From my understanding, changing WB does nothing in hardware, rather it
shifts colors based on what you tell the camera/software what WB to
use. For example, with tungsten light, it will shift down the red,
and shift up the blue to balance neutrals.
The math is over my head, but there is a
On 19 November 2010 02:16, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 18 November 2010 20:56, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Last night I tried a more rigorous test of photographing with and without a
cokin blue filter on my camera. I also
I always figured setting them to neutral/0 would have the least
effect. Not that it really matters for Lightroom since it doesn't
read any of those settings.
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Miserere miser...@gmail.com wrote:
You mentioned something about RAW histograms in your first post (or
I find that if I close my eyes the copyright symbol doesn't bother me.
Stunning pics btw mate - at first I thought might be a bit too much
contrast but actually I like them like that. Really impressive street
work. x100 territory ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
On Nov 19, 2010, at 7:47 AM, Miserere wrote:
The closest you can get on your Pentax is
to set your picture settings all the way to the left. Your camera
previews will now look dull, but the histogram should be as close to
RAW as you can get.
What do you mean by my picture settings all the
I'm certainly no expert on the subject, but it seems to me that
putting filters in front of the lens of a camera with a digital sensor
in it is a bit silly especially for BW purposes. Your sensor is
already filtering the light through three filters to achieve a red
channel, a blue channel, and a
If you have infinite precision and/or infinite range on your
sensor, you would be right. But if you're trying to get a usable
amount of information from each of the channels you want to have
reasonably similar range on each one; you don't want one channel
squashed down into just four bits of
Last night I tried a more rigorous test of photographing with and without a
cokin blue filter on my camera. I also tried with and without using custom
white balance in the camera. The following collection are the best few shots
of each of the permutations I tried:
On 18 November 2010 20:56, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Last night I tried a more rigorous test of photographing with and without a
cokin blue filter on my camera. I also tried with and without using custom
white balance in the camera. The following collection are the best few shots
On Nov 18, 2010, at 6:49 PM, Miserere wrote:
On 18 November 2010 20:56, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Last night I tried a more rigorous test of photographing with and without a
cokin blue filter on my camera. I also tried with and without using custom
white balance in the camera.
10 matches
Mail list logo