He certainly was a technical genius. And much of what he discovered
remains the foundation of BW photogrtaphic science. His work differs
from that of most others in that it can't be judged from a print in a
book. You have to see the silver prints. Then you can understand his
artistry and why he
Hi,
His work differs from that of most others in that it can't be judged
from a print in a book. You have to see the silver prints.
Surely this just makes him a good printer rather than a good
photographer.
In my opinion a good photographer's work doesn't depend on the quality
of the
I've been reading over this book recently just to get a feel for how a
well-known photographer went about his work. Its a pretty good book,
although, a lot of the pictures have similarities, making some of the
narratives a little repetitive: Most of them were taken only a little ways
from his
3 matches
Mail list logo
