Impressive indeed, David. I'd try the .mov if you upload it somewhere...
How far are the shots spaced?
LF
David Savage escreveu:
G'day All,
Another from my trip to Karijini National Park, taken on the final night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/3531464204/
The 239, 30 second
It would take a certain type of person to want their wedding shot with
that equipment.
frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Doug Franklin
jehosep...@mindspring.com wrote:
Christian wrote:
So, as with photography, the skills of the chef/photographer matter a
lot,
On 15/5/09, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Another from my trip to Karijini National Park, taken on the final night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/3531464204/
The 239, 30 second exposure, images that make up this sequence were
shot over 4 hours. At which point the freshly
Very interesting, and very well done.
Thank you for sharing it with us.
Dan
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 15/5/09, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
Another from my trip to Karijini National Park, taken on the final night:
I lover the tiger image. Very nice shot.
Dan M
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 6:16 PM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Liz and I had another charter to the Toronto Zoo today. Great day,
sunny and warm.
http://photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=911374
I know the back ground in the
Thanks.
The self portrait was from my very first roll in a Pentax. I had
just purchased the Spotmatic, and loaded it with firm. I took a few
shots from the aircraft -- nothing special. on the way home, I
decided to finish the roll. I adjusted the rear view mirror and the
camera so I could see
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:41:17PM -0400, Bruce Walker wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:05:01PM -0300, Luiz Felipe wrote:
others - very interesting. Light seems harsh in some others...
Larry, that was what struck me about these too, I'm afraid. If roses had
eyes, in
On 5/14/09, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd love to do a whole wedding with a Holga or a Lomo...
I do believe, sir, that you are a genius.
--
Scott Loveless
Cigarette-free since December 14th, 2008
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks, Frank.
I submitted more than 12 before I got some in -- a lot more than 12.
First, I submitted my favorite images: all rejected. Then, I
submitted the ones that had received positive feedback here or on
another forum: all rejected. Then, I submitted my prettiest
images: all rejected.
G'day All,
Another from my trip to Karijini National Park, taken on the
final night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/3531464204/
The 239, 30 second exposure, images that make up this sequence were
shot over 4 hours. At which point the freshly charged battery ran out
of juice
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/14/09, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd love to do a whole wedding with a Holga or a Lomo...
I do believe, sir, that you are a genius.
Or completely crazy.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 7:31 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I can see why spokeheads, once smitten when young, will always be
spokeheads. That is a very pleasurable photograph.
Thanks, Derby, and thanks to everyone who looked and commented!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
2009/5/14 Graydon o...@uniserve.com:
Magnesium is important in proper nerve function; maybe it's supposed to
help with resolve?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithium_pharmacology
Cheers
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 12:24 AM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
Excellent grab, Frank. Panning, composition, rendering all great, but
what's really great is the expression on the cyclist's face. Cheers,
Christine
Thanks, Christine.
I love the kid's smile, too. But I also
I'll go along with Christian, I haven't been able to look at the
display, it loads to slowly,.bit I trust his judgment...
Christian wrote:
Much like my ex-wife, I hate you more and more every day, Savage.
that is too f-ing cool.
Post a link to the original .mov file.
--
--
The free man
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:39 PM, P. J. Alling p_all...@hotmail.com wrote:
I'll go along with Christian, I haven't been able to look at the display, it
loads to slowly,.bit I trust his judgment...
Trust me, you'll hate him even more than you did already...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 9:10 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Thanks David.
I like it. The near silhouette works well, but there's enough detail to
catch the exuberance of his face. I would crop out enough of the left to
eliminate that messy bit of business over there. I'd
Congrats!
... and wasn't that you, who wanted to buy some Tamron... ;)
DA*60-250 is expensive lens and worth of every penny. Yesterday I made
some direct comparisons with DA*50-135 (my favorite zoom so far!) and
now it seems that I'll sell my DA*50-135.
BR, Margus
paul stenquist wrote:
It
Finally finished loading. Damn...
Christian wrote:
Much like my ex-wife, I hate you more and more every day, Savage.
that is too f-ing cool.
Post a link to the original .mov file.
--
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin
Oh, someone would have lied to me? ;)
Anyway, those plastic guys will have to look elsewhere...
U sure u don't mean Lithium? :-)
Jostein
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user
Well that's what I was asking for a couple of years ago, LX frame rate
with a 20~40 frame raw buffer. Now I'll have to consider it. :-\
Thibouille wrote:
How many FPSs', can you give a ball[park figure, say LX with drive speed or
Canon EOS 1D Mark III speed. Somewhere in between? Faster
Your going to need an angel to help you on this one. The DA 12-24
sells for $260 more than the DA 10-17 at BH.
I see. Perhaps someone with an older copy of the lens won't mind so
much.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
http://www.cafepress.com/calemp
http://www.cafepress.com/neovenatorphoto
- Original Message -
From: Margus Männik
Subject: Re: DA* 60-250 arrived
Congrats!
... and wasn't that you, who wanted to buy some Tamron... ;)
DA*60-250 is expensive lens and worth of every penny. Yesterday I made
some direct comparisons with DA*50-135 (my favorite zoom so far!)
2009/5/14 P. J. Alling p_all...@hotmail.com:
Apparently two years in my kill file weren't long enough either, you still
don't know how to take a joke.
Har.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I believe the gentleman is referring to the composition of the body of
the K7. But I doubt the exterior skin is made of same.
On May 14, 2009, at 10:31 , AlunFoto wrote:
2009/5/14 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
Mmm anybody needs to take some magnesium pills? ;)
U sure u don't mean
No idea if it's possible to make the shutter re-cock mechanism
independent of the mirror-return mechanism. That's what it reqires,
though...
Jostein
2009/5/14 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
It seems to me that it should be possible to expand dynamic range by
firing off two (or three) frames on
2009/5/14 Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com:
I believe the gentleman is referring to the composition of the body of the
K7. But I doubt the exterior skin is made of same.
You mean as in lick a camera for dietary supplement? :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
Electronic control of the shutter independent of the mirror is probably
easier to implement than mechanical control. It wouldn't need tight
tolerances between what are essentially separate mechanical subsystems.
I kind of thought that might already be the case.
AlunFoto wrote:
No idea if
2009/5/14 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
David Savage wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/3531464204/
you suck
Yep. Bet he snores too.
Hate you, Savage. Now 25% more.
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Video cameras don't have mechanical shutters at all, though. :-)
Jostein
2009/5/14 P. J. Alling p_all...@hotmail.com:
Electronic control of the shutter independent of the mirror is probably
easier to implement than mechanical control. It wouldn't need tight
tolerances between what are
Nor does the K20 when in Burst Mode.
When shooting in RAW, you should be able to get HDR from a single shot
in post by creating two or three versions from the RAW data, each
taking advantage of the limits of the RAW data high and low, then
combining them using Photoshops HDR.
Have you
If you took any pix of exact same subject and lighting and aperture and
focal length
with both we would love to see them.
JC O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom - Thomas Jefferson
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Christian,
I never thought I'd say this but...I'm going to blog this ad :-) Due
credit will be given to you, of course.
As for Calphalon lenses, I've never used them (or even heard of them),
but if they were rebadged Cosinas I bet they were pretty good.
Cheers,
--M.
--
I've always found mine useful for warming up 40-year-old single malt whisky
while cycling around in bespoke Harris Tweed cycling wear on my Cervelo
custom-built titanium penny-farthing.
Bob
We have the original, hard anodized uncoated Caphalon pans. They're
over twenty years old now and
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I've always found mine useful for warming up 40-year-old single malt whisky
while cycling around in bespoke Harris Tweed cycling wear on my Cervelo
custom-built titanium penny-farthing.
Cervelo doesn't make ti.
cheers,
frank
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
I've always found mine useful for warming up 40-year-old
single malt whisky
while cycling around in bespoke Harris Tweed cycling wear
on my Cervelo
custom-built titanium penny-farthing.
Cervelo doesn't make ti.
On the other side of the link one of the stupider products I've ever seen...
http://gizmodo.com/5252291/the-study-ball-enslaves-your-lazy-kids
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
drinking; he can ruin himself with gambling. If he does he is certainly a
Made this morning ...
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2230/3532016184_44e6330361_o.jpg
Morning Paper - Palo Alto 2009
Panasonic G1 + Olympus G.Zuiko 40mm f/1.4
ISO 100 @ f/2.8 @ 1/30 sec
flickr.com page: http://www.flickr.com/photos/gdgphoto/3532016184/
Comments always appreciated.
BTW, you
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:55 PM, P. J. Alling p_all...@hotmail.com wrote:
On the other side of the link one of the stupider products I've ever seen...
http://gizmodo.com/5252291/the-study-ball-enslaves-your-lazy-kids
It'll build the kids' biceps and pecs as they carry it out the door...
Okay,
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
it's a very exclusive one
Ah, so it's their ~limited edition~ penny farthing...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
There is a reason why K20D reduce the number of pixels recorded for
burst mode. I would take an amazing bandwidth to gulf down a full
monty of mpix.
But you know, I really don't know the tech magic anyway. I just kinda
suspect that if it was easy, all the cams would have had it already.
I don't
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
Made this morning ...
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2230/3532016184_44e6330361_o.jpg
Morning Paper - Palo Alto 2009
Panasonic G1 + Olympus G.Zuiko 40mm f/1.4
ISO 100 @ f/2.8 @ 1/30 sec
flickr.com page:
It's a joke.
Jostein
2009/5/14 P. J. Alling p_all...@hotmail.com:
On the other side of the link one of the stupider products I've ever seen...
http://gizmodo.com/5252291/the-study-ball-enslaves-your-lazy-kids
--
The free man owns himself. He can damage himself with either eating or
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
it's a very exclusive one
Ah, so it's their ~limited edition~ penny farthing...
Yes. Racing model.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:49:12PM +0200, AlunFoto wrote:
There is a reason why K20D reduce the number of pixels recorded for
burst mode. I would take an amazing bandwidth to gulf down a full
monty of mpix.
I'm certainly not looking for a big burst, just 2-3 frames.
But you know, I really
The autofocus is very close, so I don't think I'll adjust it. It appeared
to be right on at 60mm and registered a wee bit of front focus at
250mm.
Congratulations on getting the lens.
Pentax's recommendation for AF testing with a zoom lens is to do
it at an intermediate focal length. But it
According to Gizmodo it's a real product...
Not available on the vendors site, though they do have it advertised...
AlunFoto wrote:
It's a joke.
Jostein
2009/5/14 P. J. Alling p_all...@hotmail.com:
On the other side of the link one of the stupider products I've ever seen...
ideally, really good zoom lenses dont change focus when zoomed in or
out. I guess this
is a separate issue from AF focus errors vs focal length. I still dont
understand
why these pentax cameras dont auto focus all the lenses the same when
the
af sensing is in the body. The AF bodies need
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:14:34PM -0700, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Have you tried the HDR Digital Filter in the K20 yet? Page 194-196
I don't think that it is real HDR, but rather the faux HDR from a
single raw.
--
The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post
the
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:23:25PM -0700, Larry Colen scripsit:
I'm not looking for tonemapping. Last night I was trying to shoot the
sunset while overlooking the Santa Clara Valley. I could expose on the
sky, or on the valley, but not both. It is a perfect case of where two
shots, several
The one with the photograph on the ground speaks volumes.
Dave
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com wrote:
http://www.drivingtheflies.com/?p=1214
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Good contrast between patio stones, and very good placements of the
living elements.
Dave
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:56 PM, Marco Alpert ma...@alpert.com wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo07/peso12.html
Comments, as always, welcomed.
-Marco
---
Web:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:04 PM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/5/14 Doug Brewer d...@alphoto.com:
David Savage wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/3531464204/
you suck
Yep. Bet he snores too.
Hate you, Savage. Now 25% more.
I'll add another 25%, with Krelm.
Dave
Well, i like all of them.:-)
Dave
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote:
Made this morning ...
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2230/3532016184_44e6330361_o.jpg
Morning Paper - Palo Alto 2009
Panasonic G1 + Olympus G.Zuiko 40mm f/1.4
ISO 100 @ f/2.8 @ 1/30
On Wed, 13 May 2009 23:51:54 -0500
Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
How irked would you guys be? What, if anything, would you guys do or
say?
I would be really pissed.
what we need is an ink that does not impact viewing of an original but
shows up in scanning. you damned thief
Spent a few minutes at this watering hole nearby and caught a flash of
red. Had to stay a while and capture the male redwing that was
searching the ground for food. Ducks were extra.
http://homepage.mac.com/jomac/Pentaxian%20GESO/
Comments appreciated.
Joseph McAllister
pentax...@mac.com
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:07 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: People Scanning Our Prints
I'd be irked.
However, this is the kind of thing i go through.:
http://www.highviewfarms.ca/clinics.html
Look close at the
But have you tried it?
On May 14, 2009, at 14:33 , Larry Colen wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 01:14:34PM -0700, Joseph McAllister wrote:
Have you tried the HDR Digital Filter in the K20 yet? Page 194-196
I don't think that it is real HDR, but rather the faux HDR from a
single raw.
Unfortunately I have already deleted those files (as I do with most of
my technical shots).
But I have wrote down some observations:
60mm - DA*60-250 is sharper at f/4. At f/8 two lenses are practically
the same in sharpness, but I like the bokeh of 60-250 a bit more.
90mm - no significant
On Thu, 14 May 2009 19:52 +0100, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
G'day All,
Another from my trip to Karijini National Park, taken on the
final night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/3531464204/
The 239, 30 second exposure, images that make up this sequence were
On May 14, 2009, at 11:36, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Another from my trip to Karijini National Park, taken on the final
night:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/3531464204/
Very very cool! But your stars are spinning in the wrong
direction. :-)
If there is enough
Oops :)
(actually I wanted to say that I inspected also other FRAMES on the
film, but it's also true that I really had 2 identical DA*60-250 LENSES
for testing. No difference between the copies)
BRM
mike wilson wrote:
Margus Männik mar...@eol.ee wrote:
I've inspected also my other
Bit of horsein' around.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=418
K20, 50~135 fun drive-by
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
G'day all,
Thanks for your interest kind (well maybe not so kind) comments.
Here is the link to the original .mov file (~18.5MB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/D700/Galactic%20Ballet.mov
It's not much larger (aspect ratio wise) but the image quality is better.
Cheers,
Dave
--
Har!
I like it.
DS
2009/5/15 Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com:
Bit of horsein' around.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=418
K20, 50~135 fun drive-by
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On May 14, 2009, at 4:01 PM, AlunFoto wrote:
2009/5/14 Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com:
I believe the gentleman is referring to the composition of the
body of the
K7. But I doubt the exterior skin is made of same.
You mean as in lick a camera for dietary supplement? :-)
Jostein
On May 14, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Bob W wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
it's a very exclusive one
Ah, so it's their ~limited edition~ penny farthing...
Yes. Racing model.
Bob
Fixie?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I was totally expecting Red Wings and Mighty Ducks fans in a bar here...
humph
Joseph McAllister wrote:
Spent a few minutes at this watering hole nearby and caught a flash of
red. Had to stay a while and capture the male redwing that was
searching the ground for food. Ducks were extra.
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:26:51PM -0400, Beaker scripsit:
On May 14, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Bob W wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
it's a very exclusive one
Ah, so it's their ~limited edition~ penny farthing...
Yes. Racing model.
Fixie?
A geared
Like this?
Original scanned from film...not art, just an example.
http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/images/inside_out_1.jpg
With a little post processing...
http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/images/inside_out_2.jpg
Graydon wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 02:23:25PM -0700, Larry Colen
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:32:26PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:26:51PM -0400, Beaker scripsit:
On May 14, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Bob W wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
it's a very exclusive one
Ah, so it's their ~limited edition~
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:04:39PM -0500, Paul Sorenson scripsit:
Graydon wrote:
It's surprisingly effective to set the exposure between the sky and the
valley, take a single raw exposure, process it twice or thrice with
radically adjusted white balance (once for the sky and once for the
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 04:47:42PM -0700, Larry Colen scripsit:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:32:26PM -0400, Graydon wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 07:26:51PM -0400, Beaker scripsit:
On May 14, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Bob W wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
The simple way to do this is to lock the mirror with an electromagnet
once it has swung up and then release when complete. There was a range
of electromagnetic leaf shutters developed in the sixties that used a
completely mechanical action to fire the shutter, but an electromagnet
to vary
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:39:09PM -0400, paul stenquist wrote:
I think I prefer the size of the k20/k10. Aside from my Leica, I've always
worked with big cameras, and I'm comfortable with that. Now, someone said a
new K30D is coming later this year. I wonder if it will be spec'ed as well
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:51:54PM -0500, Christine Aguila wrote:
I gave a nice print--as a gift--to a friend. My friend's father-in-law
took the print to get it framed, and come to find out, he also made some
scans of the print and gave them to family members. I'm just going to come
out
Grace at the park. 250mm, f5.6, ISO 400:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9184392
100% detail of Grace at the park:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9184395
And a drive by shooting of a Canada Goose (through the open car
window) f5.6, 200mm, ISO 400:
I definitely plan on keeping both. The extra stop of the DA* 50-135 is
needed for indoor work, like concerts and wedding ceremonies. Plus
it's relative compact size makes it a good walkaround lens. On the
other hand, I'm thrilled with the DA* 60-250 thus far. I'll use it for
outdoor
fun pic! Well seen.
Paul
On May 14, 2009, at 6:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
Bit of horsein' around.
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=418
K20, 50~135 fun drive-by
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
I see Grace is advertising the Hello Kitty Pentax!
- Original Message -
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:50 PM
Subject: PESO: A couple of DA* 60-250 pics
Grace at the park. 250mm, f5.6, ISO 400:
I'd be pleased. Thanks for the look, Paul!
Jack
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: PESO: A couple of DA* 60-250 pics
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 5:50 PM
Grace
Appreciate your commenting, Dave.
J
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Hi Neighbor
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 4:00 PM
Har!
I like it.
DS
2009/5/15 Jack
On Tue, 12 May 2009 23:44 -0400, John Graves jh.gra...@verizon.net
wrote:
Brian.
Great shoteven if there aren't any sailboats there!
Thanks, John. And thanks to all who looked.
Ken and Christine suggested a tighter crop on the left and I agree that
it's an improvement.
So I've
I'm running low on targets,,I guess. ;-))
Thanks, Paul!
Jack
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
From: paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: PESO: Hi Neighbor
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Thursday, May 14, 2009, 5:57 PM
fun
Nice shot. Dramatic light. Well rendered. I like it.
Paul
On May 14, 2009, at 9:07 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Tue, 12 May 2009 23:44 -0400, John Graves jh.gra...@verizon.net
wrote:
Brian.
Great shoteven if there aren't any sailboats there!
Thanks, John. And thanks to all who
This is one of those interesting dilemmas where there is no right
answer. Thinking out loud as to how I would react in the same
situation...
First, I would be very irked.
Second, I would try to figure out why it irked me. Two thoughts come
to mind. First, I would be irked because it is MY
why not make up some simple stick on address type labels and put them on
the back of
the photos :
--
Photo Copyright 2009 John Doe
No Unauthorized Reproduction
--
these labels are cheap and may save some headaches in some cases.
I can't help but think that the ego gratification that might be
derived from telling a friend that the photo they copied wasn't just a
photo but valuable art probably isn't worth the cost of a friend. As
photographers, we take great pride in our work and expect that others
will recognize
I heard a lecture by Timothy Leary in the early '60s on the
wonderfulness of the psychedelic experience possible via LSD (acid
to you younger folks). This reminds me of that. Same effect, without
the drugs. Way cool, man.
stan
On May 14, 2009, at 5:56 PM, David Savage wrote:
G'day all,
Note that I did say former friend. My recommendation accepts the
fact that it may cause hard feelings. But if really irked and yet
don't say anything, then you harbor a grudge and that is just as
toxic. On balance, I would take a deep breath, say something about it
so that it was off my
Ok. It's beautiful, alright.
But halve the frame rate so it's long enough to have the music go to a
natural cut-off. Dumps my mood on the floor every time.
:-
On May 14, 2009, at 15:56 , David Savage wrote:
G'day all,
Thanks for your interest kind (well maybe not so kind) comments.
I like this much better than the original. It lost nothing and gained
a bunch.
On May 14, 2009, at 18:07 , Brian Walters wrote:
So I've modified the crop to this:
http://www.blognow.com.au/PESO/137291/Boats_in_the_Harbour.html
Joseph McAllister
Pentaxian
http://gallery.me.com/jomac
Speaking of male redwings - they beat the ducks tonight, 4 to 3, go WINGS !
Bring on the Blackhawks...
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com
Subject: GESO- Quackers, Redwings, and Rushes
Spent a few minutes at
Looks too green to me...
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
I like this much better than the original. It lost nothing and gained a
bunch.
On May 14, 2009, at 18:07 , Brian Walters wrote:
So I've modified the crop to this:
Wow! Looks like a great lens! Sure is a fun time with all this new Pentax
gear coming out! Thanks for the peek, Paul! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:04 PM
Wow, the rendering on Morning Paper is just stunning, Godfrey. Nice work.
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com
To: SeePhoto Talk seeph...@micapeak.com; DUG
digitalusersgr...@yahoogroups.com; PAW Picture-A-Week project
p...@micapeak.com;
Boy does that light and those boats pop now, Brian! Really lovely. Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 8:07 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Boats in the Harbour
On Tue,
Fun catch. Very playful! You've rumped this one for sure, Jack :-).
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 5:41 PM
Subject: PESO: Hi Neighbor
Bit of horsein' around.
Yep, what Cotty said! Way to go, Frank! You're the man! Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Cotty cotty...@mac.com
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 12:38 PM
Subject: Re: OT - Ring My Bell
On 13/5/09, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:42 -0400, paul stenquist
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Nice shot. Dramatic light. Well rendered. I like it.
Thanks, Paul. I think the rendering was pretty much done by nature. I
just pressed the button
:-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian
101 - 200 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
