On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 08:51:08PM -0700, Aahz Maruch wrote:
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It is purely subjective, since I didn't have the K-5 side by side,
but the autofocus seemed to be noticeably quicker, and I didn't seem
to lose any shots due to bad autofocus.
Which
On Sat, Jun 29, 2013, Larry Colen wrote:
It is purely subjective, since I didn't have the K-5 side by side,
but the autofocus seemed to be noticeably quicker, and I didn't seem
to lose any shots due to bad autofocus.
Which lenses were you using?
--
Hugs and backrubs -- I break Rule 6
Larry, the Tamron Back Caps are pretty good at covering the Electronic
Contacts on the Lens. There was a Seller offering Lens Back Caps that
were Weather Proof for some $ 10 or so each. Try Googling. It does
cover the electronic contacts as well.
A friend of mine has the K-5 IIs with the 18-135 WR
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 12:00:52PM +0530, Bipin Gupta wrote:
Larry, the Tamron Back Caps are pretty good at covering the Electronic
Contacts on the Lens. There was a Seller offering Lens Back Caps that
were Weather Proof for some $ 10 or so each. Try Googling. It does
cover the electronic
It is purely subjective, since I didn't have the K-5 side by side,
but the autofocus seemed to be noticeably quicker, and I didn't seem
to lose any shots due to bad autofocus.
I got off work about 10PM, and stopped to see some friends play
at JJ's, a local dive bar.
The stage lighting wasn't
5 matches
Mail list logo