Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-26 Thread P. J. Alling
On 1/22/2010 7:54 PM, frank theriault wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: I've met some students this week who have never seen a record player (I quickly told them to google record player and click web images), and I used the expression

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-26 Thread Scott Loveless
On 1/26/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Hell, I had/have correction tape in my Royal manual typewriter. You really were old school... Don't use that stuff. It crumbles and falls into the machine, gumming up the works something awful. Learn to type betetr or jsut leanr to

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-26 Thread David J Brooks
On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote: On 1/26/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:  Hell, I had/have correction tape in my Royal manual typewriter.  You really were old school... Don't use that stuff.  It crumbles and falls into the

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread mike wilson
William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine And I just replied, equally offlist. And I just went and had another shower - purely due to the photoporn, I assure you

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread David J Brooks
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used.  :-) Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread paul stenquist
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used. :-) Might just as well not mention my box of

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread mike wilson
David J Brooks wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used. :-) Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then Pffft. Cylinders

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread David Savage
2010/1/24 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com: David J Brooks wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine  Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote:  and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used.  :-) Might just as well

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread mike wilson
David Savage wrote: 2010/1/24 mike wilson m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com: David J Brooks wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used. :-)

RE: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread Bob W
and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used. :-) Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old Edison format, and a crank-up phonograph to play them

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread P N Stenquist
On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bob W wrote: and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used. :-) Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old Edison format, and a

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread P. J. Alling
On 1/24/2010 8:54 AM, paul stenquist wrote: On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread eckinator
2010/1/24 P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net: My records aren't vinyl, they're some kind of ceramic. They break if you look at them the wrong way. you mean shellac? cheers ecke -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread P. J. Alling
On 1/24/2010 12:00 PM, P N Stenquist wrote: On Jan 24, 2010, at 11:45 AM, Bob W wrote: and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to define the term used. :-) Might just as well not mention my box of 78's then I have a couple of hundred 78s,

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread eckinator
2010/1/24 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com: On 1/24/2010 8:54 AM, paul stenquist wrote: On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine  Aguila wrote: and I usedthe expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then proceeded to

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread P. J. Alling
Looks like somebody's robot got lost... On 1/21/2010 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote: No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html William Robb -- {\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier New;}}

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread Tom C
That's what I was thinking. I looked to see if a Jawa was peering from behind the dumpster. On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 3:48 PM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Looks like somebody's robot got lost... On 1/21/2010 9:23 AM, William Robb wrote: No attempt at art, but this is a

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread Derby Chang
Subash wrote: talking of film, i just got myself a SuperA in beautiful condition: the electronics, metering, everything works. came with an odd 20mm lens, RE.Auto-Topcor 20mm 1:4. googled a bit and found out about topcon cameras and that the voigtlander nokton 58/1.4 is 'derived' from the topcor

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-24 Thread David J Brooks
On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 8:54 AM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: I have a couple of hundred 78s, including a few in the old Edison format,   and a crank-up phonograph to play them on. Paul Dave I;'m not sure how many Dad had but IIRC its around 50-75, not really sure. Sis

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this year for a Pentax medium format film camera. I'll give you a good deal on some very nice 6x7 gear. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread Christine Aguila
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com - Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this year for a Pentax medium format film camera. I'll give you a good deal on some very nice 6x7 gear

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread Subash
On Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:23:50 -0600 William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead And I'm determined to have some cash saved some time later this year for a Pentax medium format film camera. I'll give you a good deal on some very nice 6x7

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers, Christine In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bit: http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/6x7stuff/fleet67.html William

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread Christine Aguila
Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: William Robb war...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Saturday, January 23, 2010 9:11 AM Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead - Original Message - From: Christine Aguila

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine And I just replied, equally offlist. best bill -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread Ken Waller
Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: William Robb war...@gmail.com Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead - Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead Bill, I just emailed you off list. Cheers, Christine

RE: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread John Coyle
Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead - Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers, Christine In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bit: http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread P N Stenquist
Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of William Robb Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 1:12 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead - Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead In all

RE: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread John Coyle
Thanks Paul - but finances won't let me! John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P N Stenquist Sent: Sunday, 24 January 2010 11:08 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead On Jan 23, 2010

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-23 Thread P. J. Alling
On 1/23/2010 10:11 AM, William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: Christine Aguila Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead In all seriousness, I will keep this offer in mind, Bill. Cheers, Christine In all seriousness, this should whet your apetite a bit: http

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread eckinator
somebody go diving... =( 2010/1/22 Pasvorn Boonmark pasv...@boonmark.net: I also bet that more goody were in the red dumpster too. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote: Wow, is that a film processor?  Looks like it was once expensive. -- Bruce

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Bruce Dayton Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive. Yup, Back in it's day that was about 25K worth of machinery. It was stripped for whatever parts might be useful (bellows pumps and the like

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread Pasvorn Boonmark
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:32 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote: somebody go diving... =( Oh, I would love too. But my wife will kill me, for sure. -Pasvorn -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread Bruce Dayton
, you wrote: WR - Original Message - WR From: Bruce Dayton WR Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive. WR Yup, Back in it's day that was about 25K worth of machinery. WR It was stripped for whatever parts might be useful (bellows

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread John Sessoms
From: Bruce Dayton Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive. -- Bruce Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote: WR No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview. WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html WR William Robb Noritsu

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread Mark Roberts
Bruce Dayton wrote: Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at home is the only viable option. I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value. About two years ago I stopped in at one of

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread Christine Aguila
- Original Message - From: Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 1:15 PM Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead Bruce Dayton wrote: Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the cost to get color

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread mike wilson
John Sessoms wrote: From: Bruce Dayton Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive. -- Bruce Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote: WR No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview. WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html WR

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: John Sessoms Subject: Re: PESO: Film is Dead Question for William Robb - What is the function of the building it was sitting next to? That building is the back of the warehouse where I (and a whole bunch of other people) have storage/workshops

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread Adam Maas
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Bruce Dayton wrote: Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film.  Sounds like the cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at home is the only viable option. I'm sure glad I sold my film gear

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread paul stenquist
On Jan 22, 2010, at 5:20 PM, Adam Maas wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Bruce Dayton wrote: Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at home is the

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread John Sessoms
From: Mark Roberts Bruce Dayton wrote: Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at home is the only viable option. I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value. About two years ago I

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread John Sessoms
From: Christine Aguila Bruce Dayton wrote: Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at home is the only viable option. I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value. About two years

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread frank theriault
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net wrote: I've met some students this week who have never seen a record player (I quickly told them to google record player and click web images), and I used the expression *45* and received lots of wrinkled brows; I then

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-22 Thread Christine Aguila
From: Christine Aguila Bruce Dayton wrote: Certainly a tell-tale sign of the future of film. Sounds like the cost to get color developed is only going to rise until doing it at home is the only viable option. I'm sure glad I sold my film gear when it still had some value. About two

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-21 Thread David J Brooks
All thats left is to carve the head stone Dave On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-21 Thread frank theriault
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote: No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview. http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html Looks artsy to me. A poignant photo that brought a tear to my eye. cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-21 Thread Bruce Dayton
Wow, is that a film processor? Looks like it was once expensive. -- Bruce Thursday, January 21, 2010, 6:23:16 AM, you wrote: WR No attempt at art, but this is a bonafide foundview. WR http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/fid.html WR William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: PESO: Film is Dead

2010-01-21 Thread Pasvorn Boonmark
I also bet that more goody were in the red dumpster too. On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Bruce Dayton bkday...@daytonphoto.com wrote: Wow, is that a film processor?  Looks like it was once expensive. -- Bruce -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net