On 28/11/05, Ann Sanfedele, discombobulated, unleashed:
aside to Cotty - see this has dramatic lighting
but still lets us see the
person, doesn't hide her, the shot is about her,
not about frank.
well except for a bit of theraultian blur of
course
Ahh, that's how it's done. I have often
In a message dated 11/21/2005 6:16:12 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Much like the last one, but this time with her eyes closed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3896653size=lg
Hope you enjoy it. Comments are always welcome. Thanks in advance.
cheers,
frank
On 11/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice, frank. Like the frown. Always looks like singers are hitting high
notes when they frown. Good balance of BW areas. Very pleasing.
Marnie aka Doe
Thanks, Marnie! g
-frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
frank theriault wrote:
On 11/28/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very nice, frank. Like the frown. Always looks like singers are hitting high
notes when they frown. Good balance of BW areas. Very pleasing.
Marnie aka Doe
Thanks, Marnie! g
-frank
--
Sharpness
btw -
aside to Cotty - see this has dramatic lighting
but still lets us see the
person, doesn't hide her, the shot is about her,
not about frank.
well except for a bit of theraultian blur of
course
ann
On 21/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Much like the last one, but this time with her eyes closed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3896653size=lg
No problem Frank, I looked at this one with my eyes closed too.
Another nice shot.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
On 11/21/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank,
Many of your Pirate jenny and similar shots are ruined by the microphone
obscuring the performer's face. Maybe you can station yourself in such a
position (on stage, back stage, wherever, maybe use different lenses) that
you're
On 11/22/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
Much like the last one, but this time with her eyes closed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3896653size=lg
No problem Frank, I looked at this one with my eyes closed too.
On Nov 22, 2005, at 4:50 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Much like the last one, but this time with her eyes closed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3896653size=lg
Good shot. You caught a fine moment of emotion and passion, rendered
it well.
Godfrey
On 11/22/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
But, Shel: The shot is ruined by the mic? I guess you're entitled
to your opinion, but ruined? That's fairly strong language.
BTW, I'm not in any way insulted or hurt by the use of the word. I'm
just surprised by your use of it.
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Much like the last one, but this time with her eyes closed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3896653size=lg
Hope you enjoy it. Comments are always welcome. Thanks in advance.
Another great Pirate Jenny shot!
BTW, I don't mind the microphone
Well, perhaps for you and some others. However, when I make a shot and
something upsets or detracts from my intent, I consider the shot ruined.
That's my standard for my own work. I didn't get the shot i wanted. Maybe
I'm just more critical (at least about my work in general). If you find
the
The issue, as I see it, is that Frank's photograph isn't yours, Shel.
When critiquing someone else's work, you cannot answer to what
*their* intent was, you can only respond to the photograph. For you,
the microphone ruins the shot, but that isn't true for Frank, I or
several other people,
Good advice ... sometimes I'm too direct or focused on what I think the
photo (or anything) should be. It's a bad habit from my childhood,
instilled by an over-domineering, abusive mother and too absent father,
coupled with an underlying level of low self . In my weak defense it
should be noted
Hi!
Many of your Pirate jenny and similar shots are ruined by the microphone
obscuring the performer's face. Maybe you can station yourself in such a
position (on stage, back stage, wherever, maybe use different lenses) that
you're able to capture more face and, therefore, more unobscured
Subject: RE: PAW: Pirate Jenny at the Red Guitar - Another Take
Frank,
Many of your Pirate jenny and similar shots are ruined by the microphone
obscuring the performer's face. Maybe you can station yourself in such a
position (on stage, back stage, wherever, maybe use different lenses
On 11/22/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, perhaps for you and some others. However, when I make a shot and
something upsets or detracts from my intent, I consider the shot ruined.
That's my standard for my own work. I didn't get the shot i wanted. Maybe
I'm just more
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: PAW: Pirate Jenny at the Red Guitar - Another Take
Thanks for your comments, Shel and Paul. I agree with the microphone
part. Both this and the last
Much like the last one, but this time with her eyes closed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3896653size=lg
Hope you enjoy it. Comments are always welcome. Thanks in advance.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
I prefer the other shot. I find the microphone shadow somewhat
distractint on this one.
Paul
On Nov 21, 2005, at 9:15 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Much like the last one, but this time with her eyes closed:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3896653size=lg
Hope you enjoy it. Comments
Frank,
Many of your Pirate jenny and similar shots are ruined by the microphone
obscuring the performer's face. Maybe you can station yourself in such a
position (on stage, back stage, wherever, maybe use different lenses) that
you're able to capture more face and, therefore, more unobscured
21 matches
Mail list logo
