These lenses are still available -- photos available on request. If interested,
email me at jj...@cornell.edu. Thanks for the discussion about these lenses
sparked by this posting last week!
Two lenses in excellent condition -- the AF Sigma 24mm f/2.8 Super-Wide II and
the MF (with Pentax-A
I was once given the AF version of this lens to shoot for few days. It
was extremely good. The only problem was rather weak flare resistance.
It was easily as sharp as k24/2.8 that I had at the time. Color
rendition was slightly different but not bad at all. Later I was
interested and
Long time no see!
Well, I've completed my MA work and am looking toward a Spring graduation.
Finally. Only been 6 years.
You get down to Columbus much these days?
Anyway, I'm interested in one of these. Can you send me a sample image
from each?
The version II has always gotten good respect.
Joe, that exposure correction matches my findings on one sample Sigma
AF 24mm 2.8, with MZ5, PZ70, PZ1p, Mx and Lx (both Mx and Lx needed no
correction at all). Wrong maximum aperture reported to the camera was
tought to be the problem back then.
Cheers,
lf
Joe's words:
The AF lens seems to
I owned the manual focus version of this lens for quite some time and
liked it for its good IQ and small size. I also enjoyed its close-up
capabilities; not a macro, but it focused closer than just about any
other 24mm (or 28mm) I've come across. When I look back at my photos
with it, most of them
Two lenses in excellent condition -- the AF Sigma 24mm f/2.8 Super-Wide II and
the MF (with Pentax-A contacts) Sigma 24mm f/2.8 Super-Wide II lenses in Pentax
mount.
The AF lens seems to need a -1.0 EF adjustment on most Pentax digital bodies;
the MF lens needs -1.3 EF or so (this seems to be
6 matches
Mail list logo
