Which one? they made several different
90mm macro lenses.
I have a MF 90mm f2.5 in adaptall2 mount
(55mm filter version ) that has outstanding
image quality and works well in every mount
I have tried including KA.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
was from the eighties, IIRC.
Ciao, Flavio
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:43 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Which one? they made several
Dave, I used to have Tamron 90/2.5 the earlier version with 49 mm filter
threads. I had it with KA adaptall adapter. It was splendid lens. There
was just one very small problem with it. Sometimes it would produce a
flare/glare circle straight in the middle of the frame. That was with
*istD at
On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, I used to have Tamron 90/2.5 the earlier version with 49 mm filter
threads. I had it with KA adaptall adapter. It was splendid lens. There
was just one very small problem with it. Sometimes it would produce a
flare/glare circle straight
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:43 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Which one? they made several different
90mm macro lenses.
I have a MF 90mm f2.5 in adaptall2 mount
(55mm
The link does not work for me...
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ItemsDisplay?catalogId=10001departmentId=10407itemID=132354categoryId=10412
If the link works, this one
Dave
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Pentax produces DFA 100/2.8 which seems (I am not sure really) no worse
than FA version and it is really light and small (49 mm filter threads)...
It is also said to be optimized for digital and it does cover full 35 mm
frame.
Boris
David J Brooks wrote:
On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL
Sorry.
Try this one.
http://tinyurl.com/2nb9bs
Dave
On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link does not work for me...
David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.henrys.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ItemsDisplay?catalogId=10001departmentId=10407itemID=132354categoryId=10412
If
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Pentax produces DFA 100/2.8 which seems (I am not sure really) no worse
than FA version and it is really light and small (49 mm filter
threads)...
It is also said to be optimized for digital and it does cover full 35 mm
frame
I couldn't possibly tell :-(. I wonder that myself.
Boris
Minelli Flavio wrote:
Which brings me to wonder why, if it has all that the older heavier,
bulkier one had, didn't they made it like that in the first place...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Same result :-(. But I suppose I know what you're talking about - Modern
90/2.8 AF variety.
David J Brooks wrote:
Sorry.
Try this one.
http://tinyurl.com/2nb9bs
Dave
On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link does not work for me...
David J Brooks wrote:
, JCO's 90/2.5
was from the eighties, IIRC.
Ciao, Flavio
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
J. C. O'Connell
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 3:43 PM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Which one
Still not cigar.
David J Brooks wrote:
Sorry.
Try this one.
http://tinyurl.com/2nb9bs
Dave
On 4/6/07, Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The link does not work for me...
David J Brooks wrote:
Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Which brings me to wonder why, if it has all that the older heavier,
bulkier one had, didn't they made it like that in the first place...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent
-Discuss Mail List
Subject: RE: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
Which brings me to wonder why, if it has all that the older heavier,
bulkier one had, didn't they made it like that in the first place...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
David J Brooks wrote:
I have one for the Nikon mount, and i really like it. Good design,
light weigh, nice and sharp.
Anyone have one in Pentax mount.
Happy with it.
I'm thinking of getting that, if the response is good, and sell the af 100
F2.8
Dave
As good as the Tamron is (and
I have the AF version of the 90mm Tamron f2.8 in Pentax mount, very happy with
it. It is probably more flare prone then Pentax glas.
However, why would you give up the FA 100/2.8?
On Friday 06 April 2007 16:06, Boris Liberman wrote:
Dave, I used to have Tamron 90/2.5 the earlier version with 49
Wüthrich
Sent: 06 April, 2007 10:34 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Anyone using the tamron 90mm macro
I have the AF version of the 90mm Tamron f2.8 in Pentax
mount, very happy with
it. It is probably more flare prone then Pentax glas.
However, why would you give up the FA 100/2.8
I've been using this version for years and think it's excellent. However, I've
never had anything else to compare it with.
It's an adaptall 2 lens which adds to its usability immeasurably. In addition
to the Pentax K/KA bodies, I've used it on an old Konica T3, various M42 bodies
and,
Indeed, I agree with you, Brian. If one own more than one camera system
- the adaptall lenses are a blessing. It just so happens that I own only
Pentax ;-).
Boris
Brian Walters wrote:
I've been using this version for years and think it's excellent.
However, I've never had anything else to
20 matches
Mail list logo
