Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-17 Thread Peter Alling
At 09:39 PM 12/14/2002 +0200, Feroze wrote: Is there more than one Pentax bellows? Yes, In K mount there are three, although I don't think that there's any real difference between the M and A versions. The MZS manual says that Auto Bellows A cannot be used with this camera. There is one on

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread Dr E D F Williams
] Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 1:45 AM Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX - Original Message - From: Feroze Kistan Hi William, Theres about 8mm btw the lents mount outer edge and the bottom edge of the protrusion- It looks like you need about 10mm of clearance to be able to mount

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread Rfsindg
In practice, it all means that you would need a small extension tube (or set of tubes) to use the Auto Bellows with the MZ-S. The Auto Bellows allows for a minimum extension of about 37mm. Another 8 mm would make that 45 mm. They provide a maximum extension of about 163 mm, and the

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread Feroze Kistan
Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX - Original Message - From: Bob Blakely Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Just add a small extension tube (to gain clearance) between the bellows and the camera? That should do it. I figure the #1 tube from the Auto Extension Tube set should do

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Feroze Kistan Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Pretty daft of Pentax designers if you ask me, I wonder what else dosn't fit on this camera don't they realise there are no 3rd party stuff for Pentax? Maybe they figure that with the advent of long helicoid

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread Feroze Kistan
- Original Message - From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 6:34 AM Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX On Saturday, December 14, 2002, at 05:45 PM, William Robb wrote: - Original Message

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread Feroze Kistan
- From: Dr E D F Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 10:23 AM Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX It means that your bellows is going to be 10 mm farther away the film plane than it would be without the tube. In other words the bellows will stop

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread Lon Williamson
If anyone needs to use a small extension tube, note this: the Pentax K tube set is cheaper than the KA, and the smallest tube on the K set is smaller than the smallest tube on the KA set. The K tubes do not couple aperature, but my guess is this doesn't matter on a bellows. -Lon [EMAIL

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Feroze Kistan Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Wouldn't I then from this and your previous comment make my life so much easier by just buying a 100mm macro. Got a fairly decent price but much much more than the bellows but still within my price range? I can

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-15 Thread Dan Scott
On Sunday, December 15, 2002, at 12:50 PM, Feroze Kistan wrote: - Original Message - From: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 6:34 AM Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Feroze, It's your bellows, you rack

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Andre Langevin
Is there more than one Pentax bellows? The MZS manual says that Auto Bellows A cannot be used with this camera. There is one on a local auction site for ZAR600 (about U$D60) He also has a LX, 3 Finders and a 55mm f1.8 lens plus filter for ZAR 1500 (about USD150) Are both these worth the price???

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Feroze Kistan
. What will sell after the CLA for $400, the LX or the finders? Feroze - Original Message - From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2002 10:19 PM Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Is there more than one Pentax bellows? The MZS manual says

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Dan Scott
On Saturday, December 14, 2002, at 02:19 PM, Andre Langevin wrote: Good price for an Auto-bellows A. I would also like to know why it does not fit the latest Pentax body. Might not be rotatable due to the handgrip. Dan Scott

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Feroze Kistan Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Hi Andre, All the manual says is Note that Auto bellows A cannot be used with this camera because it cannot be fitted to it. It looks like the MZ-S prism extends out past the lens mount. I would bet

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Andre Langevin
Hi Andre, All the manual says is Note that Auto bellows A cannot be used with this camera because it cannot be fitted to it. How many bellows are there I think K, M and A, but maybe only two. Very very similar. They look the same to me. Except for the extra contacts (A-model). I want the

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Feroze Kistan
:13 PM Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX - Original Message - From: Feroze Kistan Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Hi Andre, All the manual says is Note that Auto bellows A cannot be used with this camera because it cannot be fitted to it. It looks like the MZ-S prism extends

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Alexander Krohe
The MZ-S camera body gets into the way with the bellows. Insert an extension ring between bellows and camera body. Alexander Feroze Kistan wrote : --- Hi Andre, All the manual says is Note that Auto bellows A cannot be used with this camera because it cannot be fitted to

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Feroze Kistan
How many bellows are there I think K, M and A, but maybe only two. Very very similar. They look the same to me. Except for the extra contacts (A-model). So if he has the right one it should work, sides it'll work on my other camera and I never seen anybody use AF on a macro shot anyway

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Feroze Kistan Hi William, Theres about 8mm btw the lents mount outer edge and the bottom edge of the protrusion- It looks like you need about 10mm of clearance to be able to mount the bellows. How would the size of the image be affected by that

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Bob Blakely
I know littla about the MZS, but what on earth would prevent Auto Bellows A from being used with this camera? Regards, Bob Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy! - Benjamin Franklin From: Feroze Kistan

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Bob Blakely
Just add a small extension tube (to gain clearance) between the bellows and the camera? Regards, Bob Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy! - Benjamin Franklin From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Bob Blakely Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX I know littla about the MZS, but what on earth would prevent Auto Bellows A from being used with this camera? It looks like the prism housing extends forwards over the lens mount and won't allow enough clearance

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Bob Blakely Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX Just add a small extension tube (to gain clearance) between the bellows and the camera? That should do it. I figure the #1 tube from the Auto Extension Tube set should do it. William Robb

Re: auto bellows + LX

2002-12-14 Thread Feroze Kistan
- From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2002 12:46 AM Subject: Re: auto bellows + LX be used with a 5 images per second motor, with other finders (some are really nice), etc... Andre Oh sweet, thats twice as fast as the MZS