreciated. Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2008 11:31 AM
Subject: Re: PESO Well, they ain't the Canadian Rookies . . .
In a message dated 1/11/2008
I tend to forget that yesterday for me was a long time ago
for some, especially when referring to computer games. It is
not my kind of image, but it is certainly a valid kind of
image if that was you intent. I could have also have said it
looks like a 1950's postcard, but that may be going
Over saturated colors, smoothed out detail, typical digital
image taken to the extreme. Someone on the list a long while
ago called it the cartoon effect, and that describes it
perfectly. All digital images have it to some extent or
another, but folks have gotten used to it and no longer
I do not understand about helmets.
About the only good thing that I see about them is that they
make some retailers a lot of money. About the only real
study as opposed to Emotional Crap done on bicycle helments
was in Britain, it basically said when you need a helmet
(car bike crash) the
1 - 100 of 213 matches
Mail list logo
