It's still Friday in California, so I'm going for it.
Up for sale is my K100D Super. In excellent condition, with box,
manual, etc., etc. (but no batteries!). Shutter actuations under
7,000.
$250 OBO shipped within the US. Elsewhere in the world would incur an
extra shipping fee.
If anyone is
This is why we keep the Welsh in Wales
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-11268644
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Well, Mr. Roberts ... I hope you're happy with yourself. I certainly
would be.
-- Walt
On 9/10/2010 10:48 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
A gallery of snaps from last weeks trip to Canada:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/index.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 11 September 2010 01:26, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
There's really no point in asking this question right now. They've only
just announced the cameras, no one's gotten their hands on them, much less
tested them.
Get with the times, John :-)
Some K-r samples. First,
I really like that, Sasha. Wonderful light and lines.
-- Walt
On 9/11/2010 12:45 AM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
Sorry, the final version is this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4964062869/lightbox
--S
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Sasha Sobolsa...@asobol.com wrote:
My uncle, in Australia on a work/holiday break, was in a horrifying bus
accident coming back from the 12 Apostles, and underwent surgery in
Melbourne. Back in Sydney and is thankfully is recovering well. He
brought back amazing stories, and a neck brace
On 9/09/2010 4:19 PM, John Celio wrote:
May I be the first to say: I will be avoiding the just-announced DA L
35mm f2.4. Plastic construction aside, the SR feature of Pentax SLRs
does not mean a (relatively) slow normal lens is a good thing to offer
if you want to attract new users. :P
On 11/09/2010 1:48 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
A gallery of snaps from last weeks trip to Canada:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/index.html
I especially like the light in this one
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/7da04393.html
Those are fearsome beasts they have
On 11 September 2010 03:14, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
ARGH.Mike Johnston RiceRolled me
MARK!
--M.
--
\/\/o/\/\ -- http://WorldOfMiserere.com
http://EnticingTheLight.com
A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 9 September 2010 02:19, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
May I be the first to say: I will be avoiding the just-announced DA L 35mm
f2.4. Plastic construction aside, the SR feature of Pentax SLRs does not
mean a (relatively) slow normal lens is a good thing to offer if you want to
On 10/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW: Here are *my* personal faves of the lot:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/7da04313.html
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/7da04015.html
Just shows what kind of mood I'm in, I suppose.
Very Lord of the Rings!
On 10/9/10, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's especially difficult to get good photos when hiking
with other people. They're forever getting irritated with waiting and
taking off without you. I rushed a lot of this stuff more than I would
have liked and still ended up doing a lot of
Thibouille wrote:
I like that, personally.
Of importance IMO, new flashes begin 2011 allowing 1/250 sync speed,
18 AF points, speed optimized AF-C, 8fps, 1080p, 200-12800iso,
extended 50-25600iso.
http://k-rumors.com/new-pentax-k-5-leaked-by-lenstip/
Surely it's the shutter that determines
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:57 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
* Dave waves his white PC flag*
It has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do
with being sensitive and respectful towards others.
It appears to me that there is a number
http://www.pentaximaging.com/camera-
lenses/smc_PENTAX_DA_L_35mm_F2.4_A
L/
John
Amateur Photographer UK are saying it's a full frame lens (and that Pentax
have a FF DSLR for that matter):
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Pentax_35mm_f24__smc_P
That's funny (the picture, not the story). You should send it to
http://happychairishappy.com/
regards, Anthony
Of what use is lens and light
to those who lack in mind and sight
(Anon)
On 11 September 2010 17:10, Derby Chang
Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that, personally.
Of importance IMO, new flashes begin 2011 allowing 1/250 sync speed,
18 AF points, speed optimized AF-C, 8fps, 1080p, 200-12800iso,
extended 50-25600iso.
So, this is the camera the K-7 should have been right from the start.
:-/
On 11/9/10, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
I think you are over-interpreting the statement from AP. Cotty can put his
hat back in the pantry.
In terms of the doomsday clock, it's not even out of the packet yet.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
2010/9/11 paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
Of course. Although focus usually achieved by means of a bellows or other
device that moved the lens. But a modern camera that uses one ring for focus
and other controls would be inexcusable if it weren't a PS.
true. but I have to say I
Glad he is recovering well and what a funny shot... a samurai named
hans (acronym for head and neck shield)... and now we dance =)
Thank you for sharing and my best wishes to your uncle
Ecke
2010/9/11 Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au:
My uncle, in Australia on a work/holiday break, was in a
This seem to be a pattern from Pentax. First they introduce something
new, then they makes it better in next generation.
I think I'll jump on K-5, then skip next model, and so on.
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/9/11 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Thibouille
Dosn't all (most) companies do that? It's up to you to decide if it is worth
upgrading from one generation to the next.
Stig Vidar Hovland
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim
Øsleby
Sent: Saturday, September 11, 2010 1:04 PM
My favourite way to start a weekend morning.
Okay, my second favourite.
;-)
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/morning-jolt.html
Fresh-ground dark roast coffee from a French press. Mm!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:24 AM, mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
It has nothing to do with political correctness and everything to do
with being sensitive and respectful towards others.
It appears to me that there is a number of listers who find _all_ forms
The problem is there are other photographers out there who are
charging $15 and making money off of it. They use cheap labor and
churn out the pictures fast.
They are making money by being the exclusive provider of services and
offering up-sells of the basic package.
I personally wouldn't pay
SV Hovland pdml...@heime.org wrote:
Dosn't all (most) companies do that? It's up to you to
decide if it is worth upgrading from one generation to the next.
Nothing wrong with a little progress and evolution. But as it looks now,
the K-5 will become an impressive demonstration of what a mess
On 9/11/2010 12:24 PM, mike wilson wrote:
It appears to me that there is a number of listers who find _all_ forms
of organised religion contrary to their beliefs to the point of
offensiveness. So
It is all matter of expression and timing, Mike. It seems to me that
even the most patient
Mark Roberts wrote:
A gallery of snaps from last weeks trip to Canada:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/index.html
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/7da04205.html
The trumpet fungi may be lichen. Their greenness is exceeded only by my
own.
--
PDML
Much better than the first link.;-)
Well lit and love the line work here,.
Dave
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Sasha Sobol sa...@asobol.com wrote:
Sorry, the final version is this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4964062869/lightbox
--S
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Sasha Sobol
May he recover soon and fully.
Boris
On 9/11/2010 10:10 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
My uncle, in Australia on a work/holiday break, was in a horrifying bus
accident coming back from the 12 Apostles, and underwent surgery in
Melbourne. Back in Sydney and is thankfully is recovering well. He
Nice framing here,.
Dave
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
By the same Adirondack lake:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11585866
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Must have missed this one.
I like the framing and colour to this one. The OOF mirrored bit behind
and to the left works for me.,
Dave
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 3:45 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Went for a nature walk this morning, and fifteen minutes after I left
the house
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/11/2010 1:30 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Well, it's not a Pentax invention.
IrSimple(tm) is already used by Fuji in their digital cameras,
and apparently it shows up in several mobile phones as well.
While current
2010/9/11 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that, personally.
Of importance IMO, new flashes begin 2011 allowing 1/250 sync speed,
18 AF points, speed optimized AF-C, 8fps, 1080p, 200-12800iso,
extended 50-25600iso.
So, this is the camera
mike wilson wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
A gallery of snaps from last weeks trip to Canada:
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/index.html
http://www.robertstech.com/galleries/banff2010/7da04205.html
The trumpet fungi may be lichen. Their greenness is exceeded only by my
own.
I
Adam Maas wrote:
2010/9/11 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that, personally.
Of importance IMO, new flashes begin 2011 allowing 1/250 sync speed,
18 AF points, speed optimized AF-C, 8fps, 1080p, 200-12800iso,
extended 50-25600iso.
So,
Is the brace mocking your uncle's cries of anguish? ;)
Jack
--- On Sat, 9/11/10, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
From: Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au
Subject: OT PESO - samurai
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, September 11, 2010, 12:10 AM
My uncle, in
Did you just fart?
- Original Message -
From: Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com
To: Pentax List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 4:55 PM
Subject: PESO - Caption Contest 2 !
We encountered these guys on an Adirondack farm. There are so many
caption possibilities...
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
new bodies to avoid noise? Like seriously, if I didn't have noise reduction
in LR these days, I'd be trashing a LOT of my stuff - something I
Are you that old, Frank or hadn't you gone to bed yet? ;)
I know from old, that being my favorite time of day.
Jack
--- On Sat, 9/11/10, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - Morning Jolt
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Liz and i had our tea out side, at first light this morning. Birds had
come a bit earlier than normal for their
breakfast.
A lot of jays this morning.
This one had his meal interrupted.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=11601470
K10D, DA F 50-200, AF360 at -2.0 EV for fill. 1/60 at F
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:01 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Are you that old, Frank or hadn't you gone to bed yet? ;)
I know from old, that being my favorite time of day.
Jack
One difference between Franks table and mine. There would be 5-6 more
sitting there.:-)
Dave
--- On Sat,
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
new bodies to avoid noise?
Shoot in a forest.??
:-)
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
Good action grab and flash setting choice, David.
Jack
--- On Sat, 9/11/10, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Peso Sir, I do believe you are in my seat.
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barbara Brooks bbaro...@gmail.com,
Petch
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
Good action grab and flash setting choice, David.
Jack
Thanks Jack.
I just wish i was a split second faster on the shutter button, as both
of them were all fluffed up.
-1.5 is to much and -2.0 is a tad to little, so a small
Fun stuff. That lens has excellent bokeh in most situations. Nice.
Paul
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:01 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Liz and i had our tea out side, at first light this morning. Birds had
come a bit earlier than normal for their
breakfast.
A lot of jays this morning.
This one had his
That's what I would have thought as well.
On 9/11/2010 5:06 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Thibouille wrote:
I like that, personally.
Of importance IMO, new flashes begin 2011 allowing 1/250 sync speed,
18 AF points, speed optimized AF-C, 8fps, 1080p, 200-12800iso,
extended 50-25600iso.
On 9/11/2010 5:55 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Thibouillepentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that, personally.
Of importance IMO, new flashes begin 2011 allowing 1/250 sync speed,
18 AF points, speed optimized AF-C, 8fps, 1080p, 200-12800iso,
extended 50-25600iso.
So, this is the camera
On 9/11/2010 8:18 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
2010/9/11 Ralf R. Radermacherfotor...@gmx.de:
Thibouillepentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
I like that, personally.
Of importance IMO, new flashes begin 2011 allowing 1/250 sync speed,
18 AF points, speed optimized AF-C, 8fps, 1080p,
I'm sorry too. The first was impressive enough, thank you.
On 9/11/2010 1:45 AM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
Sorry, the final version is this:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/4964062869/lightbox
--S
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Sasha Sobolsa...@asobol.com wrote:
It's a combination of the shutter speed, the SR system and also the
flash burn speed nowadays.
SR apparently costs sync speed, the high-end Sony's do 1/250 with SSS
off and 1/200 with it on. Likely Pentax and Olympus are limiting their
sync similarly.
Flash burn speed also matters, but only if
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Just like the K20D was the camera the K10D should have been from the start.
The K10D was fine in its time.
In my book, the K20D and the K-7 should never have been at all. This
whole Samsung interlude was a mistake right from the start.
Ralf
--
Oh hell, I'm irreligious, I /know/ there's a God, I just can't define
God well enough to believe in religion.
On 9/11/2010 7:37 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:24 AM, mike wilsonm.9.wil...@ntlworld.com wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
It has nothing to do with political
A fellow from work has been waiting for the next generation to buy a
home computer...since the 486 chips!
You pays your money and you takes your chances.
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 8:29 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/11/2010 8:18 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
2010/9/11 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Just like the K20D was the camera the K10D should have been from the start.
The K10D was fine in its time.
In my book, the K20D and the K-7 should never have been at all. This
whole Samsung
There are always exceptions that prove the rule. The S90 is among an
elite group that includes a couple of Niknos, a couple of Canons and a
Couple of Leicas, (and their Panasonic siblings).
On 9/10/2010 9:11 PM, David Savage wrote:
I was playing with a friends Canon S90 last weekend and it
Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
You pays your money and you takes your chances.
So I did. Paid 1300 for a K-7, last summer. With some luck I might be
able to get 600 for it now, on ebay. The K-5 is rumored to be at around
1600.
Spent the last months doing a lot of audio and scanning
Except, that the aperture shutter and focus all were controlled by
different rings. Primary functions should have dedicated controls.
On 9/10/2010 9:34 PM, David Parsons wrote:
That is how it was originally done. All the controls were on the lens
and about the only thing on the body was the
Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
Pentax was pretty much forced into it. The Sony 12MP CMOS sensor was
not yet available to Pentax for the K20D, so Samsung was the only
option to get something better than the old 10MP CCD in the K10D. With
the K-7 Pentax was primarily updating the body so they
That is precious, good catch. I'd crop a bit off the top however.
On 9/11/2010 9:01 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Liz and i had our tea out side, at first light this morning. Birds had
come a bit earlier than normal for their
breakfast.
A lot of jays this morning.
This one had his meal
On 9/11/2010 9:03 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:26 PM, Tanya Lovetanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
Does anyone know if any work has been done on upgrading the sensors in the
new bodies to avoid noise?
Shoot in a forest.??
:-)
Dave
But then you'll hear the trees fall...
On 9/11/2010 7:17 AM, frank theriault wrote:
My favourite way to start a weekend morning.
Okay, my second favourite.
;-)
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/morning-jolt.html
Fresh-ground dark roast coffee from a French press. Mm!
cheers,
frank
Sometimes coffee is better
On 9/11/2010 3:57 AM, Miserere wrote:
On 9 September 2010 02:19, John Celion...@neovenator.com wrote:
May I be the first to say: I will be avoiding the just-announced DA L 35mm
f2.4. Plastic construction aside, the SR feature of Pentax SLRs does not
mean a (relatively) slow normal lens is a
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
You pays your money and you takes your chances.
So I did. Paid 1300 for a K-7, last summer. With some luck I might be
able to get 600 for it now, on ebay. The K-5 is rumored to be at
around
On 9/11/2010 10:00 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
You pays your money and you takes your chances.
So I did. Paid 1300 for a K-7, last summer. With some luck I might be
able to get 600 for it now,
2010/9/11 Ralf R. Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de:
Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
Pentax was pretty much forced into it. The Sony 12MP CMOS sensor was
not yet available to Pentax for the K20D, so Samsung was the only
option to get something better than the old 10MP CCD in the K10D. With
the K-7
Slide show on flicker, seems to be random, collection of BW photos
from 1890 to sometime in the 1960s.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37775831%40N02/sets/72157620345353756/show/
--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral
bankruptcy.
-Woody Allen
They do.
It seems that the neat thing about Pentax is that when you know them,
you know what generation to buy.
If you wants a body upgrade, you go for the body upgrade generation.
If you don't, then you wait for the next refinement generation.
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
Even worse news: There's going to be a camera better than the K5 someday.
;-)
not really. Cameras have been perfect for decades. What happens is that the
marketers and ad-men find new ways to stimulate our spending reflex.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Slide show on flicker, seems to be random, collection of BW photos from
1890 to sometime in the 1960s.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/37775831%40N02/sets/72157620345353756/s
how/
I don't know if it was you or someone else who chose the title, but a great
many of those pictures are of
There's really no point in asking this question right now. They've only
just announced the cameras, no one's gotten their hands on them, much
less
tested them.
Get with the times, John :-)
Wow, I had no idea. Did someone already post that here and I just missed
it? The noise levels look
OK, I see what you mean, but I don't agree with you that K-7 was only a body
upgrade from K20D. K-7 gave us more frames per second capture rate. 77 segment
metering, fast AF in low light, white balance correction of AF, focus assist
light, 100% viewfinder, 1/8000 shortest shutter speed and HD
No particularly special technique. Just a simple panoramic crop of a
single frame
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20stonycreekharbor.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 28-200mm f3.8~5.6
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
His lack of
Except for the fps (which requires improved speed from the sensor and
processor in addition to body changes) and video those are all body
upgrades (IE upgrades of the parts which would be in a film camera).
Body is more than the physical shell, it's everything but the sensor
and image processing
This kind of stuff always makes me laugh. Pentax is a small camera
company that releases stuff as fast as it can and still make money.
It probably has the smallest budget of the DSLR makers. You want
cutting edge, buy a Canikon. You buy Pentax if you want reasonably
priced primes and uber-AF is
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 03:42:52PM +, SV Hovland scripsit:
OK, I see what you mean, but I don't agree with you that K-7 was only
a body upgrade from K20D. K-7 gave us more frames per second capture
rate. 77 segment metering, fast AF in low light, white balance
correction of AF, focus
Den 11. sep. 2010 kl. 17.21 skrev Bob W:
Even worse news: There's going to be a camera better than the K5 someday.
;-)
not really. Cameras have been perfect for decades. What happens is that the
marketers and ad-men find new ways to stimulate our spending reflex.
B
So true!
I´ll
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Graydon gray...@marost.ca wrote:
One of the most interesting things (to me) in the K-5 descriptions I've
seen is the suggestion that the viewfinder has a transparent LCD that
displays the framing lines and focus points. If that's true, it's a body
thing, but
Doesn't seem like a big investment on their part. If it's optically
good, newbie zoomers might get to sample the sharpness of a prime
lens. Besides, just think of the fights we could have if a subset of
the list really likes this lens.
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:19 AM, John Celio
At 25600 it looks about the same as my
old *istD at 1600, so I can at least stand by my second point. :)
John,
Your wisdom is an inspiration to us all. ;-) The high iso stuff is
amazing, isn't it? Glad I held onto my slow lenses.
Your humble servant,
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML
On 11 September 2010 12:14, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't seem like a big investment on their part. If it's optically
good, newbie zoomers might get to sample the sharpness of a prime
lens. Besides, just think of the fights we could have if a subset of
the list really
'm not particularly squeamish, but I may never eat fish again.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20beenfishin.html
Note: The focus wasn't particularly good on this one. Yet I still like
it, if like is actually appropriate...
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 28~200mm
With fast lenses the newer cameras can pretty much see in the dark.
Too bad Pentax cameras can't focus in the dark.
On 9/11/2010 12:25 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
At 25600 it looks about the same as my
old *istD at 1600, so I can at least stand by my second point. :)
John,
Your wisdom
I'm sure that the majority of the members of this list do not confuse
the maximum aperture of the lens with maximum image quality. I think
that Pentax designers would probably rather have a Very Good f/2.4
than a Good f/2. Don't know why anyone would be excited by another
35mm f2 anyway. The FA is
Hum, I wonder how that I got lost...
On 9/11/2010 12:37 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
'm not particularly squeamish, but I may never eat fish again.
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20beenfishin.html
Note: The focus wasn't particularly good on this one. Yet I still
like it, if
The ebayer who purchased my 6x7 renigged. She says she was buying it
for her husband but suddenly realized it's the wrong camera. I don't
want to relist it now. I'll sell it to a PDML member for $200 plus
shipping. As far as I know it works fine. It has mirror lock up, the
metered prism,
On Sep 11, 2010, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/11/2010 10:00 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
You pays your money and you takes your chances.
So I did. Paid 1300 for a K-7, last summer.
did you try giving the lower non-winning bidders a second chance offer
as ebay provides for that service.
--
J.C. O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Join the CD PLAYER DISC Discussions :
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdplayers/
http://launch.groups.yahoo.com/group/cdsound/
I'm not so knowledgeable. What kind of stuff do you do, Ralf?
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:46 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/11/2010 10:00 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Oops... Sorry.
Boris
On 9/11/2010 3:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:58 AM, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/11/2010 1:30 AM, Adam Maas wrote:
Well, it's not a Pentax invention.
IrSimple(tm) is already used by Fuji in their digital cameras,
and apparently it
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20alongthequinnipiack.html
Equipment: Pentax K20D w/smc Pentax FA 28-200mm f3.5~5.6
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignored.
--
His lack of education is more than compensated for by his keenly developed moral
bankruptcy.
On 9/11/2010 12:44 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
The ebayer who purchased my 6x7 renigged. She says she was buying it
for her husband but suddenly realized it's the wrong camera. I don't
want to relist it now. I'll sell it to a PDML member for $200 plus
shipping. As far as I know it works fine. It
probably kidnapped by jObs and taken to a gleaming white cellar somewhere in
Cupertino to be shrunk in a vat of bullshit until it achieves miniscule
proportions.
Hum, I wonder how that I got lost...
On 9/11/2010 12:37 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
'm not particularly squeamish, but I may
Ralf's work is predominantly very long exposure night work. Check out
his site, there's some brilliant work there.
The K-7 forces long-exposure NR on longer exposures, functionally
locking up the camera for twice the duration of the exposure. Not a
big issue at a 30s exposure, but at 30 minutes
On Sep 11, 2010, at 12:57 PM, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
did you try giving the lower non-winning bidders a second chance
offer
as ebay provides for that service.
Yep. Either they didn't see the offer or had already moved on. Happily
I sold al my 6x7 gear -- four lenses and a waist level
So his stuff is a worst case scenario for sensor noise. I see his
problem. Aside from some peeping Tom stuff, most of my high iso work
is just causal snaps. ;-p
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
Ralf's work is predominantly very long exposure night work. Check out
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:53 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9/11/2010 7:17 AM, frank theriault wrote:
My favourite way to start a weekend morning.
Okay, my second favourite.
;-)
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/morning-jolt.html
Fresh-ground dark roast
On 12 September 2010 01:06, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
Ralf's work is predominantly very long exposure night work. Check out
his site, there's some brilliant work there.
The K-7 forces long-exposure NR on longer exposures, functionally
locking up the camera for twice the duration of the
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 12:41 PM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm sure that the majority of the members of this list do not confuse
the maximum aperture of the lens with maximum image quality. I think
that Pentax designers would probably rather have a Very Good f/2.4
than a Good
David J Brooks wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:53 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/11/2010 7:17 AM, frank theriault wrote:
My favourite way to start a weekend morning.
Okay, my second favourite.
;-)
http://knarfdummyblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/morning-jolt.html
Fresh-ground dark roast
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
