Joe,
The link to the Shepperson paper :
http://members.door.net/arisbe/menu/library/aboutcsp/shepperson/safety.pdf
doesn't seem to work, or I miss
something
Could you help me, please ?
Denis Bayart[EMAIL PROTECTED]---Centre
de recherche en gestionEcole polytechnique et CNRS(33) (0) 1
John Collier wrote:
JC: This is interesting, Gary. I have a draft
of Chapter 1 of Arnold's
thesis, which is definitely not ready for publication, plus I have a
final version of his thesis project when he died. This is fairly
complete, as I recall, but I will need to look at it again.
I hope
Peirce-James Question.wpd
Description: Peirce-James Question.wpd
Gary,
I would tend to agree with your analysis below, while I was especially
responsive to your interpreting the Gita in terms of what is real (as
opposed to actual), that it refers to types (not tokens)You wrote:
GF:. . . . . . . . . . . . . In Peircean terms, the scripture must refer
Response to J Kasser (resend)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: peirce-l@lyris.ttu.edu
Sent: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [peirce-l] Re: What "fundamenal psychological laws" is Peirce referring to?
J Kasser says,
"It's not easy to see how Peirce could
Gary F.
I'm not going the respond at any length here because I don't think my side
belongs here. Yours, as a Peircean concern might.
Bill,
[[ To deny what I said of the Bhagavad Gita, you have to deny what is
written there. ]]
Well, if you choose (or are predisposed) to read it as an apology
I am very sorry to hear of Arnold's death and send my
condolences. He will be missed.
Gene Halton
---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com
