Forwarded from Jurriaan Bendien:
See about this Patrick Karl O'Brien, Imperialism and the Rise and Decline
of the British Economy,
1688-1989, New Left Review 238 (1999).
I met O'Brien (LSE) in Amsterdam at a Mandel seminar. He's quite clued up
about the historical data and some material
For sale -- cheap: 'Dead white men's clothing'
In Africa, the West's castoff clothes are de rigueur, not demeaning.
Nearly everyone has to buy used
LA Times, July 14, 2004
By Davan Maharaj, Times Staff Writer
Tossed off a flatbed truck, a 100-pound bale of used panties and bras,
worn socks,
, that the
notion of anybody but Bush is a sign of cowardice, and that the real
problem is not Bush but Bushism, a new word for a phenomenon as old as
G.W. Bush himself, namely, that both mainstream parties share in the
crafting of US imperialism.
It is not exactly clear to me whether you think
David Harvey
THE NEW IMPERIALISM
Afterword to Foreign Language Editions
(clip)
The question of the exact state of global oil supplies and reserves
remains as murky as ever. In my initial text, I stated, for example,
that oil reserves in Canada are running down. If, however, the
difficult
Published: Friday, June 04, 2004
Bylined to: Patrick J.
O'Donoghue
Chavez Frias blamed for Miss
Venezuela's poor showing in Miss Universe
Analyzing the failure of Venezuela
to figure in the final 5 candidates of the Miss Universe contest held in
Quito, Ecuador, some Venezuelan luminaries are
What a wonderful example of American imperialism! On a more serious
note, Michael, what are the prospects for a recall?
Also, I suspect that everybody here is grateful for the serious
information we have been getting about Venezuela. Thanks.
By the way, Michael L. was one of the 2 original
NY Times, June 3, 2004
Trade Theory vs. Used Clothes in Africa
By CARTER DOUGHERTY
KAMPALA, Uganda - Today's globalized economy boasts few unrepentant
protectionists, but Eyasu Sirak does not deal in gentle euphemisms of
fair trade or level playing fields. He wants his government to ban
imports of
Of the various reasons given for the likely failure of the new US
imperialism the economic analysis is relatively long term and
independent of particular politics:-
Fourthly, as suggested by world-systems analysis, new imperialist
direct rule is too expensive and forceful economic exploitation
(This article contains some interesting insights, but lapses into
reformist illusions about old Europe and multilateralism in the
conclusion.)
New Imperialism and beyond. Why the New Imperialism will fail and unseat
the Bush Administration?
Petri Minkkinen
After the shock of S-11-2001 terrorist
From Seymour Hersh's latest New Yorker article:
The notion that Arabs are particularly vulnerable to sexual humiliation
became a talking point among pro-war Washington conservatives in the
months before the March, 2003, invasion of Iraq. One book that was
frequently cited was The Arab Mind, a
(I changed the subject line because I think the question of imperialist
booty interferes with the analysis of imperialism. It creates the
illusion that the leopard could change its spots.)
Devine, James wrote:
I think Lennon (or what it Lenin?) had something to say here. You're talking about
.
Imperialism, in our view, is no longer possible today. In other words,
no nation state, not even the United States, is capable of acting as a
sovereign power to rule over the global order.
Furthermore, the contemporary global order will not be defined by the
competition among imperialist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/26/2004 5:41:35 PM
Maybe Michael Hoover or Yoshie can help us out, but I think that the
morality police
during the 30s pressured Hollywood not to show class conflict.
Michael Perelman
excuse tardy reply, placed above in to do file...
decline of class conflict in hollywood
f Monopoly Capitalism/Imperialism?
For example, I find
this "criminal forensics genre" interesting.Starting with "Quincy" in the
early 1980s and up to the present CSI, CSI Miami, Cold Case, Crossing Jordan,
Law and Order Criminal Intent, NCIS, etcwe see the message of th
With the cowboys, the railroad people, bankers, and owners of large estates were
often the bad guys.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
With the cowboys, the railroad people, bankers, and owners of large
estates were often the bad guys.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu
Very perceptive. You can of course add us savage Indians
Maybe Michael Hoover or Yoshie can help us out, but I think that the morality police
during the 30s pressured Hollywood not to show class conflict.
Michael, a distant relative of the Warner Bros, both of whose grandfathers along with
many others in town, were offered a $50 partnership, and whose
Craven, Jim wrote:
In the case of the Reality shows, they are relatively cheap to
produce, focus on trappings of wealth (temporary) like being set in
exotic locales and big mansions, and of course utilize, celebrate,
preach, reward and reinforce: rat-race individualism, greed,
selfishness,
. With a combination of NY Review of Books glitterati and buildings
by Frank Gehry, why would any liberal-minded Goldman-Sachs banker pick
another school for his son or daughter?
When I got the latest issue of the alumni magazine in the mail today, I was
startled to see an article titled American Imperialism
George Soros
Is the billionaire speculator the Democrats' most powerful weapon?
By Sebastian Mallaby
Posted Wednesday, March 10, 2004, at 2:17 PM PT
Way, way back, when Howard Dean had neither risen nor fallen, George
Soros began to plot the sort of speculative bet that has made him a hero
and a
the last. The consequences of hundreds of years of
cultural, economic and religious imperialism, that is, the imposition of
power, authority and influence over others (usually darker than us), are now
festering throughout the world, just as the military powers of the West
conspire to keep the same
In Iraq, ...some of the hired interpreters are betraying soldiers hunting
for guerrilla fighters and the caches of arms they're using to attack
American soldiers... We heard about dozens of cases where the infantry
would find out where stuff was, brief the interpreter, but the interpreter
would
1. ISRAEL'S NUCLEAR WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION BUILT WITH AMERICAN AND
FRENCH AID
Peter Preston said in The Guardian on December 22, 2003 that the Israeli
nuclear arsenal makes it the world's fifth largest nuclear power,
boasting more bangs from Washington's bucks than Blair's Britain, and
over
carefully consider the criminality of American
imperialism.
PROPORTIONS
The American Gulag is rivalled only by Russia and Rwanda. The
USA, with 5% of the world's population, houses a
quarter of the world's prisoners (i.e. 2 million of the world's total of 8
million). About 100,000 adult prisoners
Mon 2.02.04| Instruments of Imperialism
Eminent political economists from the global South
spoke at a World Social Forum panel titled
Instruments of Imperialism: War, Trade and Finance.
Among the luminaries were Jomo K.S., Prabhat Patnaik,
and Samir Amin, talking about military Keynesianism
(From ultrarightist David Horowitz's website. The Center for the Defense
of Free Enterprise was founded by wise use spokesman Ron Arnold, who
was cited heavily on the infamous British TV channel 4 documentary on
the Greens produced by Frank Furedi's crew. The notion of
Eco-Imperialism
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/64/34272.html
The US seems to be demanding that Europe degrade its GPS system. Only the
US is allowed to have a good one to maintain military superiority.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
http://www.whiteknucklerproductions.com/bashir/Imperialism.front.final.pdf
US Imperialism in the 21st Century
(Sponsored by the Center for Comparative Literature and Society
by the Department of Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures)
Following the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks
Africa: Imperialism Goes Naked
by Sarah Bracking and Graham Harrison
(clip)
Marx never used the term imperialism, but it remains a key part of any
analysis of contemporary global capitalism. The sinews of political
power and accumulation that are derivative of capitalisms birth as a
global
UN says war in Congo is fuelled by foreign firms
By David Usborne in New York
The Independent, 31 October 2003
A panel of experts renewed its warning to the United Nations yesterday
that the illegal exploitation of precious minerals in the Democratic
Republic of Congo (DRC) is continuing to fuel
[Federal Register: October 31, 2003 (Volume 68, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 62158-62159]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr31oc03-120]
===
(Thanks to Richard H. for making me aware of this important article, which
every socialist should read; I have excerpted the important bits and
slightly edited it - JB)
This coming October 23 to 24, the United States will be sitting down with
rich creditor countries, the International Monetary
Well, that's about as succinct a presentation of the problem as I've
seen so far. What have we got? A recipie for war-lord imperalism:
1. Destroy/ravage/immiserate/traumatize a country through bombing,
economic sancations, and chemical warfareto soften it up and make it
a reconstruction
joanna bujes wrote:
2. Reconstruct and liberate the country and pay for it by
appropriating all the wealth and natural resources of the country, which
you then sell off to those who are willing to bet that Iraq can be
reconstructed into a vast labor camp ...with lots of oil.
I doubt Washington or
Empires do die because something in human
nature either revolts or cannot thrive in this kind of environment.
I agree totally with your sentiments, but you may not be correct on this
point. Suppose that instead of getting people to revolt, you get them to
mutate in some way, let's think of a
Yes, the Life is Beautiful argument. (That Italian movie where a
clownish man acts out in order to convince his son that a concentration
camp is not a concentration camp. I couldn't force myself to see it, but
apparently that was the plot)...or perhaps Schindler's List, where the
essential
Yes, the Life is Beautiful argument. (That Italian movie where a
clownish man acts out in order to convince his son that a concentration
camp is not a concentration camp. I couldn't force myself to see it, but
apparently that was the plot)...or perhaps Schindler's List, where the
essential
( The British journal Living Marxism, always seeking to provoke, once ran an
article mentioning the re-emergence of bubonic plague in the CIS republics.
The reality is grimmer in some ways - JB).
Across the Russian Federation's vast expanse, which stretches from Japan to
the borders of Belarus,
Ronald H. Chilcote, ed. The Political Economy of Imperialism: Critical
Appraisals. Lanham and New York: Rowman Littlefield, 2000. viii + 261 pp.
Notes, bibliography, biographies, index. $28.95 (paper), ISBN 0-7425-1010-7.
Reviewed by Leland Conley Barrows, UNESCO European Centre for Higher
Thanks for this reference. Chilcote is very good, he
worked with Anwar Shaikh.
J.
big economic slip and
Finally, I think it is important to remind ourselves that 19th imperialism
had a number of forms. The real estate battle (or as you well summarized
Hardt Negri in your link: Nation X owns colony Y) only really applied
to some places like Africa and India. In places
Karl Kautsky : Imperialism and the War
Source: International Socialist Review, November 1914
Translated: William E. Bohn
Transcribed: for marxists.org, March, 2002
If imperialism were necessary to the continued existence of the capitalist
method of production-these arguments against it would make
The article on imperialism Kautsky published on the eve of world war 1, was
published in New Left Review. See:
Ultra-Imperialism, by Karl Kautsky, NLR I/59, January-February 1970, pp.
41-6.
In the classical tradition, Ernest Mandel's critique of Kautsky's idea can
be found in his book Late
* _Monthly Review_ 55.3 (July-August 2003)
Can U.S. Workers Embrace Anti-Imperialism?
by William Fletcher, Jr.
No doubt one is a wretched plebeian harassed by debts and military
service, but, to make up for it, one is a Roman citizen, one has
one's share in the task of ruling other nations
. That was Kautsky's
heresy, no?
Just because Lenin considered Kautsky to be a heretic (mostly because of the latter's
attitude toward the Russian Revolution, BTW) doesn't mean that Kautsky was always
wrong. Of course it took two World Wars and one Cold War before his prediction of
ultra-imperialism
Devine, James wrote:
Finally, I'm confused: Doug, you say that the system isn't one of
competition among major powers anymore but also point to dispersed
and polycentric power. Where are the centers of power that are
competing with the US if not in the core? China?
I said that there was little
France's Five Cardinal Sins Over Iraq
André Glucksmann
International Herald Tribune
February 22, 2003
PARIS: The usual trans-Atlantic spats are growing into a full-blown divorce.
It is time everyone swept off his own doorstep and closely examined his
government's responsibilities. In my view,
The most coveted jobs in Cuba are now in a tourist sector that is the
country's biggest earner. The dollar became a legal currency in 1993 as
Castro sought to refloat an economy which had been propped up by the old
Soviet Union. It rules supreme, at least in the minds of many Cubans.
Those who
Imperial history repeats itself
Once again, Indians are being asked to fight Iraqis for empire's sake
Randeep Ramesh
Thursday July 3, 2003
The Guardian
The blood has barely dried on the British empire than it has already begun
to seep over its American successor. The US occupation of Iraq is
interesting questions that I want to take up, especially Leo Panitch's
problem with the usefulness of the traditional Marxist understanding of
imperialism. But first a word or two about the principals.
Panitch edits Socialist Register, a yearly journal that was launched by
the late Ralph Miliband
EU's secret plans hold poor countries to ransom
Larry Elliott and Charlotte Denny
Tuesday February 25, 2003
The Guardian
The European Union has drawn up secret plans aimed at prising open service
sector markets in the world's poorest countries in return for cutting its
lavish farm subsidies, it
plan for Africa.
The word imperialism will probably not be used. But it will cogently expose
the double standards by which national indebtedness is managed, through the
mysteries of international finance.
It therefore will be implicitly anti-imperialist.
It is an example of an organ of what
in the imperialist center. I don't think Lenin was right about
super-profits providing a bribe for imperialist workers, but that is
quite secondary to his core perception that imperialism, _in some way_,
underwrites opportunism in the working class
Vulgarizedtheories ofa "redistrib
Devine, James wrote:
[clip]
Above, I'm not disagreeing with Carrol or Lenin as far as I know.
Agreed. Part of the process of moving Lenin's analysis out of the
handbook into the world.
But
I want to quibble about super-imperialism (meaning a unified
rich-capitalist imperialist bloc
Title: RE: [PEN-L:34406] Re: redistributionism and imperialism
Carrol writes:
I don't think this fundamentally affirms the possibility of
super-imperialism. What Kautsky saw coming was not just a protracted
period of imperialist unity against a serious working-class challenge
Title: Davos debates imperialism
from SLATE's news summary:
The [Wall Street] Journal has the best details on Davos' cross-Atlantic
atmosphere of animosity. During a dinner speech, Patrick Cox,
president of the E.U. parliament, proudly announced, The real
Europe has real values, adding our
Top World News
12/24 12:45
North Korea Further Tampers With Monitors, UN Says (Update1)
By Mark Drajem
Washington, Dec. 24 (Bloomberg) -- North Korea broke more seals
on its nuclear facilities and further tampered with surveillance
equipment, increasing concern that the nation will develop
We can be confident that in the long run their real interests will lead
global elites to support empire and refuse any project of US imperialism.
In the coming months, and perhaps years, we may face a tragedy that we
read about in the darkest periods of human history, when elites
Title: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
We can be confident that in the long run their real interests will lead
global elites to support empire and refuse any project of US imperialism.
this sentence sounds like an assertion of inevitability. I thought
Devine, James wrote:
joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
We can be confident that in the long run their real interests will lead
global elites to support empire and refuse any project of US imperialism.
this sentence sounds like an assertion of inevitability. I thought
that such assertions
Title: RE: [PEN-L:33190] Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
Devine, James wrote:
joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
We can be confident that in the long run their real
interests will lead
global elites to support empire and refuse any project
of US imperialism.
this sentence
Doug Henwood wrote:
Devine, James wrote:
joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
We can be confident that in the long run their real interests will lead
global elites to support empire and refuse any project of US imperialism.
this sentence sounds like an assertion of inevitability. I
of the capitalism.
Devine, James wrote:
Devine, James wrote:
joanna bujes quotes Michael Hardt:
We can be confident that in the long run their real
interests will lead
global elites to support empire and refuse any project
of US imperialism.
this sentence sounds like an assertion of inevitability. I
Title: RE: [PEN-L:33194] Re: RE: Re: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
As Ahmet says and Carrol agrees,
I do not understand the need for a label.
that's right. Labels don't really help much, especially since they tend to become reified. (Also, I'm no expert on postmodernism, since I have
The difference seems to be
that Hardt seems to be pretty positively disposed toward
ultra-imperialism (imperialist unity) or what he and Negri call
empire.
.. so the only question is, what can be learned from such
scum?
Joanna
Title: RE: imperialism vs. Empire.
I wasn't saying that they were scum since I didn't finish their book. Maybe they are, but more likely they're confused (being happy about being communist and the like).
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
-Original
Devine, James wrote:
I wasn't saying that they were scum since I didn't finish their
book. Maybe they are, but more likely they're confused (being happy
about being communist and the like).
And scummy Negri is still under the care of the Italian state
because they think he's a dangerous
Doug Henwood wrote:
And scummy Negri is still under the care of the Italian state
because they think he's a dangerous revolutionary.
Stalin mobilized Odessa workers against a pogrom. That was indeed a
dangerous revolutionary act-- more dangerous to the regime than anything
Negri has
White House Touts 'Solid' Evidence on Iraqi Weapons
By Barry Schweid
AP Diplomatic Writer
Thursday, December 5, 2002; 2:14 PM
The White House said Thursday it possesses solid evidence that
Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, and rejected Baghdad's
denials, saying they have no credibility.
their reanalysis of the debate about
ultra-imperialism. Perhaps there is now no neat formula on this since it is
a complex contradiction. But whether we like, loathe, or just feel uneasy,
about Hardt or Negri, if they had never existed, a marxist approach would
still predict that the possibility
But for the purposes of this political economy
list, what I find remarkable
is how carefully Hardt and Negri argue their
reanalysis of the debate about
ultra-imperialism. Perhaps there is now no neat
formula on this since it is
a complex contradiction. But whether we like,
loathe
Chris wrote:
about Hardt or Negri, if they had never existed,
a marxist approach would still predict that the
possibility of imperialism turning into ultra-imperialism
could be of enormous strategic significance.
Although I don't understand what exactly is meant above, I
believe it would
By the way, _predicting_ is about associating probabilities with
possibilities, which, unfortunately, is a subjective act. My
impression of Hardt and Negri is that they associate the
probability of one to the possibility of imperialism turning
into ultra-imperialism. Tell me that my impression
On 16/11/2002 7:35 PM, Chris Burford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, Hardt and Negri have an irritating display of lightness of being
about serious matters, which is also strategically suspect in view of the
magnitude of the dangers
Wood-faced indignation, well timed compassion and unbearable
At 16/11/02 01:03 -0800, Charles wrote:
But for the purposes of this political economy
list, what I find remarkable
is how carefully Hardt and Negri argue their
reanalysis of the debate about
ultra-imperialism. Perhaps there is now no neat
formula on this since it is
a complex
How careful is their analysis when they so
miscalculated on the weight and power of the
US
in all this?
I was referring to the arguments on pp 229-231
of Empire.
Chris Burford
And I was referring to the whole book and
everything I've read from them after that. Again,
it is a total
The Rediscovery of Imperialism
by John Bellamy Foster
(clip)
A more influential left criticism of the notion of imperialism was
launched by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri in their book Empire (2000),
published by Harvard University Press. According to Hardt and Negri
imperialism ended
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31715] Re: the 1898 war on Spain and imperialism
I'm confused. TR was an officer in the reserves
during the Spanish-American War. He served
briefly as VP under McKinley in 1901.
C. Jannuzi
and he adds:
Actually I should have said he was
under-secretary
Title: the 1898 war on Spain and imperialism
This afternoon on U.S. National Public Radio, I heard one of the main news-readers, Robert Segal, interview an establishmentarian fellow who'd written a book about the 1898 U.S. imperalist war against Spain, which led to the Spanish-American war
One minor point, Jim. Teddy R. did lead the troops up San Juan Hill. If
I recall correct, it was sort of a reenactment rather than a real battle.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the 1898 war on Spain and imperialism
- Original Message -
From: Devine, James
To: 'pen-l '
Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 6:04 PM
Subject: [PEN-L:31703] the 1898 war on Spain and imperialism
This afternoon on U.S. National Public Radio, I heard one of the main
news-readers, Robert
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31704] Re: the 1898 war on Spain and imperialism
that makes TR better than Cheney, Bush, or the other chickenhawks. But he did it because he felt bad about his father not fighting in the Civil War -- and to compensate for his sickly health as a youth.
jim
-Original
Title: RE: [PEN-L:31705] Re: the 1898 war on Spain and imperialism
This afternoon on U.S. National Public Radio, I heard one of the main
news-readers, Robert Segal, interview an establishmentarian fellow who'd
written a book about the 1898 U.S. imperalist war against Spain, which
led
:31712] RE: Re: the 1898 war on Spain and imperialism
Date sent: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 20:44:18 -0800
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible
Segal asked if the Marxist theory that
imperialism is a natural outgrowth of capitalism
had any validity. No, said the interviewee, the
economic interests (businesses?) were split over
the war and were only brought into unity after
the battleship Maine had blown up. The main
groups in favor
-American War.
This is an interesting account. It seems
African-American troops were the true heroes of
the day. And like the Persian Gulf War, front
line duty was dangerous more for medical reasons
than from enemy bullets.
--
http://www.smplanet.com/imperialism/splendid.html
Rough Riders Despite
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Keaney
Sent: 07 October 2002 09:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [A-List] US imperialism: Iraq and oil
Sunday Herald - 06 October 2002
Official: US oil at the heart of Iraq crisis
By Neil Mackay
policy of USNA imperialism to modernize the superstructure - the political superstructure, of the Middle East - in general.
Iran scared the profits out of the USNA imperialist. "That" kind of bourgeois revolution is unacceptable to my imperialist. Keeping Iraqi oil off the market is
..]
http://maxspeak.org/gm/index.html
TOWARDS A DEFINITION OF IMPERIALISM. Thinkers influencing the Bush
Administration, if you'll pardon the oxymoron, are advocating a new
imperialism, so I think it's o.k. for us to talk about it too. But what is
it?
On the simplest level, though I am no expert on Marx
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/articles/nssreport_Sep20.pdf
Ian, could you explain a bit? I doubt many of us are going to read
enough of that statement to get the point.
Carrol
Title: RE: [PEN-L:30408] the feminine side of militarism and imperialism
why feminine? Ian, I find such cryptic headlines to be irritating at best. Please explain.
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
-Original Message
ine.lmu.edu/~jdevine
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: pen-l
> Subject: [PEN-L:30408] the feminine side of militarism
and imperialism
>
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/articles/nssreport
> _Sep20.pdf
>
>
I saw this line in the report:
We will also continue to lead the world in efforts to
reduce the terrible toll of HIV/AIDS and other infectious diseases.
If this is the measure of leadership, by that standard, Haiti could
conquer the US tomorrow. But sadly, the boys are more serious about
- Original Message -
From: Carrol Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2002 11:54 AM
Subject: [PEN-L:30410] Re: the feminine side of militarism and imperialism
Ian, could you explain a bit? I doubt many of us are going to read
enough
For all those who might have, for whatever reasons I cannot fathom, taken offense at
the
subject header. It is a simple turn of phrase. There is no cryptic or Freudian or other
ideological intent. I take no stand on the materials I post to the list other than
they would
seem to make a decent
Title: RE: [PEN-L:30424] Re: Re: the feminine side of militarism and imperialism
Ian, just use titles that are descriptive.
if you go for a beer, I hope that you have more than a first draft.
Jim
-Original Message-
From: Ian Murray
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 9/20/2002 4:54 PM
This is a tempest in a teapot. If the headers are unclear, just ask. I
don't see a problem. I appreciate Ian's participation, and I did not see
anything from Jim's question about header that should make anyone upset.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 04:54:47PM -0700, Ian Murray wrote:
For all
Feminism as imperialism
George Bush is not the first empire-builder to wage war in the name of women
Katharine Viner
Saturday September 21, 2002
The Guardian
Respect for women... can triumph in the Middle East and beyond! trilled the leader
of the
free world to the UN last week. The repression
Louis mentioned a week or two ago that Marx unconditionally
supported all manner of anti-colonial revolts, no matter how
primitive the nature of the resistance.
If somebody could throw me a few cites where his arguments
on this point are explicaated, I'd appreciate it.
max
1 - 100 of 378 matches
Mail list logo
