On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Keith Whaley wrote:
Going to the site you posted, I got this:
The area you wish to access is behind registration.
Oh! I'm not registered either, I don't think? I certainly didn't log on
and I haven't a clue what my username and password might be if I was.
Oh
on 19.11.03 18:13, Paul Eriksson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry but I can't agree with that a good quality record player in a good
stereo system a cd can't touch a LP much less a high quality pressed LP.
It's all relative. There are some audio qualities on LPs played on thousends
$
on 20.11.03 1:13, J. C. O'Connell at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
crush CDs, it isnt even close and his digital stuff
cost about 20K including
I have no opinion WRT the quality of CDs versus LPs, but I thought the
following link from the UK Sunday Times 'Style' magazine might be timely?
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2104-882918,00.html
There is a large picture to accompany the words in the actual paper
magazine. Perhaps
Hi Chris,
Going to the site you posted, I got this:
The area you wish to access is behind registration.
If you are an existing user of Times Online please enter you Username
and Password on the spaces provided below on the right.
If you are new to Times
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
with 8Mpixel sensor!
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
same
of one of the main advantages of digital vs. film. Silly, very very
silly.
Dario Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: alex wetmore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 9:46 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003
Yep ... the F828 ... should be v-e-r-r-r-y interesting to see how well it
works. Its predecessors, the F717, was very highly regarded.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
with 8Mpixel sensor!
Looks like 6Mpixel is
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I just read somewhere that Sony ( or maybe it
was minolta?) has a new digicam ( not slr)
with 8Mpixel sensor!
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
Where have you seen sample pics? Can you provide a URL? The dpreview
preview had no photos ... oops, images.
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
same size as the old 5mp sensor and it shows
critical this late evening) Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
Yep ... the F828 ... should be v-e-r-r-r-y interesting to see how
JCO, so do you see we can agree?
I'm fully with you on this topic.
Dario (yawn) Bonazza
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
Noisier I
on 11/20/03 10:15 PM, Shel Belinkoff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Where have you seen sample pics? Can you provide a URL? The dpreview
preview had no photos ... oops, images.
Someone posted first sample from his just-bought F828.
http://www.pbase.com/image/23462004exif=Y
Much better, than
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
They do. All of the sample photographs released so far have been
pretty terrible though. They are producing an 8mp sensor that is the
same size as the old 5mp sensor and it shows in the quality of the
photographs.
http://www.dpreview.com has
become my Point and Shoot of choice, if the price is under
US$1000.00
Len
* There's no place like 127.0.0.1
-Original Message-
From: J. C. O'Connell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Yes, but at the start CDs offered better quality than longplays.
I'm sorry but I can't agree with that a good quality record player in a good
stereo system a cd can't touch a LP much less a high quality pressed LP.
Sure. As long as you're young enough to
Hi,
This is surely a moot point. It is well nigh impossible to buy new LP
records and the equipment needed to play them. The reason is because the
marketplace has spoken, and the LP is out.
At the moment, the marketplace is talking about film vs. digital. As soon as
film loses, it's gone.
I
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
- Original Message -
From: Paul Eriksson
Subject: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Yes, but at the start CDs offered better quality than longplays.
I'm sorry
On 19 Nov 2003 at 18:19, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Wrong, there are tons of new models of turntables
coming out and also tons of ultra high quality
reissue LPs. The high end audio market has spoken
and the winner IS NOT CD. CDs are a mass market
mid fi product to be played on crappy $300
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 7:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
On 19 Nov 2003 at 18:19, J. C. O'Connell wrote
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
crush CDs, it isnt even close and his digital stuff
cost about 20K including upsamplers, jitterboxes,
etc. His phono rig is
On 19 Nov 2003 at 19:13, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
crush CDs, it isnt even close and his digital stuff
cost about 20K including upsamplers,
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily in
both analog and CD. On his system, the best LPs
crush CDs, it isnt even
-
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
Each to their own. Well executed double blind audio testing often leads to
fractured fantasies particularly where large sums of money
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
- Original Message -
From: Rob Studdert
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
I have a friend who has about a $100k audio system
($29K loudspeakers) and he has invested heavily
Message -
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 10:10 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
Each to their own. Well executed double blind audio testing often leads to
fractured fantasies particularly where large
i have and i know. you pull this on the Naktalk mailing list too.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 9:40 PM
Subject: RE: way OT: CD/LP was A conversation with Noritsu.
I suggest you listen
28 matches
Mail list logo
