Hi all,
Yesterday I finished reading the biography of Robert Capa, written by
Richard Whelan.
In short, I wholeheartedly recommend it to anyone. Capa was quite a
character.
Now I'm thinking about borrowing Slightly Out Of Focus for Capa's
(reportedly quite embellished) versions of many of
Bruce Dayton wrote:
That is a deceiving figure. While the single dot resolution is that
high, the real dithered dot to make up the right color is not that
high of resolution - somewhere between 200-400 dpi in a traditional
sense. It takes up many dots together of one or more of the ink
Good work, Bob. Are they all from Moscow?
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: Raimo Korhonen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 19. tammikuuta 2003 0:58
Aihe: Re: Vs:
In a message dated 1/18/2003 8:01:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
for me the photo is far more important. anything i use is to give me what i
envisioned when i was at the location. the equipment's job is to give me
the control i need without getting in the way,
yeah Herb, I am still using this rather unsatisfactory (but nonetheless
effective) method. I suppose you haven't got a spare trannie scanner
lying about you want to throw my way have you...:):):):)
Cheers
Shaun
Herb Chong wrote:
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have just
Hi,
Sunday, January 19, 2003, 9:38:06 AM, you wrote:
Good work, Bob. Are they all from Moscow?
Thanks. Yes - they're all from Moscow.
Bob
http://www.web-options.com/pcd4671/img0002.jpg
http://www.web-options.com/pcd4671/img0008.jpg
http://www.web-options.com/pcd4671/img0009.jpg
In a message dated 1/18/2003 5:42:20 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aw, bless her. Makes me want to give her a big hug :-)
Cotty
All I can say is that I am glad that naivete is huggable.
Doe aka Marnie Rather than just plain annoying. ;-)
as mint condition still have box
used once not as convenient as i wanted
$250 ono australian dollars
accept paypal
Anyone knows anything about this lense - is it a good lense?
Thanks
Peter Smekal
Uppsala, Sweden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3000460338category=3342
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.
- Original Message -
From: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003
Well he clearly stated that the camera has problems and that the sale is
final. The leather case is the only thing he claims is functional. You
have to read closer next time and don't let greed overcome good sense.
I don't think you'll get your money back. If it seems to good to be
true...
Len
- Original Message -
From: Leon Altoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: For Sale - K mount/screw mount, auto/manual focus
(P)Z1(p)Grip Strap X 2
One in box one not. Both in good condition, slight marks around tripod
mount.
Grip one (with packaging)
Price : US$50
Grip two
Price : US$45
Paul, that lens doesn't allow for too much sudden anthing. It's a behemoth
of a manual focus lens. It's very sharp but it requires careful focusing. I
use mine often with a small extension tube to shoot birds through a window.
The bird pretty much fills the frame at 6 feet.
If you need to be
Vic,
I used my K200/2.5 a couple of months ago taking photos of my kids playing
in the backyard (hand held in the late afternoon). You do have to be
careful focusing. If you are careful, this lens produces fantastic images;
very sharp, great color rendition and the bokeh is very pleasing.
Hi, Len,
Well, I must confess, when I read the auction last night, I didn't notice
the all sales final part. But, I still think it's a very misleading
description:
Overall in Great Condition
Then he mentions a sticky mirror that was supposedly fixed in 1988, and says
I guess that is still the
Hi,
Weird problem. My sister and I sell photographs on eBay as well as from
our site. A bit of pocket money, is all it is.
We have a photo of a vintage Italian Gaggia Espresso Maker which has
been a good seller for us.
No real similarities between Basque and Finno-Ugric languages.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vastaanottaja: Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Päivä: 19. tammikuuta 2003
Hi, Steve,
Hee Hee. Good one!
See, a few days ago, when Marnie (aka Doe) was asking how to describe her
Crap-O-Zoom (can't remember the brand), I posted, mentioning that she shouldn't
be over the top with hyperbole, as so many auctions suffer from exactly that
problem. And, here's an example.
On Saturday, January 18, 2003, at 09:16 AM, T Rittenhouse wrote:
Unfortunately a scan of my prints on the net would lose so much
quality that
you could tell nothing about them, so you will have to do your own
comparison if you don't trust mine.
Tom,
I don't think a image on the net would
Ahhh
The venerable DC120 was what I had back in early 1998 from the auction site
onsale.com for $300.00 USD(eventually taken over by egghead.com who is still
around but powered now by amazon.com - and after just checking.. the site is
still up).
That had a max resoultion of 1280x960. 1.3MP
Plus, I just noticed that the bidder that drove the price up to near $36 is
Brazilian, so I may need some Portuguese translation assistance as well!
Again, contact off list if you can help.
thanks again,
frank
frank theriault wrote:
Hi,
Weird problem. My sister and I sell photographs on
Hi Frank,
Very good advice you gave to Doe.
Just to be sure that I`m not picking on Keith`s lens, I also own
One of the greatest lenses ever made. Gotta go, gotta take
some pictures with One of the greatest lenses ever made ;)
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Everyone has a photographic
I have bought a ME with a zoom in KR mount:
TOKURA MC Auto Zoom 4.0-5.6/70-210mm
Anyone know Tokura and this lens ?
The KR mount is Ka compatible: A setting, same electricals contacts
and one more. It work fine with the MZ-S: Tv, Prog, matrix metering ...
I have found that is a RICOH
Here's what a site on the Basques says about the language:
Although there are theories (none of them proven
beyond a doubt) that Basque is related to other languages (such
as the Georgian family of languages in the Caucasus, or the
Berber language family of Africa, or even the Quechua language
This is what I love about the PDML. No matter where in the world you
might be having a problem, there is always a PDMLer close to help you
out. I know when I needed batteries for a Spotmatic, I received help
from Canada (thanks again Chris). And I remember that
Cananadian/Argentina problem
I agree with those too. I can also recommend The complete Guide to
Close-Up Macro Photography by Paul Harcourt Davies.
My number one advice would be to decide What is Macro Work? Do you want
to fill the frame with a butterfly? A house fly? a mosquito? Once you
decide how you want to
So, what's up? You got egg on yer face, too? It wasn't misleading at
all. You just proved that people see only what they want to see. Go
over the whole description carefully. It was described as not working,
and not only did it say that the sale was final, it also said that the
camera was
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003, Foto Syb wrote:
Question: What does QD mean? Is it better than just ZX 5N? Does QD exist
in Europe as well? And what is it called here? (Is there a MZ-5n QD?)
Quartz Date. The date back for the model, that is. You can turn it off, if
you never choose to use it.
--
I also went to the Kodak site, and all I can say is WOW.
I think is was Bruce Dayton that once suggested that we simply consider
digital as another format. That's a good approach, although this format
changes much faster than film ever did. Not being an MF person I can't
really comment on the
- Original Message -
From: Len Paris
Subject: RE: Ripped on eBay
This is what he has to say about the camera body.
He Had It Serviced Back In 1988 For The Mirror Not Dropping Down. I Guess
That Is Still The Problem.
He definitely said the camera has a problem, but he didn't describe
Juey, I don't think you have thought that through. A scan of a print vs. the
orginial file would load the images in favor of the digital. Scans of both
prints would load the images in favor of the 6x7 because the digital print
is halftoned and halftoned prints do not scan well. You really need to
Paul Jones wrote:
Does any one have any nice Photoshop actions that will add a
thin black frame to an image?
... old-fashioned, but I still use PShop v2.5.1 ;^)
- set up your image w/ even # of pixel dimensions
- make a new canvas w/ same dpi a few pixels larger
We the PDML as a collective unit shall take over the world!
Really though, the goodwill on this list always amazes me.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.
- Original Message -
From: Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Paul Jones wrote:
Does any one have any nice Photoshop actions that will add a
thin black frame to an image?
... old-fashioned, but I still use PShop v2.5.1 ;^)
- set up your image w/ even # of pixel dimensions
- make a new
In a message dated 1/19/2003 6:44:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Unlike Mike I wouldn't really recommend to start with $400
4MP
digips.
I wouldn't either. I made a big long post responding to all Mike's later points,
including that one and it has not shown up on the
Did you ever think that maybe these guys just want the photo? It is nice.
Sending them a note that it is just a photo, would probably make them think
you don't think it is worth that much. You may want to varify that they
realize they have bought a photo before shipping, so you don't get stuck
Amen!
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: Ripped on eBay
This is what I love about the PDML. No matter where in the world you
might
Rather than saying it's just a photo, I would say something more positive like This
photograph does not produce coffee.
And if you can't find a translator, send it in English -- there is bound to be around
him who reads English. As long as you include the item number on the subject line so
he
In case anybody hasn't noticed, the economy is way down. People who
still
have jobs are tending to save their money just in case, rather than
buying
toys. Prices were down in 91, and in 81. Both those times it took a
few
years for them to recover, and many have never recovered to the
pre-81
level.
In a message dated 1/19/2003 11:06:07 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once you
decide how you want to approach close-ups and what you want to photograph,
building technique becomes a lot easier and leads to
experience which will
give you the desire to try new ideas and
If you add extension tubes to some tele, does it not make
problems with wigneting? Is there any rule regarding this
matter?
regards,
===
Waldemar Krasowski
tel: +48 501087147
mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
===
In a message dated 1/19/2003 12:10:17 PM Eastern Standard Time, eactivist writes:
Or this Photograph takes better than the coffee the actual
machine produces!
tastes
One of these days I am getting a new head, more nimble typing fingers, or a better
built-in spell checker.
Doe aka Marnie
Anyone up there know bigdon007 that sells on eBay?
Reputable?
Collin
Well, he said that his dad had sent it in for repair because the mirror
wouldn't come down and he said that it still had that problem. He just
didn't say how it got that way. If you want me to give a word-by-word
explanation, I'll be happy to download the text of the description and
parse it for
thanks for the LATE heads up. :(
On the contrary. Thanks for not mentioning it.
Fred
Yep, it's be a good throw. Besides, I'm still broke from Christmas. I'm
thinking of skipping the slide scanner altogether and going straight to
DSLR when it arrives. This obviates the need for a scanner completely.
Then I'll scan older trannies as the chance arises in the future. I have
a
The January edition of the Digital Journalist:
http://digitaljournalist.org/contents.html
For the gear grunts, The advantages of film over digital...:
http://digitaljournalist.org/issue0301/nutsandbolts.html
BR
Hi, gang.
I just wanrted to do a book recomendation: Dialogue
with photography by Hill and Cooper. It's a
compilation of interviews to some of the best
photographers of 20th century (Brassai, Doisneau, HCB,
etc, etc). Good, long interviews where they talk about
their whole life and approach to
I know a grandmother who shoots film with a point-and-shoot. She goes
through about one camera every five or six years, and she paid about $150
for her last camera. But she shoots 80 rolls of film a year and pays $14 a
roll for film and processing. That's $30 a year for the camera and $1120 a
http://home.earthlink.net/~richditch/aboutme.htm
and
http://www.birdsasart.com/b5.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is the major downside, of course. And where film cameras will always out
beat digital cameras. A good film camera does not get so out-of-date it
becomes obsolete.
It doesn't? So you wouldn't mind shooting with a Graflex plate SLR, or a
screwmount Leica I, or a Zeiss folder, or an 828
Tom Graywolf,
Sorry to start a new thread, but given my temporary enforced absence from
the PDML Digest I've literally lost the old one.
When you compared the 14-mp Kodak print to one of your chemical prints, what
printer and printer driver were you using to make the digital print?
Not trying
[was: Vivitar Series One 28/1.9 PK for $60?]
there is at least another rare VS1 zoom - the 70-210/2.8-4 QDOS
novelty.
What`s the deal on this lens, I have a 70-210/2.8-4 (used it
tonight as a matter of fact), is the QDOS a different beast, or is
it just hype? I seem to remember one on ebay,
I kind of agree with Len, as this Tupperware seller might know very
little about cameras. I just hope you'll convince him that the
shutter curtain problem should have been noted, and that the mirror
problem he mentionned normally calls for an easy repair while
replacement of shutter curtains
I thought Doug and Dinsdale used sarcasm...
-Mat
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Steve,
I have visions of you appearing on this guy's doorstep, with your
Howitzer (you know, the 1000mm Tak) non-chalantly slung over your
shoulder, looking like Doug and/or Dinsdale Piranha (the infamous Piranha
Fred wrote:
However, I still don't have a K VS1 200/3.
You should try one, they`re nice.
I'm trying, Steve, I'm trying - I just haven't come up with one of
'em yet, that's all - g.
If it's basically a stretched out version of the VS1 135/2.3, then
it ought to be darned good. ;-)
Fred
That is a bizarre lens. Thanks for all the info Fred! I put on my
daughters 3D glasses, and it really does look 3D! I prefer
stereo over QDOS.
I also now know that I have the 3rd version 70-210.
Thanks again Fred,
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some
The nuts and bolts column is thought provoking.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:50 PM
Subject: Calling PDML Shutterbabes!
The January edition of
...Violence and sarcasm.
I thought Doug and Dinsdale used sarcasm...
-Mat
frank theriault wrote:
Hi, Steve,
I have visions of you appearing on this guy's doorstep, with your
Howitzer (you know, the 1000mm Tak) non-chalantly slung over your
shoulder, looking like Doug and/or Dinsdale
The 200/3 is quite a bit bigger, close focus is four feet, which
really sold me on it. It is hard to find in K mount.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
Everyone has a photographic memory. Some just don't have film.
- Original Message -
From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Weird problem. My sister and I sell photographs on eBay as well as from
our site. A bit of pocket money, is all it is.
We have a photo of a vintage Italian Gaggia Espresso Maker which has
been a good seller for us.
Uhhh? Adobe doesn't have a printer driver. It uses whatever is setup in
Windows (maybe those kiddy computers you are used to using are different,
HAR!). I used an Epson 820 with the latest driver available on the Epson
site. One print was on Epson's Premium Photo Glossy paper, the other on
their
And, I printed from Adobe Photoshop 5.5.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 5:10 PM
Subject: Kodak digital vs. 6x7 prints
Tom Graywolf,
Sorry to start
With the poor quality of the images on eBay, it'd be tough to say how
good looking the MX could be. What does it look like, Colin?
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Andre Langevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, January 19, 2003 4:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 22:19:00 -0800, you wrote:
Hi,
Does any one have any nice Photoshop actions that will add a thin black
frame to an image? The one that comes with PS adds a huge thick border and
any of the ones i've found on the web have been no good.
Thanks,
Paul Jones
Here's some hints,
In a message dated 1/19/2003 5:02:44 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It doesn't? So you wouldn't mind shooting with a Graflex plate SLR, or a
screwmount Leica I, or a Zeiss folder, or an 828 camera?
Certainly it does.
It just takes longer, is all. s
--Mike
Thought
Fred wrote:
However, I still don't have a K VS1 200/3.
Steve replied: You should try one, they`re nice.
Fred wrote: I'm trying, Steve, I'm trying - I just haven't come up with one
of 'em yet, that's all - g.
If it's basically a stretched out version of the VS1 135/2.3, then
it ought to be
Doe wrote:
IMHO, it will be the same with digital. At some point a good enough level will be
reached that one can stay satisfied with a DSLR for six-eight years. Since I don't
know enough about cameras, for me the telling sign will be when 60-80% of most
good/experienced/professional/etc.
Mike wrote:
Uh, Pal, I shoot Kodak Tri-X with a variety of Pentax Spotmatics and develop
it in Kodak D-76. Your point again...?
My point is that you're bloody atypical!
But Pal, it *is* a global phenomenon. Film sales are down for the first time
since the fall of Saigon, and for the third
And I was conscious I was addressing my arguments to Pal, who seems very
digital-resistant.
I'm not digital resistant. I just want the arguments down to earth where they belong...
Pål
Funny, there was a 67 lens up for auction this past week (maybe it still is, I
don't know). It was a fisheye, I think (can't remember the focal length).
It was described as an auto-focus lens. But, he took pains to mention that it
could still be used on the older manual focus 6x7's. vbg
Hi Paul,
I haven`t noticed the lackluster colors in my 200/3 K mount,
here are some examples:
http://pug.komkon.org/02mar/greg.html
http://stevelarson.0catch.com/Photography/Sunrise%20in%20Backyard.jpg
I think the colors are quite nice, I`ve shot flowers with it too. I`m not
being defensive,
With the poor quality of the images on eBay, it'd be tough to say how
good looking the MX could be. What does it look like, Colin?
Len
True. Bad photos and only a great condition mention that is worth
a tupperware.
I hope Collin will have some good news soon...
Andre
--
There are actually some of us who
a) like sheet film
b) have 120 folders
c) tinker with old stuff. (Though in my life I've only seen 2 828 rolls,
ever.)
I just got done processing 12 sheets of 4x5 landscapes.
Looking forward to seeing those contacts tomorrow!
Collin
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Uhhh? Adobe doesn't have a printer driver. It uses whatever is setup in
Windows (maybe those kiddy computers you are used to using are different,
HAR!). I used an Epson 820 with the latest driver available on the Epson
site. One print was on Epson's Premium Photo Glossy
A friend of mine has an undeveloped roll of 828 film that he's looking
for a place to develop (C41 color print film).
He also has an old Kodak rangefinder that takes 620 film. Pain in the
**s to load up that one...
I'm just happy that my photography class this semester involves 120 and
4x5
http://home.earthlink.net/~richditch/aboutme.htm
and
http://www.birdsasart.com/b5.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~richditch/roadrunner1.htm
That must be an example of a N*k*n bad bokeh...
Andre
--
Well..
here we go again.
I'm going to concentrate on one 35mm Autofocus system and the Contax G2
rangefinder won't be it. As much as I love this camera I have to let it go.
http://www.chang-sang.com/html/contaxg2_sale.html is where you'll find all
the info on it.
$1050.00 USD
buyer pays
A friend of mine, serious about ornithology, takes all his photos
with a rather small digital camera set at infinity and shooting
through the eyepiece of a high quality spotting scope (on a tripod).
The results are way better than what I can do with my Takumar 300mm +
high res. scanner. But
Mike Johnston wrote:
I'm either off the list, or the Digest has stopped again. Haven't had any
word from the PDML in 24 hours or more.
--Mike
Lucky you. A little peace. :)
- Original Message -
From: T Rittenhouse
Subject: Re: Kodak digital vs. 6x7 prints
You did note the 6x7 was a DP 8x10, not a custom print? I think they were
of comparable quality.
This is both a fair and an unfair comparisons, and I think it underlines
the real problem with
Pal didn't directly respond to the case presented in the original post.
He responded to what Pal thinks about what Pal does. If we stick to
granny, then we're talking about 4x6 prints, and a $500 PS digital will
be adequate until it wears out. A computer isn't even needed for doing
your own
- Original Message -
From: Len Paris
Subject: RE: Ripped on eBay
Well, he said that his dad had sent it in for repair because the mirror
wouldn't come down and he said that it still had that problem. He just
didn't say how it got that way. If you want me to give a word-by-word
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: Ze Masked Enabler Strikes Again!
OTOH, when it comes to computer technology there is always a cut-off
point, when it is good enough to last one for say six-eight years (or
more). With PCs Pentium was good enough for me (I have Pentium III). When
I don't defend it. I only maintain folks should read more carefully.
But, when you screw up...
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 7:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ripped on eBay
- Original
Bruce wrote:
Pal didn't directly respond to the case presented in the original post.
He responded to what Pal thinks about what Pal does. If we stick to
granny, then we're talking about 4x6 prints, and a $500 PS digital will
be adequate until it wears out. A computer isn't even needed for
I'm near Milwaukee, I'll bring the 67II and 1Ds- Mike will have to
supply to studio.
Ryan,
Really? We should get together and do a trial or two. I'll write a web
column about it...
But maybe we can wait until the weather is a little warmer...g
--Mike
On Sun, 19 Jan 2003 15:41:44 -0500, you wrote:
BTW anyone have knowledge about the picture on picture programs.My
regular custumers are asking if i can do this.Right now i run PS6.
PS6 does this. Go to File Automate Picture Package.
...or for same-size images there's File Automate Contact
This has just appeared on the photographica website:
Official statement from Canon is that the D60 has been discontinued.
The newcomers !!! are The EOS 3 based, 8megapixel D80 full size camera.
The D40 based on a smaller camera features a 4 megapixel APS size chip. The
price on the latter should
And I thought they would release a 9M model at least, consider what Sigma
has released lately.
regards,
Alan Chan
Official statement from Canon is that the D60 has been discontinued.
The newcomers !!! are The EOS 3 based, 8megapixel D80 full size camera.
The D40 based on a smaller camera
Let's imagine for a moment that Microsoft buys out C and N and made cameras.
Every year or two they would introduce new cameras and they would not accept
the same film, lenses, filters, flash units, tripods, batteries, etc. as the
previous version, and could not be modified to do so.
They would
tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
At a recent camera club meeting some slides were
shown in black and white, this caught my eye as
I had not thought such a film was available?
Is this the case? If so, how is this effect created?
It's
I enjoyed reading it..
Would be 70% bigger with more features than the last camera of which 99% of
those features we never used.
Not only features increase but also camera will become slower!!
Each camera will be released to in two versions, one Enterprise Version for PROS
and Retail version
I'm having an awful time reading the numbers on the
bag. It looks like 1F640-245, or IK6Y0-245 or some
combination thereof. Terrible handwriting. Please let
me know if you have some insight into this even if
your not interested in buying the screen. Many thanks.
--- smcforme [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd just like to point out that if you followed this advice when Reagan
was elected you would have made a very bad investment decision. If you
had assets in fixed savings during the Carter and Johnson administrations you
would have been screwed by inflation. You pay's your money and you takes
Dear all,
I generally agree with Mike's argument that pixel count isn't everything.
But he did miss the following points:
1. Higher pixel count will likely to enhance the colour accuracy of the
current RGB mosaic type CCD sensors. More pixel will increase the
information available for
Pal didn't directly respond to the case presented in the original post.
He responded to what Pal thinks about what Pal does.
Oh, bull. Another fat, bright red herring from our local Muddier of the
Waters. Look at the thread below: Pal quoted my argument and then said that
he doesn't buy it. He
At 10:23 17.1.2003 -0600, you wrote:
Hey Pal,
You can go download this TIFF file and make a print on your own printer.
That way you can tell if you think a 14-mp camera stands up to film.
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/cameras/dcsPro14n/sampl
Rob Studdert wrote:
You'll find that the files probably aren't interchangeable, each batch
35mm or otherwise has it's own specific cal files.
Yes, someone else pointed that out earlier.
The reference files are on Kodak's FTP site at the following address:
ftp://ftp.kodak.com/gastds/q60data/
Bob Walkden wrote:
Currently I'm back to reading the Yes, Prime Minister diaries :) What
a fantastic show that was.
I watched it in Basque once when I was in San Sebastian. Somehow it
didn't seem quite so funny g.
I found a German translation of a Garfield book a couple of years ago.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
