Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-18 Thread David Mann
On Apr 18, 2011, at 9:43 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote: And Paris, Texas is in downtown Christ Church, New Zealand. Or at least it was there ten years ago. I thought it was too, but not according to their website. I wonder if they closed their shop(s) here. I'm not in their target market so I

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Boris Liberman
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Turns out the photo was of the replica Statue of Liberty in Las Vegas, not the real thing. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-13101814 :-) It strikes me as an entirely non-trivial matter - which of the two - the

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread AlunFoto
2011/4/17 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a stock photo agency, made it into a stamp and printed three billion of them. Wonder if the agency/photographer had been entirely

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Boris Liberman
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 1:18 PM, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote: Wonder if the agency/photographer had been entirely accurate in their keywording of that image... :-) Jostein They might have allowed themselves quite a few liberties on the matter... -- Boris -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Ralf R. Radermacher
Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Turns out the photo was of the replica Statue of Liberty in Las Vegas. That's what you get for cheapskating. When Apple ran their first ads announcing the next generation of OS X (Lion) they used a stock photo of a lion's head. Too bad the same picture

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread P. J. Alling
Our government at work, (don't bother I know it's a semi-private enterprise. It's still working under bureaucratic rules), On 4/16/2011 6:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a stock

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread P. J. Alling
Sadly there's probably more actual liberty in Vegas than in all of New York. On 4/16/2011 7:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: I thought the Statue of Liberty was in Vegas . . . On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:09 PM, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 16/04/2011 4:13 PM, Mark Roberts

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Joseph McAllister
On Apr 16, 2011, at 17:44 , Paul Stenquist wrote: In the end, it probably doesn't matter. The Vegas statue is a replica and the image on the stamp is tiny. Paul On Apr 16, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Not true. The real one (New York Version) has black snot running out of her

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Daniel J. Matyola
Don't believe the propaganda; the Statue of Liberty is in New Jersey, not New York. Dan On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 9:43 AM, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote: Sadly there's probably more actual liberty in Vegas than in all of New York. On 4/16/2011 7:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Igor Roshchin
Sat Apr 16 18:09:28 CDT 2011 William Robb wrote: On 16/04/2011 4:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a stock photo agency, made it into a stamp and printed three billion of them.

RE: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Bob W
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Boris Liberman Turns out the photo was of the replica Statue of Liberty in Las Vegas, not the real thing. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada- 13101814 :-) It strikes me as an entirely non-trivial matter -

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: that's very philosophical. But the real one is still in Paris. But Paris is also in Las Vegas. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

RE: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Bob W
-Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Matthew Hunt On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: that's very philosophical. But the real one is still in Paris. But Paris is also in Las Vegas. Las

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread AlunFoto
2011/4/17 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: that's very philosophical. But the real one is still in Paris. But Paris is also in Las Vegas. I thought it was in Texas. -- http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Brian Walters
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:43 +0200, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/17 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: that's very philosophical. But the real one is still in Paris. But Paris is also in Las Vegas. I thought it

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Ken Waller
What's more bothersome here is that the folks chosen to find the image never took the time to verify what it was. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Another reason not to buy photos

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Paul Stenquist
On Apr 17, 2011, at 5:33 PM, Brian Walters wrote: On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:43 +0200, AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/4/17 Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com: On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote: that's very philosophical. But the real one is still in Paris.

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Ken Waller
When I lived in Jersey, growing up I could see it from my bedroom window. It took moving to Michigan before I ever went to the Statue. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com Don't believe the

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Mark Roberts
Ken Waller wrote: When I lived in Jersey, growing up I could see it from my bedroom window. It took moving to Michigan before I ever went to the Statue. When I immigrated to the U.S. in 1967 my family came by ship (the Queen Elizabeth I). I guess that, aside from refugees on rafts and such, we

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Bran Everseeking
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 12:52:48 +0300 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote: It strikes me as an entirely non-trivial matter - which of the two - the real one or the Vegas replica has been seen by more people. It very well may be that the replica is the genuine article, so to say. Seems odd

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-17 Thread Charles Robinson
On Apr 17, 2011, at 17:31, Mark Roberts wrote: Anyway, all good immigrants are supposed to view the Statue of Liberty as they sail into New Your harbor, but as luck would have it we arrives in the wee hours of the morning and missed it. I've still never visited it, though I'd rather like to

Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread Mark Roberts
The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a stock photo agency, made it into a stamp and printed three billion of them. Turns out the photo was of the replica Statue of Liberty in Las Vegas, not the real thing.

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread eckinator
awesome. nice job =) 2011/4/17 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a stock photo agency, made it into a stamp and printed three billion of them. Turns out the photo was of

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
that is both funny and sad. G On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 3:56 PM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote: awesome. nice job =) 2011/4/17 Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread William Robb
On 16/04/2011 4:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a stock photo agency, made it into a stamp and printed three billion of them. Turns out the photo was of the replica Statue of

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread Steven Desjardins
I thought the Statue of Liberty was in Vegas . . . On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:09 PM, William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote: On 16/04/2011 4:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread Mark Roberts
Steven Desjardins wrote: I thought the Statue of Liberty was in Vegas . . . You're thinking of the Planet of the Apes movie, I think. -- Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia www.robertstech.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread William Robb
On 16/04/2011 5:26 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: I thought the Statue of Liberty was in Vegas . . . You are thinking of the Statuesque of Liberty. -- William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread Ken Waller
Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com Subject: Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies I thought the Statue of Liberty was in Vegas . . . And I thought it was Polish

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread Steven Desjardins
That's right! Damn you! God damn you all to hell . . . On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Mark Roberts m...@robertstech.com wrote: Steven Desjardins wrote: I thought the Statue of Liberty was in Vegas . . . You're thinking of the Planet of the Apes movie, I think. -- Mark Roberts -

Re: Another reason not to buy photos from stock agencies

2011-04-16 Thread Paul Stenquist
In the end, it probably doesn't matter. The Vegas statue is a replica and the image on the stamp is tiny. Paul On Apr 16, 2011, at 6:13 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: The U.S. Postal Service wanted to make a Statue of Liberty stamp. So they bought a photo of the Statue of Liberty from a stock photo