Thank you, Larry.
Hmm. My Lancia is a 1967 model ... I seem to recall the Alfa Romeo type 105
chassis replaced the Giulia Sprint and its siblings, starting around 1965 or
1966, but I'd have to look them up to be certain. Doesn't matter really ... the
Giulia Sprint and Guiletta Spider are
Yes, Ive been known to inadvertently arrive on the ground.
Paul
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 8:46 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> Beautiful,
>
> ... but you know that as we get older getting down there isn't as much of a
> problem as getting back up again.
>
>> On 3/3/2024 8:51 PM, Comcast wrote:
>>
Doug, I was wrong. The problem persists.
My next wide-open time is Friday, though late afternoon Wednesday or
Thursday would work.
Rick
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 1:12 PM Rick Womer wrote:
> My number is 215-764-2998. Or, I can phone you.
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:45 Doug Brewer wrote:
>
I still haven't seen Henk's original post, but I noticed a distinct lack
of PDML the last week or so and then suddenly today a flood (mostly
about the new film camera)
Those are both great images. I'm not sure which I like more.
On 3/4/2024 1:02 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Beautiful shots,
If you read along with the English subtitles, he says they interviewed a
lot of young people to find out what THEY wanted in a film camera.
Face it Larry, you're "over the hill".
On 3/3/2024 3:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Mar 3, 2024, at 9:29 AM, Bill wrote:
On 3/3/2024 9:04 AM, Comcast
Target market is YOUNG PEOPLE, not veteran photographers.
On 3/3/2024 10:04 AM, Comcast wrote:
As a medium, film suffers in comparison to digital in that it is less capable
of low light reproduction and when pushed, image quality drops precipitously.
The solution has always been larger
I'd play with film more if I had a reliable place to get it processed.
On 3/3/2024 4:01 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
More news on the Pentax film camera:
https://youtu.be/xqRQTOkhOJU?si=PssAjafiIoYaxbuW
As for me, with a least a dozen film camera's accumulating dust on the
shelf is not fair to
Beautiful,
... but you know that as we get older getting down there isn't as much
of a problem as getting back up again.
On 3/3/2024 8:51 PM, Comcast wrote:
The snowdrops bloomed yesterday. As I’ve done for many a year, I got down on the
ground — more or less — and photographed a bloom.
On March 4, 2024 3:08:47 PM PST, Bill wrote:
>
>On 3/4/2024 3:15 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>>
>> As long as this camera keeps them happy for, say, half a year or 4 rolls of
>> film until it ends up in a drawer with all their other no longer fashionable
>> gadgets, it certainly will fit
Am 05.03.24 um 00:08 schrieb Bill:
That would make it's usage identical to probably 95% of all cameras
ever sold.
Right enough.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Fotos :
On 3/4/2024 3:15 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
As long as this camera keeps them happy for, say, half a year or 4
rolls of film until it ends up in a drawer with all their other no
longer fashionable gadgets, it certainly will fit the bill.
Ralf
That would make it's usage identical to
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 8:06 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> Minox 35... I still have my Minox 35GT-E, which I purchased new in 1998. It
> is a lovely camera and has made many great photos for me. I've currently got
> it loaded with some Tri-X and may take it on my two-week excursion to the
>
Great photos!
On March 4, 2024 9:50:49 AM PST, Henk Terhell wrote:
>After some days not receiving posts from pdml on my outlook mail account
>(though I was able to send mail), I decided to revert to my mail account of
>the internet provider.
>As a test here this mail with link to two pictures
Am 04.03.24 um 21:16 schrieb Marco Alpert:
I guess my question on this is how long these theoretical young folks will continue
to find waiting anywhere from a few days to a week to even see what they’ve shot
“fun"
My guess would be as long as they take to find the next new big thing.
This
I guess my question on this is how long these theoretical young folks will
continue to find waiting anywhere from a few days to a week to even see what
they’ve shot “fun.” Given the apparent popularity of the Fuji Instax cameras,
absolute image quality is not necessarily a big requirement for
Am 04.03.24 um 19:38 schrieb Stanley Halpin:
I had “2 to 3 Minox 35…” I remember for sure it was at least 2. I had one, it
was fine, a newer model was introduced with some feature that intrigued me, I
think the camera store gave me a trade-in discount when I bought the 2nd.
Ah, I see. The
Nice!
Cotty
> On 4 Mar 2024, at 17:50, Henk Terhell wrote:
>
> After some days not receiving posts from pdml on my outlook mail account
> (though I was able to send mail), I decided to revert to my mail account of
> the internet provider.
> As a test here this mail with link to two pictures
I had “2 to 3 Minox 35…” I remember for sure it was at least 2. I had one, it
was fine, a newer model was introduced with some feature that intrigued me, I
think the camera store gave me a trade-in discount when I bought the 2nd. It
seems that there might have been a 3rd, but I don’t have the
My number is 215-764-2998. Or, I can phone you.
On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 11:45 Doug Brewer wrote:
> Sure.
>
> On 3/4/24 11:30 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
> > How about a phone call about 3?
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 8:10 PM Doug Brewer
> wrote:
> >
> >> I should be free mid afternoon. Fire when
Beautiful shots, Hank. Love the light!
Paul
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 12:50 PM, Henk Terhell wrote:
>
> After some days not receiving posts from pdml on my outlook mail account
> (though I was able to send mail), I decided to revert to my mail account of
> the internet provider.
> As a test here
Am 04.03.24 um 16:06 schrieb Stanley Halpin:
I had 2-3 different Minox 35 GT 35mm cameras many years ago.
2 to 3 because they kept failing? My 35GT has been repaired a few times
because of shutter probs until I eventually gave up on it.
Still, a lovely little camera and capable of great
Exactly!
On 04-Mar-24 05:59 PM, Bob W PDML wrote:
On 4 Mar 2024, at 15:42, Alan C wrote:
It's not going to be a horizontal half frame, that would just be plain silly.
There were a couple of quick teasers in the video. Portrait format like a
'phone camera. IMHO it will be standard film
Sure.
On 3/4/24 11:30 AM, Rick Womer wrote:
How about a phone call about 3?
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 8:10 PM Doug Brewer wrote:
I should be free mid afternoon. Fire when ready.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
How about a phone call about 3?
On Sun, Mar 3, 2024 at 8:10 PM Doug Brewer wrote:
> I should be free mid afternoon. Fire when ready.
>
> On 3/3/24 6:08 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
> > Thanks, Doug. I’d love to “pick your brain”!
> >
> > Church and a memorial service ate up today. Tomorrow is pretty
Minox 35... I still have my Minox 35GT-E, which I purchased new in 1998. It is
a lovely camera and has made many great photos for me. I've currently got it
loaded with some Tri-X and may take it on my two-week excursion to the Right
Coast tomorrow.
Regards terminology, cameras like this, the
> On 4 Mar 2024, at 15:42, Alan C wrote:
>
> It's not going to be a horizontal half frame, that would just be plain
> silly. There were a couple of quick teasers in the video. Portrait format
> like a 'phone camera. IMHO it will be standard film advance, but half a frame
> at a time. It
It's not going to be a horizontal half frame, that would just be plain
silly. There were a couple of quick teasers in the video. Portrait
format like a 'phone camera. IMHO it will be standard film advance, but
half a frame at a time. It seems to me it will be like a digital compact
with film
I had 2-3 different Minox 35 GT 35mm cameras many years ago. Many. I don’t know
if it was the proper technical term, but I always thought it had a zone focus
system.
Depending on amount of light available, I set f/ to /5.6, 8/, or 1/11, usually
used an ISO64 film, sometimes ISO200. Auto
> On 4 Mar 2024, at 10:16, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>
>
>> In the video he talks about using zone focusing on the camera.
>
> The only times I ever see this term is when people describe the way the
> Horizon panoramic camera is focussed or rather isn't. It has no focussing
> control.
Am 04.03.24 um 10:53 schrieb Bob W PDML:
Making the camera square would do away with that. In fact using a square
negative 24x24 would give you 54 frames per roll.
But it wouldn't look like what those youngsters expect a film camera to
look like.
In the video he talks about using zone
> On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:45, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
>
> Am 03.03.24 um 18:29 schrieb Bill:
>> I was quite surprised that it is a vertical half frame, but the logic behind
>> that decision is that a vertical format is what the target market is already
>> comfortable with.
>
> Making it a
31 matches
Mail list logo
