1. How long will it take for my hand to stop telling me the front &
back wheels are awkwardly placed after 4 years carrying a *ist-D?
2. Why does it have to be so big? [By the way, the K200D doesn't feel
significantly smaller in the hand.]
3. 23M .dng files, yow... maybe .pef would be more tract
On Mar 6, 2008, at 2:11 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> One of my favorite things about CDs, despite how "clinical, cold, and
> whatever" they are compared to the analog stuff is that they do NOT
> require:
>
> 1. isopropyl alcohol
> 2. Zerostats
> 3. Discwasher (tm) brushes
I take it you've
- Original Message -
From: "Owen LaPrath"
Subject: Re: K20D pictures
> The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots starting at
> iso1600.
> I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
> Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)
Like I said, it isn't there at 3200, 6400 is only a
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> If a K10D file is 16 megabytes, and a K20D file is 23 megabytes, that
> corresponds roughly to the difference between 10 megapixels and 14.6
> megapixels. Right?
Yeah, but the K10D file had a small JPG in it, too, which made those
file sizes variable as well. If they
D300 actually. The D3's incredible, but too big, too heavy and too
costly. My normal kit seems to be the 20/2.8 AF for almost everything
right now, with a 35/2 AI-S and 85/1.8 AI'd for the rest.
-Adam
On 3/5/08, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you bought a D3 or K20D. Go
Paul, thanks for the report. Do you mind a couple of questions?
For the DA 16-45, did you test the adjustments at more than one focal
length? Or just one (which one?)? How did that work?
Secondly, I assume you are shooting your chart at not too great a
distance. Does this give you the results y
The top image has that annoying banding I see in all K20d shots starting at
iso1600.
I have even seen it in iso800 shots!
Sorry, I'll stick with my K100d :)
later
Owen
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, 05 March
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer"
Subject: Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results
>I disagree, Paul. I was having a significant
> backfocusing problem on my K10D with all my lenses,
> which I corrected using the "hacked" firmware
> available on the web. Now things focus =muc
- Original Message -
From: "Owen LaPrath"
Subject: Re: more K20D autofocus adjustment results
>
> Frankly, with the K20d being the 9th Pentax dSLR model, autofocus,
> underexposure issues (the Dubai shots are UGLY), high ISO noise, and high
> ISO banding ought not to be a problem. Yet t
My understanding is that when Pentax added remote
flash support to the K10D firmware (version 1.2), they
had to take out the focus adjustment utility because
of limited camera memory.
They substituted software running on a PC to do the
job; it would be nice if that were generally
available.
I didn't do well today, but I did something.
The top picture is shot at ISO6400!!
With a 100% detail shot below.
The studio thing was a 30 second light set-up shot at iso 800, because i am a
dork sometimes.
Below it is a 100% detail as well.
None of the images recieved any post processing, o
All I can say is:
I am kicking myself for ever having wanted a K10.
Autofocus was a dissapoinmtent to say the least - no faster than the K100,
and actually less reliable!
After seeing a few K20d shots from Dubai, my K100d even compares favorably
for high ISO shots at iso3200, which I do a lot of.
I disagree, Paul. I was having a significant
backfocusing problem on my K10D with all my lenses,
which I corrected using the "hacked" firmware
available on the web. Now things focus =much= better,
though there is still a tiny variation between lenses.
I could not have done my recent macro shooti
This is an especially good (and big!) gallery.
My faves are "Micro Car", "Gum Emperor Caterpillar,"
"Leaf Skeleton" and its neighbor "Outlook", and
"Applelight".
No, Ken, I can't guess what it is; but I don't crave
an aperture simulator so it's no problem!
Rick
--- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Mar 4, 2008, at 10:07, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> I've put two samples up on Photo.net.
> They are basically DNG's converted to jpegs and compressed to 2-3
> megs.
> If you click on the photos you can go to a full sized image for each.
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=814433
>
> The t
I think focus adjustment is somewhat useless if it's not lens
specific like that of the K20D.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2008, at 9:15 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> My understanding is that when Pentax added remote
> flash support to the K10D firmware (version 1.2), they
> had to take out the focus adjustment uti
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 15:39:18 -0500
Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://pug.komkon.org/
thanks for putting it all together again Scott.
I finally managed to make a submission!
my favourite is Eyes by Tom Wannenburg black critters are so hard to
shoot.
Bran
--
PDML Pentax-Disc
My understanding is that when Pentax added remote
flash support to the K10D firmware (version 1.2), they
had to take out the focus adjustment utility because
of limited camera memory.
They substituted software running on a PC to do the
job; it would be nice if that were generally
available.
Rick
If a K10D file is 16 megabytes, and a K20D file is 23 megabytes, that
corresponds roughly to the difference between 10 megapixels and 14.6
megapixels. Right?
Paul
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:31 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
> William Robb wrote:
>
>> The DNG files are massive, varying from just under to j
The only fly in the ointment is that you really can't tell if a
camera/lens combination is spot-on until you compare the results to
other levels of adjustment. I suspect that it's more than a firmware
thing, but I could be wrong.
Paul
On Mar 5, 2008, at 8:04 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> On
If you're noticing it, it's off by a bunch. I don't know why Pentax
didn't adjust it properly. The adjustments I'm talking about here are
really fine tuning. I did notice the front focus on the FA 50/1.4,
which was off by -4 on the K20 scale. The other lenses seemed fine
before checking.
Pa
Most Canon flash units are pretty much limited to working with the
Canon bodies. You might consider a Metz flash unit with an
interchangeable dedicated module that would work on both.
I don't know the LX at all, but can't you just set the exposure time
you want to use manually along with the
William Robb wrote:
> The DNG files are massive, varying from just under to just over 23mb each,
> which is 7 mb larger
> than the K10 DNG files. I have no idea why there is a size variance though my
> K10 DNG files vary
> somewhat as well.
Probably due to the embedded JPG version of the imag
On Mar 5, 2008, at 15:12, AlunFoto wrote:
> Capstan, btw, bring my thoughts to something inside a tape
> recorder... :-)
>
Me too.!
Those were the days, cleaning the capstan and pinch-roller with 99%
isopropyl alcohol, trying trying TRYING to get the cassettes to play
without being all warb
On Mar 5, 2008, at 18:30, George Sinos wrote:
> Paul -
>
> Thanks for passing along the info. I know at least one other camera
> manufacturer is doing the same thing. It won't be long before it's a
> must have feature.
>
One wonders if there is an ice-cube's chance in hell of the K10D ever
ga
What's really frustrating is when it says 'out for delivery' all day,
and then switches to 'failed delivery - nobody home'.
Especially when you have been watching for it all day!
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sometimes I think that
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: more K20D autofocus adjustment results
> So far I've adjusted the FA 50/1.4, the FA 35/2 and now the DA
> 16-45/4. The 50/1.4 came in at -4. I retested to make sure. Same
> result: -4. The FA 35/2 came in at +2. Tonight I did the DA 1
In a message dated 2/25/2008 2:31:32 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
UPS man brought the K20D from Calumet Photo this afternoon...battery
is charging.
Initial impressions:
Huge 250 page instruction book - much worse that I remember for the K10D.
(30 page Quick Start bookl
Hum.
My K10D still does what i sent it in for, my Nikons are fine, what gives.
Dave
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So far I've adjusted the FA 50/1.4, the FA 35/2 and now the DA
> 16-45/4. The 50/1.4 came in at -4. I retested to make sure. Same
> re
Hey everyone. With my usual habit of lurking, I'd bet few of you noticed I
was missing, but the address I use for the PDML was pretty much dead while I
was still with my old website host, EZPublishing.com.
About a week ago I started the process of moving my site to my new host,
GoDaddy.com. A
Paul -
Thanks for passing along the info. I know at least one other camera
manufacturer is doing the same thing. It won't be long before it's a
must have feature.
I find it interesting that just a few years ago it would be unlikely
that we would have found these differences and even less likely
29% of 60 is a dam fine batting average.
Looks like Pentax is more of a hockey firm
LOL
Dave
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:46 PM, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per Carolyn today:
> If image only receives 0 - 29% positive votes out of 60 = Image auto
> declined. IOW, 0 - 17 yes votes.
>
Paul, Peter and Rick.
Yes i have tried it with the da 50 the 16-45 the 50-200. I just did a
few retests and its still BF
about 1/2 to a full CM.
Focusing on larger items like faces, buldings etc its fine, but when i
try close shots it is definetly BFing a lot.
I will DL my tests and post. Its go
So what do you use the hampster for, twist ties.
:-)
Dave
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 6:16 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "wendy beard"
>
> Subject: Re: Ivan
>
>
> > Haven't weighed him properly for a couple of months, but he's in the
> > regi
So far I've adjusted the FA 50/1.4, the FA 35/2 and now the DA
16-45/4. The 50/1.4 came in at -4. I retested to make sure. Same
result: -4. The FA 35/2 came in at +2. Tonight I did the DA 16-45/4,
and as I suspected, it was closer to dead on at just +1 adjustment.
I simply do a series of sho
Paolo Vercesi wrote:
> I really appreciate any critique or comment on this photo:
>
> http://picasaweb.google.it/paolo.vercesi/20080302IsolaDellaCona/photo#5173230268807381794
Very nice, Paolo. Great first post. I love the empty look of the
landscape around the horses ... like they're the onl
Wow, thanks!
I totally wasn't expecting anybody to like it much.
CW
- Original Message -
From: "Rebekah" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: March PUG is up
> What a great PUG! I think the Black and White EQ is my fav
- Original Message -
From: "wendy beard"
Subject: Re: Ivan
> Haven't weighed him properly for a couple of months, but he's in the
> region of 21Kg and just over 24" at the shoulders. He's only just 10
> months old (on the 8th) so he's still got some growing to do. I don't
> think he's
Sounds like you bought a D3 or K20D. Good on ya. I still use ISO 400
and get the results I need to get. I already have a Summilux-D 25mm f/
1.4 ASPH for ultra low light with the Panny and Oly bodies. I do a
lot of available light shooting with the Nikkor 20/3.5 at present
too. If I need a fa
- Original Message -
From: "Micah B. Kleit"
Subject: Re: Is there anything more distracting than "Out for Delivery"?
> It beats DHL;
A friend of mine works for DHL.
Apparently, it is an acronym for Driver Hopelessly Lost.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I put two more sample photos out there.
Click DETAILS below the photo for aperture/shutter speed/iso.
Click LARGER for full size jpegs of 2-3 megs.each.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7022571
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7022563
Regards, Bob S.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
- Original Message -
From: "jtainter"
Subject: K20D Misfocusing
>
> I suspect that I have a defective K20D, and that I have to send it to Pentax.
You've had it for such a short time, you should be able to do an over the
counter exchange if it
is defective.
William Robb
--
PDML Pe
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: PPG Brain Damaged Voting System
>
>
>> I stopped looking at the thing when they decided that judging by
>> incompetents was de rigeur.
>
> I stopped looking when I realized that my photos would never get voted in.
I love it w
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Loveless"
Subject: Re: It's here!!
>>
> God, you're weak.
I know.
It sucks, it really does.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On Sat, Mar 1, 2008 at 12:52 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I stopped looking at the thing when they decided that judging by
> incompetents was de rigeur.
I stopped looking when I realized that my photos would never get voted in.
:-)
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois
1/8 second and sharp is a big deal... Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Charles Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I went walking at lunchtime to make sure that the darned thing
> works. It seems to!
>
> Most shots taken with the kit lens, then I popped the Tamron on for
> the
Just bought one at Lens & Shutter in Vancouver. K20 available as
body-only. K200 only in kit form. -T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
> >
> > Capstan, btw, bring my thoughts to something inside a tape
> recorder... :-)
> >
> > Jostein
>
> Yep - same word. That's because the two variants function in much
the
> same way - both are roughly cylindrical devices which, by rotating,
> assist in moving a linear object passing over t
Return. The lazy b*ds need to get it right, and
test it before they send it back to you.
--- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:36 AM, P. J. Alling
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's not the lens, you focusing screen and "film"
> plane don't agree.
> >
I went walking at lunchtime to make sure that the darned thing
works. It seems to!
Most shots taken with the kit lens, then I popped the Tamron on for
the last few.
It seems to me like it's working just fine. I'm pleased. Nice
responsiveness, great user interface (really prefer to the D
On Wed, Mar 05, 2008 at 10:12:47PM +0100, AlunFoto wrote:
>
> Capstan, btw, bring my thoughts to something inside a tape recorder... :-)
>
> Jostein
Yep - same word. That's because the two variants function in much the
same way - both are roughly cylindrical devices which, by rotating,
assist i
I think I remember the photo. However the archives are not complete. I
don't have any real solution to the problem of looking for it unless the
person who took it responds.
Amita Guha wrote:
> This is going to sound weird, but does anyone remember a photo in a
> previous PUG of two ladybugs ma
...a cleat is different again.
Similar function, but different form.
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 5:27 AM, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Very definitely not a capstan, which is a large winch-like device.
> Cleat or bollard would be most likely correct.
>
> -Adam
>
>
>
> On 3/
Really great colours and I like the way the old girl is heading off into the
sunset (literally and metaphorically)
But I'm going to be picky. The horizon slopes to the right just slightly but
noticeably and the centre is very cluttered with all of those small boats.
Probably wouldn't be s
What a great PUG! I think the Black and White EQ is my favorite.
Kenneth, looks like you've got a car's headlight or taillight on your
picture there :)
Derby, how did you get that adorable child to hold so still? What a
great focusing job. And I love the Mirco Car, Andy :) The lighting
on the
Very nice series, Wendy.
Together they come across as a study you really concentrated on, while at it.
Hope I'm right... :-)
I mean, if it's produced as just a whim I'll hate you in the P.J. way. :-)
Best,
Jostein
2008/3/4, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just for a change (for me anyway)
> S
This is going to sound weird, but does anyone remember a photo in a
previous PUG of two ladybugs mating on a flower? I want to show it to
a friend of mine. I just spent some time digging around the archives
and couldn't find it.
Thanks,
Amita
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http:/
Thanks, I'll give it another go straight away. :-)
Jostein
2008/3/5, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I used the Contact Us link on their Artist's Pages. Used it many times
> and have always received a response.
>
> Jack
> --- AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for querying, Jack.
Looks like those two on the left have swallowed both bait, hook and line... :-)
Jostein
2008/3/5, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Billy was our scoundrel helo pilot :-)
> He was always pulling some wild storey out of thin air!
>
> Walt
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Ant
Hi Susan...
Or Jens?
Jens as in Bladt?
Slightly confused,
Jostein
2008/3/5, Susan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Or capstan
> Regards
> Jens
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
> Doug Brewer
> Sendt: 5. marts 2008 19:52
> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mai
Thanks a big heap, folks!
These terms are hard enough to figure out in my own language. After
some google shovelling I have sort of gathered that it's called
"pollart" in Norwegian. I would guess that's a Norwegianised form of
the English word.
Capstan, btw, bring my thoughts to something inside a
Scott,
A throughly enjoyable gallery! More comments later...
Thanks, Bob S.
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://pug.komkon.org/
>
> 33 very nice photographs. Only one shot on film, which is the lowest
> film to digital ratio I recall seeing. There
I used the Contact Us link on their Artist's Pages. Used it many times
and have always received a response.
Jack
--- AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for querying, Jack.
>
> Btw, did you contact her via the webform or directly to her email
> address? I've been trying to reach them la
Thanks for querying, Jack.
Btw, did you contact her via the webform or directly to her email
address? I've been trying to reach them lately by the webform and get
an error message back from the webserver.
Jostein
2008/3/5, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Per Carolyn today:
> If image only rece
Billy was our scoundrel helo pilot :-)
He was always pulling some wild storey out of thin air!
Walt
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/Antarctic-Brook.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pl
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Nice gallery, not a lot of real macro. Mine would have fit right in,
> but I didn't think a simple close focus shot would do...
That's why it was called "Macro AND Close Up". ;)
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 5/3/08, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>http://pug.komkon.org/
Superb gallery - outright best for me is Leaf Skeleton by David Dixon.
The rest are excellent.
And Daddy has a nice girl :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http:
I do shoot a lot more really low-light stuff than you do, so the
aperture combined with the ISO1600 limit on the E-410/420 would be an
issue for me. Heck, I run out of room shooting f2 lenses at ISO3200
(My new limit of 6400 is very nice for low-light work).
I agree that 20mm would be nicer, but a
Thanks, Frank.
Also thanks to Paul and Scott.
frank theriault wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>a few shots of stuff you don't usually see from me:
>>
>> http://photos.drivingtheflies.com/index.php?page=album.7
>>
>>
>
>
> Great stuff, Doug!
>
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Taylor"
Subject: K20D PEF Files On a Mac?
> Does anyone know how to convert PEF files to DNG's? I can't get the
> freakin' Pentax software to install on my Mac.
> Lightroom can't read em, nor can PS3/Bridge or Bibble.
Time for a PC?
HAR!!
William Rob
Nice gallery, not a lot of real macro. Mine would have fit right in,
but I didn't think a simple close focus shot would do...
Scott Loveless wrote:
> http://pug.komkon.org/
>
> 33 very nice photographs. Only one shot on film, which is the lowest
> film to digital ratio I recall seeing. There
Hi all,
I'm following this mailing list since a couple of months, and this is
my first post.
I really appreciate any critique or comment on this photo:
http://picasaweb.google.it/paolo.vercesi/20080302IsolaDellaCona/photo#5173230268807381794
taken a couple of day ago with a K100D and Samsung 50-
The lens looks great! I don't consider f/2.8 to be too slow, but I'd
prefer a 20mm rather than 25mm.
Godfrey
On Mar 5, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0803/08030501olympuse420.asp
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listin
http://pug.komkon.org/
33 very nice photographs. Only one shot on film, which is the lowest
film to digital ratio I recall seeing. There are also a LOT of 3rd
party lenses involved. So, a few firsts, I guess.
I'll have next month's submission form (Portraits!) up later tonight.
Enjoy.
--
Quite nice, David. I'll look at it again when I'm back on my desktop
machine but here on the laptop it seems just a little bit on the dark
side in the Zone II-V range.
Godfrey
On Mar 5, 2008, at 5:24 AM, David Savage wrote:
> Fremantle was the last Australian stop of the QEII's farewell voy
Very definitely not a capstan, which is a large winch-like device.
Cleat or bollard would be most likely correct.
-Adam
On 3/5/08, Susan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Or capstan
> Regards
> Jens
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
> Do
Ok. You must be getting a comission from Pentax. ;+}
I thought I could resist, but I'm not sure based on your great results
you.ve posted so far.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PESO: Another K20D Pic
> After abo
Or capstan
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Doug Brewer
Sendt: 5. marts 2008 19:52
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Need help with maritime terminology
looks like a cleat
AlunFoto wrote:
> Dear gang,
> Can someone pleas
Joe,
I get the exact same behavior with my DA* 16-50 on my new K10D when the lens
is set at 16mm. At longer focal lengths, the lens focuses just fine out to
infinity.
Interestingly enough, 2+ meters is the hyperfocal distance for a 16mm lens
set at F5.6 and a circle of confusion of 0.02mm accord
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:17 AM, jtainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I mount the DA* 16-50 F2.8 on the K20D and focus on something far away,
> the autofocus will move the focus point to just short of the 2 m. mark. It
> won't focus to the infinity mark. If I manually focus to infinity, dist
Per Carolyn today:
If image only receives 0 - 29% positive votes out of 60 = Image auto
declined. IOW, 0 - 17 yes votes.
If image receives 30 - 100% positive votes out of 60 = Images is
reviewed by Pentax team. IOW, 18 - 60 yes votes.
The 60 vote criteria is the result of a recent raise fro 40.
I,
Hi all,
First of all, many thanks for all of you, for your kind advices.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bienvenue, bemvindo, or whatever.
>
"Benvenuto" it's ok ;)
> Do you live in the Camargue? By a strange coincidence I was thinking
> about the Camargue la
Well those look a little healthier than the ones in the garden...
Nice work Wendy.
Cheers,
Dave
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:15 AM, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just for a change (for me anyway)
> Some flower pics
>
> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/gerbera
>
> K10D Sigma 180/3.5 mac
or a bollard?
Paul
On 5 Mar 2008, at 18:51, Doug Brewer wrote:
> looks like a cleat
>
> AlunFoto wrote:
>> Dear gang,
>> Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
>> thingy in this image?
>>
>> http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jostein
It's called a Bollard.
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 3:45 AM, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear gang,
> Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
> thingy in this image?
>
> http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
looks like a cleat
AlunFoto wrote:
> Dear gang,
> Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
> thingy in this image?
>
> http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg
>
> Thanks,
> Jostein the landlubber
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
Dear gang,
Can someone please tell me the English name of the orange-coloured
thingy in this image?
http://www.alunfoto.no/temp/20070616-0037_lzn.jpg
Thanks,
Jostein the landlubber
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
h
The autofocus adjustment will only alter the relationship of the lens to the
focal plane. In other words, you can't choose to adjust one end of the focal
length range and not the other. I don't own that lens, so I can't tell you if
it's a problem on my camera, but my DA 16-45 and DA 50-200 seem
Thanks Jens.
-- Original message --
From: "Susan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Brillinat Shot, Paul
> Regards
> Jens (Denmark)
>
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sendt: 5. marts 2008 19:03
When I mount the DA* 16-50 F2.8 on the K20D and focus on something far away,
the autofocus will move the focus point to just short of the 2 m. mark. It
won't focus to the infinity mark. If I manually focus to infinity, distant
parts of a scene noticeably sharpen up. If I zoom to 50 mm, the lens
WOW.
I was thinking maybe I'd skip the upgrade this time.
I do like my K10D a lot. Except for low light shots - only ISO 1600
available.
Perhaps I will after all :-)
Regards
Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 5. m
Have you tried it with more than one lens? You might have a lens that doesn't
focus correctly. My focus adjustments on the K20 have indicated that there is
variation from one lens to the next.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brillinat Shot, Paul
Regards
Jens (Denmark)
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 5. marts 2008 19:03
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: PESO: Another K20D Pic
After about 300 shots I'd have to say the new sensor i
After about 300 shots I'd have to say the new sensor is a very substantial
upgrade over the K10D's CCD. The noise reduction is amazing, but the image
quality in bright light at low ISO appears to be considerably better as well in
terms of detail and maybe even dynamic range, although the latter
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 3:15 PM, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just for a change (for me anyway)
> Some flower pics
>
> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/gerbera
>
> K10D Sigma 180/3.5 macro
> (warning: the first 4 in the gallery are Canon shots)
Gorgeous!
cheers,
frank
--
"Sharpnes
P. J. Alling wrote:
> The plane of focus at the focusing screen and at the sensor should be
> the same otherwise why have a focusing screen. Send it back to Pentax
> with a stiff note describing the problem and telling them you want it
> fixed. They can't just adjust the software, the focusing
The plane of focus at the focusing screen and at the sensor should be
the same otherwise why have a focusing screen. Send it back to Pentax
with a stiff note describing the problem and telling them you want it
fixed. They can't just adjust the software, the focusing screen is out
of alignment
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:36 AM, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not the lens, you focusing screen and "film" plane don't agree.
> You need to have that fixed...
Well, the initial testing from my recently returned K10D, suggests
that what ever they did, did not work.
To accept as
On Mar 5, 2008, at 10:43, Scott Loveless wrote:
> William Robb wrote:
>> My K20 is here!
>>
>> William Robb
>>
> God, you're weak.
>
My K10 is here!
(and I'm weak, too - but happy)
-Charles
--
Charles Robinson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Minneapolis, MN
http://charles.robinsontwins.org
--
Very interesting. Pixelpeepers heaven! My LBA shortlist is now even shorter.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:12 PM, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.pixel-peeper.com/
>
> William Robb
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
