OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me, Jeepgirl, Pat
in
SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
eight ^_^
To get even more firmly on topic, what Pentaxes are the sisterhood
shooting
with?
MX and ME
bye Katrin
Less glossy papers wick the ink out away from the point of
application. So throwing a 0.01mm droplet of ink, it'll hit the
paper and be wicked out to maybe 0.05mm or 0.1mm (depending on the
paper, of course). In general, the matter the paper, the more
wicking action it will have. There's a
Ka and Kaf?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Treena [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 4:23 PM
Subject: Re: OT Pentax wife
I'm a Pentax wife, and I've got a Pentax husband - we have no
compatibility
issues. :)
- Original Message -
From:
Not sure if
this happens to other people, but my email program is not able to sort
Mike's emails. So all Mike's responses would appear as a new thread,
instead of following the post he was replying to.
Sorry, Mike, I did not mean to pick on you :-) A few other posters'
emails behave the
As I say, my favorite paper is Epson Enhanced Matte, née Archival Matte (I
guess it wasn't archival enough to call Archival any more s). It's only
$14 for 50 sheets at BH Photo. Here's the link:
Yep, I have a pack of that stuff already. Nice enough but nowhere near
Hahnemuhle William Turner
I have my own ideas as to which of the gentlemen can tell us,
definitively, how
many women are here.
Mutley-snigger
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
Dear Adelheid!
Cotty
snigger
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
It appears to me that the rumours of the new Pentax cameras ist and 67III
come from a recent interview of the President of Pentax in Japan. During
the interview, he said that compact and simple are the major direction of
current Pentax camera development and Pentax is developing a compact
Hi,
Feroze wrote:
I get that often too, always the same pics that wont load. Herb's idea to use
Netscape seems good. What are you using?
Er, Netscape 4.61 8-) I've tried it with many options
enabled/disabled but I still cannot access all images in many
pages. This is usually only
http://appft1.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2Sect2=HITOFFp=1u=/netahtml/PTO/search-bool.htmlr=6f=Gl=50co1=ANDd=PG01s1='ASAHI+KOGAKU+KOGYO+KABUSHIKI+KAISHA'.AS.OS=AN/ASAHI+KOGAKU+KOGYO+KABUSHIKI+KAISHARS=AN/ASAHI+KOGAKU+KOGYO+KABUSHIKI+KAISHA
Hi,
Rob wrote:
(expletive deleted)
10 new digitals in the next 4 months
But Henry's original quote was:
more than 10 new light weight and compact Pentax cameras
I see this as more likely to be literally what it says - an
overhaul of the Espio line.
mike
For latest on what Tanya is doing (plus a cheap 28/3.5)
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3005204514category=46
88
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 3:41
Rob wrote:
RB The next year is certainly going to be exciting, one way or another...
To bent a quote, 2003 will be an exciting year or Pentax will not
be at all...
Servus, Alin
That Optio thingy is s small, rather cute too. I wouldn`t
mind having one.
Steve Larson
Redondo Beach, California
- Original Message -
From: Iren Henry Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 2:31 AM
Subject: Re: Ten new cameras to be
Mike wrote:
But Henry's original quote was:
more than 10 new light weight and compact Pentax cameras
I see this as more likely to be literally what it says - an
overhaul of the Espio line.
But according to Pentax president everything they do currently is small and
lightweight so it
i am able to make Saturday or Sunday, whichever date that turns out to be.
since i am taking Metro North into the city as well, i don't want to stay
too late.
Herb...
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Do NiMH require different charger from NiCad?
Just an extension of charge time proportional to the increase in
capacity over the original cells.
Of course, as has been pointed out here, fast charging NiMH with a
peak detecting NiCd charger can cause
Alin Flaider wrote:
To bent a quote, 2003 will be an exciting year or Pentax will not
be at all...
Sadly, I agree with this...
Cheers,
Boz
Mike,
That Enhanced Matte (S041341) is $11.42/50 sheets @
www.atlex.com. I've yet to see lower prices for the
Epson supplies. I've used them and have no complaints.
On Tue, 04 Feb 2003 05:15:55 -0800 (PST), Mike Johnston
wrote:
Mark,
As I say, my favorite paper is Epson Enhanced Matte,
née
I've got to wonder if Mike W. has not got it right... new Espio's.
Think small, compact, popularly priced, mass market digital.
This is how you take the stock price to 1000 yen, and
this is the same market as the ME/ME Super some 20+ years ago.
Recreating the success of the past with great cameras
At 03:36 AM 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
OTOH, I
seem to remember reading that there are several couples on the PDML who share
the Pentax platform. Wendy (who lost a Pentax lens to hubby's collection?)
I lost two, actually. A lovely new 28-105 3.2-4.5 and an 80-320.
Gave me an excuse to buy the
At 03:36 AM 04/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
To get even more firmly on topic, what Pentaxes are the sisterhood shooting
with?
ERN
(PZ-1; ZX-5n; LX; MX; WR-90. Prefer cameras to be as compact as reasonably
possible)
MX, LX, MZ-S, 67.
MX is still my favourite, but the MZ-S is now my most used.
W.
Just ran it through babelfish and it doesn't really say anything new
apart from reiterating the 10 new models stuff. The only bit which
could be interesting is for the Optio S: In addition as for MCM, we
have assumed it actualized the release time lag of approximately 0.01
seconds, shortened also
Hi,
I recieved my Sigma EX 24mm/1.8 just today. I can't comment on the optical
quality yet (other than no distortion visible), but the mechanical side
could be better. Focusing from 18cm to infinity in a quarter of a twist
takes getting used to since I use only manual focusing gear. The focus
Pål Jensen wrote:
Henry wrote:Hnenry wrote:
It appears to me that the rumours of the new Pentax cameras ist and 67III
come from a recent interview of the President of Pentax in Japan. During
the interview, he said that compact and simple are the major direction of
current Pentax
Hi,
Paul wrote:
I saw an exhibition of her work last year, quite amazing what was achieved so early
on.
Having taken up the subject in middle age, when she was probably
expected to settle into dowager-like somnolence, and dealing
with an almost completely do-it-yourself process involving wet
Maybe Mr. Babelfish will give you a clue...:-)
Ondrej
-Original Message-
From: Pĺl Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 04, 2003 1:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ten new cameras to be announced
Can someone please translate this?
Pål
- Original
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Butch Black wrote:
I checked a calendar Fri is the 21st, Sat 22nd, Sun 23rd. We are off to a
great start gang. VBG
Alright, I admit it, my calender was from last year. I'm easily confused!
Its not _my_ fault I looked at the stupid computer calender clock thing
and not the
At 22:12 3.2.2003 +, you wrote:
OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me, Jeepgirl, Pat
in
SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
Hmm.. Katrin from Germany ?
Antti-Pekka
.. and of course Adelheid; no idea HOW I managed to forget her. (I've a
#5 will be a weekday dinner to accomodate our travelling secretary
Cesar Matamoros.
Date: 2/24/03
Time: 7:30
Place: Mandalay Restaurant, College Park, MD
http://www.mandalayrc.com/index.html
Directions:
http://www.mandalayrc.com/directions.html
The restaurant might be a little hard to spot.
Cotty posted:
I have my own ideas as to which of the gentlemen can tell us,
definitively, how
many women are here.
Mutley-snigger
OK, that's one heard from, but you didn't provide the number. What were we up
to now,
ten?
-Original Message-
From: Stan Halpin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
And don't forget Daphne - she is still around.
Did we include Deb in Texas?
tv
Bob Walkden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Monday, February 3, 2003, 8:30:09 PM, you wrote:
[...]
I'm in the middle of volume 3 of Simon Schama's A History of Britain
and just read a long, fascinating section about Julia Margaret Cameron.
(Quite a refreshing surprise considering Schama's focus
Doug Franklin wrote:
It must have been Wilmer McLean who first coined the phrase, You can run
but you can't hide.
If he didn't coin it, he sure made a good (?bad?) example. :-)
I've heard a permutation of this story, probably an urban legend,
but what the heck:
In the late 1930s, when
Bob wrote:
I've got to wonder if Mike W. has not got it right... new Espio's.
Think small, compact, popularly priced, mass market digital.
This is how you take the stock price to 1000 yen, and
this is the same market as the ME/ME Super some 20+ years ago.
One DSLR, one film sibling and a
I wondered that myself - I was familiar with Fotomat but did not know that
they had an SLR line. The lens was designated macro' and had macro-style
magnification markings on the barrel, which is pretty distinctive for a 24mm.
- MCC
At 06:07 PM 2/3/2003 -0600, you wrote:
On Mon, 03 Feb 2003
To get even more firmly on topic, what Pentaxes are the
sisterhood shooting
with?
K1000
KM
Optio 230
-Original Message-
From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Bob wrote:
I've got to wonder if Mike W. has not got it right... new Espio's.
Think small, compact, popularly priced, mass market digital.
This is how you take the stock price to 1000 yen, and
this is the same
But Henry's original quote was:
more than 10 new light weight and compact Pentax cameras
I see this as more likely to be literally what it says - an
overhaul of the Espio line.
Most likely, something along these lines, although I anticipate more compact
digital models.
However, from
Thanks, Ken, glad you like them!
I wound up going with the extension setup after trying a variety of stacked
lens setups (e.g. A*200mm macro with an M50mm f1.7 reverse mounted in
front.) The reserve mounted 50mm on extension seems to be sharper than any
of the stacked lens setups.
The biggest
All email programs seem to have their own way of recognising threads, but none I have
encountered so far have a 100% hit rate.
Best,
Jostein
=== At 2003-02-04, 00:40:00 you wrote: ===
On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
Finally, I'm pleased to report that my weekly column, The
At 01:15 PM 2/3/2003 -0600, Mike Johnston wrote:
Are you aware that there's a children's book out now about an early pioneer
of snowflake photography? I can't remember the name of the book/man, but I
know it's being widely read in public schools around here right now. Maybe
you could piggyback
=== At 2003-02-03, 18:47:00 you wrote: ===
And the next relevant point to consider is how many of the said women on the
list are married and therefore, indeed Pentax wives not just Pentax women.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Wonder what the ratio is of Pentax husbands to
production rate of the company is
about 70,000 to 80,000 units per month.
Here is the Japanese link:
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20030204-0019-bcn-sci
Am I dreaming? Pentax is waking up!
Regards,
Henry Chu
4/2/2003
Ah, but the 'more than 10' new ones are due by MID 2003!
So much happenning...
-Original Message-
From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I think we'll see a 2nd DSLR announced by the end of the year.
of
the company is
about 70,000 to 80,000 units per month.
Here is the Japanese link:
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20030204-0019-bcn-sci
Am I dreaming? Pentax is waking up!
Regards,
Henry Chu
4/2/2003
Hi Mike,
Please answer my direct mail to you.
Cheers
Alek
Uytkownik Mike Johnston [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
But Henry\'s original quote was:
more than 10 new light weight and compact Pentax cameras
I see this as more likely to be literally what it says - an
overhaul of the Espio line.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Ah, but the 'more than 10' new ones are due by MID 2003!
This is true, but I think only one will be a dslr, and it will be
targeted at the low end. I think a higher spec'd one will follow
shortly.
tv
I just managed to get the first shot of the deer with the arrow in its head
on my website more to follow.
Go to new images and then click on first thumbnail
http://hometown.aol.ca/pentxuser/NewImgs.html
vic
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 03:01 AM, Mike Johnston wrote:
It's very tempting to simply re-title each reply, but people complain
when I
do that, so now I try to copy the existing thread title and paste it
in.
--Mike
And it's a much appreciated change.
Dan Scott
% to 5%. The current camera production rate of the company is
about 70,000 to 80,000 units per month.
Here is the Japanese link:
http://headlines.yahoo.co.jp/hl?a=20030204-0019-bcn-sci
Am I dreaming? Pentax is waking up!
Regards,
Henry Chu
4/2/2003
P.S. I propose a new division of terms for this discussion:
P-DSLR: Any old Pentax Digital Single Lens Reflex, even, or especially, a
crappy cheapo cynical rushed-to-market cobbled-up little 3-mp mass-market
sensor jobbie that'll have us all moaning and groaning and venting;
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I just managed to get the first shot of the deer with the
arrow in its head
on my website more to follow.
Go to new images and then click on first thumbnail
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 01:30 AM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
At 22:12 3.2.2003 +, you wrote:
OK, so now we're at least seven -- Annsan, Amita, Wendy, me,
Jeepgirl, Pat in
SF and Kathy with the name neither Dan nor I can spell.
Hmm.. Katrin from Germany ?
Antti-Pekka
Wasn't
There is no doubt that Pentax can build a solid future on PS style
cameras, like Olympus did, but how many people on this list really care
about those cameras?
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got to wonder if Mike W. has not got it right... new Espio's.
Think small, compact, popularly
Hi,
There was also the lurker Mary Jane from Krakow, Poland (just in
case there's a Krakow, Texas) who moved to Colorado for a
while. Don't know if she's still around.
Speak now.
m
Please use this method to get to the deer site. I'd be interested to see how
many people go to see it. my Website counter is on this page.
Just click on new images and then the first thumbnail which is a picture of
the deer. I apologize for the Copyright signs.
If you look at the cut-away, you would see that the camera is flat
only with the lens stored. To make it pack flat the center element group
is moved out of the light path so the front and rear groups can be
brought closer together. I wonder what sort of alignment can be
maintained after that
Dear All,
I am going to use PZ1 with some my K lenses. Is it truth that there appears
overexposure of 2/3 EV? Now I checking it using Velvia but on the basis of some
measurements it really seems to me that overexposure occurs. Any comments...So the
correction is needed.
I do hope it is constant
Ouch! Poor thing. I wish you guys the best of luck in tranqulizing
her...
Mike wrote:
the
aforementioned small, innovatively styled, nicely made SLR-style camera, but
with a pellicle mirror that allows real-time preview on the LCD screen, and
a 3-mp (right, 3-mp) Fuji SuperCCD SR (super dynamic range) sensor--and a
6-mp version promised for the not-too-distant
More speculation for PMA:
Sigma to unveil a complete range of 6x7 lenses with OS ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It's not the bodies that cost, it's the lenses. Where are you
going to
find a $100 Sigma 6x7 zoom for it?
?a=20030204-0019-bcn-sci
Am I dreaming? Pentax is waking up!
Regards,
Henry Chu
4/2/2003
_
Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Alek wrote:
I am going to use PZ1 with some my K lenses. Is it truth that there appears
overexposure of 2/3 EV? Now I checking it using Velvia but on the basis of some
measurements it really seems to me that overexposure occurs. Any comments...So the
correction is needed.
I do hope it is
Keith wrote:
Just when we thought Pentax was going to abandon us, right
Wrong! I never thought for a moment.
Pål
As for me, I'm not asking for a smaller 67 or a plastic one. I want
it to be fully compatible with the current lenses. You don't buy MF
to save money on your photography. About the only area where I find
the 67II problematic is in the flash synch area. They could really
use a new 75mm leaf
last I looked, a new 6x7 body from BH was running about $1500. The
$1000 difference might let me buy a lens. . .
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Rubenstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It's not the bodies that cost, it's the lenses. Where are you
going to
find a $100 Sigma 6x7
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
If you look at the cut-away, you would see that the camera is flat
only with the lens stored. To make it pack flat the center element group
is moved out of the light path so the front and rear groups can be
brought closer together. I wonder what sort of alignment can
Hope you're right! g
Regards, Bob S.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One DSLR, one film sibling and a new 67. That leaves a
maximum of seven Espios :o)
Pål
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 11:42 AM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
If you look at the cut-away, you would see that the camera is flat
only with the lens stored. To make it pack flat the center element
group is moved out of the light path so the front and rear groups can
be brought closer
Alek,
At the PDMLUK event last summer, I took most of the airplane pictures with a A*400/2.8
and the AF1.7TC, on a Z1. See http://oksne.net/ for the images, and Cotty's page for
pics of the combo http://www.macads.co.uk/pdml/index.html.
After also using it with many other lenses, I have found
Stephen Moore
I've heard a permutation of this story, probably an urban
legend,
but what the heck:
In the late 1930s, when the storm clouds of war were
gathering
over Europe, there was a Briton who saw what was coming
and
decided to move to someplace safe. He did extensive
research,
pored
This sister shoots with a MZ-5 and a MZ-5n.
I used to have a ME super which belongs now to my sister in law.
Adelheid
-Original Message-
From: Amita Guha [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Dienstag, 4. Februar 2003 15:59
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Women in photography
To
Alek,
I never had any problems with the PZ-1 exposing slide film accurately. Any problems
with print film were masked by the corrections done by the print machines.
The PZ-1p seems to be a bit off (1/2 stop) with slide film, but just fine with print
film. And I don't think you could judge
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 08:53 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
Bob wrote:
I've got to wonder if Mike W. has not got it right... new Espio's.
Think small, compact, popularly priced, mass market digital.
This is how you take the stock price to 1000 yen, and
this is the same market as the ME/ME
It isn't how many times you can get the mechanism to work, it's the
alignment of the lens elements. Those lens elements are going to have
relatively small diameters and axial alignment tolerances have to be
very tight to keep performance from going down the toilet. Let's not
forget this has to
On Tuesday 04 February 2003 00:22, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure whether the most recent versions of NS/Mozilla and MSIE
do this or not, but I use the open in background command quite
often to open up a window for a link I know I'm going to want to
look at _soon_ but not _now_, without
So we don't like the idea of a PS Pentax digital?
Some folks say the Canon digital makes the 6X7 obsolete.
If so, why can't a Pentax PS make our 35mm obsolete?
Here's a challenge for you. Take one of those PS digitals and take some photos.
Take along your 35mm and favorite lenses, then compare
Thanks!
I would use it with A50/1.4, SMC K105/2.8, SMC K135/2.5
And optically it is like a zoom?Better/worse?
What price of it could be?
Alek
Uytkownik Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Alek,
At the PDMLUK event last summer, I took most of the airplane pictures with a
A*400/2.8 and the AF1.7TC,
With A 50/1.7 exposures were great. The difference is with older lenses.
So now you have MZS.. Better than Pz-1p?I have read some reviews and many people
believe PZ1p has more features and not so expensive. It is truth.
Alek
Uytkownik Pl Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa:
Alek wrote:
I am going
Hi
But I have not written I use print film!!
And you wrote that with PZ1p you had 1/2 stop but over or under?rather overexposure...
So Pz1p usually overexposure and PZ1 not?
So maybe it is better to buy another PZ1 instead of PZ1p?
Do you know if I can do flash compensation with PZ1? For instance
Flash exposure compensation is possible on the PZ-1, though it isn't
as convenient as on the PZ-1p.
With the PZ-1, use the hyper manual program and hit the IF button
to set the program exposure. Then dial in the exposure compensation.
This won't affect the exposure settings you just made when
For some types of subjects the results with a digital PS will be fine.
For other subjects that are doing things like moving and are therefore
time dependent, it will rot. It is really no different than Film PS
cameras: for some shots they are just as good as a SLR, but for others
they are
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
It isn't how many times you can get the mechanism to work, it's the
alignment of the lens elements. Those lens elements are going to have
relatively small diameters and axial alignment tolerances have to be
very tight to keep performance from going down the toilet.
I'd really like to make the big meeting, but, unfortunately (??) I'll be in
Maui that day. Please keep me up to date on what's going on, however.
Dan
gfen wrote:
What: The PDML NY area meeting.
Where: NYC.
When: 2/23/03?
Who:
bruce rubenstein, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
butch black, [EMAIL
On 2/04/03 1:59 PM, Bruce Rubenstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It isn't how many times you can get the mechanism to work, it's the
alignment of the lens elements.
Your initial question was indeed boiled down to the cycle. I am sure the
alignment is fine and the concern, if any, would be about
From Jostein
After also using it with many other lenses, I have found that AF with the
TC is very accurate with f/2.8 (or better) lenses. Precision with eg.
M-200/4 is ok, but no more than that. Lenses of apertures darker than f/4.5
will make the AF hunt in low light. AF is quite fast. Comparable
Hi,
an exhibition of her work has just opened at the National Portrait
Gallery in London. There was an interesting and very good review of
her work in tpday's 'Independent' newspaper. Unfortunately that review
is not on their website, but there is a review of a recent biography
here:
On 2/04/03 1:40 PM, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday, February 4, 2003, at 11:42 AM, Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
If you look at the cut-away, you would see that the camera is flat
only with the lens stored. To make it pack flat the center element
group is moved out of the light
On 2/04/03 1:17 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want
it to be fully compatible with the current lenses. You don't buy MF
to save money on your photography.
I thought so too :-).
Ken
The dates are awfully close to PMA are in synch with
the new KAF3 new AF patents.
I'm no engineer, but it looks like an IS patent.
I will be optimistic say YES.
Peter
--- Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The only thing I'm certain of is this:
They'll be cameras designed for enthusiasts and snapshots.
Anything pro-grade will be a sideline to the main direction of Pentax.
Im not Mike but I have Practical Photography November 2000 issue in front of me. In
the test 90-105 mm macro lenses get the following points:
Canon AF 100/2.8 - 9/10
Minolta AF 100/2.8 - 9/10
Nikon AF 105/2.8D - 7/10
Pentax AF 100/2.8 - 6/10
Sigma AF 105/28 EX - 9/10
Tamron AF 90/2.8 SP - 9/10
On 2/04/03 2:43 PM, Keith Whaley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once it sashays back _into_ the optical axis, it must nestle into
position positively and surely, each and every time.
This is not magic. This is precise mechanical engineering. It might
require some fancy 'tricks of the trade' but
On 4 Feb 2003 at 13:24, Keith Whaley wrote:
I suppose you'd know, but it isn't the optical engineer that designs
the optical mounts for his lenses...it's the mechanical engineer! It's
HE that arranges for the lenses to be precisely a red-headed flea's
fine curly hair apart, and axially
Beyond perhaps wanting one, or seeing it as a camera to suggest the next
time a non-hobbyist asks what digital camera should I buy, I think the
reason to be excited about this, is that if these little babies sell, it
may keep Pentax a healthy company.
More cash-flow may mean more RD for the stuff
Hi,
I saw a similar article in a medical journal when I worked at the
British Library. A guy had trepanned himself by hammering a cold chisel
into the top of his head. The article included an x-ray photograph
which showed that the cold chisel had penetrated his brain to about
half-way down. The
The other third party 24mm lens is a Ricoh Rikenon 24mm f2.8. (...)
It's a decent lens and in non-flare conditions does quite well. It
is not very good with flare though.
I ... still have the Rikenon and also a K-24 f2.8. I don't use
either very much, though.
- MCC
As the Pentax-M 28/3.5
All this talk about The Women of PDML and female photogs in general
has reminded me of someone, but I can't remember her name.
I've only heard of her once. I believe she was English, and about 100
or 110 years ago, as a young single lady (maybe 20), she obtained a
great huge view camera (I guess
http://www.xitek.com/bingqiku/hasselblad/body/h1.htm
Another Blad/Fuji partnership.
Interesting, the last two models (this Xpan) are with Fujinon glass, not
Zeiss.
Collin
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
