I agree with Frank. A few previous posts referenced trite
technique. I think that can freeze us (group pressure being
applied) from experimenting further.
For example, I used to think that pictures taken deliberately
unsquare (ie camera tilted noticably off plumb square) were
trite. I still
clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16. mars 2006 05:45
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Tel Aviv
Hi!
Seriously. You have turned a static scene into something dynamic. At
first
glance I saw that as a contradiction. After
Impressionistic images are often dynamic and trigger unique reactions
in us all. This is no exception, but, alas, I'm weak and couldn't
resist my usual base humor.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
Get yourself a good tripod. LOL
I have Slik Able 300 DX... I just
Hi Boris,
Honest and brutal, but also very (!) subjective this time.
I love this kind of shots. It pulls you in. However, there are a few things that
distracts from the effect, imo. The highlights become little doodles and
introduce a bit of dizziness. I find that a bit... um... dunno if it's
What street is that. I want to look it up on my map of TA.
I like the shot, BTW. It works nicely.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Love it. I can imagine this on my wall.
Malcolm
Dynamic ;-)
Seriously. You have turned a static scene into something dynamic. At first
glance I saw that as a contradiction. After a moment of reflection I
realised it opens for a lot of interpretations. May I suggest a new title,
City life? Kind of cliché, but thats what I see underneath the
Get yourself a good tripod. LOL
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as
On Mar 15, 2006, at 9:51 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as usual sought after and
appreciated.
No need to be brutal. It works as an interesting graphic image, but
I'm not sure if it solves the issue you had in
I like the image. It's pretty and well balanced. However, this technique has
been used a lot, and, in my opinion, the results don't vary enough to warrant
more and more executions of this type.
-- Original message --
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Yep, the technique is trite, but it certainly warrants experimentation,
especially by someone who hasn't done it before.
I also agree with Godders about this not being the best way to instill some
dynamics into a photo. I don't think dynamic necessarily means movement.
It can be emotional, or
On 3/15/06, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as usual sought after and appreciated.
Boris, I like it. Has a certain sophistication about it.
Nice to see you trying something different, we all should.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Tel Aviv
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Nicely done abstract. Looks like living room art from the 60's.
Tom C.
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Tel Aviv
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:51:38 +0200
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography
Hi!
No need to be brutal. It works as an interesting graphic image, but I'm
not sure if it solves the issue you had in mind. Making photos that have
a more dynamic quality doesn't necessarily mean producing a graphic
effect with camera movement.
Well, of course you're right. But I had to
Hi!
Seriously. You have turned a static scene into something dynamic. At first
glance I saw that as a contradiction. After a moment of reflection I
realised it opens for a lot of interpretations. May I suggest a new title,
City life? Kind of cliché, but that’s what I see underneath the surface.
Hi!
Get yourself a good tripod. LOL
I have Slik Able 300 DX... I just don't carry it to my work and back
every day... ;-)
Boris
Hi!
I like the image. It's pretty and well balanced. However, this
technique has been used a lot, and, in my opinion, the results don't
vary enough to warrant more and more executions of this type.
Why do I feel so executed? ;-) I mean like in hanging or da-chair... ;-)
Thanks... I am not
Hi!
I am starting to realize that most of my photography is very static.
Here I've tried to be slightly less static...
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Your honest and brutal feedback is as usual sought after and appreciated.
I like it. I must say, I usually exect smooth lines
Hi!
Boris, I like it. Has a certain sophistication about it.
Nice to see you trying something different, we all should.
Ken, funny you should mention sophistication. Most recently I couldn't
see anything more sophisticated that outright trivial...
Thanks, but I humbly disagree... This is
Hi!
Nicely done abstract. Looks like living room art from the 60's.
Har! Thank you! I am indeed flattered!
Boris
Hi!
Yep, the technique is trite, but it certainly warrants experimentation,
especially by someone who hasn't done it before.
I also agree with Godders about this not being the best way to instill some
dynamics into a photo. I don't think dynamic necessarily means movement.
It can be
Hi!
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=12495
Love it. I can imagine this on my wall.
Thanks!
Boris
23 matches
Mail list logo
