will probably get a 17-70.
I like the last pic particularly.
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 8/7/10, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com
Subject: Pentax SMC FA 24-90 mini review with samples
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
That's on my keep dreaming list.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
If Pentax fixes its SDM problem, I will probably get a 17-70.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
particularly.
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 8/7/10, Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Boris Libermanbori...@gmail.com
Subject: Pentax SMC FA 24-90 mini review with samples
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Date: Saturday, August 7, 2010, 7:29 AM
Hi
On 8/8/2010 7:50 PM, gldnbearz wrote:
That's on my keep dreaming list.
It is rather good (for me at least) that I don't care at all for these
DA lenses... So, one can say, I stopped dreaming a while ago...
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 8/7/2010 6:18 PM, gldnbearz wrote:
If you think that the build is plasticky, it's pretty much the same
as the FA 28-105/3.2-4.5. They are roughly the same length when fully
extended (and slightly wobbly), with the 24-90 being just a bit larger
in circumference.
It occurs to me that
I have three SDM lenses with a total of about 30,000 frames of use
cumulatively. No problems. The DA* lenses are too good to pass up.
Paul
On Aug 8, 2010, at 12:50 PM, gldnbearz wrote:
That's on my keep dreaming list.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Rick Womer rwomer1...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Aug 8, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 8/7/2010 6:18 PM, gldnbearz wrote:
If you think that the build is plasticky, it's pretty much the same
as the FA 28-105/3.2-4.5. They are roughly the same length when fully
extended (and slightly wobbly), with the 24-90 being just a bit
I wish they still made f/3.5-4.5 lenses... I really don't like f/5.6
at the long end when the long end is shorter than 200mm.
Glad the lens is working out for you, Boris.
--M.
On 07/08/2010, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Hi!
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2010/08/pentax-fa-24-9035-45-if-al-mini-review.html
All in all - I am very happy about my yet another recent acquisition.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Glad to see you are enjoying the lens. Paired well with the Zx-5n.
For me, the FOV was better on 35mm than APS-C because it isn't wide
enough at the short end.
If you think that the build is plasticky, it's pretty much the same
as the FA 28-105/3.2-4.5. They are roughly the same length when
10 matches
Mail list logo
