On 5 Mar 2015, at 01:09, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>> Whoa. You should be able to view individual atoms with that. You
>> should even be able to read the manufacturer's warning labels on those
>> atoms.
>
> Just curious. What do the warning labels on atoms say?
>
Do not fo
Quoting Paul :
I think what he's saying is the max size of the long side can be no
more than 1400 pixels and the short side can be no more than 1/2 the
size of the long side.
Yep - that's sort of what I was trying to say.
:-)>
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian W
Quoting Ann Sanfedele :
Got it ... so the frame is 1400 x 700 ...
That would mean I could also submit a photo that is 1200 x 600, or
1200 x 700 yes? or even 1000 x 600 (one person's panorama not the
same proportions as another's, agreed? )
Well, not if the 2:1 or greater aspect ratio
I think what he's saying is the max size of the long side can be no more
than 1400 pixels and the short side can be no more than 1/2 the size of
the long side.
-p
On 3/4/2015 11:37 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Got it ... so the frame is 1400 x 700 ...
That would mean I could also submit a photo
Got it ... so the frame is 1400 x 700 ...
That would mean I could also submit a photo that is 1200 x 600, or 1200
x 700 yes? or even 1000 x 600 (one person's panorama not the same
proportions as another's, agreed? )
(I'm only talking landscape orientation here)
thanks
ann
On 3/5/2015 00:
Quoting Ann Sanfedele :
When you say 2:1 or "greater" does that mean we can do 1400 x
800/900? OR 1800 x 700 ?
that is, where is the wiggle room ?
Apologies if two responses to this appear - the first one seems to
have been thrashed by my Webmail.
The two examples you give would not
When you say 2:1 or "greater" does that mean we can do 1400 x 800/900?
OR 1800 x 700 ?
that is, where is the wiggle room ?
tanks
ann
On 3/4/2015 23:29, Brian Walters wrote:
Hi all
After discussion with Igor, here's the modified submission conditions
for the April PUG.
Theme: Panorama
As
Hi all
After discussion with Igor, here's the modified submission conditions
for the April PUG.
Theme: Panorama
Aspect ratio: 2:1 or greater
Max pixel dimensions: 1400 x 700
Max file size: 600kB
As usual, camera body or lens must be Pentax
Colour space: none or sRGB
For horizontal panos, the
Quoting Mark Roberts :
Bruce Walker wrote:
Whoa. You should be able to view individual atoms with that. You
should even be able to read the manufacturer's warning labels on those
atoms.
Just curious. What do the warning labels on atoms say?
"May contain traces of nuts"
--
Cheers
Brian
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:09 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>>Whoa. You should be able to view individual atoms with that. You
>>should even be able to read the manufacturer's warning labels on those
>>atoms.
>
> Just curious. What do the warning labels on atoms say?
For display p
Improper use may result in injury or death, consult the users manual.
On 3/4/2015 8:09 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Bruce Walker wrote:
Whoa. You should be able to view individual atoms with that. You
should even be able to read the manufacturer's warning labels on those
atoms.
Just curious. What
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Bruce Walker wrote:
>
>>Whoa. You should be able to view individual atoms with that. You
>>should even be able to read the manufacturer's warning labels on those
>>atoms.
>
> Just curious. What do the warning labels on atoms say?
"UNDER PENALT
On 2015-03-04 18:09 , Mark Roberts wrote:
Just curious. What do the warning labels on atoms say?
"fuse with care"
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the di
Cool - that's super close!
On 3/4/2015 3:42 PM, John Celio wrote:
Last night I decided to have some fun with my Q7 and my macro
extension equipment:
http://imgur.com/a/Vou0k (three images)
I'm pretty sure this experiment went beyond the resolving power of the
lens. I shot at all sorts of apert
Bruce Walker wrote:
>Whoa. You should be able to view individual atoms with that. You
>should even be able to read the manufacturer's warning labels on those
>atoms.
Just curious. What do the warning labels on atoms say?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
P
On 04/03/2015 2:18 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
So today I mounted the FA 20-35mm F4.0 on the K-5II, and felt the same
cognitive dissonance that I always felt mounting the mostly plastic,
(though really optically excellent), lens on my LX, and realized I have
pretty much a digital LX, just not in the i
Whoa. You should be able to view individual atoms with that. You
should even be able to read the manufacturer's warning labels on those
atoms.
I like!
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:42 PM, John Celio
wrote:
> Last night I decided to have some fun with my Q7 and my macro
> extension equipment:
>
> htt
They are fine images, Larry.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
> Even though I shot 5500 frames last month, most of them were at events or of
> home repairs, and I had to stretch a bit to get three "keepers" for my
>
<>
Are you sure you're not compensating for something John?
:)
Seriously, I'd love to find a helicoid extension tube, but probably
only because I have Pentax Hoarder's Syndrome.
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> That is one hell of a macro set-up!!!
>
> Dan Matyola
> htt
That is one hell of a macro set-up!!!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 3:42 PM, John Celio
wrote:
> Last night I decided to have some fun with my Q7 and my macro
> extension equipment:
>
> http://imgur.com/a/Vou0k (three images)
>
> I'm pretty
Even though I shot 5500 frames last month, most of them were at events
or of home repairs, and I had to stretch a bit to get three "keepers"
for my monthly "best of". All three are of Venus, Mars and the moon.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157651167464565/
--
Larry Colen l...@
I shouldn't be at all surprised, Ken. :)
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Her butt looks a little soft. ;+)
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
>
> - Original Message - From: "Bruce Walker"
> Subject: PESO - a "Curved" discarded PUG c
Last night I decided to have some fun with my Q7 and my macro
extension equipment:
http://imgur.com/a/Vou0k (three images)
I'm pretty sure this experiment went beyond the resolving power of the
lens. I shot at all sorts of apertures and could never get the image
sharper than this.
John
--
PDML
So today I mounted the FA 20-35mm F4.0 on the K-5II, and felt the same
cognitive dissonance that I always felt mounting the mostly plastic,
(though really optically excellent), lens on my LX, and realized I have
pretty much a digital LX, just not in the in way I always wanted one.
--
I don't w
Macro is almost impossible due to extremely limited depth of field. If you
stick to flat objects you might have some success, but with the bellows
extended a great deal, you will have to calculate reprocity failure to get
correct exposures.
Large format lends itself best to things like portrai
I get the joke, but there doesn't seem to be any place where you can
look at the bridge and actually see the resemblance.
On 3/4/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
There is one in the city, and one upstate, which is also sometimes
referred to as the "Dolly Parton Bridge" because of its cu
On 3/4/2015 8:53 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I may be able to get a 4x5" camera with a 90mm f/8 lens.
Price aside (which is another big question mark), I have questions.
First, the reasoning:
I like macro photography most.
I am getting increasingly more able to spend time on photography.
I like sp
They could easily escape by riding on the back of a woodpecker.
> On 4 Mar 2015, at 18:35, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> But in this case all they need is a nail gun to seal the wee offenders in
> their trees permanently, problem solved.
>
>> On 3/4/2015 2:20 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
>> The good old-f
But in this case all they need is a nail gun to seal the wee offenders
in their trees permanently, problem solved.
On 3/4/2015 2:20 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
The good old-fashioned British Bobby has always resisted calls to be armed, but
sometimes things get so out of hand that the policy becomes
Technically they're both in New York, there is more to the State than
the City, though the City rarely acknowledges that.
On 3/4/2015 12:05 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
There is one in the city, and one upstate, which is also sometimes
referred to as the "Dolly Parton Bridge" because of its c
On 3/4/2015 8:53 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I may be able to get a 4x5" camera with a 90mm f/8 lens.
Price aside (which is another big question mark), I have questions.
First, the reasoning:
I like macro photography most.
I am getting increasingly more able to spend time on photography.
I like sp
I wondered if there were one upstate but didn't see it pop up on google
- just ours...
When I googled the NYC one came up... and not the Albany..then I just
grabbed a wiki to post. ugh... the upstate one is more curvacious.
Ours has been in the news a lot lately because of planned walkway :
htt
I hope he makes a bundle on it... talk about "f8 and be there" and good
reflexes
saw it all over the place ... call me envious :-)
ann
On 3/4/2015 11:56, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
It starts appearing on the news, but if you haven't seen it yet:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-31711446
To me, it's in
There is one in the city, and one upstate, which is also sometimes
referred to as the "Dolly Parton Bridge" because of its curvaceous
shape:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thaddeus_Kosciusko_Bridge
Are you familiar with the mustard as well? Is is one of the best
brands, far better than Kraft or G
It starts appearing on the news, but if you haven't seen it yet:
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-31711446
To me, it's interesting, that HLN showed the same picture with a HUGE
contrast (and brightness) enchancement. I'd say, way beyond where I'd get
it bumped up.
Igor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
Ooops ... not Albany - NYC
(unless there is one upstate too)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thaddeus_Kosciusko_Bridge
ann
On 3/4/2015 01:45, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting "Daniel J. Matyola" :
There is a famous Kosciusko Bridge in New York,
near Albany
also
known as the Double B
another thing you have to deal with is exposure compensation when extending
lenses into the macro range. It varies with extension so getting
exposure correct
is a challenge.
On 3/4/2015 9:42 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
I was searching for a proper, locally available 150mm lens (it is not
include
Her butt looks a little soft. ;+)
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Walker"
Subject: PESO - a "Curved" discarded PUG choice
I thought this might be just too obvious, as well as possibly too
NSFW. Yes, there's an art-nu
Sure thing - Bruce
Now that I can actually see those things they jump out at me
ann
On 3/4/2015 09:24, Bruce Walker wrote:
Thanks for noticing that sparkle, Ann. I was wondering if it would
bother anyone. It's one of many hair clips Aly used to create her
messy updo. I'll spot that out.
Thank y
- Forwarded Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
To: "PDML"
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2015 1:53:51 PM
Subject: Re: Peso-Silver Butte #2
Hi, Darren!
I woke up to the fact that I failed to respond to all of your appreciated
critique comments.
To tell you the truth, I was surprised to see only a s
I was searching for a proper, locally available 150mm lens (it is not
included in the package) as the standard focal range.
I was thinking that the range of movements might have helped in
selectively increasing the DOF.
If that is not the case even with extreme range of movements I have to
re-cons
I thought this might be just too obvious, as well as possibly too
NSFW. Yes, there's an art-nude at the link ...
"Into the light"
https://500px.com/photo/100389205/into-the-light-by-bruce-walker
K-3, DA* 50-135/2.8, 58mm, f:8.0, 1/125th sec, ISO 200
Lr + Ps + Nik Silver Efex Pro
Comments always
Let's start one !
-Original Message-
>From: Brian Walters
>Sent: Mar 4, 2015 1:45 AM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: OT - Anyone with experience with hiking poles?
>
>Quoting "Daniel J. Matyola" :
>
>> We don't really have a Kosciusko Day in Nee Jersey.
>
>Sounds like you sh
based on my experience with large format photography:
first of all, the larger the format, the less DOF. so macro photography
on large
format is very difficult due to narrow DOF.
focusing a 90mm F8 lens isnt that difficult with a lupe, but its
a wide angle and not really suitable for macro. Fo
Thank you, Paul.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 7:49 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Excellent!
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 11:44 PM, John Coyle wrote:
>>
>> Gorgeous model beautifully photographed - who could ask for anything more?
>>
>>
>> John in Brisbane
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
Appreciated, John! :)
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 11:44 PM, John Coyle wrote:
> Gorgeous model beautifully photographed - who could ask for anything more?
>
>
> John in Brisbane
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
> Sent: Tuesday, 3
Thanks, Christine.
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:51 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> BW is quite lovely! Cheers, Christine
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
>> On Mar 2, 2015, at 9:27 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Best spent Sunday afternoon in ages. A local (Brampton) jazz singer
>> named Aly Westwood came ove
Thanks for noticing that sparkle, Ann. I was wondering if it would
bother anyone. It's one of many hair clips Aly used to create her
messy updo. I'll spot that out.
Thank you!
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Both nice, but I I prefer the black and white - and I'll nit pi
love the response from my target audience - tanks :-)
A
On 3/4/2015 01:41, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Superb!
B
On 4 Mar 2015, at 02:28, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2015-and-all-that/i-Cc4XkV4/L
at the South street seaport a couple of days ago.
--
P
I may be able to get a 4x5" camera with a 90mm f/8 lens.
Price aside (which is another big question mark), I have questions.
First, the reasoning:
I like macro photography most.
I am getting increasingly more able to spend time on photography.
I like spending "hours" to get one single beautiful im
How veddy, veddy British.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> The good old-fashioned British Bobby has always resisted calls to be armed,
> but sometimes things get so out of hand that the policy becomes increasingly
More like, disheveled Redwing. No back story, just...because.
Suffers a bit from being on the edge of the lens' reach.
Comments?
Jack
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=900
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUB
52 matches
Mail list logo
