Ilford has introduced two new disposable cameras shooting BW film.
One comes loaded with XP2 and the other HP5. I have no idea who would
buy such things, I mean their lenses will probably be too good and have
fewer light leeks than lomograhers would want, and anyone else
wanting to shoot
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 10:39 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Ilford has introduced two new disposable cameras shooting BW film. One
comes loaded with XP2 and the other HP5. I have no idea who would buy such
things, I mean their lenses will probably be too good and have
John Graves jh.gra...@verizon.net writes:
PS my LunaPro still works...I will need a source
for the PX625a cells though.
I've been buying them from this guy:
http://stores.ebay.com/BATTERY-MART
-tih
--
I don't believe that souls or bodies can be changed by incantation.
On 1/18/2011 3:52 AM, Tom Ivar Helbekkmo wrote:
John Gravesjh.gra...@verizon.net writes:
PS my LunaPro still works...I will need a source
for the PX625a cells though.
I've been buying them from this guy:
http://stores.ebay.com/BATTERY-MART
-tih
Now that it's been decided that it's
On 18/01/2011 10:01 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Now that it's been decided that it's alright to have mercury in Light
Bulbs when will we get our mercury batteries back?
Yeah, that's pretty funny actually.
Ceiling Voice says:
Did you know that compact florescent light bulbs contain mercury and as
Yeah. Unfortunately last figure stated for Germany was 89% end up in
household trash. Mercury doesn't react into something harmless in
waste incinerators and cannot be filtered, it goes straight into the
food chain. Politics. You have to wonder.
Ecke
2011/1/18 William Robb
On 18/01/2011 10:46 AM, eckinator wrote:
Yeah. Unfortunately last figure stated for Germany was 89% end up in
household trash. Mercury doesn't react into something harmless in
waste incinerators and cannot be filtered, it goes straight into the
food chain. Politics. You have to wonder.
Ecke
I
On 1/18/2011 1:43 PM, William Robb wrote:
On 18/01/2011 10:46 AM, eckinator wrote:
Yeah. Unfortunately last figure stated for Germany was 89% end up in
household trash. Mercury doesn't react into something harmless in
waste incinerators and cannot be filtered, it goes straight into the
food
Aside from my Digital Pentax, I am the recipient of some of my Dad's
cameras. Included in the lot are a couple of Contaxes and a Leica M4.
The Tessar 50 mm is supposedly good. The M4 has an assortment of lenses
including what can either be described as a cannon or a do-it yourself
SLR.
I'm jealous! The M4 is a great camera. Some Contaxes are excellent as well.
Tell us more!
The thing that looks like a cannon or do-it-yourself SLR is probably a Leica
Visoflex system for focusing longer lenses that aren't rangefinder coupled.
It's awkward at best. What other Leica lenses do
Silver salts have been used in the past as an antibiotic. They kill a
lot of bacteria. However unless you're dumping commercial quantities,
(hundreds of gallons), not a gallon or two, and in your case probably a
lot less, it shouldn't cause any problem in a sewage treatment plant. I
know
Paul,
I have already discovered the Leica snick. Lenses. The Cannon is a 200
mm Telyt which must be used with the Visoflex viewer/mirror assembly. It
took me a while to figure out how to put that assembly together. The
camera came with a 50mm f1.4 Summilux, 35mm f2.0 Summicron, and 135mm f4
From: John Graves
I have a few questions for the group though. If I dump the Microdol
into the town's septic system, will the Treatment Plant blow up or
otherwise stop functioning. Is there a good way to clean out the
plastic and glass (fixer) bottles or should I add to my collection?
Have I
On 18 January 2011 09:08, John Graves jh.gra...@verizon.net wrote:
Paul,
I have already discovered the Leica snick. Lenses. The Cannon is a 200 mm
Telyt which must be used with the Visoflex viewer/mirror assembly. It took
me a while to figure out how to put that assembly together. The
Nice. The Summilux 50/1.4 gets good reviews; the Summicron 35/2 is a classic.
And, as I'm sure you know, both of those Contax bodies are wonderful cameras. I
believe there's some debate in regard tow which is superior -- the II or IIA,
but both are superb. I think the II was a prewar design,
On 1/22/2010 7:54 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
I've met some students this week who have never seen a record player (I
quickly told them to google record player and click web images), and I used
the expression
On 1/26/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Hell, I had/have correction tape in my Royal manual typewriter. You really
were old school...
Don't use that stuff. It crumbles and falls into the machine, gumming
up the works something awful. Learn to type betetr or jsut leanr to
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1/26/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Hell, I had/have correction tape in my Royal manual typewriter. You really
were old school...
Don't use that stuff. It crumbles and falls into the
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO:
Film is Dead
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine
And I just replied, equally offlist.
And I just went and had another shower - purely due to the photoporn, I
assure you
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of
David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
Pffft. Cylinders
2010/1/24 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com:
David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded
to
define the term used. :-)
Might just as well
David Savage wrote:
2010/1/24 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com:
David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded
to
define the term used. :-)
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then
proceeded to define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old
Edison format, and a crank-up phonograph to play them
On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bob W wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then
proceeded to define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old
Edison format, and a
On 1/24/2010 8:54 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
define the term
2010/1/24 P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
My records aren't vinyl, they're some kind of ceramic. They break if you
look at them the wrong way.
you mean shellac?
cheers
ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On 1/24/2010 12:00 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bob W wrote:
and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then
proceeded to define the term used. :-)
Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then
I have a couple of hundred 78s,
2010/1/24 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
On 1/24/2010 8:54 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
and I usedthe expression *45* and received lots of
wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to
Looks like somebody's robot got lost...
On 1/21/2010 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote:
No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
William Robb
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
That's what I was thinking. I looked to see if a Jawa was peering
from behind the dumpster.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:48 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like somebody's robot got lost...
On 1/21/2010 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote:
No attempt at art, but this is a
Subash wrote:
talking of film, i just got myself a SuperA in beautiful condition: the
electronics, metering, everything works. came with an odd 20mm lens,
RE.Auto-Topcor 20mm 1:4. googled a bit and found out about topcon
cameras and that the voigtlander nokton 58/1.4 is 'derived' from the
topcor
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old Edison format,
and a crank-up phonograph to play them on.
Paul
Dave
I;'m not sure how many Dad had but IIRC its around 50-75, not really
sure. Sis
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this year for a
Pentax medium format film camera.
I'll give you a good deal on some very nice 6x7 gear.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this year for
a Pentax medium format film camera.
I'll give you a good deal on some very nice 6x7 gear
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:23:50 -0600
William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this
year for a Pentax medium format film camera.
I'll give you a good deal on some very nice 6x7
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers,
Christine
In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bit:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/6x7stuff/fleet67.html
William
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:11 AM
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine
And I just replied, equally offlist.
best
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers,
Christine
In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bit:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb
Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf
Of
William Robb
Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 1:12 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
- Original Message -
From: Christine Aguila
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
In all
Thanks Paul - but finances won't let me!
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P N
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 11:08 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
On Jan 23, 2010
On 1/23/2010 10:11 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re:
PESO: Film is Dead
In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers,
Christine
In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bit:
http
somebody go diving... =(
2010/1/22 Pasvorn Boonmark pasv...@boonmark.net:
I also bet that more goody were in the red dumpster too.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
wrote:
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
--
Bruce
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
Yup, Back in it's day that was about 25K worth of machinery.
It was stripped for whatever parts might be useful (bellows pumps and the
like
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:32 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
somebody go diving... =(
Oh, I would love too. But my wife will kill me, for sure.
-Pasvorn
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
, you wrote:
WR - Original Message -
WR From: Bruce Dayton
WR Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
WR Yup, Back in it's day that was about 25K worth of machinery.
WR It was stripped for whatever parts might be useful (bellows
From: Bruce Dayton
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
-- Bruce Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote:
WR No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview.
WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
WR William Robb
Noritsu
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
home is the only viable option.
I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
About two years ago I stopped in at one of
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:15 PM
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
-- Bruce Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote:
WR No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview.
WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
WR
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead
Question for William Robb - What is the function of the building it was
sitting next to?
That building is the back of the warehouse where I (and a whole bunch of
other people) have storage/workshops
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
home is the only viable option.
I'm sure glad I sold my film gear
On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote:
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
home is the
From: Mark Roberts
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
home is the only viable option.
I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
About two years ago I
From: Christine Aguila
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
home is the only viable option.
I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
About two years
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila
cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:
I've met some students this week who have never seen a record player (I
quickly told them to google record player and click web images), and I used
the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then
From: Christine Aguila
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the
cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at
home is the only viable option.
I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value.
About two
No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
All thats left is to carve the head stone
Dave
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
Looks artsy to me.
A poignant photo that brought a tear to my eye.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
--
Bruce
Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote:
WR No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview.
WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html
WR William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I also bet that more goody were in the red dumpster too.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive.
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Bob, don't forget the destiny of out-of-work horses...
LF
Bob W escreveu:
They still make buggy whips too. I doubt anyone has any
illusion that
the horse drawn buggy is still alive as a transportation machine,
though. :-)
it is, actually. Most of the world's population do not live in
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Luiz Felipe luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br wrote:
Bob, don't forget the destiny of out-of-work horses...
That's a sticky subject.
--
Scott Loveless
Cigarette-free since December 14th, 2008
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Mar 23, 2009, at 11:18 , Scott Loveless wrote:
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Luiz Felipe luiz.fel...@techmit.com.br
wrote:
Bob, don't forget the destiny of out-of-work horses...
That's a sticky subject.
While I'm tanning tomorrow I'll hide my remorse for the horse.
Joseph
V700
.-)
DagT
Den 20. mars. 2009 kl. 22.01 skrev Nick Wright:
Now who's being ridiculous?
If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why
did Fuji reintroduce Velvia?
Why did a company show a new $1,600 enlarger at PMA? Why is
Voigtlander still pumping out brand new
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:40 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film?
Some of us still use it:
J:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/443000-443999/443614_1280x1024.jpg
T:
In a message dated 3/20/2009 2:41:28 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
li...@thrane.name writes:
And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film?
Some of us still use it:
J:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/443000-443999/443614_1280x1024.jpg
T:
Now who's being ridiculous?
If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why
did Fuji reintroduce Velvia?
Why did a company show a new $1,600 enlarger at PMA? Why is
Voigtlander still pumping out brand new rangefinders and lenses to go
with? Not to mention their new Bessa III
.
They still make buggy whips too. I doubt anyone has any illusion that
the horse drawn buggy is still alive as a transportation machine,
though. :-)
G
On Mar 20, 2009, at 2:01 PM, Nick Wright wrote:
Now who's being ridiculous?
If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why
did
and money for the
vast majority. Fortunately, that makes film equipment very inexpensive
for those who do wish to partake.
Paul
On Mar 20, 2009, at 5:01 PM, Nick Wright wrote:
Now who's being ridiculous?
If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why
did Fuji
/images/444000-444999/444154_1280x1024.jpg
Bronica SQ-A, PS 180mm 1:4.5, Ilford HP5+ 120, Epson V700
.-)
DagT
Den 20. mars. 2009 kl. 22.01 skrev Nick Wright:
Now who's being ridiculous?
If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why
did Fuji reintroduce Velvia?
Why did
Wonderful portraits, Dag!
I bet you didn't really *need* to use film to make them.
However, that old Bronica SQ-A is a nice camera.
Godfrey
On Mar 20, 2009, at 2:40 PM, DagT wrote:
And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film?
Some of us still use it:
J:
Thanks!
Maybe you are right. Give me a dslr with waist level finder and large
sensor and I´ll consider it .-)
And the PS180mm is a fantastic lens too...
DagT
Den 20. mars. 2009 kl. 22.43 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:
Wonderful portraits, Dag!
I bet you didn't really *need* to use film to make
Sorry! I thought you were being serious. I hate email.
I happen to believe that the horse and buggy is a completely
appropriate form of transportation, seriously. If I had enough land to
grow the food a horse would require I would have and use one in a
heartbeat.
Also if film were dead (or even
Great portraits. I especially like that second one. Was he hamming for
the camera? Or was he really upset?
Also, how do you like that V700?
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 4:52 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
Thanks!
Maybe you are right. Give me a dslr with waist level finder and large sensor
and
They still make buggy whips too. I doubt anyone has any
illusion that
the horse drawn buggy is still alive as a transportation machine,
though. :-)
it is, actually. Most of the world's population do not live in the countries
that we live in, but the horse-, donkey- or ass-drawn buggy
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 10:40:55PM +0100, DagT wrote:
And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film?
Some of us still use it:
J:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/443000-443999/443614_1280x1024.jpg
T:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
They still make buggy whips too. I doubt anyone has any
illusion that
the horse drawn buggy is still alive as a transportation machine,
though. :-)
it is, actually. Most of the world's population do not live in the
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry! I thought you were being serious. I hate email.
I happen to believe that the horse and buggy is a completely
appropriate form of transportation, seriously. If I had enough land to
grow the food a horse would
DagT wrote:
And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film?
Some of us still use it:
J:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/443000-443999/443614_1280x1024.jpg
T:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/445000-445999/445718_1280x1024.jpg
L:
ridiculous?
If film is dead then why did Kodak make Ektar (now in 120 too)? Why
did Fuji reintroduce Velvia?
Why did a company show a new $1,600 enlarger at PMA? Why is
Voigtlander still pumping out brand new rangefinders and lenses to go
with? Not to mention their new Bessa III 6x7/6x6
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Film is dead (was: Re: New gear, but now I have a decision to
make...)
Film is no more dead than painting is dead. It's just found a slightly
different niche than it once had.
Slightly different, and much, much smaller.
William
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Film is dead (was: Re: New gear, but now I have a decision to
make...)
Also if film were dead (or even on life support), there would not be
two one hour minilabs in a town with under 10,000 population.
I think you'll find
Hi DagT: Your portraits are Beautiful! Beautiful! Beautiful! I love'em!
Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: DagT li...@thrane.name
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 4:40 PM
Subject: PESO - Three boys, WAS: Film is dead
And why do
Thanks, Nick and the rest of you!
He was really upset and I guess I intruded on him with the camera. My
wife loves that photograph (T) but I prefer the first one (J), so it´s
nice that others disagree as well :-)
DagT
Den 20. mars. 2009 kl. 22.57 skrev Nick Wright:
Great portraits. I
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry! I thought you were being serious. I hate email.
We are serious. This is the PDML.
:-)
dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML
be surprised. When I worked there, there was
more film brought in than I thought especially disposable cameras.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 6:09 PM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Film is dead (was: Re: New gear, but now I have a decision
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 7:09 PM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Film is dead (was: Re: New gear, but now I have a decision to
make...)
Also if film were dead (or even on life support), there would not be
two one hour
Well done. Beautifully rendered, great looks.
Paul
- Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
DagT wrote:
And why do companies like Ilford still sell lots of film?
Some of us still use it:
J:
http://foto.no/linkeddata/bildekritikk/images/443000-443999/443614_1280x1024.jpg
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: Film is dead (was: Re: New gear, but now I have a decision to
make...)
Granted, I know that's true. I recently worked at one of them for a short
bit.
But the fact remains that the film machine is a seperate machine from
On 8/14/07, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Diagrams and artists renditions are always nice touches for rumors...
A better link for Zenit rumours:
http://www.rangefinderforum.com/forums/showthread.php?p=574956
--
Sandy Harris,
Nanjing, China
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Yeah, and small sensors will improve too, just not as much. Small size
matters to people and the small sensors are here to stay. It just
shifts more of the market away from the MF or bigger formats. I'm not
saying these things won't exist, but they will be even more of a niche
market ( and
Diagrams and artists renditions are always nice touches for rumors...
Sandy Harris wrote:
On 8/6/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 5, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
There have been reports that Zenit is working on a DSLR with a 4/3
sensor that will take LTM
On 8/6/07, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 5, 2007, at 10:37 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
There have been reports that Zenit is working on a DSLR with a 4/3
sensor that will take LTM (Leica thread mount 39mm) kenses. Not
sure about exposure, but obviously manual focus.
Reports from
Interesting. I still think (nothing radical here and has been said by
others) that APS or 4/3 (maybe both) will be the new 35 mm and that
the 24 x 36 sensor will be the new MF. MF sensors will just be
expensive overkill for most folks, consumer, enthusiast or professional.
Sandy Harris
Already he forgets the beauty of medium and large format prints and
slides...
Steve Desjardins wrote:
Interesting. I still think (nothing radical here and has been said by
others) that APS or 4/3 (maybe both) will be the new 35 mm and that
the 24 x 36 sensor will be the new MF. MF sensors
1 - 100 of 701 matches
Mail list logo
