Umm, Chris, might not the grain enhancer degrade things a bit g -
probably more than a good quality ND filter, don'tcha think?
Chris Brogden wrote:
True enough. Some may not be partial to using a faster film, especially
with the attendant degradation from the ND filter, but that could work
Mark R. wrote:
in last month's Popular Photography that one of their
monthly reader's photos had artificially enhanced grain that was achieved by
shooting a normal slide, projecting it onto *sandpaper*
Why in the world wouldn't someone just choose a film with a grain pattern he
liked and
What a crock ...
Due to the industry progression of films
towards extremely fine grain, photographers
have often had to do without the pleasing
visual effect a coarse or moderately grained
image can invoke. [...] Many photographers have
wanted to add the mood and drama of graininess
Rob Brigham wrote:
Is this idea of any interest?
One of our distributors tried to get me interested in it... I passed.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users'
Of course, one could always use a neutral density filter on a higher
speed film and get the grain plus some of the benefits (wider
aperture, slower shutter speeds) of a slower, finer grained film.
Chris Brogden wrote:
Well, to be fair to them the nice thing about an add-on grain filter is
So you have to keep the thing inside the camera for the whole
roll. Great idea.
And I like this phrase:
transforming ordinary images into extraordinary works of art.
Whohoo!
I'm calling the MOMA right now!
j
--
---
Shel wrote:
What a crock ...
bunch 'o advert stuff deleted for brevity
Color film? What do i know, but I'm sure there are at least several
color films that offer moderate to course grain.
May I humbly suggest Fuji 1600
(Oh, you said moderate grain, sorry ;^)
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Tri-X, Agfapan 400, Kodak 2475 Recording Film, Ilford HP-5 and HP-5+,
Neopan 1600, Delta 3200, Bergger 200, etc. And then there are
numerous developers and developing techniques that can contribute to
grain.
Well, to be fair to them the nice thing
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Rob Brigham wrote:
Is this idea of any interest?
One of our distributors tried to get me interested in it... I passed.
Did you test it forts? Does it really work? Or is it all hype?
Bob Harris
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
Yeah, the Kodak Max films. Especially the 800 speed.
Bruce Dayton
Sacramento, CA
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 10:39 AM
Subject: Re: Artificial film grain (different)...
Snip
Tri-X, Agfapan 400
Robert Harris wrote:
Does it really work? Or is it all hype?
The idea was so silly that I just passed on it after reading the brochure.
-Aaron
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
May I humbly suggest Fuji 1600
(Oh, you said moderate grain, sorry ;^)Fore!!8^D )
...or Konica 3200. As a photography teacher once said to me, in a thick
Danish accent, These grains appear to be the size of chickens.
To be totally
True enough. Some may not be partial to using a faster film, especially
with the attendant degradation from the ND filter, but that could work for
others.
chris
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Of course, one could always use a neutral density filter on a higher
speed film and
Shel Belinkoff writes:
Color film? What do i know, but I'm sure there are at least several
color films that offer moderate to course grain.
I've been known to deliberately underexpose 400 or 800 colour print film to get
a grainy effect. It looks horrible but can be useful. You have to be
14 matches
Mail list logo
