On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 03:31:03PM -0400, John wrote:
> On 6/17/2020 16:12:20, John Francis wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:48:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Jun 12, 2020, at 11:28 PM, Alan C wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Igor, I did a lot of tests too. The TC shots were
On 6/17/2020 16:12:20, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:48:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
On Jun 12, 2020, at 11:28 PM, Alan C wrote:
Igor, I did a lot of tests too. The TC shots were always inferior to the cropped
shots without TC. I only have consumer lenses so I can't
It looks a wee bit sharper with the teleconverter, but that could be
subject movement.
On 6/10/2020 11:25 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I took some photos of Mombird today with the bigma, and some with the bigma
plus my 2x teleconverter (which becomes manual focus)
It’s my impression that the best
I think the non versions are better imo
Dave
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 11:25 PM Larry Colen wrote:
> I took some photos of Mombird today with the bigma, and some with the
> bigma plus my 2x teleconverter (which becomes manual focus)
>
> It’s my impression that the best with the TC are a little
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 11:48:50PM -0700, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
> > On Jun 12, 2020, at 11:28 PM, Alan C wrote:
> >
> > Igor, I did a lot of tests too. The TC shots were always inferior to the
> > cropped shots without TC. I only have consumer lenses so I can't comment on
> > how a TC
> On Jun 12, 2020, at 11:28 PM, Alan C wrote:
>
> Igor, I did a lot of tests too. The TC shots were always inferior to the
> cropped shots without TC. I only have consumer lenses so I can't comment on
> how a TC performs with Limited or Star lenses. Paul's bird images with the
> D-FA
Igor, I did a lot of tests too. The TC shots were always inferior to the
cropped shots without TC. I only have consumer lenses so I can't comment
on how a TC performs with Limited or Star lenses. Paul's bird images
with the D-FA 150-450 with 1.4x TC (=630mm) are so good which seems to
suggest
Hi Larry!
A while back, I've had a few occasions when I had a chance to compare
a lens+TC vs lens+cropping.
My overall impression was that indeed, sometimes, going without TC might
be as good or even better than with TC (but not always).
I remember two cases when no TC was better.
1. I was
> On Jun 11, 2020, at 12:15 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
>
> Due in part to the moving target (in addition to other issues),
> a precise comparison seems impossible.
>
> Still, I found the "no teleconverter" images a bit more satisfactory.
> In other words, teleconverter does not seem to
Due in part to the moving target (in addition to other issues),
a precise comparison seems impossible.
Still, I found the "no teleconverter" images a bit more satisfactory.
In other words, teleconverter does not seem to contribute.
Bulent
I took some photos of Mombird today with the bigma, and some with the bigma
plus my 2x teleconverter (which becomes manual focus)
It’s my impression that the best with the TC are a little bit better than
cropping without it, though with manual focus I missed many more shots.
It’s pretty warm
11 matches
Mail list logo
