Algorithm? We used to call that "drought" ;-)
Alex
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:09 PM Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> On 18/11/19, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >https://digg.com/video/this-researcher-created-an-extraordinary-
> >algorithm-that-removes-water-from-underwater-photos
The "rumor" didn't made sense from the beginning: *we* don't know the
details about the Ricoh-Hoya deal, but Ricoh definitely does.
Yet we're supposed to believe that Ricoh - who is preparing for the
November anniversary - is either a. unaware they would lose the right
to Pentax brand or b.
The GR cameras were always Ricoh (this goes well before they bought
Pentax). That the GR III is a Ricoh branded camera is expected - just
like the DSLR products being branded Pentax (like the newly launched
DA* 11-18mm)
Don't worry, Ricoh isn't phasing out the Pentax brand - if anything,
they
I'm able to photograph the place where the concert was.
Alex
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 3:25 PM Jostein wrote:
>
> It could be worse, Larry.
>
> You could have excelled in photographing microphones where a singer has
> recently been.
>
> That's about my level of skill at concert photography.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 8:44 PM John wrote:
>
> On 10/25/2018 12:01, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> > Has anyone sent in a camera for the upgrade? I think both Stan and Bill have
> > done so. How long did it take? Is there a marked improvement in performance
> > over the original? Any downside other
focused on the upgrade
> services."
>
> I see that as saying that feedback is used primarily to upgrade existing
> models, not on new model direction.
>
>
>> On 07 April 2018 at 08:26 Alex Sarbu <alexandru.sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Int
Interesting statement; as I'm seeing several times in the interview
that owner feedback is very important to them. But I don't see
anywhere the statement you're talking about.
Alex
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:57 AM, mike wilson wrote:
>> On 06 April 2018 at 21:13 Gonz
Indeed, "intelligent" chargers would detect "bad" batteries and refuse
to charge them; and often you can jump-start them in a "dummy"
charger. Apparently that's a feature.
You could use the BC 900 to test or refresh the batteries (don't leave
the charger unsupervised! - nor near flammable
Hello,
I'm trying to choose a cloud storage myself. Crashplan sounds
interesting if you have large amount of data - though, how large is
"unlimited"?
Cloud is nothing more than "someone else's computer"; trust is very
important, as Bill pointed out.
How I'm planning to do it: I bought a NAS unit
"When in panic or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout" ;-)
Please ignore the alarmist Nikkei article - FTR Ricoh had to
officially deny 2 such "news", the one about closing down the camera
business (denied) and one about selling the leasing and semiconductor
businesses (not sure it means
Congratulations and happy birthday!
Alex
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 4:06 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> It really is today, Dec 10th - 80 years and feeling fine -
>
> Hoping for twenty more
>
> ann
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
>
I've done some pseudo-investigation (actually, just opened a 1:1 RAW
in Silkypix and Pentax DCU).
They're saving the entire 3:2 frame, but with a tag for 1:1 cropping;
so you can recover the "extra" data - assuming your preferred image
processing software's crop tool supports this operation.
The HD Pentax D FA* 70-200mmF2.8 ED DC AW doesn't use the same type of
SDM micromotors as the DA*-series lenses. Actually it doesn't use SDM
at all - but DC motors. Fast, reliable.
Last Pentax lens with these SDM micromotors was announced in 2008.
Since then we had 3 K-mount "SDM" lenses, all
Obviously, that it's too expensive to reverse engineer the new
electronic aperture control protocol ;-)
Alex
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Bipin Gupta wrote:
> Just some two months back, 3rd Party Lens Manufacturers were
> complaining that do not do too many Pentax Lenses
Yep, the Disturbed version is not bad, but IMO it doesn't hold a
candle to the original.
Alex
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> I prefer the original. Perhaps I find something incongruous about
> shouting the words to "Sounds of Silence."
>
> What
Is there any (real) advantage of old-style, mechanical cable releases
compared to the electronic ones?
Just curious.
Alex (I have a CS-205 somewhere...)
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Mark C wrote:
> I use various IR remotes for snowflakes and stacked macros and
Yes, you can use the Image Sync application to control the camera from
your smartphone or tablet. Transferring files is probably slow.
You can use wired tethering via the Image Transmitter application (I
don't think it's free though).
The sensor is moving inside a well calibrated plane, it
Hello, Doug,
I'd say, skip the K-5 and get a K-5II - which indeed is a K-5 done
right, and with some tweaks added. If you liked the K-7, you would
like the K-5II even more.
I had a K-5, replaced it with a K-5IIs - it's worth the difference, IMO.
P.S. Both cameras have the excellent 16MP Sony
Happy new year!
Alex (long time lurker)
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Thanks, Igor!! Happily I haven't made anew years resolution to lose weight
> and then be disappointed with myself
>
> J.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Igor PDML-StR"
On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 4:59 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> This should be good for some Pentax visibility.
>
> << Pentax 645z medium-format digital SLR camera is now on the top of
> the DxOMark camera list with the highest score of 101. >>
>
> #2 is the Sony A7R II; #3 is the
Thank you; I might replace the 60-250 with this lens so I'm quite
interested in user feedback.
Most of the sharpness was lost by using ISO3200, but I won't be
nitpicking about some quick, first samples. I'm looking forward to
hear more impressions about this lens.
Alex
On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at
21 matches
Mail list logo