Re: Icebergs, was The Chilean Model?l03102816b15d7215f16b@[166.84.250.86] 13624.43300.566883.9740@lisa.zopyra.com

1998-04-18 Thread Mark Jones
Bill, you'd defintely know about it if I started in on you for real, so take it easy. You're a smart guy. Your article on Butler's NLR piece was good and I'm still awaiting the follow-up. As for Doug, who is a friend of mine, he really doesn't need your help. As for evidence of your own myopia it

Re: Icebergs, was The Chilean Model?

1998-04-18 Thread William S. Lear
On Sat, April 18, 1998 at 09:02:22 (+0100) Mark Jones writes: William S. Lear wrote: Nothing like a little exaggeration to help one's argument, is there? Oh, yeah? Try this for size, from today's London Times (note the final optimistic sentence). As for Doug Henwood's false optimism, since you

Re: Icebergs, was The Chilean Model?l03102816b15d7215f16b@[166.84.250.86] 13623.62927.243766.611480@lisa.zopyra.com

1998-04-18 Thread Mark Jones
William S. Lear wrote: Nothing like a little exaggeration to help one's argument, is there? Oh, yeah? Try this for size, from today's London Times (note the final optimistic sentence). As for Doug Henwood's false optimism, since you share the same disease (myopia) to an even greater degree,