Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-16 Thread Christine Aguila
No need to apologize. Thanks for the tip! Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: eckinator eckina...@gmail.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 5:21 AM Subject: Re: Speaking of SDM... Sorry Christine, totally missed your question

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-13 Thread eckinator
2010/1/13 Christine Aguila cagu...@earthlink.net: Ecke--is this for just the 16-50?  Or is this advice for the 50-135mm as well?  Cheers, Christine Hi Christine, my understanding from my readings of failure stats published in the internet and the few official figures given locally by Pentax

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-13 Thread eckinator
Sorry Christine, totally missed your question with the answer; yes, the advice is given for the 50-135 as well and there are some people saying for the others as well based on an assumption on which I cannot comment that part of the issue may be due to grease/fat degrading and causing the drive to

Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread John Celio
Does anyone else notice a warm up period between mounting an SDM lens and when the AF starts functioning? Whenever I put my 16-50 on my K10D, it takes between 5 and 15 (guestimate) seconds for the AF to start working. I should note that I don't use the lens very often, since my DA21 is my

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread eckinator
Hate to say so John but that is how the trouble started on my 1st 16-50 (also frequent forum opinion). After I had the sdm motor replaced, it was the first thing again so I returned it to Pentax for a NIB replacement. The 2nd 16-50 is now my always on, mainly because I like the lens but also

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread Rob Studdert
On 13/01/2010, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote: Hate to say so John but that is how the trouble started on my 1st 16-50 (also frequent forum opinion). These SDM lenses might have great optics but the number of stories relating to failures keeps me well away, I just don't need the grief. I'm

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread paul stenquist
On Jan 12, 2010, at 6:52 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: On 13/01/2010, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote: Hate to say so John but that is how the trouble started on my 1st 16-50 (also frequent forum opinion). These SDM lenses might have great optics but the number of stories relating to

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: paul stenquist Subject: Re: Speaking of SDM... I easily have 20,000 exposures on my three SDM Pentax lenses, with no problems. That's just one case, so it proves nothing, but I'm very satisfied. Go over to ForumsNeurotica and read some of the SDM

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread Rob Studdert
On 13/01/2010, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: I easily have 20,000 exposures on my three SDM Pentax lenses, with no problems. That's just one case, so it proves nothing, but I'm very satisfied. Paul That's great Paul, you were fortunate enough to get good ones, I too had a

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread Tom C
Rob wrote: Having a bad experience like that hones your sensitivity to these sorts of problems. I've always felt you were sensitive... Tom On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote: On 13/01/2010, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: I easily

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread Rob Studdert
On 13/01/2010, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Rob wrote: Having a bad experience like that hones your sensitivity to these sorts of problems. I've always felt you were sensitive... You can call me whatever you like but just don't tell me my camera gear's not fcked when it is ;-) -- Rob

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread Tom C
ROTFLMAO. On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 5:57 PM, Rob Studdert distudio.p...@gmail.com wrote: On 13/01/2010, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote: Rob wrote: Having a bad experience like that hones your sensitivity to these sorts of problems. I've always felt you were sensitive... You can call me

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread eckinator
2010/1/13 William Robb war...@gmail.com: Go over to ForumsNeurotica and read some of the SDM threads. You'll consider yourself lucky. to be fair, i also found threads indicating for the 1st gen DA*s (16-50, 50-135) sdm related failure rates of approx 1% which doesn't sounds too bad but is

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread John Celio
Thanks for your comments, everyone. I sent Pentax an email about my SDM issue, and also mentioned that time last year when the zoom locked up and didn't work until I twisted off the lens hood. I imagine this lens has been a lemon from the start, I was just being blissfully ignorant about it.

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread Joseph McAllister
On Jan 12, 2010, at 16:01 , William Robb wrote: - Original Message - From: paul stenquist Subject: Re: Speaking of SDM... I easily have 20,000 exposures on my three SDM Pentax lenses, with no problems. That's just one case, so it proves nothing, but I'm very satisfied. Go over

Re: Speaking of SDM...

2010-01-12 Thread Christine Aguila
- Original Message - From: eckinator eckina...@gmail.com The 2nd 16-50 is now my always on, mainly because I like the lens but also forums say if you want to be sure your sdm motor is ok, use the lens often, both to provoke the next failure and in case it needs a regular workout. I've