(and not fully rendered) as well. The window in the
final version is composited from another exposure.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18504755/Cropped-and-rendered-DA-12-24-on-K-1-full-frame-The-window-was-composited-in-from-another-exposure
https://www.photo.net/photo/18504754/Uncropped-DA-12-24-4-image-on-K
-The-window-was-composited-in-from-another-exposure
>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18504754/Uncropped-DA-12-24-4-image-on-K-1-full-frame-mode
>>> On Nov 2, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>> Yes. I’d say the image quality is good. I haven’t used it recently, but I
&
. The window in the
final version is composited from another exposure.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18504755/Cropped-and-rendered-DA-12-24-on-K-1-full-frame-The-window-was-composited-in-from-another-exposure
https://www.photo.net/photo/18504754/Uncropped-DA-12-24-4-image-on-K-1-full-frame-mode
On Nov
://www.photo.net/photo/18504755/Cropped-and-rendered-DA-12-24-on-K-1-full-frame-The-window-was-composited-in-from-another-exposure
https://www.photo.net/photo/18504754/Uncropped-DA-12-24-4-image-on-K-1-full-frame-mode
> On Nov 2, 2018, at 7:49 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Yes. I’d say
Yes. I’d say the image quality is good. I haven’t used it recently, but I think
I have an example. I will look.
Paul
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 8:45 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Hey Paul. I figured it would only work in crop mode. Does the image quality
> hold up?
>
> Thanks for the rec on the
Sorry, Rick. I had a fisheye zoom that I made about ten frames with
before the novelty ran out and I got rid of it.
On 11/1/18 10:18 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Doug, are you interested in fisheye or "normal"?
I have an F 17-24 fisheye that I haven't used since I switched to digital.
Rick
--
Doug, are you interested in fisheye or "normal"?
I have an F 17-24 fisheye that I haven't used since I switched to digital.
Rick
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 8:45 PM Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Hey Paul. I figured it would only work in crop mode. Does the image
> quality hold up?
>
> Thanks for the rec on
Hey Paul. I figured it would only work in crop mode. Does the image
quality hold up?
Thanks for the rec on the 15-30, too. I'd have to ponder that kind of
outlay.
On 11/1/18 4:41 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I have both the k1 and the 12-24. The combo is fine with the k1 in crop mode,
but in
Thanks, Jos. I don't know that I'm willing to perform surgery. I'll have
to look into the 15mm. It might be an interesting item.
On 11/1/18 4:35 PM, Jos de Fotograaf wrote:
Hi Doug,
I tried the Sigma 8-18mm on my K1.
On FF it gave only APS-C coverage as it was limited by the build on
metal
Hi Doug,
I tried the Sigma 8-18mm on my K1.
On FF it gave only APS-C coverage as it was limited by the build on
metal sun-shade.
I carefully cut of the sunshade, this increased the coverage to a square
APS-C coverage at the same optical quality as original APS-C
The coverage increased a bit
The 15-30/2.8 is an excellent full frame lens. But it’s big and heavy, as one
would expect given its 2.8 ap.
Paul
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Hi, kids.
>
> Pondering getting a K-1 (the first one) for my birthday this month and am
> wondering how it performs with the
I have both the k1 and the 12-24. The combo is fine with the k1 in crop mode,
but in full frame mode the lens’s image circle doesn’t come close to filling
the frame.
Paul
> On Nov 1, 2018, at 4:06 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
> Hi, kids.
>
> Pondering getting a K-1 (the first one) for my
Hi, kids.
Pondering getting a K-1 (the first one) for my birthday this month and
am wondering how it performs with the 12-24/4 that's made for the crop
bodies. I think Mark Roberts has the combo, but am not sure. Do any of
you folks also have it?
I am open to purchasing a full-frame wide,
13 matches
Mail list logo
