Re: 31/1.8 vs Sigma 35/1.4 art
Get the sigma. It's a better/faster lens. I said it. On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 1:16 AM, Boris Libermanwrote: > Larry, > > Good friend of mine has Sigma lens in Canon mount. He's using it on 5dmk3. > The results are excellent. Wide open center sharpness is really good. The > rendering of this lens is also very pleasing to his and actually to my eye > as well. > > So if you really need 1.4 over 1.8, you cannot really go wrong with Sigma. > > As for ergonomics, I suggest you visit a closest to you camera store and > give it a try. > > Good luck with your hunt. > Boris > > On 19 Oct 2016 08:13, "Larry Colen" wrote: > > I do a lot of my photography in really low light. The 2/3 stop between > f/1.8 and f/1.4 doesn't seem like much, but when you're talking the > difference between 1/13 and 1/20 Second, it can be a huge difference. > Similarly, doing night landscapes, the 2/3 stop can be a big deal with star > motion in the background. > > Does anyone have experience with both the 31 limited and the 35 art? I > can't justify buying the faster lens without selling the 31. It's been a > workhorse lens for me, particularly since it was my only fast "standard" in > APS. > > I've heard good things about the sigma, and even if it isn't as sharp in > some situations, the faster aperture would make an even bigger difference > in others. > >LRC > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: 31/1.8 vs Sigma 35/1.4 art
Larry, Good friend of mine has Sigma lens in Canon mount. He's using it on 5dmk3. The results are excellent. Wide open center sharpness is really good. The rendering of this lens is also very pleasing to his and actually to my eye as well. So if you really need 1.4 over 1.8, you cannot really go wrong with Sigma. As for ergonomics, I suggest you visit a closest to you camera store and give it a try. Good luck with your hunt. Boris On 19 Oct 2016 08:13, "Larry Colen"wrote: I do a lot of my photography in really low light. The 2/3 stop between f/1.8 and f/1.4 doesn't seem like much, but when you're talking the difference between 1/13 and 1/20 Second, it can be a huge difference. Similarly, doing night landscapes, the 2/3 stop can be a big deal with star motion in the background. Does anyone have experience with both the 31 limited and the 35 art? I can't justify buying the faster lens without selling the 31. It's been a workhorse lens for me, particularly since it was my only fast "standard" in APS. I've heard good things about the sigma, and even if it isn't as sharp in some situations, the faster aperture would make an even bigger difference in others. LRC -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: 31/1.8 vs Sigma 35/1.4 art
Larry, I perfectly understand your dilemma. But... Selling 31/1.8 to purchase Sigma 35/1.4 is like selling your left kidney to finance the surgery on your right one. IMHO, 31/1.8 is just too good of a lens to let it go. It is almost as good as 77/1.8. The rendering of both of these is so great that it would be a high bar to match it, save to exceed it. (I am talking about low light performance.) Of 3 fast primes that are always traveling in my bag, FA 50/1.4 is the least used, - exactly for the reason explained. (Actually, in my most recent trip, I've decided to leave that at home, to save on the carry-on weight. No regrets from that decision. I've used all lenses I had with me.) Igor Larry Colen Tue, 18 Oct 2016 22:14:07 -0700 wrote: I do a lot of my photography in really low light. The 2/3 stop between f/1.8 and f/1.4 doesn't seem like much, but when you're talking the difference between 1/13 and 1/20 Second, it can be a huge difference. Similarly, doing night landscapes, the 2/3 stop can be a big deal with star motion in the background. Does anyone have experience with both the 31 limited and the 35 art? I can't justify buying the faster lens without selling the 31. It's been a workhorse lens for me, particularly since it was my only fast "standard" in APS. I've heard good things about the sigma, and even if it isn't as sharp in some situations, the faster aperture would make an even bigger difference in others. LRC -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.