Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John
> Celio
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 12:50 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO 2007 - 46c - GDG
>
> > Landscape composition is everything. Weight and balance through a
.
Tom C.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:14 PM
> To: PDML List
> Subject: PESO 2007 - 46c - GDG
>
> Thanks for all the commentary on yesterday's photo. Wh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Different sets of skills does not necessarily mean that one set of
>skills is better than another set of skills. And the skills may be
>very similar, more similar than they appear. Godfrey is very careful
>in his compositions when he does minimalism. Tom seems to be
Thanks Mark. That makes everything perfectly clear.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> >Surprised you didn't recognize that it speaks to the discipline
> >disparity between styles.
> >You have to recognize tha
You're remarks, as usual, are rational and considerate to all views. If
this were the case, both on and off list, this would be an even more
pleasant place.
If only everyone who invited critiques actually accepted them with your
grace, and that of the vast majority of participants, this sort of ego
Jack Davis wrote:
>Surprised you didn't recognize that it speaks to the discipline
>disparity between styles.
>You have to recognize that there is a different set of skills attendant
>to a varying array of styles.
>Some subjects require more discipline in rendering an intended image
>with the inte
In a message dated 11/8/2007 5:48:17 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Surprised you didn't recognize that it speaks to the discipline
disparity between styles.
You have to recognize that there is a different set of skills attendant
to a varying array of styles.
Some subjec
> Landscape composition is everything. Weight and balance through a
> mixture of size and tone are employed to please the eye. All elements
> and their relationship to the others is critical. It is an intricate
> assemblage that touches a sweet chord and imparts instant harmony.
So you're saying a
Did I mention also that your comment is wrong?
G
On Nov 8, 2007, at 7:32 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> You failed!
>
> Jack
> --- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Frankly, Jack, I find your response a pile of uncompromising
>> condescenion, pretension and pomposity. In more succinct te
On Nov 8, 2007, at 9:08 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>> http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46c.htm
>
> Godfrey, you managed to hmmm bring pleasure both to my eye while
> viewing
> the picture and to my hmmm brain while reading your text...
>
> Thank you at least twice.
Your very welcome,
Hi!
> ...
> What else might be made of it, well, that's beyond any purpose I have
> in showing my work to this subscriber community.
>
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46c.htm
Godfrey, you managed to hmmm bring pleasure both to my eye while viewing
the picture and to my hmmm b
You failed!
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frankly, Jack, I find your response a pile of uncompromising
> condescenion, pretension and pomposity. In more succinct terms, utter
>
> and total bullshit.
>
> I tried to be polite in my prior response to you.
>
> Godfrey
>
Frankly, Jack, I find your response a pile of uncompromising
condescenion, pretension and pomposity. In more succinct terms, utter
and total bullshit.
I tried to be polite in my prior response to you.
Godfrey
On Nov 8, 2007, at 5:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Surprised you didn't recognize th
Surprised you didn't recognize that it speaks to the discipline
disparity between styles.
You have to recognize that there is a different set of skills attendant
to a varying array of styles.
Some subjects require more discipline in rendering an intended image
with the intended effect.
The relevanc
An interesting statement but of absolutely no relevance to the
question I posed to Tom.
Godfrey
On Nov 8, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Landscape composition is everything. Weight and balance through a
> mixture of size and tone are employed to please the eye. All elements
> and their
Landscape composition is everything. Weight and balance through a
mixture of size and tone are employed to please the eye. All elements
and their relationship to the others is critical. It is an intricate
assemblage that touches a sweet chord and imparts instant harmony.
The viewer thus enjoys the
Godfrey, you have a way with words as well as images. Very well said.
>http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/46c.htm
And awesome photo, too.
John Celio
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Thanks for all the commentary on yesterday's photo. While it was
being looked at and discussed, I was out for another walk and
couldn't resist a few more. ;-)
I dislike the notion of trying to "defend" my photographs: I see no
reason to do so. And having read various discussions of 'art' on
18 matches
Mail list logo
