Re: PESO: lens compare

2017-03-21 Thread Igor PDML-StR
As far as I can tell, these two lenses are focused on different objects. I am comparing the add sheets with "tasracing.com.au" (or whatever it is), as well as "800". I am also looking at the lamps in the top left corner. It looks like the main point in focus in the bottom one is somewhere near

RE: PESO: lens compare

2017-03-21 Thread John Coyle
lens you put on it. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of mike wilson Sent: Tuesday, 21 March 2017 3:54 PM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> Subject: Re: PESO: lens compare > On 21 March 2017 at 04:08 Philip Northea

Re: PESO: lens compare

2017-03-21 Thread Larry Colen
Philip Northeast wrote: https://flic.kr/p/T5fdc1 1/5 crop of same scene taken with Pentax #pentaxK1 body and 21st century Zeiss planar T*f1.4 50mm at f8 and a mid 1970's Pentax M series 55mm also at f8. The result may surprise. I take it that the pentax is the bottom one? There are so

Re: PESO: lens compare

2017-03-20 Thread mike wilson
> On 21 March 2017 at 04:08 Philip Northeast wrote: > > > > https://flic.kr/p/T5fdc1 > > 1/5 crop of same scene taken with Pentax #pentaxK1 body and 21st century > Zeiss planar T*f1.4 50mm at f8 and a mid 1970's Pentax M series 55mm > also at f8. The result may

Re: PESO: lens compare

2017-03-20 Thread Philip Northeast
I did try my Pentax M series 50mm f2 lens and it was terrible. Philip Northeast www.aviewfinderdarkly.com.au On 21/3/17 3:48 pm, Alan C wrote: They do! The Pentax M 50/1.7 is very good - even better than the 1.4. Alan C -Original Message- From: Philip Northeast Sent: Tuesday, March

Re: PESO: lens compare

2017-03-20 Thread Alan C
They do! The Pentax M 50/1.7 is very good - even better than the 1.4. Alan C -Original Message- From: Philip Northeast Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 6:08 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: PESO: lens compare https://flic.kr/p/T5fdc1 1/5 crop of same scene taken with Pentax