Re: Benbo Trekker Mk3 Compact Tripod

2010-11-21 Thread CheekyGeek
Uni-Loc tripods have been called Benbo done right. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-20 Thread CheekyGeek
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: Darren, I am not certain I grok your rant rightly... Are you ranting about the copyright notices obscuring your view? Or are you ranting about the fact that people are clueless about copyright? All of the above. The

Re: OT: Anyone here able to read/translate Chinese?

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
Character-based languages are interesting. For example, there is a character for roof. Also a character for woman and pig. If you put the pig character under the roof character you have the word home. If you put the woman character under the roof character you have the word peace. If you put TWO

Re: Filter experiment

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
I'm certainly no expert on the subject, but it seems to me that putting filters in front of the lens of a camera with a digital sensor in it is a bit silly especially for BW purposes. Your sensor is already filtering the light through three filters to achieve a red channel, a blue channel, and a

A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
A conversation in another thread brought to my attention a big 'ol copyright image, designed to be nearly impossible to remove and even more impossible to miss. Frankly, when I see this sort of behavior, I see the C to stand for Clueless rather than Copyright. I would suggest that people who do

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 12:50 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote: While you are technically correct, filing a copyright lawsuit is ridiculously expensive and takes years in court to pursue.  And while you can get statutory damages if you promptly file for registration, if someone

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
Well, I can assure you it goes well beyond theory, and that it is anything but impractical, but I see no benefit to myself in doing any further convincing on the subject. Closed minds are a powerful thing. Suffice it to say that this thread is (empirically) the most financially invaluable (and

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
Infringers enrich Copyright-smart Photographers. Google Flickr (along with the rest of the internet) make infringing simple. That's good for Copyright-smart Photographers. They also make catching infringers pretty simple, because most of them are clueless. While it may be counter-intuitive,

Re: OT: Anyone here able to read/translate Chinese?

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
...@mindspring.com wrote: On 2010-11-19 10:21, CheekyGeek wrote: Perhaps this much Chinese should be taught in all schools? : ) I think it would be better to teach enough Engrish so that we could actually communicate with the folks in the customer support call center when something goes wrong

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: That's pretty much how I work things. A few weeks ago I attended a seminar on copyright held by the American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP), so let's clear up a few misconceptions about copyright that have been

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: CheekyGeek wrote: there are specific ADDITIONAL penalties that the infringer puts themself in line for if they (for example) remove or crop out your copyright notice on their use of the infringed image. More leverage

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: So tell us how much you've collected and from who...  :-) Regards,  Bob S. On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 2:26 PM, CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com wrote: Well, I can assure you it goes well beyond theory, and that it is anything but impractical, but I see no benefit

Re: A small rant on obtrusive copyright marks.

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: I make all my images available under Creative Commons Attribution/Non-Commercial/No-Derivatives license. Anyone is free to use them for non-profit purposes. I think this is just an acknowledgement of the reality you

Re: PESO - Shepherding the Flock

2010-11-19 Thread CheekyGeek
I like it! Nice title. Darren Addy Kearney, Ne On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 4:20 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: K-5, DA*60-250, ISO 400, f4 @ 1/1000th, 60mm. Cropped to about 60% of frame. Could have tightened up a bit, but the moment would have been gone. Rendered on my

I think I may have a problem....

2010-11-18 Thread CheekyGeek
I have been joking about selling a kidney in order to pay for a K-5, but that may not be necessary. I took a little inventory last night and what I found surprised me. I've accumulated a fair amount of stuff in my pursuit of legacy glass for my K200D (and later K-x). A rather SILLY amount of

Re: OT you've all seen ken rock well...

2010-11-18 Thread CheekyGeek
Speaking of Barbie, this gives me a good excuse to point out one of the more BIZARRE Barbie Dolls I have seen yet. Frankly, I think it is for the birds. http://tinyurl.com/27x87kh Darren Addy Kearney, NE - - - Nothing is sure but Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List

Re: digital bw

2010-11-18 Thread CheekyGeek
The only filters that I feel are necessary/useful in the digital world are Neutral Density filters (for those times you want longer shutter speeds at equiv. apertures or gradient NDs) and maybe polarizers. Other than that, you can do the filter-thing for various BW enhancements with a

Re: What Price Today the K-5 In USA

2010-11-18 Thread CheekyGeek
Interestingly, Buy.com has Adorama selling the K-5 body for $1493 + 16 shipping ($1509 total), while the Adorama site itself has it priced at $1565 with free shipping. Buy.com currently shows it In Stock and shipping in 1 to 2 business days.

Re: digital bw

2010-11-18 Thread CheekyGeek
I'm in the process of setting up an old school BW darkroom just because I miss the process/smells/etc. The only film I really plan on shooting from this point forward will be BW that I develop myself. I'm also interested in exploring alternative processes in the monochrome world. However, if you

The Sam Abell thread (1)

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
I'd like to try something, and if it goes well perhaps it will provide a new sort of PDML thread for members to start periodically. Conversations will, no doubt, evolve like wheel spokes off of a central topic (hub), but I'd like this threads hub to be National Geographic photographer Sam Abell. I

Re: yet another peso

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:49 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: Remindes me of those 'mostly awful modern art inside.' The blank canvas doesn't really do anything for me. Regards,  Bob S. Bob S. took my comment. As far as fruitful commentary is concerned, before clicking the link I

Re: PESO: Yellowbook

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
And the photo credit appears WHERE? Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the

Re: The Sam Abell thread (1)

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote: I think we don't go to enough exoctic locations to have great photos.  :-) Regards,  Bob S. I realize that you are joking here, but I would posit that, for a good photographer, location or subject matter is never an

Re: The Sam Abell thread (1)

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
If I'm not mistaken, a lot of what Miserere was saying in that article was with tongue firmly planted in cheek. Or maybe I just need new batteries in my sarcastometer/ironicalgraph. Darren Addy Kearney, NE -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Yellowbook

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
Well congrats on them choosing your photograph. It is indeed worthy of appreciation by the wide audience it will receive. But as for the value of the photo credit and website address nowhere in the proximity of said photograph, I'd have to say it is near nil. If you have Google Analytics on your

Re: I think I may have a problem....

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
I must say, I find some of the value judgments made in this thread to be oddly entertaining and encouraging. I'm also going to use them as motivation. : ) Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: PESO: Yellowbook

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: I wondered what kind of whore you were.  But, if you're free, you're a slut, not a whore, you've got to make money to call yourself a pro. I know dialog and that is particularly harsh. - When

Re: The Sam Abell thread (1)

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: one of the people commented well, anyone can take good photos in a place like that. ^^^ How to diagnose an abusive personality in one sentence (or, at a minimum, Severe Social Retardation). Reminds me of the line Wow your

Re: PESO: Autumn

2010-11-17 Thread CheekyGeek
Of your set, I like this one best: http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/K5Samples#5538679904854969650 Thanks for sharing with the class. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

PESO: Absolutely Fireproof

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
http://www.pixelsmithy.com/absolutely-fireproof Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and

Re: Just a note ...

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
Wishing you well, John! The c-word can put a chill through you, but there has been no better time in history to get treatment for it. Also, choose a hospital with free wi-fi in the room. : ) Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: I think I may have a problem....

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
I'm still looking for a couple of Adaptall 2 PK/A adapters for my Tamrons. If anyone has one and is looking to trade for something in particular, let me know! I've got duplicates of some lenses (or what I like to call emergency backups). Clearly my problem is that I never get RID of stuff, but

Re: PESO: Absolutely Fireproof

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 9:52, CheekyGeek wrote: http://www.pixelsmithy.com/absolutely-fireproof Swell ghost sign!  Did you juice the colors a bit or is/was it really that VIVID? This is an in camera jpg, shot with my

Re: I think I may have a problem....

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote: Wow. 29 SLR bodies?  EBay and a K5 beckons. I'll be doing my share of eBaying here shortly, but eBay takes such a bite that I prefer the Pentax Forums Marketplace, to be honest. Does anybody know of a good place to hit

I think I may have a problem....

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
Forgot that I have an extra S-M-C Takumar 50mm f1.4. Also think I have a couple extra Super Takumar 50mm f1.4s and maybe one extra 55mm f1.8 Super Tak. Another coupla oddballs... a Spiralite Macrovar (screws onto 49mm filter thread and then gives variable close-up capability with a twist... down

re: I think I may have a problem....

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
Oops. Only sent this to Collin. To list... -- Forwarded message -- From: CheekyGeek cheekyg...@gmail.com Date: Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 1:27 PM Subject: Re: I think I may have a problem To: collin.brendemu...@contractor.huntington.com K Bodies: Multiple K1000s - one

Re: PESO: Absolutely Fireproof

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:13 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 7:52 AM, CheekyGeek wrote: http://www.pixelsmithy.com/absolutely-fireproof One of the best brick wall shots I've seen yet. Thanks Larry! (I think) : ) Darren -- Nothing is sure, except Death

Re: PESO 2010 - 198-The Lighting - GDG

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
Superb. Reminiscent of pushed Tri-X. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com wrote: A new post on my photo blog available for your pleasure:  http://godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com/the-lighting Comments always appreciated, thanks for

Re: PESO: Absolutely Fireproof

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote: Oh Please!  Don't call the K200D 'old'! I can't afford to upgrade mine.  I really can't Great shot, by the way. I wonder why the owners felt the need to mention the building's fire-proofness? Brian, I did not

Re: I think I may have a problem....

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
LOL. Silly me. On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote: On Nov 16, 2010, at 13:45, CheekyGeek wrote: Couple of Super Takumar 55mm f1.0 I'll take all of these - unless that's a typo.  -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http

Re: test

2010-11-16 Thread CheekyGeek
This concludes this test of the emergency mobile phone post system. Had this been an actual post, it would have contained photos, opinion, or something resembling a reasonable facsimile of what passes today for pseudo-intelligence. On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:36 PM, cagu...@earthlink.net

Re: Don't look back, something might be gaining on you.

2010-11-15 Thread CheekyGeek
Perhaps more appropriate posted here? http://www.mamiya.co.uk/index.php?content=mamiya+users What you posted is a body, with no lens, and no back. Not quite sure in what universe this is gaining on a $10K complete system. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska Needing a little more fiber in his diet...

A little DIY lens...

2010-11-12 Thread CheekyGeek
900mm f3.2 http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-forum/customer-forum/66544-home-made-900mm-lens.html Not exactly made for backpacking now, is it? : ) Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: A little DIY lens...

2010-11-12 Thread CheekyGeek
I'm rather amused to see a discussion on a Leica forum that involves a Pentax! Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit

Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
I also wish the focus point was the same. Other than the color balance/rendition I think the most noticeable difference is in the fine branches in the middle of the image. Before someone pointed out the focus point difference, I had assumed that it was highlighting the K-5's superior resolution at

Tonight's the night...

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
It's going to seem like a long work day, and I'll be humming the old Rod Stewart ditty Tonight's the Night but not for the same reason as he was: A couple of month's ago I found a beautiful Spotmatic with a S-M-C 50mm f1.4 in original soft case at the thrift store for a song. When I took the

Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
Assuming that LR defaults were used to process both RAW files, it would be interesting to see the old color chart photographed by both cameras. I'm especially curious about the RED response. (Of course, it must be remembered that the three channels are all monochrome through different color

Re: Tonight's the night...

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
I've always been the sort of person that is happy for others' good fortune, but I apologize to any who instead tend to go to the Dark Side emotionally. That was not my intent. I will keep the story's end to myself if it is going to be disturbing to anyone. (Odds are that it will be some Asanuma or

Re: K-7 K-5 samples at iso 100

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:22 AM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: My pics were all shot with AWB, and I assume that the difference in tonality was due to the way the camera handles that. That's my point. You can shoot and post-process any way that you like (of course) but if we are

Re: OT: Nat. Geo. image of Flamingos

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote: How do they train the birds to do that? No training necessary. It's fractals at work. If you get far enough away, all of the galaxies in the universe assume the same shape. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing

K-5 real world example

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
Has this been shared with the list yet? EIGHT STOP underexposure - impressive, to say the least: http://grumpyjohns.com/index.php?module=articleaction=viewarticle::article::id=182 As the writer says wicked dynamic range. For those who poo-poo Dx0 Mark tests, perhaps this real world example will

I really need to stop looking at K-5 images...

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
...because I'm considering selling a kidney to get one: http://www.flickr.com/groups/k-5/discuss/72157625170255966/ Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to

Re: After bombs away

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
Cool pic. Was reading an old Smithsonian mag with an article about a guy in the SW U.S. that has $30,000 worth of microfilm in his desk with data on crash sites in the U.S. He likes to find them (hiking to remote locations, mostly). The statistic that staggered me was how many aircraft crashes

Re: OT - What the F-stop time is it?

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
A must-have if you are an adherent of the Time Zone System . Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly

Re: [Norton AntiSpam]Help Norton Antispam

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
Norton products are such resource hogs that owners have to CHOOSE BETWEEN running Norton and actually using another application. No joke. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: Tonight's the night...

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
Counting the minutes now... In the same (very) small town where I'm meeting up with the box of stuff there is a Danish Bakery. On Thursday's it becomes a pizza place run by a couple of Germans. (Go figure). The pizza is purportedly to die for and only available on Thurs. nights. So I called to

Re: Tonight's the night...

2010-11-11 Thread CheekyGeek
Well, it wasn't exactly a treasure trove, but very nice for the price (free). First of all, the pizza is awesome. The word pizza really doesn't do it justice. It's about 1-1/2 thick and STUFFED with ingredients. This medium pizza weighs 6 to 8 pounds if it weighs an oz. Unbelievable. On to the

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 7:45 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Yep. I'm extremely happy with the Samsung sensor and can easily wait to upgrade. If I do, it'll be because of the lower minimum ISO of 80 rather than the high ISO settings of the K-5. OK. Let's look at it on your terms:

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: OK. Let's look at it on your terms: In a digital camera, I would argue that lower ISOs are *primarily* important for the maximum Dynamic Range that they provide. Not to me. OK. Can you expand on that? What is it about

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
This is a bit of a ridiculous discussion, if we equate it to film days... Let's imagine a set of photographers (let's say they shoot for National Geographic) who swear by Kodachrome 25. If Kodak or a competitor came out with a film that gave them Results Indistinguishable from Kodachrome 25 - but

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: OK. Can you expand on that? What is it about lower ISOs that make them primarily better to you? Longer shutter speeds. That's fine. ISO 100 to 80 is less than a 1/2 stop difference (if we compare the SETTINGS). If we

Re: PUG changes and themes for 2011

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
Theme suggestions off the top of my head (apologies if any of these have been used before): Rush Hour Life's Simple Pleasures Big Weather Underfoot Packing Heat A Fork in the Road The Ravages of Time Out of this World The Twilight Zone Bohemian Rhapsody Upon closer examination... Songs in the Key

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:16 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Why does it bother you so much that I like to work the way I like to work? I could care less about how you like to work. However I find your inability to adequately justify your stated positions in this particular

What your choice of camera says about you...

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
Sounds about right! http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/10/what-your-choice-of-camera-says-about-you.html Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Way OT: Canon Dial 35

2010-11-10 Thread CheekyGeek
http://www.scribd.com/doc/2570932/Canon-Dial-352-manual Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above

Re: peso rub don't blot

2010-11-09 Thread CheekyGeek
See also: http://www.flickr.com/photos/nebulagirl/4522787365/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/orphanjones/449153962/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/bonniezee/3664033552/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/25752...@n04/4864626809/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/backstabbers/218823329/

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-09 Thread CheekyGeek
That K-7 image looks like my old K200D at ISO 1600. (Which would make it a 2 stop improvement) but still an unfortunate amount of noise, in my book. Those who think the K-7 image looks GOOD have to be K-7 owners. : ) I'd rather see a comparison between the K-x at 6400 and the K5 at 6400 and see

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-09 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:53 PM, P N Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: Noise is only a small part of it. You also get better exposure control, weather sealing, better build quality, better write speed, better battery life and you don't get lumped in with people who buy red cameras:-).

Re: K-5, K-7, side-by-side at ISO 6400

2010-11-09 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 5:55 PM, paul stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote: But you asked why the flagship models were worth more than the Kx. **Rereads my post. Finds no such question, probably because I have no such question.** Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death

Re: It's offical: K-5 is the best (D7000 tested)

2010-11-08 Thread CheekyGeek
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: According to DxO, K-7 has bigger sensor than D7000. The crop factors are 1.52 vs 1.53 respectively... *Evil grin* I'm guessing that you are not serious, but isn't the crop factor due to a *combination* of the sensor size

Re: Let's bring back the K-1000

2010-11-06 Thread CheekyGeek
You don't really need to bring back something that is available in plentiful numbers. I haven't taken inventory, but I'm pretty sure I have 4 or 5. : ) Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from

Re: m42 takumar 300/4

2010-11-05 Thread CheekyGeek
Don't forget the Hyper Manual mode. http://www.ok1000pentax.com/2009/04/pentax-hyper-program-and-hyper-manual.html http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036message=36220193 Shooting with m42 lenses is best on a Pentax, because of Hyper Manual. Also, you should try to use an old preset

Re: Boris Peso #47 - Topaz Cat (technical)

2010-11-04 Thread CheekyGeek
Wouldn't one need to see a before/after Denoise comparison to make a meaningful comment? Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska (Looking forward to making my first meaningful comment on this list, one day.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to

PESO: A Pentax Experience

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
This photo is a little more than a cheat as a PESO submission. a) I didn't take it b) It wasn't taken BY a Pentax. However it was taken WITH a Pentax in the photo, so I thought it might be fun to share. Our family was out for the purpose of taking some group family photos. This photo was taken as

Re: DXO and light loss with fast lenses

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Dario Bonazza dario.bona...@virgilio.it wrote: This is rather interesting to me: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/an_open_letter_to_the_major_camera_manufacturers.shtml Dario, Thanks for sharing this link. I learned A LOT of things I didn't know. I would

Re: PESO: Caffe

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
I realize this is close to a religious issue, but: preground pods? imho THIS is coffee: http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/3910633204/ :P Darren Addy (runnin' and duckin' in Kearney, Nebraska) -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: DXO and light loss with fast lenses

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote: The funny thing would be if they didn't correct there would no evidence of it in this data but rather in inconsistent exposure results between lenses. I guess I should have prefaced my comments as coming from one who

Re: PESO: A Pentax Experience

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote: What amazing storm shots. Supercells are the majestic mountains of the Great Plains. (Gee, I should make bumper stickers of that.) But unless you are lucky enough to be in one's path you need to chase them to capture

Re: DXO and light loss with fast lenses

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:  Why change the iso anyway? why not just change the Tv? My guess would be because, out of the three main variables (shutter speed, aperture, ISO), ISO is the one that people will be most willing to compromise on.

Re: PESO: Caffe

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:26 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote: What pre-ground?  All I saw was a cup of the extracted form. True. He could be simply using an Illy logo cup for some other brand/method of coffee/espresso brewing with freshly ground beans. Let's hope so, shall we? :)

Re: GESO Teresa

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
A lovely model. I liked the first one the best (superb), the 2nd one next, and the third one least (mainly due to the improper white balance. Compare her teeth in the first and last shot and you'll see what I mean.) Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: PESO: Caffe

2010-11-03 Thread CheekyGeek
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:  Our local coffee shop (the Lexington Coffee Shop) is connected with a local bean roaster (the Lexington Roasting Co.) so I have long since lost track of the outside world. The outside world I recommend getting in touch

Re: On behalf of William Robb

2010-11-02 Thread CheekyGeek
I have no dog in this fight (apologies to PETA for the expression) but don't confuse Constitutional Rights with freedom from consequences or accountability for what one says when exercising such rights. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: On behalf of William Robb

2010-11-02 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote: You Tom, and others may, may practice the constitution as mush as you like, but please don't take it for granted here. Doing so, could be interpreted as, how do I put this? A bit self centered? Wait. You mean...

Re: On behalf of William Robb

2010-11-02 Thread CheekyGeek
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote: The constitution notwithstanding, let's hear it for servility. Also civility. They are both foreign concepts (and by foreign, I mean of another planet). Darren Addy Kearney, Ne -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes.

Re: film scanners

2010-11-01 Thread CheekyGeek
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Nick David Wright pedalsandpr...@gmail.com wrote: I know the Canon would be slow. But I'm okay with that. Seriously? What you probably mean to say is that you are okay with that until you hit about your 18th scan of  your first 36 exposure roll. Dust removal

Re: film scanners

2010-11-01 Thread CheekyGeek
My son-in-law is a photographer with stuff in Getty Images. He's also a photoshop expert (and Adobe PS beta tester) and has been converting a lot of his film lately with the Epson V500, which he feels is an excellent buy. He's a Windows computer - Canon Camera guy, but otherwise pretty stable. : )

Re: PESO: Lite-Brite

2010-10-31 Thread CheekyGeek
Nice image and perfect title. Pentax Zassenhaus: Clearly you are a man of excellent taste. : ) Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and Pentaxes. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the

Re: PESO -- Supervillain in search of a name.

2010-10-29 Thread CheekyGeek
It's MONOPOLY GUY (2010): http://tinyurl.com/2fc3s45 Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

FS Friday: Book...The Ultimate Asahi Pentax Screw Mount Guide

2010-10-29 Thread CheekyGeek
I realize that all of the savvy Pentax people on this list already own a copy, but since I just posted it For Sale on the pentaxforums marketplace I thought I'd also post it here: Often sold for much, much more. The Ultimate Asahi Pentax Screw Mount Guide is a must have for any serious Pentax

Re: FS Friday: Book...The Ultimate Asahi Pentax Screw Mount Guide

2010-10-29 Thread CheekyGeek
Remind me to comment on your prices whenever I see you offer something for sale! (No, I'm a better person than that). Seriously, I've seen it sold for much more. I had to wait a very long time to find a copy at this price and when it did I snagged it. No regrets either. The book has made its

Yet another Posterous photo blog

2010-10-26 Thread CheekyGeek
Since all the cool kids are doing it, I thought I would start using the Posterous blog that I set up many moons ago but never used. It is now my new photo blog. Hobson responds: I'll alert the media. http://www.pixelsmithy.com Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- Nothing is sure, except Death and

Re: Yet another Posterous photo blog

2010-10-26 Thread CheekyGeek
Thanks for the feedback, Walter and Larry! On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: TTV is Through The Viewfinder? That is correct. My muse was Flickr user Valcox: http://www.flickr.com/photos/12786...@n00/ There are some inspirational groups on Flickr for TTV as

Re: OT: Remote camera taken out by a dragster

2010-10-25 Thread CheekyGeek
No one expects the 200mph parachute! I'll bet a Takumar would have still been usable afterwards. : ) Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and

Re: OT: Landscape Photographer of the Year

2010-10-25 Thread CheekyGeek
My landscape photography would be greatly improved if only I included some castles or castle ruins. Sadly, they never built any in Nebraska. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: OT: Landscape Photographer of the Year

2010-10-25 Thread CheekyGeek
I'm in favor of fakes, as long as they're well executed, visually pleasing fakes. Are we still talking about photographs or have we moved on to bust enhancement? Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to

Re: Is a private blog safe?

2010-10-15 Thread CheekyGeek
If you put a file on a web server it is never safe. Period. Exclamation point. Add to that: Even if you make it password protected, etc. you have to share that password somehow with humans. Human beings, being human, can compromise your best intentions in many ways. Darren Addy Kearney, Nebraska

Re: Is a private blog safe?

2010-10-15 Thread CheekyGeek
Tim, if you want to share pictures between a group of 10 people (which is the impression I am getting from your initial post) then nothing really prevents you from inputting all their e-mail addresses to your e-mail client and establishing an ad-hoc mail list so that you can send these

Re: Pentas M 135/3.5 vs. Takumar 135/2.5

2010-10-12 Thread CheekyGeek
Is this a K-mount Takumar or a screw mount Takumar? The K-mount Takumar (of which the 135mm f2.5 is one of the most common) is considered to be a very poor quality lens, by Pentax standards... starting with it's lack of SMC coatings. The K-mount Takumars were consumer grade lenses and not at all

Re: Pentas M 135/3.5 vs. Takumar 135/2.5

2010-10-12 Thread CheekyGeek
There IS an SMC K mount 135mm f2.5 that is a good and sought after lens, but is it does NOT say Takumar on it. It simply says SMC Pentax. If you find that, buy it. It is purportedly the same optical design as its predecessor, the screw mount 135mm f2.5. One thing I have learned is that faster

  1   2   3   4   >