unfortunately they don't do business with customers outside of the US
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Christine Aguila
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jos from Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to select before scanning. I expect 5 to 10 % that I will want
to
Dear Group,
I have lot of film material (negatives and slides) that I want to
convert to digital.
I have a good Minolta film scanner, at that time I paid more for it than
a K20D costs :-). It delivers good quality but it takes far to much time
to be used on larger quantities of
On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
... This worked for me. Suggestions for quality or speed
improvements are
most welcome ...
I used to scan a lot of film ... probably up to five rolls of film a
week, selectively ... and it is *always* time consuming, tedious and
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Work flow to convert a BW film negative to a digital file for
PUG
On Jun 26, 2008, at 10:02 AM, Jos from Holland wrote:
... This worked for me. Suggestions for quality or speed
improvements are
most welcome
On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Most of the professionals I've talked to in the past year are now
outsourcing this work to ScanCafe (http://scancafe.com/). The results
look very good, and at $190 to scan a thousand negatives ($240 for a
thousand slides), it is great
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: Work flow to convert a BW film negative to a digital file for
PUG
On Jun 26, 2008, at 11:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Most
It sounds like you've optimized this process, and I'm sure your results will be
more than acceptable. Thje only thing I might suggest is using a good evenly
lit light box for illumination. That being said, a high quality film scanner
will undoubtedly do a better job, and I doubt that you'd
I have more than 200,000 negatives that I've never printed or scanned. Probably
10,000 that I'd REALLY like to have scanned. Many of those are BW shots of my
kids when they were toddlers -- thirty years ago. I should look into this.
Paul
-- Original message --
Thnx for your reaction Godfrey, I did not think in the direction of
having it done, yet.
Economicly you're probably right, working a few days and use that money
leads probably to more scanned film than I could do myself in those few
days.
The same holds for painting my house, but I still do it
- Original Message -
From: Jos from Holland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I want to select before scanning. I expect 5 to 10 % that I will want
to digitize. Can I tell to scancafe to scan only #6 and #24 of a set of
negative strips?
Jos: Scancafe lets you pic the scans you want--and you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have more than 200,000 negatives that I've never printed or
scanned. Probably 10,000 that I'd REALLY like to have scanned. Many
of those are BW shots of my kids when they were toddlers -- thirty
years ago. I should look into this. Paul -- Original
TNX Paul,
My Minolta Dimage ScanSpeed does a better job than the macro set-up
with my K10D, pixel count is effectively three times higher in case of
colour, but it is sooo sloow: high resolution scanning takes 45
seconds! I only want to spent so much time if the picture has to be
12 matches
Mail list logo
