On 5/17/2010 11:26 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I missed this one earlier. Excellent shot.
I prefer the original version. Sometimes a little mystery is a good thing.
Paul
What Paul said...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Hi Bruce: I think I prefer round 2. Interesting shot. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:21 PM
Subject: PESO - Clementine Rainbow Round 2
After multiple
...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO - Clementine Rainbow Round 2
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, May 17, 2010, 1:21 PM
After multiple comments I have made a
version that is lighter. As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here is a version lightened a little to bring out
On 18/05/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I guess it begs the question...Does it really matter whether it was a
daytime or nighttime shot? If a take a shot at night and expose it
to look more like daylight or take a shot in the daytime and expose
it so it looks like night...
On 18/05/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
After multiple comments I have made a version that is lighter. As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here is a version lightened a little to bring out the water and
surrounding rocks and trees:
Bruce,
I appreciate the effort you made to lighten the picture,
but have to agree that your original choice was more pleasing.
The rock on the far side and water start to look washed out in the
lightened version.
Thanks, Bob S.
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 5:12 AM, Rob Studdert
I chime in with everone else and much prefer the original
At any rate, beautiful image
Thanks for sharing
Ecke
2010/5/18 Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com:
Bruce,
I appreciate the effort you made to lighten the picture,
but have to agree that your original choice was more pleasing.
The rock
Hello Rob,
You bring up a good point. I was reading a thread on HDR recently
and that was one of the issues brought up - basically
that the compression of the dynamic range of an HDR image causes it to
look unnatural, and for some people that causes them to reject or
dislike it. Once could
RS On 18/05/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
After multiple comments I have made a version that is lighter. As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here is a version lightened a little to bring out the water and
surrounding rocks and trees:
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:14:58PM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16, Tripod
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00373-1.htm
On 17/05/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I have viewed the image on about 5 different systems/monitors and
have not noticed it to be darker than I intended. So far no one else
has commented on this being dark (of course, not that large of a
group have commented). Perhaps
Thats a well executed photo Bruce.
--
MaritimTim
http://maritimtim.blogspot.com/
2010/5/16 Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com:
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16,
bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: Re: PESO-Clementine Rainbow
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, May 16, 2010, 10:16 PM
Well, unfortunately, since I replace
a machine in the past year put
me on to Vista
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17/05/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I have viewed the image on about 5 different systems/monitors and
have not noticed it to be darker than I intended. So far no one else
has commented on this being dark (of course, not that large of a
group
I'll play around with it to bring up the other areas and see what how
it feels. Thanks for taking the time to look and comment.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, May 17, 2010, 3:01:00 AM, you wrote:
RS On 17/05/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I have viewed the image on
I guess it begs the question...Does it really matter whether it was a
daytime or nighttime shot? If a take a shot at night and expose it
to look more like daylight or take a shot in the daytime and expose
it so it looks like night...
Was the shot pleasing? I will certainly play around with it
Bruce,
I've never seen a nighttime rainbow...
It's a lovely catch, but the lake could use more light.
Just nit picking. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
I guess it begs the question...Does it really matter whether it was a
2010/5/16 Madame RD romd...@orange.fr:
I never thought someone could add poetry to a dam powerful picture !
dominique
Ce que disait Dominique =)
Thanks for sharing
Ecke
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
After multiple comments I have made a version that is lighter. As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here is a version lightened a little to bring out the water and
surrounding rocks and trees:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00373-2.htm
Original:
I missed this one earlier. Excellent shot.
I prefer the original version. Sometimes a little mystery is a good thing.
Paul
On May 17, 2010, at 4:21 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
After multiple comments I have made a version that is lighter. As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here
That would be a moonbow.
Dan
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruce,
I've never seen a nighttime rainbow...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
I think the original is more dramatic and concentrates the viewer's attention
on the falls.
Jack
--- On Mon, 5/17/10, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO - Clementine Rainbow Round 2
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml
On 5/17/2010 1:26 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
I missed this one earlier. Excellent shot.
Likewise. It's easy to fall behind on this list.
I prefer the original version. Sometimes a little mystery is a good thing.
I think that the original works a little better too.
Either way, it'sa great
On 5/17/2010 4:21 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
After multiple comments I have made a version that is lighter. As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here is a version lightened a little to bring out the water and
surrounding rocks and trees:
I prefer original over light and crispy.
Tom C.
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
After multiple comments I have made a version that is lighter. As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here is a version lightened a little to bring out the
From: Daniel J. Matyola
That would be a moonbow.
Dan
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 3:36 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruce,
I've never seen a nighttime rainbow...
Possible.
Lower Yosemite Falls produces them. Also Cumberland Falls State Resort
in Kentucky, Luna Island at
bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO - Clementine Rainbow Round 2
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Monday, May 17, 2010, 1:21 PM
After multiple comments I have made a
version that is lighter.? As I
look at them, I still prefer the original.
Here is a version lightened
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16, Tripod
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00373-1.htm
Comments welcome
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Quite a powerful image! Makes you look again. At what time of day was
it shot? Water texture is very nice.
Tom C.
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 12:14 AM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Very dramatic.
Dave
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16, Tripod
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16, Tripod
...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO-Clementine Rainbow
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, May 15, 2010, 11:14 PM
Lake Clementine just above the city
of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16
Le 16/05/10 08:14, Bruce Dayton a écrit :
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
I never thought someone could add poetry to a dam powerful picture !
dominique
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks, Tom. This was shot in late morning. it is a deep canyon so
sun doesn't get down to it until late.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Saturday, May 15, 2010, 11:33:00 PM, you wrote:
TC Quite a powerful image! Makes you look again. At what time of day was
TC it shot? Water texture is very nice.
/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com
Subject: PESO-Clementine Rainbow
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16, Tripod
http
On 16/05/2010, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote:
Lake Clementine just above the city of Auburn California. Spring
runoff makes for a nice scene.
Pentax K20D, DA* 16-50/2.8 @ 26mm
ISO 100, 1/160 sec @ f/16, Tripod
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkdphoto_00373-1.htm
Hi Bruce,
Well, unfortunately, since I replace a machine in the past year put
me on to Vista and then Windows 7. My calibration system was the
original Colorvision Spyder - and it was discontinued and is not
supported on Vista or Win7. So in short, I am running by eye
calibration right now. Calibration
37 matches
Mail list logo
