Jack Davis wrote:
You must have missed my original post wherein I related having taken a
few shots with a borrowed DL. I posed a question about jpg file size
which led to A respondent suggesting I check out some RAW. Planning to
do so this weekend using some of my own glass.
Yes,
Thanks! The link is now archived.
Jack
--- E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
You must have missed my original post wherein I related having taken
a
few shots with a borrowed DL. I posed a question about jpg file size
which led to A respondent suggesting I check out
All helpful stuff. I understand (generally) the advantages of shooting
Raw and intend to sort it out all day Sunday; (camera shop closed).
I'm looking forward to my impression at the end of the day.
This all may give me a reality prospective when the 10mp becomes avail.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Sorting out RAW conversion concepts and ideas is generally much more
than a day's work if you're starting from scratch, you can shortcut a
lot of the learning required with Bruce's book.
Godfrey
On Mar 14, 2006, at 6:41 AM,
Recommendation seconded. Best RAW workflow book, by a large margin.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Sorting out RAW conversion concepts and ideas is generally much more
than a day's work if you're starting from scratch, you can
Appreciated suggestion!
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Sorting out RAW conversion concepts and ideas is generally much more
than a day's work if you're starting from scratch, you can shortcut a
lot of
If I do (wife lets me) go for the 10mp..or?, I'll definitely obtain the
suggested book.
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Recommendation seconded. Best RAW workflow
Adam Maas wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Recommendation seconded. Best RAW workflow book, by a large margin.
Recommendation thirded :)
I use the word fine in reference to a file setting
(***) and not as a comment about my photography.
Jack, that's the way I took it. ;-)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MP vs MB
Just to be clear, I use the word fine in reference
I just received my copy of Real World Camera Raw from Amazon.com. $25.19
with free shipping. Now all I have to do is take the time to read it. It
is a thin book, but glancing thru it shows it covers a lot of material.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Mark Roberts wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do obtain a copy of Real World Camera Raw ... by Bruce Fraser.
Recommendation seconded. Best RAW workflow book, by a large margin.
Recommendation thirded :)
All in favour --
Aye!
Jack Davis wrote:
If I do (wife lets me) go for the 10mp..or?, I'll definitely obtain the
suggested book.
I'm losing track of the whole story here. Do you already have a camera
capable of recording Raw?
If so, why wait before buying the book?
If not, never mind ...
ERNR
I have both versions of Camera RAW. The CS1 release and the CS2. The
book proved invaluable many moons ago.
Paul
On Mar 14, 2006, at 9:29 PM, E.R.N. Reed wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
If I do (wife lets me) go for the 10mp..or?, I'll definitely obtain
the
suggested book.
I'm losing track of the
You must have missed my original post wherein I related having taken a
few shots with a borrowed DL. I posed a question about jpg file size
which led to A respondent suggesting I check out some RAW. Planning to
do so this weekend using some of my own glass.
Jack
--- E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL
Group,
Just shot 9 fine jpg images which yielded files in the 'prox range of
2.5mb to 3.5mb. Shot no RAW.
I know that there was a discussion on this topic several months ago,
but what might I expect in the way of mb with such a file setting?
Local photo shop has a few DL's and offered one to play
Presuming the camera was set to full resolution and JPEG *** (Fine)
quality, that sounds about right.
As long as the exposure was on the mark and the scenes you shot
weren't too difficult with contrast, you should have decent pictures.
Godfrey
On Mar 13, 2006, at 2:45 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MP vs MB
Presuming the camera was set to full resolution and JPEG *** (Fine)
quality, that sounds about right.
As long as the exposure was on the mark and the scenes you shot weren't
too difficult with contrast, you should have decent
The images opened in PS at 17.2mb and are decent. The setting was ***
at 200 ISO.
They all appeared to be slightly under exposed, but easily handled in
PS.
Thanks,
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presuming the camera was set to full resolution and JPEG *** (Fine)
quality,
decent pictures.
Jack, If you're background is slides, you should have little problem
producing good images from fine jpegs.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MP vs MB
Presuming the camera was set to full resolution
Sounds about right.
Pentax sensibly calibrates the metering on the DSLRs for JPEG capture
to protect you from highlight saturation, which generally means a
little less than what you might expect for a film camera exposure of
the same ISO. This results in well-saturated midtones and colors
20 matches
Mail list logo
