On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
Now I'm scared.
So its not just sheep then.
Dave
--
Scott Loveless
Cigarette-free since December 14th, 2008
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
It's me again, Margaret.
I have to admit that I ignored the prior threads on focus problems,
but now it seems my beloved wife's K100D has developed some of its
own. I hereby prostrate myself before the wise and knowledgeable
PDML. My own willful ignorance has left me humiliated and groveling
The K100D does not have the focus calibration feature, so it's off to
Pentax for that issue.
-Adam
On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
It's me again, Margaret.
I have to admit that I ignored the prior threads on focus problems,
but now it seems my
On 12/5/09, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
The K100D does not have the focus calibration feature, so it's off to
Pentax for that issue.
Actually, my Google Foo was off and I think there is a way to do this.
Maybe. http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=22023704
After
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 12/5/09, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
The K100D does not have the focus calibration feature, so it's off to
Pentax for that issue.
Actually, my Google Foo was off and I think there is a way to do this.
Maybe.
On Dec 5, 2009, at 11:50 , Scott Loveless wrote:
Christie's K100D is focusing past where it should.
-snip-
I've noticed similar, but not as pronounced, issues
with the FA50/1.4.
Is there any way I can fix this myself, or am I pretty much stuck with
sending it off to whoever fixes
Saw this beaut parked in front of a friend's neighbor's house. Not
quite a Fiat, but close...
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157621424899200/
--
The first step is learning to take great photos,
the second step is learning to throw away ones that are merely good.
Larry Colen
/vkanna/motori70/imagepages/image20.htm
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:30 AM
Subject: On the subject of Fiat 500s
Saw this beaut parked in front of a friend's neighbor's house
frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:37 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
It's actually a Manfrotto light boom pole.
Is that your Man Frotto or are you just happy to see me?
Old Italian saying: Man - frott'o 'til you drop'o.
--
PDML
William Robb wrote:
We did well then.
I like this
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/lyndsaye/Lyndsaye4/content/WRDP387
0_large.html
and this
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/lyndsaye/Lyndsaye4/content/WRDP368
0_large.html
The more nude ones don't come across very
Bill,
Why do you have a stripper pole in your studio?
Regards, Curious
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 11:54 PM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Feroze
Subject: Re: (no subject) because moron boy forgot one
The only ones I like are the sailor suits shots
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: (no subject) because moron boy forgot one
Bill,
Why do you have a stripper pole in your studio?
Regards, Curious
It's actually a Manfrotto light boom pole.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:37 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
It's actually a Manfrotto light boom pole.
Is that your Man Frotto or are you just happy to see me?
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: (no subject)
===
Actually, she looks quite a bit like her. Especially in the sailor
suit.
We did well then.
I like this
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/lyndsaye/Lyndsaye4/content/WRDP387
0_large.html
and this
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures
- Original Message -
From: Feroze
Subject: Re: (no subject) because moron boy forgot one
The only ones I like are the sailor suits shots, but I think she was
getting more comfortable or maybe I'm kinky and like girls in sailor
suits.
You're probably kinky.
I don't get
My friend Lyndsaye wanted to do a themed shoot. She wanted to emulate an
entertainer named Christine Aguilare or some such.
She brought along costumes and wigs and all sorts of ideas.
Anyway, against my better judgement, I'm throwing this very QD gallery out.
It starts of OK, gets silly and then
In a message dated 4/19/2009 10:19:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
war...@gmail.com writes:
My friend Lyndsaye wanted to do a themed shoot. She wanted to emulate an
entertainer named Christine Aguilare or some such.
She brought along costumes and wigs and all sorts of ideas.
Anyway, against
- Original Message -
From: eactiv...@aol.com
Subject: Re: (no subject)
===
Actually, she looks quite a bit like her. Especially in the sailor suit.
We did well then.
I like this
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/lyndsaye/Lyndsaye4/content/WRDP387
0_large.html
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:02 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
It's frogspawn coral shot through algae that had been gone over by a
snail. When the snail eats, it only harvests about half the algae in
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Can you guess what this is a picture of?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
No.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 05:58:37PM -0400, frank theriault wrote:
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Can you guess what this is a picture of?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
No.
It's frogspawn coral shot
Looks like a really dirty fish tank.
--
Bruce
Saturday, March 28, 2009, 1:14:21 AM, you wrote:
LC Can you guess what this is a picture of?
LC
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:51:42PM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Looks like a really dirty fish tank.
bingo!
I liked the patterns that the snail eats into the algae, and the color
of the frogspawn coral behind it. I need to try it sometime with
flash rather than just available light.
--
Can you guess what this is a picture of?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
--
The fastest way to get your question answered on the net is to post
the wrong answer.
Larry Colen l...@red4est.comhttp://www.red4est.com/lrc
A neon sign, with a humongous greasy thumbprint on the lens.
Easy.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 3/28/09, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Subject: PESO, mystery subject
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday
- Original Message -
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Can you guess what this is a picture of?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
That's an amoeba having sex behind some Chantilly lace.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Shot be a voyeur photog through lace curtains. ;)
Jack
--- On Sat, 3/28/09, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: PESO, mystery subject
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, March 28, 2009, 7:42 AM
Larry Colen wrote:
Can you guess what this is a picture of?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
The sensor in your bounced camera?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On Mar 28, 2009, at 01:14 , Larry Colen wrote:
Can you guess what this is a picture of?
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/3391120183/sizes/l/in/set-72157615924735969/
It's one of three things:
Food (shrimp, chicken?) that is being breaded in a plastic bag.
A dozen neckid oiled up
From Galloway, constant lurker who will de-lurk for a moment.
Golly Gee! Want to know more about the Type 57 Bug, see it inside,
outside, under the hood, being driven down the road by a real guy? The
very well-paid American comedian Jay Leno owns one. Actually he owns several
Bugattis, and
Hi Morris,
Good to see you live on the list! Thanks for the link, and a happy new year to
you.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Morris Galloway morris-gallo...@sbcglobal.net
From Galloway, constant lurker who will de-lurk for a moment.
Golly Gee! Want to
On 1/1/09, Morris Galloway, discombobulated, unleashed:
From Galloway, constant lurker who will de-lurk for a moment.
Golly Gee! Want to know more about the Type 57 Bug, see it inside,
outside, under the hood, being driven down the road by a real guy? The
very well-paid American comedian Jay
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mike wilson wrote:
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/10/28 Tue PM 03:28:15 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: GESO - Free Hugs
Seems kind of well planed for a random act of kindness.
_University_
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the _act_ of taking a photograph is all there is, why bother with film or a
memory card? Keep your battery charged and go thru the motions, because
capturing the image is not the end product ~ being in a place of your choosing
to experience the environment
John Sessoms wrote:
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the _act_ of taking a photograph is all there is, why bother with
film or a memory card? Keep your battery charged and go thru the
motions, because capturing the image is not the end product ~ being in
a place of your choosing to
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh darn, I saw this thread in my inbox and thought it was for me.
My birthday was on the 27th :)
- Dave
PS happy birthday to the other Dave!
Well, happy birthday to you too.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
After changing my 70-300 lens a number of times to test it on my K10
and K100 the K100 got a speck of dust on the sensor. I tried a couple
of puffs from a bulb blower that has always worked before but this
time not only didn't the speck move, the number of specks increased
every time I tried.
1.Give us a subject so that we can more quickly discard your posts.
2.I use a little blower that uses dry, filtered CO2 and is especially
for optical cleaning.
Regards
Bob...
---
I don't mind if you don't like my manners.
I
Another from San Francisco ... yesterday about noon...
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/74-bigheart.jpg
Big Heart - Union Square 2008
Panasonic L1 + Summilux-D 25mm f/1.4 ASPH
ISO 100 @ f/4 @ 1/1600 sec
Comments and critique always appreciated.
enjoy
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
They have a narcissistic need for a reaction from the group they have chosen
to harass. Any response, whether directly, or indirectly (this email would
classify as the latter) fulfills this need, as they then know that they are
being read, and are controlling people enough to elicit a response.
very nice shot Mark. Like others have mentioned, I wish the black
portion on top had just a tad more detail to make it seem like part of
the pic instead of some mysterious black blob. Otherwise, its
stunning, love it.
gonz
On 12/18/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Steve Desjardins
A cultural diversion here. Isn't the British equivalent of gesture
just like a victory sign, i.e., it uses two fingers?
Two fingers with the palm of the hand toward the photographer = V for
Victory.
http://www.fototime.com/D5E20E281148C5D/standard.jpg
Two
Oh!!! Or like it is customary to say here: HAR!
Now I get it. So it was indeed half the victory sign...
Fascinating!
On 10/25/07, John Sessoms [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Steve Desjardins
A cultural diversion here. Isn't the British equivalent of gesture
just like a victory sign,
The basic kit lens for Pentax digital cameras - good value. This is
essentially unused, in original box etc.
Would make a good companion to the *ist-D I also have up for sale.
Make me an offer on the lens alone or on the set.
Off list.
Stan
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
I'd like to fiddle around with my flash. What would be a good subject
so I could easily see the differences in my adjustments?
rg2
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Something of high contrast. Preferably light and dark areas holding
some amount of detail.
Jack
--- Rebekah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to fiddle around with my flash. What would be a good
subject
so I could easily see the differences in my adjustments?
rg2
--
PDML Pentax
On Sep 2, 2007, at 11:08 AM, Rebekah wrote:
I'd like to fiddle around with my flash. What would be a good subject
so I could easily see the differences in my adjustments?
Any static scene that you can shoot over and over again, preferably
with a Macbesh Color Chart in the frame.
Godfrey
sending this both to Scott and the list in case he his reading his
regular mail but not the list :) :)
also -
The clickables on the page don't work -- You may shoot me for mentioning
this again - but is
there another link to get to the older stuff? and the theme page?
ann
--
PDML
Hi Ann
Quoting ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sending this both to Scott and the list in case he his reading his
regular mail but not the list :) :)
also -
The clickables on the page don't work -- You may shoot me for
mentioning
this again - but is
there another link to get to
- Original Message -
From: Brian Walters
Subject: Re: subject for Sept PUG ?
Try this:
http://pug.komkon.org/general/themes.html
If you mean the clickables on this page:
http://pug.komkon.org/
They work for me - but the whole line isn't clickable. You need to move
Brian Walters wrote:
Hi Ann
Quoting ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
sending this both to Scott and the list in case he his reading his
regular mail but not the list :) :)
also -
The clickables on the page don't work -- You may shoot me for
mentioning
this again - but is
there another
So I tried again, same carousel. Just went through the pictures with a
finer tooth comb. STill don't know that I have found a good one, but
Anything I can do to make it better I would really like to know. thanks.
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/mypics/698154/display/9710380
sandy.
Taken a few weeks ago at a dressage clinic at the farm.
I have shown a few of Ethan, but he seems to like the camera better
every time i see him.
Here he is waiting for Mom to finish schooling my daughter.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5983342
K10D, FA 70-200, SR on, Minor PS
Great expression, and he's a seriously cute kid.
Nicely done.
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/21/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken a few weeks ago at a dressage clinic at the farm.
I have shown a few of Ethan, but he seems to like the camera better
every time i see him.
Here he is
Perfect exposure (on my monitor, ATSG) of a handsome guy.
Jack
--- David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Taken a few weeks ago at a dressage clinic at the farm.
I have shown a few of Ethan, but he seems to like the camera better
every time i see him.
Here he is waiting for Mom to
Great face!
G
On May 21, 2007, at 5:42 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Taken a few weeks ago at a dressage clinic at the farm.
I have shown a few of Ethan, but he seems to like the camera better
every time i see him.
Here he is waiting for Mom to finish schooling my daughter.
Excellent. A fine example of how sun and shadow can work for you. Nicely
blurred background. Overall, a very good shot.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Great expression, and he's a seriously cute kid.
Nicely done.
Cheers,
Cute little guy. It would have been better to deal with the shadows
in his eyes - all shade or fill flash or something. Still cute
though.
--
Bruce
Monday, May 21, 2007, 5:42:23 AM, you wrote:
DJB Taken a few weeks ago at a dressage clinic at the farm.
DJB I have shown a few of Ethan, but
On 8/5/07, Doug Brewer, discombobulated, unleashed:
You guys are killing the archiving software.
I blame Godfrey.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On May 9, 2007, at 6:08 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 09/05/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys are killing the archiving software.
Wow, It does really spack out when there's a lack of subject line,
it's a bit twilight zone ;-)
Well, since I saved all the individual
On 09/05/07, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You guys are killing the archiving software.
Wow, It does really spack out when there's a lack of subject line,
it's a bit twilight zone ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
You guys are killing the archiving software.
Doug Brewer
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I suppose, but what fun is that?
Doug Brewer wrote:
You guys are killing the archiving software.
Doug Brewer
http://www.drivingtheflies.com
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fxt hon shewb rt nslpn raq liot.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/22.htm
From: Steve Barbour [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a powerful photo... and with your words,
how life is hard...
I feel and often share your ambivalence in taking these moving
photos
It's intense stuff sometimes. I know you post photos from the
I've been trying to see just how difficult it would be to handhold
the big bling lens (FA 250-600/5.6) and it actually isn't as
difficult as I had imagined.
I managed to capture this GBH in flight with it and the K10D. SR
seems to help quite a bit (as does decent light):
Sorry for forgetting to add the subject prior to sending.
Paul,
I like the idea of completing the wing (although cheating a bit) for
a nicer composition. Yes, I believe I did have my settings on a half
stop under and the noise is pretty much visible only on the full size
image. I process my
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/5/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
Good stuff. This one is almost as amusing (warning: Pentax content).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSnc36z4m0A
--
Scott Loveless
That is funny. Have you posted it to a Canon list?
William Robb wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
William Robb
--
--
The more I know of men, the more I like my dog.
-- Anne Louise
- Original Message -
From: P. J. Alling
Subject: Re: On the subject of Canons
That is funny. Have you posted it to a Canon list?
It was posted to the Canon forum at dpreview. We'll see how long before Phil
pulls it for denigrating his sponsor.
William Robb
http://www.youtube.com
That one's just bizarre.
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/5/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
Good stuff. This one is almost as amusing (warning: Pentax content).
Too bad you'll never know how much fun this is creating (for me)
amongst a nest of Canon users and a fever pitched Canon dealer.
THANK YOU!!
Smiling Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
On 5/2/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
That is funny. Have you posted it to a Canon list?
It was posted to the Canon forum at dpreview. We'll see how long before Phil
pulls it for denigrating his sponsor.
I just put it up on the EOS list ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
On 5/2/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Welcome to Santa Monica...
Norm
William Robb wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I knew i bought Nikon for a reason.
LOL
Dave
On 2/5/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/2/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
That is funny. Have you posted it to a Canon list?
It was posted to the Canon forum at dpreview. We'll see how long before Phil
pulls it for
Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/5/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not office friendly (language warning).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SmvvvQ0ic7s
Have fun
Good stuff. This one is almost as amusing (warning: Pentax content).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSnc36z4m0A
On Feb 5, 2007, at 5:54 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSnc36z4m0A
That's funnier than the bum cursing Canon!
Maybe it's really Pentax chasing bum ... !!
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 1/27/2007 3:00:13 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi All
http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/73625976
A boating-theme still life - this yacht was tied up in the Pohara
Harbour, Golden Bay New Zealand right next to one of Jacques Costeau's
old
Hi All
http://www.pbase.com/kiwibiologist/image/73625976
A boating-theme still life - this yacht was tied up in the Pohara
Harbour, Golden Bay New Zealand right next to one of Jacques Costeau's
old ships which is being used as a floating espresso shop!
Pentax K10D ISO100 DNG
FA 24-90 @ 58mm,
Well spotted.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alastair Robertson
Sent: 27. januar 2007 23:55
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO: a knotty subject
Hi All
http://www.pbase.com
Thanks for all your thoughts, comments, compliments!
Godfrey
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/04.htm
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For me, the stone wall divides the picture too much.
Could you please go back and re-shoot the pic with the
wall more in the foreground? And
In my opinion, Film vs. Digital IS a religion, but that's another argument.
I do have some experience to share shooting and post-processing similar
subjects with two different workflows:
1) Web Gallery: http://www.westerickson.net/lithportals/
--Rolleiflex 3.5E (6x6 medium format)
On 1/22/07 4:36 PM, Mark Erickson, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.westerickson/brickwork/
You omitted .net
It should be;
http://www.westerickson.net/brickwork/
BTW, I see the difference. Interesting.
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Oops. Thanks, Ken. The two correct links are:
http://www.westerickson.net/brickwork/
http://www.westerickson.net/lithportals/
Incidentally, I just realized that I still have the original color scans and
digital images archived. I have near-duplicates of the library door, shot
from about
Apparently man can't adversely affect the
environment. Didn't you know
the recent rises in global temperature are all
natural phenomenon?
There is something to be said for this theory as
well.
Both sides of the debate have political motivations,
I don't trust either
side to be honest.
Well stated thank you for posting that.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Steve Farnham
Non-scientists have opinions all over the map, and
many of them are politically motivated.
Climatologists, that is scientists who have spent
years learning the underlying science and more years
On 12/24/06 1:59 PM, Steve Farnham, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What does that tell you?
It tells me that a possibility of me dying from hitting my head at a sharp
corner of Tofu would be far greater than dying from climate change in my
life time.
Ken
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
What does that tell you?
Honestly? It confuses me.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Steve Farnham
Sent: 24. desember 2006 19:59
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Subject: Re: Doomsday is coming upon
PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Steve Farnham
Sent: 24. desember 2006 19:59
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Subject: Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?
Apparently man can't adversely affect the
environment. Didn't you know
the recent rises in global temperature are all
natural phenomenon
Steve Farnham wrote:
Apparently man can't adversely affect the
environment. Didn't you know
the recent rises in global temperature are all
natural phenomenon?
There is something to be said for this theory as
well.
Both sides of the debate have political motivations,
I don't trust
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam
Maas
Sent: 24. desember 2006 21:39
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?
Steve Farnham wrote:
Apparently man can't adversely affect the
environment. Didn't you know
the recent rises in global temperature are all
natural
List
Subject: Re: Subject: Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?
Steve Farnham wrote:
Apparently man can't adversely affect the
environment. Didn't you know
the recent rises in global temperature are all
natural phenomenon?
There is something to be said for this theory as
well.
Both
Steve,
I'm a quantitative, measurable kind of guy with a background and love
of science. I see what you are saying, but recognize that 'Science'
is much more political than most any scientist will admit. Ths
scientific establishment dismissed/burried Einstein for nearly 20
years before it
On 12/25/06, Steve Farnham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Non-scientists have opinions all over the map, and
many of them are politically motivated.
Climatologists, that is scientists who have spent
years learning the underlying science and more years
studying the climate by actually going out
Last year when I visited my daughter in Scotland I bought an Olympus
C-7070 for the trip. I left my SLRs home, mainly because I was
already constantly in trouble with my family for spending too much on
processing film. The Oly proved to be very versatile and on seeing
and printing up to A4
JPEG files straight out of the cameras with same lens on both.
The file names say something and full Exif inside. Untouched.
FA 1.7/50mm (200 or 100 ISO):
http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_50mm_200.jpg
http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_50mm_100.jpg
Sigma EX 70-200 @ 200mm (200 or 100
JPEG files straight out of the cameras with same lens on both.
The file names say something and full Exif inside. Untouched.
FA 1.7/50mm (200 or 100 ISO):
http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/D_50mm_200.jpg
http://www.dariobonazza.com/public/K10_50mm_100.jpg
Sigma EX 70-200 @ 200mm (200
I studied them for a few minutes. After applying the same level of sharpening
to both, I found that the K resolved considerably more detail than the D in the
test with the 50mm lens. In both tests with the 200mm lens, it was harder for
me to discern any real difference in detail, which suggests
it.
Looking forward to meeting you.
Cheers
Mike
=
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:34:09 -0500
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New to the Group (DC gathering)
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain
201 - 300 of 867 matches
Mail list logo
