I've heard alot of pie in the sky ways of attracting investment, but this is
unique in my experience. maggie coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure about what technology shock is, but I do think the increase in
teen pregnancy is over stated. I believe I've said this before, the method
of reporting the statistics has more to do with the increase than actually
increasing teen births.
maggie coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 21/November/1996 06:28pm
David Harvey's book on postmodernism argues (to summarize in
more than desperate brevity) that the rise of postmodern theory
is a reflection of the rise of postmodern capitalism, i.e.,
increased flexibility, decentralization, etc., etc. He's no
check the forward to Hal Draper's "Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution"
Vol 2...forward is entitled "How Not to Quote Marx"...Michael
Or check-out Ch. 1 of Joseph O'Malley and Keith Algozin ed. _Rubel on Karl
Marx_ (Cambridge, CUP, 1981).
to what end?...my suggestion to check out Draper was
On Thu, 21 Nov 1996, D Shniad wrote:
Forwarded message:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 21 08:59 PST 1996
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Neo-Nazis on Net?
Subject: Nazi Group
Folks, this seems important. Please forward this to everyone you know:
A group of NEO-NAZIS
In a message dated 96-11-21 09:00:06 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Susan Feiner)
writes:
bj:Neo-Nazis on Net?
Date: 96-11-21 09:00:06 EST
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Susan Feiner)
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friends: this came to me via another list. I think
It appears I was a little quick on the mouse (or a little slow)...
There are a lot of good things about the Net, but the means by which things
circulate aren't always effective.
Anders Schneiderman
-
Forwarded Message:
Subj: White power usenet group
Date: 96-11-09 22:16:31
"Perhaps a rubbish heap is, after all, the best image for the rough jumble
of jurisdictions, laws, budgets, regulations, evasions, habits, agencies and
officials that together make up the policy apparatus of the state.
Certainly,
The Marx quote under discussion implies that ruthless criticism is a
condition of science, or perhaps the social sciences in particular.
Is it possible to go one step further and contend that a position of
opposition to the existing social order is a necessary precondition
of science? This
At 5:59 PM 11/20/96, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Philip Kraft discusses the new VW plant in Resende, Brazil. The special
section on technology in the Nov. 18 WSJ includes an article on Colgate
which suggests the the new intranet software connecting not only all
Colgate plants and employees around
Jim Devine wrote about an article by George Akerlof and Janet Yellen (of UC
Berkeley)
As I understand their theory, the sudden increase in the
availability of contraception technology and abortion in the US
during the early 1970s (which isn't totally a technology shock
but also a change in
sorry about posting a message about my cold to pen-l. Now if the
damn thing would go away...
in pen-l solidarity,
Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ.
7900 Loyola Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90045-8410 USA
310/338-2948 (daytime, during workweek); FAX:
Blair: 1) what is the "modernist" or "modernish" theory that you
are criticizing (below) as inadequate to explain these events?
who wrote this theory? I think that most Marxists are aware of
the fact that capitalism is changing in the general direction
which you describe. (a non-Marxist on
Dear Pen-lers,
Perhaps some of you have been following the on-and-off news
story about the Miss World pageant being held in Bangalore, India (this
coming Sat.) There has been a vigorous outcry against the event by an unsual
collection of political and other groups - feminists,
Michael Hoover wrote:
check the forward to Hal Draper's "Karl Marx's Theory of Revolution"
Vol 2...forward is entitled "How Not to Quote Marx"...Michael
Or check-out Ch. 1 of Joseph O'Malley and Keith Algozin ed. _Rubel on Karl
Marx_ (Cambridge, CUP, 1981).
Jerry
"If the construction of the future and its completion
for all time is not our task, all the more certain is what
we must accomplish in the present; I mean, the ruthless
criticism of everything that exists; the criticism being
ruthless in the
16 matches
Mail list logo
