Re: OT: Picture editors

Bob, And you wanted to see what?! ... ;-) Incidentally, today they've replaced the image. I am reading BBC news on a (semi-) regular basis, - mostly via the phone's app (which essentially displayes what is on the website). I am very disappointed by the quality of the editorship (including

Re: OT: Picture editors

On 4 Jan 2016, at 20:45, Igor PDML-StR wrote: > > > Bob, > And you wanted to see what?! ... ;-) > > Incidentally, today they've replaced the image. > > I am reading BBC news on a (semi-) regular basis, - mostly via the phone's > app (which essentially displayes what is on

OT: Picture editors

I once went to a talk by Philip Jones-Griffiths in which he said many things about picture editors, the kindest thing being that an essential qualification is blindness. Here's a case which proves him wrong. The article is accompanied by a stock picture of a horse, which is helpful because

Re: OT: Picture editors

Surely a cock-up of epic proportions. On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 7:14 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote: > I once went to a talk by Philip Jones-Griffiths in which he said many things > about picture editors, the kindest thing being that an essential > qualification is blindness. > >