Hi,there,
I never know about PDML until Andy told me few days ago.I didn't know
there are so many pentax fans around the world.Nice to meet you all.
The website link below is my on-line photo ablums,which are almost taken
with my Z-1p.Wish you all will like them.Any comments are
Maybe because the mount was bigger they had
to make the barrel bigger, based on the technology
or time or $$ available when the K-mount was
introduced.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The glass isn't bigger, just the barrel. Don't know why Pentax made it that
way.
I also got a broken LX recently from my colleague.Then I had it to be
fixed.I have looked for it since I used pentax's SLR.It's so amazing and
pleasing when I press the shutter.
Marty
- Original Message -
From: Andy Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Hi all,
After putting my last couple of PAW images up, I decided to set up a
script-based site to make it easier to add pictures. I'm getting lazy
and editing HTML is boring :)
I'd appreciate it if a couple of people could take a look at the new
pages to make sure they work for you. Here's
Hello,
Very fine shot. It looks like the second driver is searching for a
place on the pits where he can overtake (or maybe I was watching
too much Formula 1:)), looking at the pits near the left side of
Tracy's car. Seems that the difference in speed as they came out from
that curve was not
It works perfectly, Dave. I love the propeller effect... At first, I thought
there were something falling off the plane...
Andy
-Original Message-
From: David Mann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My PAW site
Hi all,
After
Herb,
I seriously doubt that you have ever installed Outlook 2000. :-)
It does not depend on an exchange server. Outlook can be configured to
use perfectly ordinary SMTP servers, IMAP servers, POP3 servers, and the
secure variants. During installation you get all the necessary questions to
The old K1000 or even an LX would dent a few nuts...
Cheers
Shaun
Dr. Shaun Canning
Cultural Heritage Services
Lawrence Way, Karratha,
Western Australia, 6714
Mob: 0414-967 644
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.heritageservices.com.au
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hello brooksdj,
Wednesday, March 3, 2004, 8:17:55 AM, you wrote:
bcin I have XP.Whats this eye candy i can turn
bcin off.I'd like to see my machine run
bcin fastergMy ME
bcin machines are quicker than my XP one.
bcin Dave
Eye candy is something worth
Tan,
As has been mentioned, the virus in question is a Beagle (Bagle) variant.
If you don't have any antivirus (AV) software, download a trial and scan
your system. Or use one of the online scan engines.
If you have AV software that just wasn't updated, try downloading a
disinfection tool.
DJE,
I sincerely hope you grasped the context of Frank's comment, and my
response. Have you been around long enough to have read a 'bunny ears'
thread? Somebody could perhaps refer you to an appropriate URL and all
would be revealed.
regards,
Anthony Farr
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Kostas!!
Omigosh, that is a bloody brilliant image!!
Thought provoking, emotion provoking, and extremely eye catching...
It is one of those I wish I'd taken that type shots!
LOVE the contrast of the bright figure with the muted
David,
It works perfectly and looks great to me on IE6 at 1024 x 768 pixels and
text size = larger. I like your choice of a grey field to display photos
on.
regards,
Anthony Farr
Tan,
After a trying day myself, that was the funniest, warmest email I've
read in a long time. I know it's all worked out fine in the end (except
for hurt equipment :( ). Thank you bring a smile to my face.
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://homepages.ihug.com.au/~derbyc
Wouldn't it be nice if there was a web page with a compilation of links to all
the sites where list members store their PAWs (something like an extra column
to the PUG list of member's sites)? I then could bookmark only this page and
browse from there through all the PAWs every week. Good examples
i refuse to install Outlook 2000 on my machines because it still remains
vulnerable to scripting viruses in emails. they run whenever you have
preview enabled.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:44 AM
alright, i have installed when it came out with Office 2000 and removed it
pretty much right away. it took MS almost a year to fix several scripting
security bugs in Outlook when they issued a fix for Outlook Express within a
couple of weeks. i have to use Outlook at work and there it does't
Go into 'Tools', 'Email Accounts' 'Add a new account' and hey presto it
should show you the options.
-Original Message-
From: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 March 2004 11:28
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
alright, i have
i think that the mail administrators have removed all options on my work
Outlook except Exchange servers.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Rob Brigham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 6:32 AM
Subject: RE: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
Go
your updates are available under Office Updates and there aren't many of
them. they are rolled up into Service Packs for Office. you have a choice of
installing the service packs or digging through all of the Microsoft
Security Bulletins and seeing which updates are available for Outlook. they
You are most very welcome Derby! I aim to please! vbg
I am starting to realise that the hurt equipment thing is all part and
parcel of what I do and it is all insured, it is just the inconvenience that
is a PIA.
BTW, that shot of the Harbour bridge on your home page is just breath
taking!
tan.
Dock animation is nothing more than
a waste of good CPU cycles.
Things like this force you to upgrade to a
faster processor because the CPU has to
waste its time doing foolish things.
Like that stupid paper clip in Word.
Yuk.
2c on a bad day,
Collin
:)
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Smith
Subject: RE: LX joy
I'm going to see how well my *ist D copies slides this weekend.
Could you reprt back about what your solution was to get a full frame
copy?
Thanks
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Mark Dalal
Subject: Re[2]: clever virus attack (Att. Dalal)
BTW: I've just tried these other mail programs. I've suddenly
remembered
why past attempts to use them have resulted in returning outlook
express, risks and all...
Thats my problem too.
I
William Robb wrote:
Could you reprt back about what your solution was to get a full frame
copy?
Hi Bill,
It's this PAW idea (thanks Shel) that makes me want to do it. I have no
scanner at present and this seems like the obvious way to get a slide I can
provide a link to. Most of my work needs
Mark Roberts wrote:
I think the T-90 would be an excellent walnut shell
cracker. Though
it might pulverize them too much.
T90, hell, get an F1--either old or new type. If you're not a Canon
guy get a Nikon F2. In either case there's enough mass that
a flick of
the wrist would
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 06:20, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
When I opened the zip file using the password, McAfee was able to find
it and identify it as W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Wow, I am quite shocked that some of you would continue to open attached
file
After contemplating it and seeing some of the discussion about GFM, I've
been too busy to read it all. I decided to register at the last minute,
I think I was one of the last as the email I received said you are
registered and the event is now sold out. I am looking forward to it.
Its sounds like
Yes, You are correct, one can't be too careful.
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 16:16, Lasse Karlsson wrote:
From: Frits Wüthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 06:20, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
When I opened the zip file using the password, McAfee was able to find
it and identify it as
From: Anthony Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DJE,
I sincerely hope you grasped the context of Frank's comment, and my
response. Have you been around long enough to have read a 'bunny ears'
thread? Somebody could perhaps refer you to an appropriate URL and all
would be revealed.
regards,
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Moes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I was one of the last as
the email I received said you are registered and the event is
now sold out.
Awesome.
tv
From: Cesar Matamoros II [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay Frank,
Which one would you take? I just had to do this...
Spotmatic SP
SV
S1a
S1a
A3
K1000
MX
MV
ME Super
ME F
Super Program
LX
LX
LX
LX
LX
ZX-5
MZ-5
MZ-S
645n
The 2nd of the LXen looks the best to me, although the ME F
Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:50:29 -0800
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: zooms
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I didn't write that!
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004,
Later in 79: M40-80, M24-35 (78-11), M75-150
This should have been (79-11) of course.
Are you serious about the K20mm f/4 being lousy? I've seen a bunch
of nice comments about it. I'd always assumed that they weren't readily
availible for the same reasons that the A* lenses are not readily
availible--Pentax didn't sell many and people are hoarding them.
If it is that bad (and
From: Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd forgotten how nifty the LX is. It's smaller and lighter
than I remembered, and yet feels very solid and well built.
The finder is very bright, especially compared to the
spotmatics. Compared to the K2 and Spot F I
Well, I found that on the ST 20/4,5 and the three examples of the K20/4.0 that
I had (still have one) the sharpness at the edges diminishes substantially, to
the point of a soft blur in some cases. I've made a lot of pics with those
lenses, and when the size gets up there, that soft blur becomes
Because (based on having been there):
A. They were not quite up to the quality of the more normal focal lengths. No
super-wide-angle was before computer design became the norm.
B. They were damn expensive (around $500, IIRC)compaired to their other lenses
(even the 35/2.0 and 85/2.0 were only
I'm going to see how well my *ist D copies slides this weekend.
My answer to precedent posts:
Re: Digicam Slide Duplicator / Scanner
Post 1:
I have tried:
*istD + M42/K adaptor + Pentax Auto-Bellow (screw) + SMC Takunar 1.4/50
(and 1.8/55, screw, normal or reverse) + Pentax
Works fine with IE 5.5 and Firebird.
I glanced at the source code. Your scripting software seems to produce very
clean code. What are you using?
--
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
After putting my last couple of PAW images up, I decided to set up a
script-based site to make it easier to add
The problem I have with having to customize the OS is that when you have to
reload it, it can take hours to get it back the way you like it.
Wan't so bad when I kept an image on the server, but I don't have a server any
more. But trying to use something designed by the advertising department in
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My virus definitions in Norton's are dated 2nd March.
The latest incarnations of Bagle emerged on the 2nd. It is possible that
your update missed it, but it sounds unlikely...
Icky stuff, these virii.
Jostein
Hi,there,
I never know about PDML until Andy told me few days ago.I didn't know
there are so many pentax fans around the world.Nice to meet you all.
The website link below is my on-line photo ablums,which are almost taken
with my Z-1p.Wish you all will like them.Any comments are
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ya just missed a couple. I sold two K20/4.0's in the past few weeks.
Wish
I'd have known you wanted one ... it's really a dog and I was glad to be
rid of 'em (Bow-Wow)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First off, can anybody tell me why it appears to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nobody has yet released an LX-D kind of camera. At the rate things are
going, the first company to make anything like that (old-fashion look and
feel, digital guts) is going to be Cosina.
Unless you specifically meant an SLR, I hear Leica Panasonic have produced
I think the password protection of the ZIP file makes virus detection
not possible.
My McAfee didn't found it before it was unzipped.
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 17:30, Jostein wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My virus definitions in Norton's are
How about the Leica Digital back for the R-8 and R-9?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0306/03062502leicadigitalr9.asp
Christian
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 11:50 AM
Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-d Digest V04 #469
On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Mark Roberts wrote:
Next time I'm over there I'd love to visit Edinburgh! Don't know when
that will happen, though. We were hoping to get over there this year but
that looks unlikely now, especially if I start grad school this summer.
Good luck! What on?
Kostas
I happened to be browsing through Gerjan's invaluable book
on screw-mount Pentaxes when I stumbled across a page describing
the factory-installable optional focusing screens. There was
a split-image screen availible, so it is possible that the
companies that offer this conversion are using an
Thanks for that reply Jostein.
I never thought of that,but its a good place to start.Pentax Canada moved,now were did
i
put their new
number.:-)
Dave
Once I was stupid enough to thrust my thumb
into the viewfinder of my Z-1. I
was gripping the camera from
so you got an exemplar that was produced on monday-morning ... mine was
fine, too
Best
Bernd
original message--
From: Shel Belinkoff
a.. Subject: Re: those 150s
b.. Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 07:29:29 -0800
From: Joe Wilensky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I read somewhere (these days, who knows where I saw it?) that
with the launch of the K-mount line in the mid '70s, Pentax was
trying to compete with Nikon in the top-notch quality prime lenses
department, and that most Nikon primes had 52mm filter
I had a chance to sit in on a camera class Monday in regards to
lighting for
portraits.Lamps,positioning Kelvins etc.I'v got a grasp on it now.:-)
The instuctor is bringing in his 6 year old to pose and assist next Monday,and i have
been
Since we have two starkistdees in our lab, about a month ago I ordered two DA 16-45s
to go with them. Today Adorama tells me that one has finally shipped. Still waiting on
the other.
Joe
...the backs are made in Denmark (I'm a little proud, that my countrymen can
make things like this) - by Imacon. They made backs for MF cameras for years
as well as pro scanners.
http://www.imacon.dk/
Regards
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think the T-90 would be an excellent walnut shell cracker. Though it
might pulverize them too much.
T90, hell, get an F1--either old or new type. If you're not a Canon guy
get a Nikon F2.
...try an MZ-S!
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Andy Chang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 4. marts 2004 08:44
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: RE: LX joy
I only recently got hold a LX, I don't think I'll ever trade it
I received this silly email as well. It contained a Zip file that needed
a code to unzip it, containing an exe file. I followed the instructions
and unzipped the attachment and looked at the exe file. I shrugged my
shoulders and deleted it.
And some people wonder why I like the Mac OS.
Cheers,
Hi,
One of each of these is coming my way. What are your opinions on
them?
Just making conversation,
Kostas
i was driving by on my way to explore some
woods near my place when i looked
out over the ice on the nearby bay and saw this immature bald eagle eating
the fish it had caught. i wish i had one of my good lenses with me. this is
the center section of the *istD image taken with the FA 80-320
Whether or not it protects you or not I can't say for sure, but the
documentation plainly states, with a Outlook 2000 updated to current
security patches, that until you open the mail all the way scripts cannot
run. It also tells you when a email contains scripts ahead of time. From
what I can
I have the Sigma 70-300mm APO Zoom. I would like to put lens converter
behind it, probably a 1.4 or 1.7 so I can try to preserve AF. My
question is whose do I use? Sigma to match optics(?) or the Pentax or
is there another I should consider.
John Graves
In a message dated 3/3/2004 12:51:45 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here's one I shot last summer. Again this was
done with a Nikon Coolpix 5700
before I had my *istD. Going back in the spring to shoot this area again
with the D.
Comments welcome.
Cotty wrote:
I received this silly email as well. It contained a Zip file
that needed a code to unzip it, containing an exe file. I
followed the instructions and unzipped the attachment and
looked at the exe file. I shrugged my shoulders and deleted it.
And some people wonder why I like
Michel Carrère-Gée wrote:
I have tried:
*istD + M42/K adaptor + Pentax Auto-Bellow (screw) + SMC
Takunar 1.4/50 (and 1.8/55, screw, normal or reverse) +
Pentax Slide-Copier Post 2:
Not full frame, approximately 20x30mm with 1.4/50mm Post 3:
I tried two new tests:
- with SMC 2/55mm:
Christian wrote:
How about the Leica Digital back for the R-8 and R-9?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0306/03062502leicadigitalr9.asp
ERN wrote:
Unless you specifically meant an SLR, I hear Leica Panasonic have
produced
such an animal.
How about winrar? How does it rate security wise?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: Viruses and WinZip
This just in, if you have an older version of WinZip you may be
vulnerable to a
In a message dated 3/4/2004 10:56:07 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Once again a technical masterpiece. I don't get what your trying to say
though.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Just a little experiment on a couple of levels ...
Went back to win 2000 and am a happy camper for the most part. Runs faster
especially when editing images and scanning and is running flawlessly after
getting the initial bugs out.
-Original Message-
From: graywolf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 11:28 AM
To:
In a message dated 3/1/2004 4:43:22 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Bill Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, February 29, 2004 10:20 AM
Subject: Snow flower
Pansy sticking it head up through the snow.
Hi,
on my home from work tonight I listened to an interview with David
Hockney about the trustworthiness of photography. Here is an article
about it:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/3532483.stm
I agree with him about art photography, but, like Russell Roberts, I
thought his
I use the Sigma 1.4X APO and 2X APO converters with my Sigma APO 300/4. I
am very happy with the results and would suggest matching the TC to the
lens. Sigma's docs suggest that AF is preserved with the 1.4X on Pentax
with the 300mm but not with the 2X. In my experience with the *ist D AF
works
Zip disks or what they now call Jump drives are the ticket. The
jump drives are really just a SD card or some such with the USB
interface. All you do is plug it in and you have an instant drive.
If you need more permanence then the zip disks work quite well. I
haven't used a floppy for a few
Hi,
Bob W wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/arts/3532483.stm
I agree with him about art photography, but, like Russell Roberts, I
thought his arguments about factual photography were rather
simplistic. Still, it's interesting to hear him, nevertheless.
Hockney's just plain
I am likely to see everything digital at GFM, right? *istD's, Canon 60D's,
10D's, etc. D's, Nikon 70D (or whatever)? And not to mention all the digital PS.
Are most people cool about letting you hold and fondle their cameras?
Marnie aka Doe It could be the perfect pre-DSLR-shopping experience
Hi!
This 85 soft is one versatile lens. Took it for a walk to a local
reserve that is being re-built. Crawled on the sand and here are two
samples:
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/36094
http://www.webaperture.com/gallery/photos/36095
I would appreciate any feedback including thrown
At the TOPDML meets, we fondle all the time.:-)
Dave
BTW the D70 is not out just yet.I think near the end of March,last i heard.
I am likely to see everything digital at GFM, right?
*istD's, Canon 60D's,
10D's, etc. D's, Nikon 70D (or whatever)? And not to
Pretty much out of date, I think.
That seems to be the problem with most of the lists relating to this list.
Someone thinks it is a good idea. Then someone does it. Then they think, It's
done. No one (at least og those those who volunteer) seem to realize that such
a list is an ongoing
In a message dated 3/4/2004 11:37:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Wouldn't it be nice if there was a web page with a compilation of
links to all
the sites where list members store their PAWs (something like an extra
column
to the PUG list of member's sites)? I then
In a message dated 3/4/2004 11:36:19 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At the TOPDML meets, we fondle all the time.:-)
Dave
LOL. Good to know.
Marnie aka Doe
I'd like to take another look at the Setright pic you posted
a week or two back. Can you provide a URL?
Tks!
Umm, how can you see the fellow's neck? It's covered with
a scarf.
There's more to see in the pic than the person in the
foreground.
Glad you like it, though ;-))
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a little experiment on a couple of levels ...
Perhaps what I'm trying to say is too deep or abstract,
perhaps I'm not
trying to say anything, perhaps ... Look deep into the
photograph, look at
all the elements, the smallest detail ... perhaps something
will strike you
... perhaps ...
shel (now you've got me wondering)
Peter J. Alling
Probably wouldn't make a difference if you were using Windows on a Power PC.
Most of the viruses are Intel specific, as well as Windows specific. However you
could run BSD on a PC and be safe. Same OS as yours without the cutesy stuff added.
BTW, do you know why they chose BSD rather than Linux
I like the second one the best.The lines work for me.
Just curious Boris,do you scan the 35mm neg or the print.What driver do you use.
Mine never look so good.I think its the way i go,or dont go,about it.
Dave
Hi!
This 85 soft is one versatile lens. Took
So put them on that tiny digital card that came with your digicame. You know,
the one that was too small to hold ten photos.
--
Malcolm Smith wrote:
The only niggle is
the lack of floppy disc drive - and many PC manufacturers are now not
fitting them. I use these discs a great deal, and I
I am likely to see everything digital at GFM, right? *istD's, Canon 60D's,
10D's, etc. D's, Nikon 70D (or whatever)? And not to mention all the
digital PS.
I've never paid a whole lot of attention as to what folks are shooting,
except you're not likely to see very many digital PS. Most
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: PAW: fresh out of scanner
I like the second one the best.The lines work for me.
Just curious Boris,do you scan the 35mm neg or the print.What driver do you use.
Mine never look so good.I think
Christian schrieb:
How about the Leica Digital back for the R-8 and R-9?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0306/03062502leicadigitalr9.asp
Christian
Hm,
the main point of aquiring an LX for me were the interchangeable
finders.
That made it _so versatile_ ...
Well, a digital MZ-S with
On a Mac G4 running OS 10.2.6, the Dock's icon animation can be turned off?
How?
keith whaley
Dock Preferences Keith.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads
BTW I was planning on bringing my SO, will there be others she can hang
out with?
Geoff
Sure mate, I'll look after her.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
_
Free UK Mac Ads
And if he didn't his editors sure did. Actually, since he claims he never did
his own darkroom work, the statement that he never cropped his photos was true
even if every one was cropped by the lab technician.
Actually, photos have never been unmanipulated, even simple snapshots are at the
On 4/3/04, ZOOMSHOT ZIGGY disgorged:
Would you like a large GT to cool you down?
Ziggy
On 3/3/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
Password protetected Zip files scramble the contents enough to keep
virus protection software from itdetifing the contents you shouldn't
worry. The virus can't do
Yes, there will be.
Bill
BTW I was planning on bringing my SO, will there be others she can hang
out with?
Geoff
Sure mate, I'll look after her.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps
How about the Leica Digital back for the R-8 and R-9?
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0306/03062502leicadigitalr9.asp
I wonder if this could be adapted by some craftsman.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cotty?
Christian, you buy me the parts and I'll have a
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Zip disks or what they now call Jump drives are the ticket.
The jump drives are really just a SD card or some such with
the USB interface. All you do is plug it in and you have an
instant drive.
If you need more permanence then the zip disks work quite
well. I
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: PAW: fresh out of scanner
I like the second one the best.The lines work for me.
Just curious Boris,do you scan the 35mm neg or the print.What driver do you use.
Mine never look so good.I think
On 4/3/04, THE GRIM REAPER ;-) disgorged:
I don't know whether or not the message I sent yesterday, before Roadrunner
decided to block the PDML server, made it through or not.
Anyhow, this year's Grandfather Mountain Nature Photo Weekend is sold out
and no more registrations will be accepted.
Geoff asked this about GFM: BTW I was planning on bringing my SO, will
there be others she can hang
out with?
My SO will be a participating photographer.
Tom Reese
1 - 100 of 192 matches
Mail list logo
