I suppose the symmetry was missed because the house is such a focal point,
and the mountain somewhat blurry.
Perhaps, if you pass that way again, take the photo from a point more to the
right, so that the peak of the mountain is closer (measured horizontally) to
the peak of the structure,
Thanks for all the replies guys, the response was a little unexpected.
Somewhere below is a response to your posts, thanks again.
On 02/05/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks completely different on flashearth.
At 02:11 PM 7/05/2007, Digital Image Studio wrote:
On 02/05/07, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely done Rob.
Thanks Dave, no L-bracket in sight!
It's coming, it's coming I promise. (But then so is the second coming of
Christ, it's more a question of when ;-)
The screw is done
Pklease take a look at my flowers:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/Flash-Shows/apples.swf
Requires Shockwave Flash (or other SWF software)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.4/790 -
On May 5, 2007, at 7:47 PM, Bob W wrote:
The secret of riding successfully on the road is to understand that
you are a vehicle with the same rights and duties as every other
vehicle [...]
Unfortunately in some places the other road users don't have that
same understanding. Heck, I think
In a message dated 5/6/2007 11:09:30 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suppose the symmetry was missed because the house is such a focal point,
and the mountain somewhat blurry.
Perhaps, if you pass that way again, take the photo from a point more to the
right, so
Hi Ken,
On Sun, 6 May 2007 16:42:00 -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
K10D, 600mmFA f4.0, 1/160, f4.0, 400 ISO on Gitzo 1548 tripod with Kirk King
Cobra Head.
Comments appreciated.
I quite like it.
Good sharpness, yet shallow depth of
On 6/5/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Gad! I loved Rolf Harris when I was a kid.
I'm Jake the Peg, with my extra leg...
I reckon you're on this page somewhere
http://www.rolfharris.com/fans/fans1.htm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
On 6/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can only
see 1/4 of it on my monitor at a time--and it's not
worth copying it to Photoshop and reducing its size.
Rick, I can't remember, are you on a Mac? What I do is simply drag and
drop the image
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 07 May 2007 09:11
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Anyone travel with a step stool?
On 6/5/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Gad! I loved Rolf Harris when I was a kid.
I'm
Great shot. Is he molting?
On May 6, 2007, at 10:45 PM, Christian wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 12:06 PM, Christian wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/38yfr6
1/200 @ f8 ISO 100 with flash (to brighten it up on an otherwise
flat
overcast day) 500mm + 1.4x TC
That's a nice
Oh! Okay, I found it...count me in.
Bong
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Thanks, Paul. No, he's not molting that's the normal plumage for a male
Pyrrhuloxia (Cardinalis sinuatus), a relative of the cardinal and only
fairly common in the Rio Grande Valley.
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Great shot. Is he molting?
On May 6,
At 07:48 PM 5/6/2007, you wrote:
Message: 1
Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:20:39 -0400
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: rootbeer?
To: Pdml@pdml.net pdml@pdml.net
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1;
reply-type=original
There
Hello again,
finally I've managed to write a reply (been busy working on the
itinerary etc.). Bob, David, Alastair - thank you very much for your
replies. Here is (more or less) final version of our itinerary:
Southern Island
---
16.5. Christchurch
Arriving at 8am. After some 26
Very nice Jens, although I still would prefer less blur on many of
them. I think the light/dark areas do an excellent job of focusing
attention to specific features. The blur becomes a distraction for me.
Regards, Bob S.
On 5/7/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pklease take a look at my
For an ongoing project I need one of those 1GB IBM Microdrives that
were common about four years ago. Anybody got one they're willing to
part with cheaply? As with most of my projects, this one has a
shoestring budget.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I am sorry about your loss, Walter. My condolences.
Carlos
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On May 6, 2007, at 7:44 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Natural root beer is banned by the FDA. It's primary flavoring is
Sassafras, (containing safrole),which is a carcinogen. I've made if
using the original root but you can't buy it you'll have to collect
yourself
Are you sure about that? I
On May 6, 2007, at 9:02 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Bob,
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can only
see 1/4 of it on my monitor at a time--and it's not
worth copying it to Photoshop and reducing its size.
How about keeping things to 600 pixels or less
vertically, please?
Don't know
Bob Shell wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 7:44 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Natural root beer is banned by the FDA. It's primary flavoring is
Sassafras, (containing safrole),which is a carcinogen. I've made if
using the original root but you can't buy it you'll have to collect
yourself
Are you
I have only had to install and use it once, but it sure worke dout well.
Dave
On 5/6/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/05/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not my SD cards, but last year i had a 1 gig Kingston card go wackos
on me when i pulled a card from
Were dio i look. If i click on Scotts link, i get a page that says Hi
and thats it.
Dave
On 5/7/07, Bong Manayon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh! Okay, I found it...count me in.
Bong
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test
It's highest concentration is supposed to be in the root bark.
But apparently it's worse than I thought it's used in making MDMA.
That means it will soon be illegal to even posses...
http://www.deadiversion.usdoj.gov/chem_prog/advisories/safrole.htm
Bob Shell wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 7:44
I'll help out. Just let me know when.
Scott Loveless wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks
This would make an interesting study. How about a mortality/morbidity
study on the number of people per 100,000 of the population who
exhibited the type of cancer caused by safrole oil before the 1960 ban
on it's human consumption and after. If there's an actual statistically
significant
On 5/7/07, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On May 6, 2007, at 7:44 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Natural root beer is banned by the FDA. It's primary flavoring is
Sassafras, (containing safrole),which is a carcinogen. I've made if
using the original root but you
To all who have responded I offer my heartfelt thanks.
I would have never thought that I would miss a person this much, much less a
cat! We had dogs many years ago that had to be put down due to age and we
were leaving the country. I was sad but excepted the reality of the
situation at the time
If you need another tester let me know.
Cheers,
Dave
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, guys and gals! I need a few volunteers to test submission form
functionality for me. If you wouldn't mind, please let me know.
--
Scott Loveless
www.twosixteen.com
--
PDML
Was in a stationery store on the weekend, and these colours attracted my eye.
Nothing earth shattering, but comments are always welcome:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=3bxqyP0yMw
Thanks,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On May 7, 2007, at 6:04 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Was in a stationery store on the weekend, and these colours
attracted my eye.
Nothing earth shattering, but comments are always welcome:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=3bxqyP0yMw
Not all pleasing compositions have to be earth
I have an iMac and a MacBook at home, and a PC at
work. That dodge may work, but it's a lot easier if
the person posting keeps the size down.
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/5/07, Rick Womer, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is probably a really nice photo, but I can
only
see 1/4
On 5/5/07, Walter Hamler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sadly I report the passing of our beloved Himalayan, Amelia. Her kidneys
have been failing for the past year and she has had a couple minor seizures
in the past. Last evening she had a terrible bout of 9 or 10 and the
Potassium meds we gave her
Rob,
You're right, this was discussed a month or two ago,
and in a poll the overwhelming majority of respondents
said they wouldn't bother to resize a pic in order to
view it, IIRC.
FWIW, I'm using Safari on a Mac.
Rick
--- Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07/05/07, Rick
Bob,
The size is better, though still a bit large.
Really nice photo! The lines of the branches, the
foreground, and the way the tree is perched on the
rock are very intriguing. It matches my mental
picture of an ent.
Rick
--- Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rick,
Thanks for the
On 07/05/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was in a stationery store on the weekend, and these colours attracted my eye.
Nothing earth shattering, but comments are always welcome:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=3bxqyP0yMw
Interesting, you've even recorded the weave
On 07/05/07, Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob,
You're right, this was discussed a month or two ago,
and in a poll the overwhelming majority of respondents
said they wouldn't bother to resize a pic in order to
view it, IIRC.
That's a pity then.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
On 5/6/07, Bob Rapp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My wife and I spent the morning at Maitland Bay. On the path going down
to the ocean, I spotted this Red Gum perched on a rock. The title is the
first thing that popped into my head.
Comments always welcomed (well - mostly)
600 pixels is too small. This is a photography list, and most viewers want to
be able to judge image quality. Even at 1200 pixels that can be difficult. At
600 it's impossible.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Rick Womer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob,
You're right,
frank theriault wrote:
Was in a stationery store on the weekend, and these colours attracted my eye.
Nothing earth shattering, but comments are always welcome:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=3bxqyP0yMw
Thanks,
frank
I'd like it better without the shelf at the bottom.
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like it better without the shelf at the bottom. Otherwise, pretty cool.
I did take one without the shelf (very) visible:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=72RyThsF5C
I like this one because of the no shelf thing, but the more I
On 5/7/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not all pleasing compositions have to be earth shattering... :-)
Thanks, Godfrey.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like it better without the shelf at the bottom. Otherwise, pretty cool.
I did take one without the shelf (very) visible:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=72RyThsF5C
I like this one because of
On 5/7/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting, you've even recorded the weave textures, not so Theriaultean :-)
So now that you've been digitized for a couple of months what's your
feelings on this new to you mode of light recording? Do you find it's
lead you to shoot
On 5/6/07, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
K10D, 600mmFA f4.0, 1/160, f4.0, 400 ISO on Gitzo 1548 tripod with Kirk King
Cobra Head.
Comments appreciated.
My favourite bird, and a great shot! The fact that he's
Personally, I prefer a browser sized image to start with and the
option of viewing a larger image. But that's not a always possible.
Firefox, and I'm assuming other browsers, offers a setting to
automatically resize the image. This particular image needs to be big,
IMO. There's a lot of
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
600 pixels is too small. This is a photography list, and most viewers want
to be able to judge image quality. Even at 1200 pixels that can be
difficult. At 600 it's impossible.
The 600 pixel
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right. Now that I see them both, I like the first better.
Of course, I ~could~ always crop a bit of the first one - if I
cropped, that is...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML
I wasn't speaking of the PUG. I think it's fine as is. I was talking about
PESOs and having the option of viewing a larger size. You can always make an
image smaller, but you can't make it larger.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rick Womer wrote:
You're right, this was discussed a month or two ago,
and in a poll the overwhelming majority of respondents
said they wouldn't bother to resize a pic in order to
view it, IIRC.
Right. A cardinal rule of web design is that the web site should
accommodate the user, not the other
On 5/6/07, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I have a confession to make.
I'm a 35 year-old-man and I just don't like beer.
There, I said it.
snip
More beer for me, Dave and Mark!
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
In a message dated 5/6/2007 4:48:06 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My wife and I spent the morning at Maitland Bay. On the path going down
to the ocean, I spotted this Red Gum perched on a rock. The title is the
first thing that popped into my head.
Comments always
In a message dated 5/4/2007 6:02:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another one with the FA 50/1.4. F 7.1 @ 1/60th. On the K10D.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5928988size=lg
===
Another cutie shot. :-) Very nice.
Marnie aka Doe
In a message dated 5/7/2007 6:06:18 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Was in a stationery store on the weekend, and these colours attracted my eye.
Nothing earth shattering, but comments are always welcome:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=3bxqyP0yMw
Thanks,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Peso Squatter's Rights
I wasn't speaking of the PUG. I think it's fine as is. I was talking about
PESOs and having the option of viewing a larger size. You can always make
an image smaller, but you can't make it larger.
My
A small amount of research has confirmed that crude
sassafras extract contains saffrole, which causes
liver cancer in rodents.
According to the FDA web site, sassafras extract is
permitted if prepared thus:
Subpart F--Flavoring Agents and Related Substances
Sec. 172.580 Safrole-free extract of
In a message dated 5/6/2007 12:08:55 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another South Texas bird from this morning's shoot:
http://tinyurl.com/38yfr6
1/200 @ f8 ISO 100 with flash (to brighten it up on an otherwise flat
overcast day) 500mm + 1.4x TC
This is a species I
On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another one with the FA 50/1.4. F 7.1 @ 1/60th. On the K10D.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5928988size=lg
A Monday Morning Smile!
Thanks, Paul.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
Hi Rob,
Just to tell you that I enjoyed your image, great work.
Cheers, Fernando
On 5/2/07, Digital Image Studio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Team,
Given that digital image capture has diminished landscape photography
I thought I'd share a recent snap-shot. The image was captured (that's
There is a flock of these living on the golf course. I took quite a few
shots of them in various settings, but don't like most of them. So I will
probably try again.
Naturally, a couple of years ago they tried to get them to relocate, move
on, go elsewhere. Nothing worked. So now they are
On 5/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Huh. That's simple yet pleasing, frank.
That's kinda the way I looked it it, Marnie.
Thanks!
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
In a message dated 5/7/2007 7:18:05 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The 600 pixel constraint was put in when monitors were smaller, bandwidth
was expensive, lots of people were on dial-up, and dinosaurs still roamed
the earth.
I can happily view an image of 800
Hi Frank,
Pleasing image, I like it.
Fernando
On 5/7/07, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was in a stationery store on the weekend, and these colours attracted my eye.
Nothing earth shattering, but comments are always welcome:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=3bxqyP0yMw
Subjects are cute, and the image is nicely composed. Very nice.
Fernando
On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another one with the FA 50/1.4. F 7.1 @ 1/60th. On the K10D.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5928988size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On May 7, 2007, at 12:03 AM, Jens Bladt wrote:
http://www.jensbladt.dk/Flash-Shows/apples.swf
That's a nice collection, Jens.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Marnie.
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In a message dated 5/4/2007 6:02:56 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Another one with the FA 50/1.4. F 7.1 @ 1/60th. On the K10D.
On May 7, 2007, at 7:05 AM, frank theriault wrote:
... Also, I really don't to good street with a biggish (relatively
speaking) zoom lense. I think I need a short prime to stick on it -
the new pancake may be just the ticket. ...
I feel the same way. Most zoom lenses just don't make it for
In a message dated 5/6/2007 7:30:38 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the good things -- perhaps the only gpod thing -- about living
in Michigan is that you can see a wide variety of nicely restored
classics cruising the avenues on any spring or summer day when
On 5/7/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What Frank said.
Now, only if you could somehow remove that person in the middle ;-).
I'm not that skilled my friend ;o)
Great photo, if you ask me.
Thanks Boris, Appreciated
Boris
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/3/07, Fernando
On May 7, 2007, at 8:14 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
It's highest concentration is supposed to be in the root bark.
But apparently it's worse than I thought it's used in making MDMA.
That means it will soon be illegal to even posses...
Good example of a benign nature/man coexistence...flying balls
notwithstanding.
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a flock of these living on the golf course. I took quite a
few
shots of them in various settings, but don't like most of them. So I
will
probably try again.
Thanks Frank. Smiles are good. Happy to provide one.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another one with the FA 50/1.4. F 7.1 @ 1/60th. On the K10D.
Nice!
Tom C.
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - Pyrrhuloxia
Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 15:06:17 -0400
Another South Texas bird from this morning's shoot:
http://tinyurl.com/38yfr6
1/200 @
In a message dated 5/7/2007 8:50:48 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good example of a benign nature/man coexistence...flying balls
notwithstanding.
Jack
===
Thanks, Jack, I thought it might be. Also the urbanization of some animals
( birds). About nothing
Thanks Fernando.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Fernando Terrazzino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjects are cute, and the image is nicely composed. Very nice.
Fernando
On 5/4/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another one with the FA 50/1.4. F 7.1 @
I've been there and can understand. I had 20 or so beautiful (I thought)
shots of Lazuli Buntings which just didn't make the grade for like reasons.
Tom C.
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Also Excellent!
Tom C.
From: Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO - cardinal
Date: Sat, 05 May 2007 15:24:38 -0400
I'm in South Texas for three days shooting birds on a ranch in the Rio
Grande
I've contacted Shel and he has given me permission to tally the results of
his monitor poll of about a month ago (month and half? whatever).
It will take me a few days to get around to it, and I also want to include
the variations people mentioned as much as possible.
So I hope to post it
Just like the gauntlet I have to run these days to
buy Sudafed for my allergies!
The word Sudafed is derived from 'pseudo ephedrine' - it's a man-made
version of ephedrine. Ephedra was the stimulant of choice (alongside
poppies and hemp) for the ancient Indo-Europeans, and is thought to
have
I've contacted Shel and he has given me permission to tally the results of
his monitor poll of about a month ago (month and half? whatever).
It will take me a few days to get around to it, and I also want to include
the variations people mentioned as much as possible.
So I hope to post it
Good eye Knarf. Not sure which one I like more.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PESO - Duly Noted
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like it better without the shelf at the bottom. Otherwise, pretty
On May 7, 2007, at 12:53 PM, Bob W wrote:
The word Sudafed is derived from 'pseudo ephedrine' - it's a man-made
version of ephedrine. Ephedra was the stimulant of choice (alongside
poppies and hemp) for the ancient Indo-Europeans, and is thought to
have been one of the principle ingredients
I am debating the idea that fences might fit nicely in my series theme.
Collage/montage type of thing. Anyway, have a lot to shoot the next two weeks
and
I may explore fences a bit.
I found this slightly amusing.
Does it do anything for anyone?
I agree. Not many would have spotted the picture here. I like it. I prefer the
version without the shelf. It's a bit more intriguing in that it takes a moment
to determine what you're looking at.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is a nice composition. Placing the fence at the top of the frame
is a bit unexpected and more interesting than a conventional composition. I'd
say it's a keeper:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am debating the idea that
On 5/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am debating the idea that fences might fit nicely in my series theme.
Collage/montage type of thing. Anyway, have a lot to shoot the next two
weeks and
I may explore fences a bit.
I found this slightly amusing.
Does it do
I agree with you, Frank--better with the shelf
included. Nice!
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/7/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like it better without the shelf at the
bottom. Otherwise, pretty cool.
I did take one without the shelf (very)
On 5/6/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the good things -- perhaps the only gpod thing -- about living
in Michigan is that you can see a wide variety of nicely restored
classics cruising the avenues on any spring or summer day when rain
doesn't threaten. You don't have to
So on a long summer's evening, when the torchlight procession is under
way, and you're lucky enough this year to be outside the wicker man,
what kind of exposure do you think is best to catch the firebrands
against the evening sky, while still being able to make out details of
the snaggle-toothed
Duly noted ;-)
Maris
frank theriault wrote:
Was in a stationery store on the weekend, and these colours attracted
my eye.
Nothing earth shattering, but comments are always welcome:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=3bxqyP0yMw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No flash. Take a spotmeter reading of the street or a walker's neutral colored
clothing and go about a half stop under. If possible, you can spotmeter the
torch flame and shoot about three stops under (placing it at zone 8).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bob
On 5/5/07, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Excellent shot. A little more contrast (applied in curves so as not
to move the shadow or highlight points) might be okay. But it's great
as shown. You are the birdmaster, Christian. And that's a good thing
to be.
I agree.
cheers,
frank
--
In a message dated 5/7/2007 10:40:12 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am debating the idea that fences might fit nicely in my series theme.
Collage/montage type of thing. Anyway, have a lot to shoot the next two
In a message dated 5/7/2007 10:40:11 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think this is a nice composition. Placing the fence at the top of the
frame is a bit unexpected and more interesting than a conventional
composition.
I'd say it's a keeper:-).
Paul
==
On 5/6/07, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another South Texas bird from this morning's shoot:
http://tinyurl.com/38yfr6
1/200 @ f8 ISO 100 with flash (to brighten it up on an otherwise flat
overcast day) 500mm + 1.4x TC
This is a species I was hoping to see/photograph while I'm down
This is the kind of abstract that I find myself attempting and failing
at miserably by trying to be too clever. This is very nice, sharp with
good detail. (Damn maybe digital does make better photographs, or at
least better in a different style). I really hate you...
frank theriault wrote:
Frank, you need a fast 50mm or 35mm equivalent. Say a 24mm or 35mm
f2.0. The M 35mm is a lovely match for the *ist-D and feels much like
a 50 f1.7 does the MX. It would be perfect if it weren't for the lack
of aperture information being communicated from lens to body. I haven't
actually
On 5/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks. Okay, frank likes it. It's in.
LOL!
-frank (still likes it)
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
I did take one without the shelf (very) visible:
http://gmapuploader.com/iframe.php?mapId=72RyThsF5C
I like this one because of the no shelf thing, but the more I looked
at the first one, the more I liked it. Something about the colours,
some interesting shadows,
Thanks Frank. It might have been quite nice when new. I think they did a good
job on the paint in the late twenties. When I was a teenager I had a 34 Ford
Tudor Sedan that still had the original burgundy paint. It buffed out very
nicely. I think it was lacquer.
Paul
-- Original
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo
