Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
@ Cord Camera here in Columbus there's an excellent D now marked @ $549.
Collin
At 14:27 2005.10.16 -0400, you wrote:
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:10:28 -0700
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jens Bladt wrote:
In my small town, tonight was opera night, as a part of the local festival
week.
I just had to put my D to work:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/859350/show/
Comments are wwelcome, naturally.
Regards
Jens
Very well done, sir!
Well exposed and each of the poses
Brian Walters wrote:
Hi all
September 1 is officially Wattle day in OZ so here is one taken
yesterday with the DS + Tamron 90 mm SP and dual flash mounted on a
tripod.
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~sgap/photos/paw/a-pub-paw.html
Click on the i for further info.
Comments welcome
Cheers,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/redthing.jpg
Thanks!
Shel
Probably the auto focus sensor.
keith
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
For higher end cars and SUVs, a V8 engine is a big plus in US auto
marketing. It has little to do with actual performance needs (although
for some vehicles, added torque and smoothness of a larger displacement
V8 helps) but the US auto market has a long history of
P. J. Alling wrote:
Saturns aint what they used to be.
Could be...
I have a 1999 S-series wagon, whose 1.9 liter 100 H.P. 16-valve DOHC
engine is so flexible, passengers frequently ask me what size it is and
comment on it's ability to accelerate into and cope with high speed
freeway
Adam Maas wrote:
Except for the SUV and the Minivan, Saturns are just rebadged Opel's
anyways.
-Adam
I won't argue with you, but where did you hear that?
Details please...
I actually LIKE Opels, so no problem here...
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course every maker who sold cars in the US had to comply with
emission standards. Those with the best powerplant engineering, Honda
for example, were able to meet the standards without crippling their
engines. I was an automotive journalist in the early eighties and
Gianfranco Irlanda wrote:
Hi everybody,
[sad tales of mechanical gear failing... snipped.]
When I came back home I found both my new computers not
working. My brother said he had taken the newer one to the shop
for a check and there it worked, or so I'm told. Now it is going
there againg...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I assume you are opposed to emission standards? Except for
third-world countries, standards are basically universal today. The
US initiated emission control but it soon became a fact of life for
all automakers. Today's engines are more powerful and more efficient
P. J. Alling wrote:
The spring hill plant used to have considerable autonomy. The used
their own methods of mass production, and had a separate contract
different in most respects with the UAW.
Yes, I'm aware of those differences.
Now they operate within the GM umbrella and it shows.
Adam Maas wrote:
Car magazines mostly.
The Sky is an Opel Roadster, the L series is based off the same Opel
(Vectra IIRC) that also became the Cadillac Catera at a higher trim
level and the current ION is based on an Opel (As are the equivalent
Pontiac Chevy cars. It's an Astra
P. J. Alling wrote:
Tell me about it, I'm driving a 13 year old SC2 which still handles
better than the latest Ion that I test drove recently.
Hah! ;-)
If it comes to it, I think I'd rather put a new engine in my SW2, if it
needed it, and just keep driving it...
I love the style, the
Sport Compact Car is by far the least fluffy Car Magazine.
Since you read it a lot, you must hves a copy about.
Who publishes it?
keith
It's fairly
hardcore though (Expect to see algebra in some columns). They also tend
not to review new cars much, being more of an enthusiasts mag.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
[...]
When it comes to sports cars, well, I'd still like a Merc CLK because
it's comfortable and I like the notion of a hard top and convertible in
one. Older ones are now getting into a reasonable ball park. Overall,
however, I'm happy to no longer be worried
mike wilson wrote:
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Finally I realized I have enough images to compile a gallery. This is
my first attempt on using automated gallery creation tools. So here
you have 16 images. Each image is roughly 150 Kb in size. Some of
those you've seen, some you haven't...
Cesar wrote:
So Scott, is there a 67 in your future? :-P
Similarities 'twixt Doug and me - other than long-lost brothers (I am
the brother Mom never talked about) - I cannot see other than who else
is in the photo... I do notice she seems a little alarmed by what he is
saying...
As for
Scott Loveless wrote:
It should be http://twosixteen.com/gallery/index.php?id=174
Of course! I'd recognize her anywhere! ;-)
keith
On 8/29/05, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cesar wrote:
So Scott, is there a 67 in your future? :-P
Similarities 'twixt Doug and me - other than long
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Two months ago the general manager of Alfa Romeo division stated that
Alfa wants to be back to US market as soon as possible, with a proper
line-up including Maserati V8 engines.
Dario
Thanks, Dario!
Very interesting news, for an old ALFA aficionado!
keith
Dario Bonazza wrote:
It is believed the new Alfa 159
(http://www.autoindex.org/news.plt?no=1091#) was designed also thinking
about US sales.
Dario
Well done, ALFA!
This is a very sophisticated machine, with it's full time 4WD and all
the other interesting specifications!
Good to dream
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 11:11 AM, keithw wrote:
Any Alfa is a real car from the day of it's birth, and will never be
otherwise...
Amen. Good to meet another insane^H^H^H^H^H^Htrue Alfisti. ];-)
Godfrey
Just for giggles, I went to my large L.A. Yellow Pages, no Alfa
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1005522ref=author
Wonder what you have to say.
Boris
H. Have you niticed, Boris, there's a person on the bench with their
head on backwards!
Trying out for the next The Exorcist movie?
keith
Cotty wrote:
1023.
(I'm a meg short of a gig)
What's the equivalent in a six-pack?
keith
Cheers,
Cotty
Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/26/2005 5:44:51 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Me think, cheap Canon lenses are really _cheap_ Tamrons!
But who am I to say?
I'm using a Tamron 28-75/2,8 and _want_ to believe it’s a proper lens.
Cotty wrote:
On 27/8/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
It is, indeed, poignant, Cotty. Great emotion, great photo.
Thanks buddy. I hope the new job isn't taking too much out of you - now
that you're just passing the time sitting on you ass talking into a mic
all day.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 25, 2005, at 6:38 PM, keithw wrote:
[...]
I mean, really! 1956! Sports car nirvana age...
My first sports car was a Triumph TR-3!
Lots of memories from back then. I was totally immersed in SCCA
activities, crewing and racing and driving my TR around
Tim Øsleby wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26. august 2005 07:10
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: CR-V3 rechargeables
In a message dated 8/25/2005 2:18:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 25/8/05, Boris
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 5:12 AM, keithw wrote:
Cars were wonderful playthings back then. Now they're too much of a
pain in the butt to deal with. I still love my FrankenSpider, however.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/vehicles/fs-3468.htm
Made non-Alfa by what
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 26, 2005, at 9:45 AM, keithw wrote:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/vehicles/fs-3468.htm
I was thinking you might have put a small block Chevy engine in
there, and a column shift, or something like that!
Heavens, no!!! ;-)
sure is purty!
Thank
Cotty wrote:
Cotty wrote:
Did I mention that we're off to see Alison Krauss in London in a couple
of weeks? g
You lucky bad!
Paul
She's a dish. Oh yeah, and she sings real nice :-)
And somebody in her band handles a fine fiddle and I hear some
outstanding banjo playing.
Her
Graywolf wrote:
Was that a J-2 with a blower that you had, Keith grin?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
No, I _wish_ I had that for a memory!
Best I can do is working on early TD's and being around TC's.
Still... fun stuff.
keith
keithw wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
I hope the hen
Graywolf wrote:
[...]
Currently my photo printer is a 3 year old Epson Stylus Photo 820. Slow,
expensive to run with Epson ink and paper, cheap with off brand stuff
from ebay. Prints better at 360 than at 720 which makes me believe that
the 2880x720 spec is just advertising crap. It too has
, but plenty of
fun reading.
keith
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
keithw wrote:
Graywolf wrote:
Was that a J-2 with a blower that you had, Keith grin?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
No, I _wish_ I had
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20050825/ap_on_bi_ge/kodak_consolidation
That's the most succinct report yet.
Thanks for posting it,
keith whaley
Graywolf wrote:
Would that be this book? No copies available unfortunately.
Press on regardless;: Or, The confessions of a sports car addict,
(Unknown Binding) 1956
by Anne Taylor
graywolf
That's the one!
The authors were Anne Taylor and Fern Mosk.
Publishers were Simon Schuster, N.Y.
wendy beard wrote:
A small diversion for me. Actually shot some ~film~ this weekend. Even
more of a diversion, it wasn't of dogs either!
Went down to Kingston on Sunday to take part in a British Cars in the
Park day.
OK, wasn't entirely dogless. Boris came too.
Mark Roberts wrote:
Kevin Waterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This one time, at band camp, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does everyone measure prints, to make sure they get their money's worth?
Or, am I missing something...
I measure mine as mostly they need to be 8x10
Most people
Mark Roberts wrote:
Illinois Bill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it's outside, perhaps it is a cicada?
I thought it might be an odd sort of cicada, or one making a different
sound, but I found a lot of cicada sound samples on the net and none
like this.
More data: This insect appears (or
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: keithw
Subject: Re: 36mm x 36mm sensor?
Ten make him an 11 X 13 1/4, or 11 X 12 3/4. It's a custom print
anyhow, isn't it?
Does everyone measure prints, to make sure they get their money's worth?
Or, am I missing something
Jack Davis wrote:
In Bryce Canyon 'prox 15 years ago, I was set up to
compress some scenery when a chipmunk appeared on a
pine tree root about 40 or 50 ft from me.
My wife broke off small pieces of a Ritz cracker, she
was munching, and placing them along the root while I
took aim.
They (it)
Mark Roberts wrote:
OK, it pales beside the weirdness of some others' shots, but it's still
quite odd:
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/7cf01017.jpg
I'm not sure what he's doing...
Yes, that is a person, not a statue. I'd describe his performance as
some kind of cross between mime and Tai Chi.
P. J. Alling wrote:
I hope the hen was well cooked...
Ahhh, keeps me in mind of the old Morris Garages autos, it does...
keith
Cotty wrote:
On 24/8/05, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty, Bob, what was the name of that ale again?
Fuller's London Pride! Just had a
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
If you've recently purchased gear from BUYDIG.COM, how did the transaction
go? Anyone have any complaints or problems? Thanks!
Shel
I've bought 3 cameras from them, all came earlier than expected, there
was no pressure to buy anything else, and the transaction was
P. J. Alling wrote:
What about Germany, I think there are more US troops there than in
either the UK or Iraq...
Unh, in response to what message?
keith
Cotty wrote:
On 22/8/05, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
50, actually.
Jens Bladt wrote:
Yup - state number 52,
frank theriault wrote:
On 8/17/05, Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did a bit of street shooting during Malakoff Rockfestival. This is one of
the subjects I stumbled across.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=189705
It's not a really good photo. Except that I like the
Andre Langevin wrote:
I like much the Optio MX (and Optio MX4, which is the same but 4MP
instead of 3MP).
Its only real problem is shutter lag, lkike about any digital PS :(.
Some are a bit better. I remember that the Pentax S5i was among the best
on that aspect.
I have one, and I agree!
Peter Smekal wrote:
Some are a bit better. I remember that the Pentax S5i was among the best
on that aspect.
I have one, and I agree!
keith whaley
What about the Pentax S5z? I'm looking for a real small compact digital.
Peter
don't know, but...
Physical specs are:
S5i:
88mm
Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
I'd like a 26 x 34 sensor myself: It's just about the same image circle
as a 24 x 36 but in the 3:4 ratio I prefer (one of the things I like
about the 645 format).
What a marvelous idea.
Then my SLR customers can
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Ummm ... doesn't the current DS have a 95/95 viewfinder? Doesn't it also
offer an 8 frame burst?
I suppose other differences between the DS and the DS2 will show up
considering these are early, and probably PR generated, comments.
I hope so. For some reason this release
Doug Brewer wrote:
Got back from the GFM Camera Clinic a few hours ago, and must report
that I had much fun. Saw several regulars like Cesar, Tom Reese, Bill
Owens and the lurkers, but also had the pleasure of meeting and talking
with our own Scott Loveless during his first visit to GFM. I
Jens Bladt wrote:
http://gallery13117.fotopic.net/p19136589.html
This is Amager Strandpark in Copenhagen, Øresund. In the background you
can see Øresundsbroen - the bridge between Denmark and Sweden.
The beach is artificially made and was opened to the public recently.
Five shot panorama,
Derby Chang wrote:
Christian wrote:
on Pentax USA site now
http://www.pentaximaging.com/products/product_details/digital_camera--*ist_DS2/reqID--6919574/subsection--digital_slr
Christian
What does freedom in the P... mean?
D
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
Dario Bonazza wrote:
keith whaley wrote:
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Ummm ... doesn't the current DS have a 95/95 viewfinder? Doesn't it
also offer an 8 frame burst?
I suppose other differences between the DS and the DS2 will show up
considering these are early, and probably PR generated,
Cotty wrote:
On 22/8/05, keithw, discombobulated, unleashed:
Viola, the DS2...
Also available in double bass and cello flavours.
Cheers,
Cotty
Ooops! Thanks for the proof reading, Cot ol' chum!
At first, I said, What is he talking about?
Then I saw it!
That's funny!
keith
Jens Bladt wrote:
I know - I am re-doing the panorama as we're speaking - so to speak.
It seems I have included one image too many (not really belonging to the
sequence).
This probnlem is one of the reasons I want a larger buffer in a future *ist
D2. Being able to shot the secuences (sometimes
Jens Bladt wrote:
Kieth wrote:
First of all, there are repeated images there. Groups of people repeated
horizontally.
Thanks, I didn't notice. Sorry about thsi - I prepared the image very
quickly thsi morning.
Normally - when this problem occures - I will past a part og the original
image
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Launching a war simply because you want to (maybe just for political reasons)
I think all wars are fought for political reasons.
and convincing others it is a good thing, is certainly different from
responding
P. J. Alling wrote:
All true, except that the Japanese were waging an aggressive war of
imperial expansion on the Chinese mainland, (where the Japanese army
used rape and plague as weapons), and had previously fought a short
undeclared war with the Soviet Union, (in which Marshal Zhukov
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking? Interesting
perspective.
Oh, did he say that?
Interesting interpretation of what he said.
keith whaley
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one
Glen wrote:
At 09:34 AM 8/22/2005, Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Daniel J. Matyola
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So your point is that the Japanese were justified in bombing Pearl
Harbor so that they could continue the rape of Nanking?
No, those are your words. I made no
clothed people.
Since I am a frequent visitor, and see how out of shape most beach
people are in Hawaii, I mentioned it by name.
Sorry if that offends you.
keith
keithw wrote:
The only thing I'm struck with is, the remarkable absence of
heavy-weight people!
Almost no one is overweight!
Like
Bob Blakely wrote:
Regarding Eactivist's post:
No one has launched a war because they wanted to. To state such nonsense
is to assume that the one launching the war has dictatorial power. To
assume that the President of the US, Prime Minister of Briton, Prime
Minister of Australia have such
William Robb wrote:
I finally managed to get out with the 600 and do some shooting.
This les is a challenge to shoot with, to be sure.
I would think so!
What was the camera attached to it?
With a 35mm camera, you're talking about a 12X magnification.
Try hand holding a 12X telescope sometime,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't care much for fireworks or fireworks pics, but I like this one -
the long trail makes it work for me. However, it appears a bit over
exposed.
That's because he exposure time was 30 seconds, I suppose. g
keith
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Savage
John Munro wrote:
Was/is yours an FA*24, or just an FA24?
Godfrey prefers an FA over an FA*, for some reason...
Do you?
keith whaley
===
The plate on the side of my lens states,
SMC
PENTAX-FA*
1:2 24mm
-IFAL-
I've never heard of an FA24 versus an FA*24; so, I checked Dimitrov's
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Hello Cameron,
I think you need to be cautious about putting down others for their
findings. I do know how to use wide angles, as well as that lens,
having owned two of them. My film experience was very good. My
digital experience was not.
Well, I'm going to keep
Gonz wrote:
Bob Blakely wrote:
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Just to clarify. The government outlawed semi automatic firearms. Not
all guns.
Don't worry, they'll finish the job.
Its true. All it will take is some guy going crazy with a bolt action
rifle. Supposedly JFK
John Munro wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
With regard to the D/DS bodies, there has been a lot of polarized
discussion of it. Some love it, others hate it. I've seen both good and
bad results from it.
It is large and heavy. I saw a lot of chromatic aberration in some
sample exposures I
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Thanks Juan! I'm finding it a nice complement to my other lenses, an
excellent fast 'normal'.
I can see why you go back and forth between this and the FA28 too;
that's what I have the 20-35 for. My principle reason for going this
way was the two stops additional
Cotty wrote:
Some pics from last night (preceded by a few shots from a certain
football club in London)
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare4.html
9 pics in total, about 50k each.
Cheers,
Cotty
I like 'em!
First I've seen of Boris 'n kids!
I see the pints of dark beer/ale well
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Aug 18, 2005, at 10:15 AM, keithw wrote:
Any idea what new price is on this lens [20-35]?
I assume it's the FA version, f/4.0?
I have no need for an automatic lens, but know of no standard K mount
zooms with that range.
I have a fixed focus 19mm, but if I find
Tom C wrote:
Bob Blakely wrote:
Valid and rational conclusion, or not, that IS what happens in the
normal course of human events. Further, the chicken was absolutely
right - until it's death. If I'm crapped on continually in ANY
situation by people of some different (sub) culture, I WILL
P. J. Alling wrote:
I'll second Godfrey on this, the 20-35 is an exceptional lens.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_untitledv.html
I remember having seen this one before. I was impressed then too! g
I guess I'll start looking for one on the used market.
Then I'll put my 19mm
Bob Blakely wrote:
You are incorrect. The only subculture that I come in contact with that
invariably (so far) gives me trouble is the Hispanic gang culture near
my area. That is not to say that all white middle aged males have
treated me well, or that all the Hispanic gang members have
Manuel Magalhães wrote:
Something was missing,
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/35146415/
Sorry,
Manuel
Some very good shots!
Tell me, how are the water clouds done?
I can think of a couple of ways, but see nothing in the image to support
my ideas!
Do you know how they
Fred wrote:
What's PLG?
Pentax Losers' Gallery
Is there a need to insult the people who've contributed to the Pentax Lens
gallery ???
Fred
He just wasn't thinking, Fred.
I'm sure it wasn't meant to be derogatory...
keith
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Tom C
Subject: RE: PAW: People Portraits #30 - GDG
I used to think along the lines that you expressed, because I never
did any darkroom work myself. Once I started scanning my own
transparencies, my viewpoint started to change.
Cotty wrote:
On 16/8/05, Tom Reese, discombobulated, unleashed:
You might want to take this quiz:
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz.html
Left Liberal.
Cheers,
Cotty
I came out as a centrist, something I never gave much thought about being...
As I gave it some thought, I realized
Glen wrote:
At 06:37 PM 8/17/2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
Alright he's been rehabilitated, however after the restoration the new
king still had him dug up, hung, drawn, and quartered.
My, what a quaint custom that is!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posthumous_execution
I had no idea that
Tom Reese wrote:
William Robb wrote:
I believe any time a police officer asks you to step out of the car,
or please come with me, you are being detained.
If you are being detained without reason, you are then suffering from
an unjustifiable arrest.
...
Be as co-operative as possible,
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Margus
thanks a lot for your solution.
Since I did not join a single lesson in chemistry, in fact, do not
understand anything about molybden isulphide oil,
is there a more common name for that seldom fluid ;-)
A good start would be your local hardware store. Look for a
Toralf Lund wrote:
Malcolm Smith wrote:
[ ... ]
In many ways it's all a nonsense; chances are in a small town you are
appearing on CCTV somewhere and in a big city maybe 50, 100, 200 cameras?
Not that I have any objection to that - I welcome it today - but the
principle should be both
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. In most states, only one party to the conversation has to consent and
that can be you if you're a party to the conversation. California requires
all parties to consent. There is no criminal penalty, but you can be sued.
In
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: keithw
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
Yessir, I do.
However, I see no danger from being watched by remote cameras, as I
don't plan to ever do anything illegal!
If they catch me scratching my butt, i hope they have a good
Cotty wrote:
[...]
When working, if I am filming in the street, I often get do-gooders
accosting me about whether I have this permission or that permission for
anything from filming a house, to filming people, to filming the sunset.
I always say yes (which is a lie). Just saves time.
If I
David Savage wrote:
On 8/15/05, keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
-Marco
Geez! That camera (in front) is about the size of a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 Crown
Graphic!
Looks like some kind of video camera to me
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: keithw
Subject: Re: The Photographer's Rights
If I read you right, you do not recommend saying, Why do you want to
know? ;-)
That's the usual rejoinder for nosy people...
While I agree with your sentiment on this one, Keith (my
Cotty wrote:
On 14/8/05, Markus Maurer, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Bill
I will buy gloves tomorrow and try your recommendation.
thanks!
Markus
Elbow length gloves work better. Get good quality rubber. Black's nice.
Cheers,
Cotty
Then a set of glossy black knee length patent
Marco Alpert wrote:
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/peso21.html
Comments welcomed.
-Marco
Geez! That camera (in front) is about the size of a 2 1/4 X 3 1/4 Crown
Graphic!
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 8/13/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just tell everyone to meet at the Starbucks at the corner of
Criminy! The over-priced-burnt-coffee plague has spread to England.
On behalf of Americans who appreciate decent coffee, I'm really sorry.
Me too.
I
Tom Reese wrote:
Keith W. asked:
You can find quite a few Pentax scope references if you go to Google.com
then search GROUPS for Pentax Scope.
Could you elaborate on that just a little, Tom?
Seems that is a way to search group interest lists for messages by
subject? Hmmm. Gotta look into
Fred wrote:
and if you've read this far then you're
a worse schluck than I thought you were!
Not that I'm any expert, but...isn't that a Schmuck?
Or maybe a schlemozzle? [sp?]
keith
Thanks, Cotty - g.
Fred
Juan Buhler wrote:
Yesterday I went to Union Suqare in San Francisco with the M100/2.8 on
the istD. I shot with the lens wide open and the camera on program
mode. I tried to keep my usual shooting distance, which was kind of
difficult given how long the lens is compared to what I'm used to.
Tom Reese wrote:
keithw wrote:
I can't help you with respect to the Pentax scope.
However, I've been so pleased with all my Pentax gear over the years,
I would have no hesitancy at all to buy one!
Scott,
You can find quite a few Pentax scope references if you go to Google.com
William Robb wrote:
http://k43.pbase.com/v3/20/519320/1/46279745.IMG_212201.jpg
William Robb
hah, hah...she never noticed that little threaded hole in the bottom,
and thought it was sort of oddly shaped for a hand grip...
keith
Mark Roberts wrote:
keithw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Reese wrote:
keithw wrote:
I can't help you with respect to the Pentax scope.
However, I've been so pleased with all my Pentax gear over the years,
I would have no hesitancy at all to buy one!
You can find quite a few Pentax
Bob Sullivan wrote:
Thanks to Keith, Christian, Bruce, and Amita for the comments.
I thought and looked hard for a new condition S4.
Meanwhile, I stumbled on a good price for an Optio SV and have bought it.
Willoughby's in NYC is offering it at $261 with a $50 rebate from Pentax.
I don't think
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I liked the picture, and thought it an interesting slice of life.
BTW, what is a Scoop Dispenser?
Where you put the doggy doo you've just scooped up?
On second thought, perhaps it's a supply of scoops for the same purpose?
keith
Hi Bob, and welcome.
For one, I am really glad to see a response from you.
I used to read Shutterbug all the time, and miss the old days.
I'm happy to hear about the spot with Digital Camera Magazine. I'm glad
to know that.
Thanks for the comments, and this comes with fervent wishes for a
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Interesting piece: a movie photographed entirely with a Canon 20D still
camera...
http://patrykrebisz.com/stills/FINAL_movie.html
QuickTime format.
Godfrey
Pretty good!
by the way, the lady's camera sure looks like an Optio S5i! ;-)
keith
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
