Re: PESO: Bat

I like it. I think it captures the essence of the bat better than if you HAD managed to freeze the motion. On 7/15/2022 9:28 AM, Toine wrote: Even 25600 ISO wasn't enough to freeze the motion. If you wonder about noise, think topaz denoise on the raw file. https://www.repiuk.nl/content

Re: PESO: Bat

great image! Dan Matyola *https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery * On Fri, Jul 15, 2022 at 9:29 AM Toine wrote: > Even 25600 ISO wasn't enough to freeze the motion. If you wonder about > noise, think topaz denoise on the raw file. > >

Re: PESO: Bat

The noise was so bat(d) lightroom couldn't handle it. Tried topaz denoise as a lightroom plugin but that was even worse. Then I remembered denoise standalone accepts raw files directly. Simply amazing. This is from a panasonic G9 which isn't the best you can get in the minimal noise department

Re: PESO: Bat

That is batshit aweseome! > On Jul 15, 2022, at 6:28 AM, Toine wrote: > > Even 25600 ISO wasn't enough to freeze the motion. If you wonder about > noise, think topaz denoise on the raw file. > > https://www.repiuk.nl/content/vleermuis/ > > Toine > -- > %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List >

Re: PESO: Bat

Am 15.07.22 um 15:28 schrieb Toine: Even 25600 ISO wasn't enough to freeze the motion. If you wonder about noise, think topaz denoise on the raw file. https://www.repiuk.nl/content/vleermuis/ Wow. This is quite amazing. Ralf -- Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany Blog :

PESO: Bat

Even 25600 ISO wasn't enough to freeze the motion. If you wonder about noise, think topaz denoise on the raw file. https://www.repiuk.nl/content/vleermuis/ Toine -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Bat Boy musical with the K-7

Good news: the K-7, 77/1.8, and 50-135 2.8 performed admirably, and I had no issues with noise. I DON'T have to rush out and get a K-5 (...unless I want to). Bad news: in the relative darkness, I tried to change modes from Aperture Priority to Shutter Speed Priority, but accidentally hit the

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

What Cotty said Cheers Ecke 2010/1/16 Cotty cotty...@mac.com: On 14/1/10, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed: Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house.  The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens.  There are thousands of them

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

On 14/1/10, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed: Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even though we had more sun in Sydney

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

Those are great, Christian. Love the bat! but all are super. Cheers, Christine - Original Message - From: Christian christ...@skofteland.net To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2010 12:23 PM Subject: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat The weather

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

In a message dated 1/14/2010 10:24:05 A.M. Pacific Standard Time, christ...@skofteland.net writes: http://birdofthemoment.blogspot.com/ Scroll down smartasses... you can click the images to make them larger. comments appreciated. -- === Love the peacock shot, had missed

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The C bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. C There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even C though we had more sun in Sydney, when I went to the botanic gardens it C was overcast

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

Brian Walters wrote: On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:23 -0500, Christian christ...@skofteland.net wrote: Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

, it was a struggle. The birds didn't want to come out from their hiding spots. The roos weren't relying on food and water provided by the local reserves and the sky was basically just pure clouds. Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from

GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

to come out from their hiding spots. The roos weren't relying on food and water provided by the local reserves and the sky was basically just pure clouds. Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even though we had more sun in Sydney, when I went to the botanic gardens it was overcast... of course. http

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

Glorious stuff!! Love them, Christian. Well cropped and crisply caught. Jack --- On Thu, 1/14/10, Christian christ...@skofteland.net wrote: From: Christian christ...@skofteland.net Subject: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Date: Thursday, January

RE: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

[... Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even though we had more sun in Sydney, when I went to the botanic gardens

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

All very well captured. The double barred finch really stands out for its unusual markings ! Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: Christian christ...@skofteland.net Subject: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat The weather really sucked for the first

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

on food and water provided by the local reserves and the sky was basically just pure clouds. Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

. The double barred finch really stands out for its unusual markings ! Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: Christian christ...@skofteland.net Subject: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat The weather really sucked for the first 2 weeks when I went

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

by the local reserves and the sky was basically just pure clouds. Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house.  The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens.  There are thousands of them roosting there during the day.  Even though we had more sun

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote: Glorious stuff!! Love them, Christian. Well cropped and crisply caught. I agree with Jack. Terrific stuff, Christian! cheers, frank -- Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house.  The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens.  There are thousands of them roosting there during the day.  Even though we had more sun in Sydney, when I went to the botanic gardens it was overcast... of course. http

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

frank theriault wrote: On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote: Glorious stuff!! Love them, Christian. Well cropped and crisply caught. I agree with Jack. Terrific stuff, Christian! Thanks, frank! -- Christian http://404mohawknotfound.blogspot.com/ -- PDML

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

provided by the local reserves and the sky was basically just pure clouds. Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even though we had

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 13:23 -0500, Christian christ...@skofteland.net wrote: Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

provided by the local reserves and the sky was basically just pure clouds. Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even though

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:23:16PM -0500, Christian scripsit: [snip] Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even though we

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house. The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens. There are thousands of them roosting there during the day. Even though we had more sun in Sydney, when I went to the botanic gardens it was overcast... of course. http

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

On Jan 15, 2010, at 7:23 AM, Christian wrote: http://birdofthemoment.blogspot.com/ Lovely silvereye shot (we call them waxeyes here). We have a few flowering plants in our garden that they tend to hang around. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: GESO - 3 birds, a frog and a bat

clouds. Here's a few shots of the local wildlife around my in-laws' house.  The bat (a gray-headed flying fox) is from the Sydney Royal Botanic Gardens.  There are thousands of them roosting there during the day.  Even though we had more sun in Sydney, when I went to the botanic gardens

Re: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/RollerBall

Christine Aguila wrote: John: I don't know the name of the game you describe, but in Chicago, we played for hours and hours a game called 500. We played with a 16 inch softball--the famous--or more accurately--the infamous 16 inch Clincher--16 inches of hard rock in the shape of a ball.

Re: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/RollerBall

I don't know if sixteen inches is an accurate circumference measurement of the Chicago Clincher balls. The diameter appears to be closer to seven inches. They're pretty substantial. And hard as a rock when new. Paul On Jun 8, 2009, at 8:24 AM, Keith Whaley wrote: Christine Aguila wrote:

Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall

- Original Message - From: Keith Whaley keit...@dslextreme.com To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 7:24 AM Subject: Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall Christine Aguila wrote: John: I don't know the name

Re: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/RollerBall

On 6/8/09, Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net wrote: I grew up in a small town north of Madison, WI and 500 was the game to play if we couldn't get enough players for a game of real ball. We played with a softball or a baseball, which ever one of us could come up with. Most of us didn't

Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall

- Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist Subject: Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall I don't know if sixteen inches is an accurate circumference measurement of the Chicago Clincher balls. The diameter appears to be closer to seven inches

Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall

. Are we on the same page? Regards, Bob S. On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:14 AM, William Robbwar...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist Subject: Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall I don't know if sixteen inches is an accurate

Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall

Robbwar...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist Subject: Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall I don't know if sixteen inches is an accurate circumference measurement of the Chicago Clincher balls. The diameter appears

Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall

on the same page? Regards,  Bob S. On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:14 AM, William Robbwar...@gmail.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Paul Stenquist Subject: Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall I don't know if sixteen inches is an accurate circumference

Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall

You may have seen me. I played in the Grant Park league and a number of others. I wasn't very good, but I was a sub for a great team. The best hitters could lure the outfield in by dropping soft liners in front of them. Then, at the next at bat, Kaboom! Believe me, there are plenty

Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall

- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan Subject: Re: another completely useless off topic question -Roller Bat/RollerBall Bill, To clarify: Major league baseball is played with a hardball, probably a 6 inch circumference. Softball is played with a 12 inch or 16 inch ball. 12 inch

OT: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/Roller Ball

Anyone else know this game from childhood? I remembered it while thinking of something else the Consumer Reports cool cameras thread sparked off. Required equipment: Baseball or softball Baseball or softball bat backyard or vacant lot a bunch of kids Rulz: One batter, pitcher catcher

Re: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/RollerBall

: something like: a 2 bounce grounder=25 points; 1 bounce grounder=50 points; fly ball=75 points. The first fielder to reach 500 points got to bat. We played 500 when there wasn't enough kids for a softball game, which was often; hence, hours and hours of 500. Cheers, Christine

Re: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/RollerBall

in the field.  Certain types of catches were worth a certain number of points:  something like:  a 2 bounce grounder=25 points; 1 bounce grounder=50 points; fly ball=75 points.  The first fielder to reach 500 points got to bat. We played 500 when there wasn't enough kids for a softball game, which

Re: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/RollerBall

the ball to kids in the field. Certain types of catches were worth a certain number of points: something like: a 2 bounce grounder=25 points; 1 bounce grounder=50 points; fly ball=75 points. The first fielder to reach 500 points got to bat. We played 500 when there wasn't enough kids

Re: another completely useless off topic question - Roller Bat/RollerBall

were worth a certain number of points: something like: a 2 bounce grounder=25 points; 1 bounce grounder=50 points; fly ball=75 points. The first fielder to reach 500 points got to bat. We played 500 when there wasn't enough kids for a softball game, which was often; hence, hours and hours

RE: PESO - Bat Ray

in relatively shallow water) Tom C. From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Subject: PESO - Bat Ray Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:32:12 -0800 Since we have continued talking about the aquarium, I thought I would post another

Re: PESO - Bat Ray

Hey Bruce, This helps. Since I don't have any digital gear I'll have to try pushing Provia 400F to 3200 as TomC recommended. Better get the DOF I guess than open the lens up and get a faster shutter speed. Though those decisions will have to wait till I get to see the inside of the place.

Re: Bat portrait

In a message dated 5/20/2005 10:08:09 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.oksne.net/paw/pippistrellus.html he's not dead, he's, he's restin' LOL... Jostein I don't think I want to see this ann = Well, now that's I've looked, I realized I

Re: Bat portrait

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 5/20/2005 10:08:09 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://www.oksne.net/paw/pippistrellus.html he's not dead, he's, he's restin' LOL... Jostein I don't think I want to see this ann = Well, now that's

Re: Bat portrait

- Original Message - From: mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Show us the beetle, Jostein! 8-) Um... no. It was the larvae, btw. Jostein

PESO: Bat portrait

With all the recent talk of bats, I thought it was worth a PESO. http://www.oksne.net/paw/pippistrellus.html Warning: picture contains an actual animal portrait. No mothers-in-law...:-) Comments and criticism always welcome. I don't think this is a particularly great photo myself, but it scores

Re: Bat portrait

he's not dead, he's, he's restin' Christian - Original Message - From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 11:55 AM Subject: PESO: Bat portrait With all the recent talk of bats, I thought it was worth a PESO. http://www.oksne.net/paw

Re: Bat portrait

- Original Message - From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oksne.net/paw/pippistrellus.html he's not dead, he's, he's restin' LOL... Jostein

Re: Bat portrait

Jostein wrote:  - Original Message - From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.oksne.net/paw/pippistrellus.html he's not dead, he's, he's restin' LOL... Jostein I don't think I want to see this ann

Re: PESO: Bat portrait

You should have warned that it was a dead bat portrait. Jostein wrote: With all the recent talk of bats, I thought it was worth a PESO. http://www.oksne.net/paw/pippistrellus.html Warning: picture contains an actual animal portrait. No mothers-in-law...:-) Comments and criticism always welcome

Re: PESO: Bat portrait

Yeah, and then gone on to emphasise there were no dead mothers in law? :-) Cheers, Jostein - Original Message - From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 8:22 PM Subject: Re: PESO: Bat portrait You should have warned that it was a dead

Re: PESO: Bat portrait

, May 20, 2005 8:22 PM Subject: Re: PESO: Bat portrait You should have warned that it was a dead bat portrait. Jostein wrote: With all the recent talk of bats, I thought it was worth a PESO. http://www.oksne.net/paw/pippistrellus.html Warning: picture contains an actual animal portrait. No mothers

Re: PESO: Bat portrait

hehehe... I'll remember that one. Thanks. Jostein - Original Message - From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 8:52 PM Subject: Re: PESO: Bat portrait Maybe the disclaimer that No mothers in law were harmed in making the image

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

Alright maybe not. (Damn now it can only be funny in a firesign theater sort of way). Cotty wrote: On 6/9/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: Cotty spoke of beating you and had some photos of bats Er, I do? Typo? Meanwhile, Alfred, time for my supper. Cheers, Cotty

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:21:55 -0400, Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cotty wrote: On 5/9/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: Don't you realize that you've really made it on the PDML when you name is in the thread twice? LOL. I've got a ways to go to beat

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

On 6/9/04, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed: Speaking of bats??? What? Huh? Wha'd I do now? WC Fields Ny, Frank reminds me of an old clock tower. A little batty in the belfry! /WC Fields Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

Cotty spoke of beating you and had some photos of bats so I came to the obvious, (well to me anyway), conclusion... You can go back to sleep now. frank theriault wrote: On Sun, 05 Sep 2004 17:21:55 -0400, Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cotty wrote: On 5/9/04, Peter J. Alling,

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

On 6/9/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: Cotty spoke of beating you and had some photos of bats Er, I do? Typo? Meanwhile, Alfred, time for my supper. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

On Mon, 06 Sep 2004 11:05:29 -0400, Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Cotty spoke of beating you and had some photos of bats so I came to the obvious, (well to me anyway), conclusion... You can go back to sleep now. Ah, thanks, Peter. I can always trust you to provide an accurate

Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat (was: Re: Cotty without camera)

Apologies, just steering my name out of this thread!! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps _

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

Don't you realize that you've really made it on the PDML when you name is in the thread twice? Cotty wrote: Apologies, just steering my name out of this thread!! Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps _

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

On 5/9/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: Don't you realize that you've really made it on the PDML when you name is in the thread twice? LOL. I've got a ways to go to beat Frank. Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|

Re: Cotty still on the dark side was[Re: Nod's As Good As A Wink To A Blind Bat]

Cotty wrote: On 5/9/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed: Don't you realize that you've really made it on the PDML when you name is in the thread twice? LOL. I've got a ways to go to beat Frank. Speaking of bats??? Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places,

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Butch Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The battery designation is 1/3n, 2L76, or 58, depending on manufacturer. ...and on this side of the pond, it's often called a CR1. -tih -- Tom Ivar Helbekkmo, Senior System Administrator, EUnet Norway www.eunet.no T: +47-22092958 M: +47-93013940 F:

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Shel Belinkoff wrote: Hi Ann ... Why might that be? Seems to be just fine in my other LX. shel Dunno - Just rememered it somewhere -- I think Mark answered the question tho ann (back from turkey day) Ann Sanfedele wrote: Maybe I'm misremembering, but I thought you were not supposed

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Shel Belinkoff wrote: I'd like to get a couple of sets of 3V Lithium batteries for the LX. Anyone know what what the proper model/size designation is for those bats? shel Maybe I'm misremembering, but I thought you were not supposed to use the lithium batteries in the LX OF course, my LX

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Shel, 1/3 N is the designation seems to work just fine in the LX. Regards, Bob S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd like to get a couple of sets of 3V Lithium batteries for the LX. Anyone know what what the proper model/size designation is for those bats?

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

The owner's manual says to use two 1.5 v alkaline (A76) or silver oxide (EPX76) mini-batteries. I can find no prohibition against the use of lithium batteries. However silver oxide batteries last so long, and are so plentiful, I see no reason to go to lithium. . . My LX came with Varta V76PX

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Hi Keith ... I have a 3v lith in my newer LX, and it's been pumping out the current faithfully for a bit more than two years. Unfortunately, there's no model/size designation that I can find on the battery. Varta is no longer making or selling batteries here. They have been taken over by

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The owner's manual says to use two 1.5 v alkaline (A76) or silver oxide (EPX76) mini-batteries. I can find no prohibition against the use of lithium batteries. Probably because lithium batteries didn't exist when the manual was written? Lithiums have, I

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Hi Ann ... Why might that be? Seems to be just fine in my other LX. shel Ann Sanfedele wrote: Maybe I'm misremembering, but I thought you were not supposed to use the lithium batteries in the LX OF course, my LX is over 20 years old

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

So, are you saying NOT to use lithiums in an LX, or that it's OK to use 'em? Mark Roberts wrote: Lithiums have, I believe, much higher surge current capacity, so they could potentially damage inductive devices like motors when they try to draw a lot of current on start-up. Many manufacturers

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

Thanks, Bob ... just the info I needed. BTW, that's the size used in many electronic dog collars. shel (charged up with good information) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Shel, 1/3 N is the designation seems to work just fine in the LX. Regards, Bob S.

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

previously written: Anyway, the silver oxide bats in one of my LX gave out yesterday right in the middle of shooting, and since it's replacement time, I'd like to go with the definitely (for me) longer lasting lithiums. A volt is a volt, what diff should it make if it comes from a lith or an

Re: Lithium Bat for LX

DL1/3N, 2L76 or CR1/3N are the designations. I have used these lithiums in six LX's (I no longer have six but I got carried away at one stage) they have worked fine and these double sized 3V batteries eliminate the contact between the two smaller 1.5s which has to be a good thing. handmaid

Re: The Bat

Hi, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 9:07:25 PM, you wrote: Could one of the users of the Bat very kindly tell me how to pre-process my mail on the server? what do you mean by 'pre-process'? What do you actually want to do? -- Cheers, Bobmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: The Bat

Hello MyHosting, Sunday, October 26, 2003, 9:07:25 PM, you wrote: M Could one of the users of the Bat very kindly tell me how to M pre-process my mail on the server? M Regards M mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1) From the toolbar select Account. 2) From the dropdown menu select

Re: OT: Re[4]: Re: Re[2]:.... The Bat!

It is posible for listers using the email client The Bat! to please dissable the numbering after the Re: after their reply subject lines? It makes such a damned mess when trying to kill threads on a text mailer. Yes, Rob. Unfortunately (in my humble opinion), this is the default setting

RE: My Bat Mitzvah gift

PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul F. Stregevsky Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: My Bat Mitzvah gift Last night I was at my synagog's annual auction. I ran into a girl who used to attend Sunday school with my daughter. She informed me that her Bat Mitzvah is in two weeks

Re: My Bat Mitzvah gift

- Original Message - From: Paul F. Stregevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 7:44 AM Subject: My Bat Mitzvah gift Last night I was at my synagog's annual auction. I ran into a girl who used to attend Sunday school with my daughter. She informed me