RE: *istD output?

2003-10-26 Thread gsinos
you later, gs -- -- George Sinos[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2003 13:16:40 -0600 From: Len Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: *istD output? Message-ID

Re: *istD output?

2003-10-26 Thread Juey Chong Ong
On Sunday, Oct 26, 2003, at 14:05 America/New_York, George Sinos wrote: Has anyone, sent an email to the makers of Capture One http://www.phaseone.com, encouraging them to add the *istD to supported cameras for their raw conversion software? They've said they are watching the market to

RE: *istD output?

2003-10-26 Thread Len Paris
I can't get to the gallery. Seems that your web page is missing a bit. Len * There's no place like 127.0.0.1 -Original Message- From: George Sinos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 1:05 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: *istD output? what effect all of

Re: *istD output?

2003-10-26 Thread John Francis
OK, I've read through the last few digests and learned all about how the *istD feels, who would like which knobs in different places and so. Don't you guys take pictures with those things? Naah - why would we do that? Actually my other half has me fairly busy this weekend, so I can't get

Re: *istD output?

2003-10-26 Thread Juey Chong Ong
On Sunday, Oct 26, 2003, at 14:05 America/New_York, George Sinos wrote: What's your opinion on the Pentax Photo Browser and Photo Laboratory software? Photo Browser is adequate, but that's not my primary browser software. Photo Lab could be much better. They should look at Capture One as an

Re: *istD output?

2003-10-26 Thread alex wetmore
On Sun, 26 Oct 2003, John Francis wrote: OK, I've read through the last few digests and learned all about how the *istD feels, who would like which knobs in different places and so. Don't you guys take pictures with those things? Naah - why would we do that? I'm taking some photographs,