Hi all,
I've been off the list for some time. I
need an digital camera that will be
convenient to use on a microscope. My
question is has anyone on the list used
an *ist D for this?
D
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 09:25:06 +0300, Don Williams wrote:
Hi all,
I've been off the list for some time. I
need an digital camera that will be
convenient to use on a microscope. My
question is has anyone on the list used
an *ist D for this?
Don,
I am currently looking for a microscope to
images taken at 0.5 um
vertical steps. If you're seriously
interested in photo micrography email me
off list and give me the details of what
you want to do and the equipment you have.
I had hoped to hear from anyone in the
group who has an *ist D attached to a
compound microscope. I'd like
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:52:54 +0300, Don Williams wrote:
Hi Leon,
Depth of field is not something you can
get very easily. If you have subjects
with real depth the answer is to use
Helicon Focus or ComZ to stack images.
They have a system like this at the museum where I do volunteer work.
I
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu AM 07:52:54 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo micrography
Hi Don,
Nice to see you're still around 8-)
mike
-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
virus-checked using McAfee(R
From: Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu PM 01:33:21 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo micrography
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:52:54 +0300, Don Williams wrote:
Hi Leon,
Depth of field is not something you can
get very easily
these days
Don
mike wilson wrote:
From: Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu PM 01:33:21 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo micrography
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:52:54 +0300, Don Williams wrote:
Hi Leon,
Depth of field is not something you can
get very
Hi Mike,
But I am up to my ears. Gathering fuel
for next winter (Wood cutting) and
microscopy right now.
Best,
D
mike wilson wrote:
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu AM 07:52:54 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo micrography
Hi Don,
Nice to see you're
I haven't used my ist D for photomicrography, but I have one available for
sale.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:25 AM
Subject: Photo micrography
Hi all,
I've been off the list
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu PM 02:19:51 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo micrography
Slowing is no good, they have to be
absolutely still -- killed and fixed.
It's impossible to take a stack of
pictures of live animals small or large
Slowing is no good, they have to be absolutely still -- killed and
fixed. It's impossible to take a stack of pictures of live animals
small or large.
An entomologist friend has two soft techniques. One is to put the
bug in the cold (portable freezer if on the field) for some time (I
don't
I haven't used my ist D for photomicrography, but I have one available for
sale.
Christian
A D or a microscope?
Andre
This one time, at band camp, Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I've been off the list for some time. I
need an digital camera that will be
convenient to use on a microscope. My
question is has anyone on the list used
an *ist D for this?
No but I have used the bellows
Hi all,
I've been off the list for some time. I need an digital camera that
will be convenient to use on a microscope. My question is has anyone
on the list used an *ist D for this?
D
If looking for 5X - 10X photography or so, a microscope lens (with a
RMS mount adapter) or a reversed 8mm or
Dafnia?
Tom C.
From: Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo micrography
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2005 23:33:21 +1000
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 10:52:54 +0300, Don Williams wrote:
Hi Leon,
Depth of field
well.
Don W
mike wilson wrote:
From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu PM 02:19:51 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Photo micrography
Slowing is no good, they have to be
absolutely still -- killed and fixed.
It's impossible to take a stack of
pictures of live
If you leave the bug there long enough, you'll have forever...
Andre Langevin wrote:
Slowing is no good, they have to be absolutely still -- killed and
fixed. It's impossible to take a stack of pictures of live animals
small or large.
An entomologist friend has two soft techniques. One is to
Indeed. The second technique was some special glue. But I guess
some insects are then moving trying to escape from the glue.
Andre
If you leave the bug there long enough, you'll have forever...
Andre Langevin wrote:
Slowing is no good, they have to be absolutely still -- killed and
fixed.
Don Williams wrote:
I had hoped to hear from anyone in the group who has an *ist D
attached to a compound microscope. I'd like to know if the shutter
vibration is a serious drawback. I know the mirror can be fired in
advance to help reduce this problem. But with a selection of other
Pentax
There are various techniques for slowing them down by varying the
environmental vairiables.
Mike
The trouble with marine animals is that as soon as you try to start
using environmental techniques to slow them down the animal contracts
and no longer looks like you want it to. Animals with
20 matches
Mail list logo
